Prospective Teachers’ Instructional Decisions and Pedagogical Moves when Responding to Student Thinking in Elementary Mathematics and Science Lessons
The work of teaching includes many in-the-moment decisions for teachers to make. In this study, we focused on the decisions prospective teachers made within the elementary context specific to shared teaching practice in mathematics and science instruction – elicit and use evidence of student thinkin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of science and mathematics education 2023-06, Vol.21 (5), p.1703-1724 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1724 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1703 |
container_title | International journal of science and mathematics education |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Estapa, Anne Davis, Jeni |
description | The work of teaching includes many in-the-moment decisions for teachers to make. In this study, we focused on the decisions prospective teachers made within the elementary context specific to shared teaching practice in mathematics and science instruction – elicit and use evidence of student thinking. Within a qualitative multisite case study, we analyzed data for how PTs took up student thinking within instructional decisions, and the nature of responsive moves enacted within an animated context once student thinking had been elicited. Findings reveal PTs were responsive to elicited student thinking. Most commonly, PTs’ instructional decisions involved asking additional questions or inviting students to test their ideas. However, PTs’ pedagogical moves varied across mathematics and science disciplines. Our findings guide teacher educators to focus on what moves best support PTs’ development to use evidence of student thinking across disciplines in the elementary classroom. The consistency of asking questions within mathematics and science begins to inform the quest for shared core practices. Results highlight the benefit of using technology (i.e. animations) as a tool to support PTs’ learning of instructional decisions and pedagogical moves to uncover the nuances of the teaching practice elicit and use evidence of student thinking. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10763-022-10304-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2809101812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1376004</ericid><sourcerecordid>2809101812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-4776a5b71813296d50e77d0d13eba75a643029bb2cdd8f3b7e3ed7415b0b51d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFuEzEQXaEi0RZ-AAnJUs8LY3t3JzmiEqBVKioazpbXniQuiTd4nCJu_YuK3-uX4HZRuXGa0Xvz3mjmVdVrCW8lAL5jCdjpGpSqJWhoav2sOpQt6loiNgePvawBusmL6oj5GkC1OMXD6u4yDbwjl8MNiQVZt6bE97e_xVnknPYFH6LdiA_kApeWhY1eXJK3q2EVXGEuhhti8XNNUXwl3g3Rh7gSeRBXee8pZrFYh_j9AQtRzDa0LZhNv8SFzWva2hzc6HnlAkVHYk7MZc_L6vnSbphe_a3H1bePs8Xp53r-5dPZ6ft57RTKXDeInW17lBOp1bTzLRCiBy819RZb2zUa1LTvlfN-stQ9kiaPjWx76FvpQR9XJ6PvLg0_9sTZXA_7VE5moyYwlVCcVZlS45Qr3-JES7NLYVvOMBLMQwBmDMCUAMxjAEYX0ZtRRCm4J8HsXGrsAJrC65HnwsUVpX-r_-P6BxR0lZU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2809101812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective Teachers’ Instructional Decisions and Pedagogical Moves when Responding to Student Thinking in Elementary Mathematics and Science Lessons</title><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Estapa, Anne ; Davis, Jeni</creator><creatorcontrib>Estapa, Anne ; Davis, Jeni</creatorcontrib><description>The work of teaching includes many in-the-moment decisions for teachers to make. In this study, we focused on the decisions prospective teachers made within the elementary context specific to shared teaching practice in mathematics and science instruction – elicit and use evidence of student thinking. Within a qualitative multisite case study, we analyzed data for how PTs took up student thinking within instructional decisions, and the nature of responsive moves enacted within an animated context once student thinking had been elicited. Findings reveal PTs were responsive to elicited student thinking. Most commonly, PTs’ instructional decisions involved asking additional questions or inviting students to test their ideas. However, PTs’ pedagogical moves varied across mathematics and science disciplines. Our findings guide teacher educators to focus on what moves best support PTs’ development to use evidence of student thinking across disciplines in the elementary classroom. The consistency of asking questions within mathematics and science begins to inform the quest for shared core practices. Results highlight the benefit of using technology (i.e. animations) as a tool to support PTs’ learning of instructional decisions and pedagogical moves to uncover the nuances of the teaching practice elicit and use evidence of student thinking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1571-0068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10763-022-10304-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore</publisher><subject>Cognitive Processes ; Context ; Decision Making ; Decisions ; Education ; Elementary School Mathematics ; Elementary School Science ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Education ; Mathematics Instruction ; Pedagogy ; Preservice Teachers ; Qualitative analysis ; Questioning Techniques ; Questions ; Science Education ; Science Instruction ; Teacher Response ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Technology Uses in Education</subject><ispartof>International journal of science and mathematics education, 2023-06, Vol.21 (5), p.1703-1724</ispartof><rights>Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2022</rights><rights>Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-4776a5b71813296d50e77d0d13eba75a643029bb2cdd8f3b7e3ed7415b0b51d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-4776a5b71813296d50e77d0d13eba75a643029bb2cdd8f3b7e3ed7415b0b51d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10763-022-10304-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10763-022-10304-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1376004$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Estapa, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Jeni</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective Teachers’ Instructional Decisions and Pedagogical Moves when Responding to Student Thinking in Elementary Mathematics and Science Lessons</title><title>International journal of science and mathematics education</title><addtitle>Int J of Sci and Math Educ</addtitle><description>The work of teaching includes many in-the-moment decisions for teachers to make. In this study, we focused on the decisions prospective teachers made within the elementary context specific to shared teaching practice in mathematics and science instruction – elicit and use evidence of student thinking. Within a qualitative multisite case study, we analyzed data for how PTs took up student thinking within instructional decisions, and the nature of responsive moves enacted within an animated context once student thinking had been elicited. Findings reveal PTs were responsive to elicited student thinking. Most commonly, PTs’ instructional decisions involved asking additional questions or inviting students to test their ideas. However, PTs’ pedagogical moves varied across mathematics and science disciplines. Our findings guide teacher educators to focus on what moves best support PTs’ development to use evidence of student thinking across disciplines in the elementary classroom. The consistency of asking questions within mathematics and science begins to inform the quest for shared core practices. Results highlight the benefit of using technology (i.e. animations) as a tool to support PTs’ learning of instructional decisions and pedagogical moves to uncover the nuances of the teaching practice elicit and use evidence of student thinking.</description><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Elementary School Mathematics</subject><subject>Elementary School Science</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Questioning Techniques</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Teacher Response</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><issn>1571-0068</issn><issn>1573-1774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcFuEzEQXaEi0RZ-AAnJUs8LY3t3JzmiEqBVKioazpbXniQuiTd4nCJu_YuK3-uX4HZRuXGa0Xvz3mjmVdVrCW8lAL5jCdjpGpSqJWhoav2sOpQt6loiNgePvawBusmL6oj5GkC1OMXD6u4yDbwjl8MNiQVZt6bE97e_xVnknPYFH6LdiA_kApeWhY1eXJK3q2EVXGEuhhti8XNNUXwl3g3Rh7gSeRBXee8pZrFYh_j9AQtRzDa0LZhNv8SFzWva2hzc6HnlAkVHYk7MZc_L6vnSbphe_a3H1bePs8Xp53r-5dPZ6ft57RTKXDeInW17lBOp1bTzLRCiBy819RZb2zUa1LTvlfN-stQ9kiaPjWx76FvpQR9XJ6PvLg0_9sTZXA_7VE5moyYwlVCcVZlS45Qr3-JES7NLYVvOMBLMQwBmDMCUAMxjAEYX0ZtRRCm4J8HsXGrsAJrC65HnwsUVpX-r_-P6BxR0lZU</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Estapa, Anne</creator><creator>Davis, Jeni</creator><general>Springer Nature Singapore</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Prospective Teachers’ Instructional Decisions and Pedagogical Moves when Responding to Student Thinking in Elementary Mathematics and Science Lessons</title><author>Estapa, Anne ; Davis, Jeni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-4776a5b71813296d50e77d0d13eba75a643029bb2cdd8f3b7e3ed7415b0b51d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Elementary School Mathematics</topic><topic>Elementary School Science</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Questioning Techniques</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Teacher Response</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Estapa, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Jeni</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of science and mathematics education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Estapa, Anne</au><au>Davis, Jeni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1376004</ericid><atitle>Prospective Teachers’ Instructional Decisions and Pedagogical Moves when Responding to Student Thinking in Elementary Mathematics and Science Lessons</atitle><jtitle>International journal of science and mathematics education</jtitle><stitle>Int J of Sci and Math Educ</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1703</spage><epage>1724</epage><pages>1703-1724</pages><issn>1571-0068</issn><eissn>1573-1774</eissn><abstract>The work of teaching includes many in-the-moment decisions for teachers to make. In this study, we focused on the decisions prospective teachers made within the elementary context specific to shared teaching practice in mathematics and science instruction – elicit and use evidence of student thinking. Within a qualitative multisite case study, we analyzed data for how PTs took up student thinking within instructional decisions, and the nature of responsive moves enacted within an animated context once student thinking had been elicited. Findings reveal PTs were responsive to elicited student thinking. Most commonly, PTs’ instructional decisions involved asking additional questions or inviting students to test their ideas. However, PTs’ pedagogical moves varied across mathematics and science disciplines. Our findings guide teacher educators to focus on what moves best support PTs’ development to use evidence of student thinking across disciplines in the elementary classroom. The consistency of asking questions within mathematics and science begins to inform the quest for shared core practices. Results highlight the benefit of using technology (i.e. animations) as a tool to support PTs’ learning of instructional decisions and pedagogical moves to uncover the nuances of the teaching practice elicit and use evidence of student thinking.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Nature Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s10763-022-10304-3</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1571-0068 |
ispartof | International journal of science and mathematics education, 2023-06, Vol.21 (5), p.1703-1724 |
issn | 1571-0068 1573-1774 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2809101812 |
source | Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Cognitive Processes Context Decision Making Decisions Education Elementary School Mathematics Elementary School Science Mathematical analysis Mathematics Mathematics Education Mathematics Instruction Pedagogy Preservice Teachers Qualitative analysis Questioning Techniques Questions Science Education Science Instruction Teacher Response Teachers Teaching Teaching Methods Technology Uses in Education |
title | Prospective Teachers’ Instructional Decisions and Pedagogical Moves when Responding to Student Thinking in Elementary Mathematics and Science Lessons |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A20%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20Teachers%E2%80%99%20Instructional%20Decisions%20and%20Pedagogical%20Moves%20when%20Responding%20to%20Student%20Thinking%20in%20Elementary%20Mathematics%20and%20Science%20Lessons&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20science%20and%20mathematics%20education&rft.au=Estapa,%20Anne&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1703&rft.epage=1724&rft.pages=1703-1724&rft.issn=1571-0068&rft.eissn=1573-1774&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10763-022-10304-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2809101812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2809101812&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1376004&rfr_iscdi=true |