Prospective Teachers’ Instructional Decisions and Pedagogical Moves when Responding to Student Thinking in Elementary Mathematics and Science Lessons

The work of teaching includes many in-the-moment decisions for teachers to make. In this study, we focused on the decisions prospective teachers made within the elementary context specific to shared teaching practice in mathematics and science instruction – elicit and use evidence of student thinkin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of science and mathematics education 2023-06, Vol.21 (5), p.1703-1724
Hauptverfasser: Estapa, Anne, Davis, Jeni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1724
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1703
container_title International journal of science and mathematics education
container_volume 21
creator Estapa, Anne
Davis, Jeni
description The work of teaching includes many in-the-moment decisions for teachers to make. In this study, we focused on the decisions prospective teachers made within the elementary context specific to shared teaching practice in mathematics and science instruction – elicit and use evidence of student thinking. Within a qualitative multisite case study, we analyzed data for how PTs took up student thinking within instructional decisions, and the nature of responsive moves enacted within an animated context once student thinking had been elicited. Findings reveal PTs were responsive to elicited student thinking. Most commonly, PTs’ instructional decisions involved asking additional questions or inviting students to test their ideas. However, PTs’ pedagogical moves varied across mathematics and science disciplines. Our findings guide teacher educators to focus on what moves best support PTs’ development to use evidence of student thinking across disciplines in the elementary classroom. The consistency of asking questions within mathematics and science begins to inform the quest for shared core practices. Results highlight the benefit of using technology (i.e. animations) as a tool to support PTs’ learning of instructional decisions and pedagogical moves to uncover the nuances of the teaching practice elicit and use evidence of student thinking.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10763-022-10304-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2809101812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1376004</ericid><sourcerecordid>2809101812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-4776a5b71813296d50e77d0d13eba75a643029bb2cdd8f3b7e3ed7415b0b51d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFuEzEQXaEi0RZ-AAnJUs8LY3t3JzmiEqBVKioazpbXniQuiTd4nCJu_YuK3-uX4HZRuXGa0Xvz3mjmVdVrCW8lAL5jCdjpGpSqJWhoav2sOpQt6loiNgePvawBusmL6oj5GkC1OMXD6u4yDbwjl8MNiQVZt6bE97e_xVnknPYFH6LdiA_kApeWhY1eXJK3q2EVXGEuhhti8XNNUXwl3g3Rh7gSeRBXee8pZrFYh_j9AQtRzDa0LZhNv8SFzWva2hzc6HnlAkVHYk7MZc_L6vnSbphe_a3H1bePs8Xp53r-5dPZ6ft57RTKXDeInW17lBOp1bTzLRCiBy819RZb2zUa1LTvlfN-stQ9kiaPjWx76FvpQR9XJ6PvLg0_9sTZXA_7VE5moyYwlVCcVZlS45Qr3-JES7NLYVvOMBLMQwBmDMCUAMxjAEYX0ZtRRCm4J8HsXGrsAJrC65HnwsUVpX-r_-P6BxR0lZU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2809101812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective Teachers’ Instructional Decisions and Pedagogical Moves when Responding to Student Thinking in Elementary Mathematics and Science Lessons</title><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Estapa, Anne ; Davis, Jeni</creator><creatorcontrib>Estapa, Anne ; Davis, Jeni</creatorcontrib><description>The work of teaching includes many in-the-moment decisions for teachers to make. In this study, we focused on the decisions prospective teachers made within the elementary context specific to shared teaching practice in mathematics and science instruction – elicit and use evidence of student thinking. Within a qualitative multisite case study, we analyzed data for how PTs took up student thinking within instructional decisions, and the nature of responsive moves enacted within an animated context once student thinking had been elicited. Findings reveal PTs were responsive to elicited student thinking. Most commonly, PTs’ instructional decisions involved asking additional questions or inviting students to test their ideas. However, PTs’ pedagogical moves varied across mathematics and science disciplines. Our findings guide teacher educators to focus on what moves best support PTs’ development to use evidence of student thinking across disciplines in the elementary classroom. The consistency of asking questions within mathematics and science begins to inform the quest for shared core practices. Results highlight the benefit of using technology (i.e. animations) as a tool to support PTs’ learning of instructional decisions and pedagogical moves to uncover the nuances of the teaching practice elicit and use evidence of student thinking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1571-0068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10763-022-10304-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore</publisher><subject>Cognitive Processes ; Context ; Decision Making ; Decisions ; Education ; Elementary School Mathematics ; Elementary School Science ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Education ; Mathematics Instruction ; Pedagogy ; Preservice Teachers ; Qualitative analysis ; Questioning Techniques ; Questions ; Science Education ; Science Instruction ; Teacher Response ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Technology Uses in Education</subject><ispartof>International journal of science and mathematics education, 2023-06, Vol.21 (5), p.1703-1724</ispartof><rights>Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2022</rights><rights>Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-4776a5b71813296d50e77d0d13eba75a643029bb2cdd8f3b7e3ed7415b0b51d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-4776a5b71813296d50e77d0d13eba75a643029bb2cdd8f3b7e3ed7415b0b51d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10763-022-10304-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10763-022-10304-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1376004$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Estapa, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Jeni</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective Teachers’ Instructional Decisions and Pedagogical Moves when Responding to Student Thinking in Elementary Mathematics and Science Lessons</title><title>International journal of science and mathematics education</title><addtitle>Int J of Sci and Math Educ</addtitle><description>The work of teaching includes many in-the-moment decisions for teachers to make. In this study, we focused on the decisions prospective teachers made within the elementary context specific to shared teaching practice in mathematics and science instruction – elicit and use evidence of student thinking. Within a qualitative multisite case study, we analyzed data for how PTs took up student thinking within instructional decisions, and the nature of responsive moves enacted within an animated context once student thinking had been elicited. Findings reveal PTs were responsive to elicited student thinking. Most commonly, PTs’ instructional decisions involved asking additional questions or inviting students to test their ideas. However, PTs’ pedagogical moves varied across mathematics and science disciplines. Our findings guide teacher educators to focus on what moves best support PTs’ development to use evidence of student thinking across disciplines in the elementary classroom. The consistency of asking questions within mathematics and science begins to inform the quest for shared core practices. Results highlight the benefit of using technology (i.e. animations) as a tool to support PTs’ learning of instructional decisions and pedagogical moves to uncover the nuances of the teaching practice elicit and use evidence of student thinking.</description><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Elementary School Mathematics</subject><subject>Elementary School Science</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Questioning Techniques</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Teacher Response</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><issn>1571-0068</issn><issn>1573-1774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcFuEzEQXaEi0RZ-AAnJUs8LY3t3JzmiEqBVKioazpbXniQuiTd4nCJu_YuK3-uX4HZRuXGa0Xvz3mjmVdVrCW8lAL5jCdjpGpSqJWhoav2sOpQt6loiNgePvawBusmL6oj5GkC1OMXD6u4yDbwjl8MNiQVZt6bE97e_xVnknPYFH6LdiA_kApeWhY1eXJK3q2EVXGEuhhti8XNNUXwl3g3Rh7gSeRBXee8pZrFYh_j9AQtRzDa0LZhNv8SFzWva2hzc6HnlAkVHYk7MZc_L6vnSbphe_a3H1bePs8Xp53r-5dPZ6ft57RTKXDeInW17lBOp1bTzLRCiBy819RZb2zUa1LTvlfN-stQ9kiaPjWx76FvpQR9XJ6PvLg0_9sTZXA_7VE5moyYwlVCcVZlS45Qr3-JES7NLYVvOMBLMQwBmDMCUAMxjAEYX0ZtRRCm4J8HsXGrsAJrC65HnwsUVpX-r_-P6BxR0lZU</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Estapa, Anne</creator><creator>Davis, Jeni</creator><general>Springer Nature Singapore</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Prospective Teachers’ Instructional Decisions and Pedagogical Moves when Responding to Student Thinking in Elementary Mathematics and Science Lessons</title><author>Estapa, Anne ; Davis, Jeni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-4776a5b71813296d50e77d0d13eba75a643029bb2cdd8f3b7e3ed7415b0b51d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Elementary School Mathematics</topic><topic>Elementary School Science</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Questioning Techniques</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Teacher Response</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Estapa, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Jeni</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of science and mathematics education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Estapa, Anne</au><au>Davis, Jeni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1376004</ericid><atitle>Prospective Teachers’ Instructional Decisions and Pedagogical Moves when Responding to Student Thinking in Elementary Mathematics and Science Lessons</atitle><jtitle>International journal of science and mathematics education</jtitle><stitle>Int J of Sci and Math Educ</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1703</spage><epage>1724</epage><pages>1703-1724</pages><issn>1571-0068</issn><eissn>1573-1774</eissn><abstract>The work of teaching includes many in-the-moment decisions for teachers to make. In this study, we focused on the decisions prospective teachers made within the elementary context specific to shared teaching practice in mathematics and science instruction – elicit and use evidence of student thinking. Within a qualitative multisite case study, we analyzed data for how PTs took up student thinking within instructional decisions, and the nature of responsive moves enacted within an animated context once student thinking had been elicited. Findings reveal PTs were responsive to elicited student thinking. Most commonly, PTs’ instructional decisions involved asking additional questions or inviting students to test their ideas. However, PTs’ pedagogical moves varied across mathematics and science disciplines. Our findings guide teacher educators to focus on what moves best support PTs’ development to use evidence of student thinking across disciplines in the elementary classroom. The consistency of asking questions within mathematics and science begins to inform the quest for shared core practices. Results highlight the benefit of using technology (i.e. animations) as a tool to support PTs’ learning of instructional decisions and pedagogical moves to uncover the nuances of the teaching practice elicit and use evidence of student thinking.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Nature Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s10763-022-10304-3</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1571-0068
ispartof International journal of science and mathematics education, 2023-06, Vol.21 (5), p.1703-1724
issn 1571-0068
1573-1774
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2809101812
source Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Cognitive Processes
Context
Decision Making
Decisions
Education
Elementary School Mathematics
Elementary School Science
Mathematical analysis
Mathematics
Mathematics Education
Mathematics Instruction
Pedagogy
Preservice Teachers
Qualitative analysis
Questioning Techniques
Questions
Science Education
Science Instruction
Teacher Response
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Technology Uses in Education
title Prospective Teachers’ Instructional Decisions and Pedagogical Moves when Responding to Student Thinking in Elementary Mathematics and Science Lessons
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A20%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20Teachers%E2%80%99%20Instructional%20Decisions%20and%20Pedagogical%20Moves%20when%20Responding%20to%20Student%20Thinking%20in%20Elementary%20Mathematics%20and%20Science%20Lessons&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20science%20and%20mathematics%20education&rft.au=Estapa,%20Anne&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1703&rft.epage=1724&rft.pages=1703-1724&rft.issn=1571-0068&rft.eissn=1573-1774&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10763-022-10304-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2809101812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2809101812&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1376004&rfr_iscdi=true