Integrating Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions to Monitor Sustainability in the G20 Countries
Several regions have struggled to define and implement strategic priorities to ensure resource supply security and environmental, economic, and social sustainability. The circular economy is gaining more and more importance as one of the forms of transition towards a sustainable future that integrat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2023-04, Vol.15 (8), p.6502 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 6502 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Terra dos Santos, Luiz C Frimaio, Adrielle Giannetti, Biagio F Agostinho, Feni Liu, Gengyuan Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B |
description | Several regions have struggled to define and implement strategic priorities to ensure resource supply security and environmental, economic, and social sustainability. The circular economy is gaining more and more importance as one of the forms of transition towards a sustainable future that integrates, in a balanced way, economic performance, social inclusion, and environmental resilience, for the benefit of current and future generations. In light of the challenges of solving or avoiding future problems, the G20 bloc created proposals and action plans to support the transition towards a more circular economic model while at the same time fostering discussions on the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to monitor and compare the performance of 19 countries in the G20 bloc (the 20th member is the European Union) from 2000 to 2020 to assess their progress toward environmental, economic, and social sustainability supported by the CE principles. To achieve this objective, the five sectors sustainability model was used and was supported by goal programming as a multicriteria analysis tool generating a synthetic sustainability indicator to assist decision making. The results showed that the countries with the best overall sustainable performance (environmental, economic, and social) in 2020 were Canada (which also occupied the best position in 2000), Australia, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States, while Argentina, South Africa, India, Indonesia, and China showed lower sustainability. The results can serve as a reference for decision making by stakeholders in designing policies and incentives to encourage the adoption of the circular economy and boost economic development without compromising welfare or the environment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su15086502 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2806623310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747540102</galeid><sourcerecordid>A747540102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2a2eab39662a5c8904c08b933d38f1748762a46ffc6b2a804484963a6a7a47213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd9LAzEMxw9RUOZe_AsKPilupj-u13scc-pAEZw-H1nXm5WtnW1P9L-3Y4IueUhIPt-EkKI4ozDkvIbr2NESlCyBHRQnDCo6oFDC4b_8uOjH-A7ZOKc1lSeFnbpklgGTdUsycZ82eLc2LuHqisy8ttuIbkEm2ju_tprc2NyO1rtIkieP3tnkA5l1MaF1OLcrm76JdSS9GXLHgIx951KwJp4WRy2uoun_xl7xejt5Gd8PHp7upuPRw0BzqdKAITM457WUDEutahAa1LzmfMFVSyuhqtwQsm21nDNUIIQSteQosUJRMcp7xflu7ib4j87E1Lz7Lri8smEK8th8OmRquKOWuDKNda1PAXX2hclXemdam-ujSlSlAAosCy72BJlJ5istsYuxmc6e99nLHauDjzGYttkEu8bw3VBotq9q_l7FfwAiNoOr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2806623310</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions to Monitor Sustainability in the G20 Countries</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Terra dos Santos, Luiz C ; Frimaio, Adrielle ; Giannetti, Biagio F ; Agostinho, Feni ; Liu, Gengyuan ; Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B</creator><creatorcontrib>Terra dos Santos, Luiz C ; Frimaio, Adrielle ; Giannetti, Biagio F ; Agostinho, Feni ; Liu, Gengyuan ; Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B</creatorcontrib><description>Several regions have struggled to define and implement strategic priorities to ensure resource supply security and environmental, economic, and social sustainability. The circular economy is gaining more and more importance as one of the forms of transition towards a sustainable future that integrates, in a balanced way, economic performance, social inclusion, and environmental resilience, for the benefit of current and future generations. In light of the challenges of solving or avoiding future problems, the G20 bloc created proposals and action plans to support the transition towards a more circular economic model while at the same time fostering discussions on the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to monitor and compare the performance of 19 countries in the G20 bloc (the 20th member is the European Union) from 2000 to 2020 to assess their progress toward environmental, economic, and social sustainability supported by the CE principles. To achieve this objective, the five sectors sustainability model was used and was supported by goal programming as a multicriteria analysis tool generating a synthetic sustainability indicator to assist decision making. The results showed that the countries with the best overall sustainable performance (environmental, economic, and social) in 2020 were Canada (which also occupied the best position in 2000), Australia, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States, while Argentina, South Africa, India, Indonesia, and China showed lower sustainability. The results can serve as a reference for decision making by stakeholders in designing policies and incentives to encourage the adoption of the circular economy and boost economic development without compromising welfare or the environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su15086502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Consumption ; Decision making ; Economic aspects ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Economic models ; Goal programming ; Multiple criterion ; Natural resources ; Performance evaluation ; Security management ; Social sustainability ; Society ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-04, Vol.15 (8), p.6502</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2a2eab39662a5c8904c08b933d38f1748762a46ffc6b2a804484963a6a7a47213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2a2eab39662a5c8904c08b933d38f1748762a46ffc6b2a804484963a6a7a47213</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2337-4457 ; 0000-0002-6445-2175 ; 0000-0002-3488-9536</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Terra dos Santos, Luiz C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frimaio, Adrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannetti, Biagio F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agostinho, Feni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Gengyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions to Monitor Sustainability in the G20 Countries</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Several regions have struggled to define and implement strategic priorities to ensure resource supply security and environmental, economic, and social sustainability. The circular economy is gaining more and more importance as one of the forms of transition towards a sustainable future that integrates, in a balanced way, economic performance, social inclusion, and environmental resilience, for the benefit of current and future generations. In light of the challenges of solving or avoiding future problems, the G20 bloc created proposals and action plans to support the transition towards a more circular economic model while at the same time fostering discussions on the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to monitor and compare the performance of 19 countries in the G20 bloc (the 20th member is the European Union) from 2000 to 2020 to assess their progress toward environmental, economic, and social sustainability supported by the CE principles. To achieve this objective, the five sectors sustainability model was used and was supported by goal programming as a multicriteria analysis tool generating a synthetic sustainability indicator to assist decision making. The results showed that the countries with the best overall sustainable performance (environmental, economic, and social) in 2020 were Canada (which also occupied the best position in 2000), Australia, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States, while Argentina, South Africa, India, Indonesia, and China showed lower sustainability. The results can serve as a reference for decision making by stakeholders in designing policies and incentives to encourage the adoption of the circular economy and boost economic development without compromising welfare or the environment.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Goal programming</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Security management</subject><subject>Social sustainability</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkd9LAzEMxw9RUOZe_AsKPilupj-u13scc-pAEZw-H1nXm5WtnW1P9L-3Y4IueUhIPt-EkKI4ozDkvIbr2NESlCyBHRQnDCo6oFDC4b_8uOjH-A7ZOKc1lSeFnbpklgGTdUsycZ82eLc2LuHqisy8ttuIbkEm2ju_tprc2NyO1rtIkieP3tnkA5l1MaF1OLcrm76JdSS9GXLHgIx951KwJp4WRy2uoun_xl7xejt5Gd8PHp7upuPRw0BzqdKAITM457WUDEutahAa1LzmfMFVSyuhqtwQsm21nDNUIIQSteQosUJRMcp7xflu7ib4j87E1Lz7Lri8smEK8th8OmRquKOWuDKNda1PAXX2hclXemdam-ujSlSlAAosCy72BJlJ5istsYuxmc6e99nLHauDjzGYttkEu8bw3VBotq9q_l7FfwAiNoOr</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Terra dos Santos, Luiz C</creator><creator>Frimaio, Adrielle</creator><creator>Giannetti, Biagio F</creator><creator>Agostinho, Feni</creator><creator>Liu, Gengyuan</creator><creator>Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2337-4457</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-2175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3488-9536</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Integrating Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions to Monitor Sustainability in the G20 Countries</title><author>Terra dos Santos, Luiz C ; Frimaio, Adrielle ; Giannetti, Biagio F ; Agostinho, Feni ; Liu, Gengyuan ; Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2a2eab39662a5c8904c08b933d38f1748762a46ffc6b2a804484963a6a7a47213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Goal programming</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Security management</topic><topic>Social sustainability</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Terra dos Santos, Luiz C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frimaio, Adrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannetti, Biagio F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agostinho, Feni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Gengyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Terra dos Santos, Luiz C</au><au>Frimaio, Adrielle</au><au>Giannetti, Biagio F</au><au>Agostinho, Feni</au><au>Liu, Gengyuan</au><au>Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions to Monitor Sustainability in the G20 Countries</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>6502</spage><pages>6502-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Several regions have struggled to define and implement strategic priorities to ensure resource supply security and environmental, economic, and social sustainability. The circular economy is gaining more and more importance as one of the forms of transition towards a sustainable future that integrates, in a balanced way, economic performance, social inclusion, and environmental resilience, for the benefit of current and future generations. In light of the challenges of solving or avoiding future problems, the G20 bloc created proposals and action plans to support the transition towards a more circular economic model while at the same time fostering discussions on the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to monitor and compare the performance of 19 countries in the G20 bloc (the 20th member is the European Union) from 2000 to 2020 to assess their progress toward environmental, economic, and social sustainability supported by the CE principles. To achieve this objective, the five sectors sustainability model was used and was supported by goal programming as a multicriteria analysis tool generating a synthetic sustainability indicator to assist decision making. The results showed that the countries with the best overall sustainable performance (environmental, economic, and social) in 2020 were Canada (which also occupied the best position in 2000), Australia, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States, while Argentina, South Africa, India, Indonesia, and China showed lower sustainability. The results can serve as a reference for decision making by stakeholders in designing policies and incentives to encourage the adoption of the circular economy and boost economic development without compromising welfare or the environment.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su15086502</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2337-4457</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-2175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3488-9536</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2023-04, Vol.15 (8), p.6502 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2806623310 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Analysis Consumption Decision making Economic aspects Economic development Economic growth Economic models Goal programming Multiple criterion Natural resources Performance evaluation Security management Social sustainability Society Sustainability Sustainable development |
title | Integrating Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions to Monitor Sustainability in the G20 Countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T13%3A12%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20Environmental,%20Social,%20and%20Economic%20Dimensions%20to%20Monitor%20Sustainability%20in%20the%20G20%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Terra%20dos%20Santos,%20Luiz%20C&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=6502&rft.pages=6502-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su15086502&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA747540102%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2806623310&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A747540102&rfr_iscdi=true |