Election Law as Ideology: Toward a New Historiography of Democracy as a Function of Law

When advocates push for legal reforms expanding voting rights or reining in the political influence of wealthy elites, they frequently allude to the need to "protect" democracy or push back against its "degradation." While these advocates often demand changes that would make the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Georgetown law journal 2023-03, Vol.111 (3), p.1
1. Verfasser: Leeds, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1
container_title The Georgetown law journal
container_volume 111
creator Leeds, David
description When advocates push for legal reforms expanding voting rights or reining in the political influence of wealthy elites, they frequently allude to the need to "protect" democracy or push back against its "degradation." While these advocates often demand changes that would make the United States' electoral system more inclusive and egalitarian, this language implies that democracy exists outside of law. This rhetoric often overlooks the ways in which undemocratic principles are baked into the very system of laws that create democratic rights for Americans in the first place. Election law in the United States presents a paradox for proponents of democracy Law creates the legal tools necessary for exercising democratic rights and simultaneously limits those rights by excluding certain classes of people from democratic processes and protecting social and economic hierarchies in the arena of electoral politics. On the one hand, all democratic rights are necessarily creatures of law. Election law creates the very rules and mechanisms that enable people to play a role in the selection of their political representatives.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2806178529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2806178529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28061785293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjM0KgkAUhWdRkP28w4XWwjiSadtSDKKV4FIuOppiXptRxLdvoh6g1eHwnfMtmMW549k-D8SKrbVuTOWucC2Whq3Mh5o6uOEEqOFaSGqpmk-Q0ISqAIS7nCCu9UCqpkph_5iBSrjIJ-UK8_nzQojG7usxyKi2bFliq-Xulxu2j8LkHNu9otco9ZA1NKrOoEz43HOO_kEE7n-rNyX9P7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2806178529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Election Law as Ideology: Toward a New Historiography of Democracy as a Function of Law</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Leeds, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Leeds, David</creatorcontrib><description>When advocates push for legal reforms expanding voting rights or reining in the political influence of wealthy elites, they frequently allude to the need to "protect" democracy or push back against its "degradation." While these advocates often demand changes that would make the United States' electoral system more inclusive and egalitarian, this language implies that democracy exists outside of law. This rhetoric often overlooks the ways in which undemocratic principles are baked into the very system of laws that create democratic rights for Americans in the first place. Election law in the United States presents a paradox for proponents of democracy Law creates the legal tools necessary for exercising democratic rights and simultaneously limits those rights by excluding certain classes of people from democratic processes and protecting social and economic hierarchies in the arena of electoral politics. On the one hand, all democratic rights are necessarily creatures of law. Election law creates the very rules and mechanisms that enable people to play a role in the selection of their political representatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-8092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Georgetown University Law Center</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Human rights ; Law enforcement ; Political parties ; Politics</subject><ispartof>The Georgetown law journal, 2023-03, Vol.111 (3), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright Georgetown University Law Center Mar 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leeds, David</creatorcontrib><title>Election Law as Ideology: Toward a New Historiography of Democracy as a Function of Law</title><title>The Georgetown law journal</title><description>When advocates push for legal reforms expanding voting rights or reining in the political influence of wealthy elites, they frequently allude to the need to "protect" democracy or push back against its "degradation." While these advocates often demand changes that would make the United States' electoral system more inclusive and egalitarian, this language implies that democracy exists outside of law. This rhetoric often overlooks the ways in which undemocratic principles are baked into the very system of laws that create democratic rights for Americans in the first place. Election law in the United States presents a paradox for proponents of democracy Law creates the legal tools necessary for exercising democratic rights and simultaneously limits those rights by excluding certain classes of people from democratic processes and protecting social and economic hierarchies in the arena of electoral politics. On the one hand, all democratic rights are necessarily creatures of law. Election law creates the very rules and mechanisms that enable people to play a role in the selection of their political representatives.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politics</subject><issn>0016-8092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNjM0KgkAUhWdRkP28w4XWwjiSadtSDKKV4FIuOppiXptRxLdvoh6g1eHwnfMtmMW549k-D8SKrbVuTOWucC2Whq3Mh5o6uOEEqOFaSGqpmk-Q0ISqAIS7nCCu9UCqpkph_5iBSrjIJ-UK8_nzQojG7usxyKi2bFliq-Xulxu2j8LkHNu9otco9ZA1NKrOoEz43HOO_kEE7n-rNyX9P7A</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Leeds, David</creator><general>Georgetown University Law Center</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Election Law as Ideology: Toward a New Historiography of Democracy as a Function of Law</title><author>Leeds, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28061785293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leeds, David</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Georgetown law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leeds, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Election Law as Ideology: Toward a New Historiography of Democracy as a Function of Law</atitle><jtitle>The Georgetown law journal</jtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0016-8092</issn><abstract>When advocates push for legal reforms expanding voting rights or reining in the political influence of wealthy elites, they frequently allude to the need to "protect" democracy or push back against its "degradation." While these advocates often demand changes that would make the United States' electoral system more inclusive and egalitarian, this language implies that democracy exists outside of law. This rhetoric often overlooks the ways in which undemocratic principles are baked into the very system of laws that create democratic rights for Americans in the first place. Election law in the United States presents a paradox for proponents of democracy Law creates the legal tools necessary for exercising democratic rights and simultaneously limits those rights by excluding certain classes of people from democratic processes and protecting social and economic hierarchies in the arena of electoral politics. On the one hand, all democratic rights are necessarily creatures of law. Election law creates the very rules and mechanisms that enable people to play a role in the selection of their political representatives.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Georgetown University Law Center</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-8092
ispartof The Georgetown law journal, 2023-03, Vol.111 (3), p.1
issn 0016-8092
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2806178529
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Democracy
Human rights
Law enforcement
Political parties
Politics
title Election Law as Ideology: Toward a New Historiography of Democracy as a Function of Law
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A07%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Election%20Law%20as%20Ideology:%20Toward%20a%20New%20Historiography%20of%20Democracy%20as%20a%20Function%20of%20Law&rft.jtitle=The%20Georgetown%20law%20journal&rft.au=Leeds,%20David&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0016-8092&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2806178529%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2806178529&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true