Hydrologic and water quality modelling of bioretention columns in cold regions

Bioretention is widely used in urban sustainable stormwater management; however, limited numerical research has been conducted on its performance in cold regions, particularly for winter snowmelt, spring runoff and summer large storms (>50 mm) for urban flood mitigation. In this study, HYDRUS 1D...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrological processes 2023-04, Vol.37 (4), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Yang, Li, Zhuowen, Yu, Tong, Guo, Shuai, Zhou, Yongchao, Li, Xiaochen, Zhang, Wenming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 37
creator Yu, Yang
Li, Zhuowen
Yu, Tong
Guo, Shuai
Zhou, Yongchao
Li, Xiaochen
Zhang, Wenming
description Bioretention is widely used in urban sustainable stormwater management; however, limited numerical research has been conducted on its performance in cold regions, particularly for winter snowmelt, spring runoff and summer large storms (>50 mm) for urban flood mitigation. In this study, HYDRUS 1D was used to explore these knowledge gaps. The model was comprehensively calibrated and validated against 2‐year hydrologic and water quality data of four bioretention columns with different designs under lab‐simulated cold region conditions. The Morris method was used to measure the sensitivity and interaction of the calibrated hydraulic parameters. The model revealed that the effective hydraulic conductivity (KS) values of the soil media were similar for winter snowmelt and spring runoff when the soil temperature was around −0.5°C. Preferential flow is likely to occur in soil media during winter or spring in cold regions. The summer modelling showed that bioretention could substantially reduce peak flow, ponding depth and duration for large storm events (even for a 1:100 local storm with 83.4 mm in 4 h). The water quality modelling confirmed experimental results that the bioretention effectively removed phosphate and ammonium but had leaching issues for chloride and nitrate. Finally, optimization and recommendations for bioretention columns were provided. Bioretention is widely used in urban sustainable stormwater management. However, limited research has been conducted on its performance in cold regions, particularly for large storm events (>50 mm). In this study, these aspects were explored using a numerical model, which was calibrated and validated by experimental data. This paper is useful for improving the understanding of bioretention in cold regions, particularly in the context of changing climate with more weather extremes in the near future.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.14871
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2805328669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2805328669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-cbb0e2dcab4cf648129aa0627e3a4f4b0f07d72e9e96e70f213a8a974965f9743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGkPTsftkdUAUGqgAEGJstJ7OLKjVs7UZV_T2hYmd7T6XnvpAehWwILAkCX38N-QTLOyBmaERAiIcDzczQDzvOkAM4u0VWMWwDIgMMMvZZDE7zzG1tj1Tb4qDod8KFXznYD3vlGO2fbDfYGV9YH3em2s77FtXf9ro3YnsYGB70Z1_EaXRjlor75yzn6fHr8WJXJ-u35ZfWwTuo0pSSpqwo0bWpVZbUpMk6oUAoKynSqMpNVYIA1jGqhRaEZGEpSxZVgmShyM0Y6R3fT3X3wh17HTm59H9rxpaQc8pTyohAjdT9RdfAxBm3kPtidCoMkIH91yVGXPOka2eXEHq3Tw_-gLL_ep8YPN6Jsog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2805328669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydrologic and water quality modelling of bioretention columns in cold regions</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Yu, Yang ; Li, Zhuowen ; Yu, Tong ; Guo, Shuai ; Zhou, Yongchao ; Li, Xiaochen ; Zhang, Wenming</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yang ; Li, Zhuowen ; Yu, Tong ; Guo, Shuai ; Zhou, Yongchao ; Li, Xiaochen ; Zhang, Wenming</creatorcontrib><description>Bioretention is widely used in urban sustainable stormwater management; however, limited numerical research has been conducted on its performance in cold regions, particularly for winter snowmelt, spring runoff and summer large storms (&gt;50 mm) for urban flood mitigation. In this study, HYDRUS 1D was used to explore these knowledge gaps. The model was comprehensively calibrated and validated against 2‐year hydrologic and water quality data of four bioretention columns with different designs under lab‐simulated cold region conditions. The Morris method was used to measure the sensitivity and interaction of the calibrated hydraulic parameters. The model revealed that the effective hydraulic conductivity (KS) values of the soil media were similar for winter snowmelt and spring runoff when the soil temperature was around −0.5°C. Preferential flow is likely to occur in soil media during winter or spring in cold regions. The summer modelling showed that bioretention could substantially reduce peak flow, ponding depth and duration for large storm events (even for a 1:100 local storm with 83.4 mm in 4 h). The water quality modelling confirmed experimental results that the bioretention effectively removed phosphate and ammonium but had leaching issues for chloride and nitrate. Finally, optimization and recommendations for bioretention columns were provided. Bioretention is widely used in urban sustainable stormwater management. However, limited research has been conducted on its performance in cold regions, particularly for large storm events (&gt;50 mm). In this study, these aspects were explored using a numerical model, which was calibrated and validated by experimental data. This paper is useful for improving the understanding of bioretention in cold regions, particularly in the context of changing climate with more weather extremes in the near future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Ammonium ; Ammonium compounds ; bioretention ; Cold ; cold region ; Cold regions ; Hydraulic conductivity ; Hydrologic models ; hydrological performance ; Hydrology ; HYDRUS 1D ; large storm ; Leaching ; Mitigation ; Modelling ; Optimization ; Parameter sensitivity ; Phosphates ; Ponding ; Preferential flow ; Retention basins ; Runoff ; Snowmelt ; Soil ; Soil temperature ; Spring ; Spring (season) ; Storms ; Stormwater ; Stormwater management ; Summer ; Temperature preferences ; Water management ; Water quality ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2023-04, Vol.37 (4), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-cbb0e2dcab4cf648129aa0627e3a4f4b0f07d72e9e96e70f213a8a974965f9743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-cbb0e2dcab4cf648129aa0627e3a4f4b0f07d72e9e96e70f213a8a974965f9743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5524-4016 ; 0000-0002-8101-4089</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhyp.14871$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhyp.14871$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhuowen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yongchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wenming</creatorcontrib><title>Hydrologic and water quality modelling of bioretention columns in cold regions</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><description>Bioretention is widely used in urban sustainable stormwater management; however, limited numerical research has been conducted on its performance in cold regions, particularly for winter snowmelt, spring runoff and summer large storms (&gt;50 mm) for urban flood mitigation. In this study, HYDRUS 1D was used to explore these knowledge gaps. The model was comprehensively calibrated and validated against 2‐year hydrologic and water quality data of four bioretention columns with different designs under lab‐simulated cold region conditions. The Morris method was used to measure the sensitivity and interaction of the calibrated hydraulic parameters. The model revealed that the effective hydraulic conductivity (KS) values of the soil media were similar for winter snowmelt and spring runoff when the soil temperature was around −0.5°C. Preferential flow is likely to occur in soil media during winter or spring in cold regions. The summer modelling showed that bioretention could substantially reduce peak flow, ponding depth and duration for large storm events (even for a 1:100 local storm with 83.4 mm in 4 h). The water quality modelling confirmed experimental results that the bioretention effectively removed phosphate and ammonium but had leaching issues for chloride and nitrate. Finally, optimization and recommendations for bioretention columns were provided. Bioretention is widely used in urban sustainable stormwater management. However, limited research has been conducted on its performance in cold regions, particularly for large storm events (&gt;50 mm). In this study, these aspects were explored using a numerical model, which was calibrated and validated by experimental data. This paper is useful for improving the understanding of bioretention in cold regions, particularly in the context of changing climate with more weather extremes in the near future.</description><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Ammonium compounds</subject><subject>bioretention</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>cold region</subject><subject>Cold regions</subject><subject>Hydraulic conductivity</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>hydrological performance</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>HYDRUS 1D</subject><subject>large storm</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Phosphates</subject><subject>Ponding</subject><subject>Preferential flow</subject><subject>Retention basins</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Snowmelt</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil temperature</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Spring (season)</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Stormwater management</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Temperature preferences</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGkPTsftkdUAUGqgAEGJstJ7OLKjVs7UZV_T2hYmd7T6XnvpAehWwILAkCX38N-QTLOyBmaERAiIcDzczQDzvOkAM4u0VWMWwDIgMMMvZZDE7zzG1tj1Tb4qDod8KFXznYD3vlGO2fbDfYGV9YH3em2s77FtXf9ro3YnsYGB70Z1_EaXRjlor75yzn6fHr8WJXJ-u35ZfWwTuo0pSSpqwo0bWpVZbUpMk6oUAoKynSqMpNVYIA1jGqhRaEZGEpSxZVgmShyM0Y6R3fT3X3wh17HTm59H9rxpaQc8pTyohAjdT9RdfAxBm3kPtidCoMkIH91yVGXPOka2eXEHq3Tw_-gLL_ep8YPN6Jsog</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Yu, Yang</creator><creator>Li, Zhuowen</creator><creator>Yu, Tong</creator><creator>Guo, Shuai</creator><creator>Zhou, Yongchao</creator><creator>Li, Xiaochen</creator><creator>Zhang, Wenming</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5524-4016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8101-4089</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Hydrologic and water quality modelling of bioretention columns in cold regions</title><author>Yu, Yang ; Li, Zhuowen ; Yu, Tong ; Guo, Shuai ; Zhou, Yongchao ; Li, Xiaochen ; Zhang, Wenming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-cbb0e2dcab4cf648129aa0627e3a4f4b0f07d72e9e96e70f213a8a974965f9743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Ammonium compounds</topic><topic>bioretention</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>cold region</topic><topic>Cold regions</topic><topic>Hydraulic conductivity</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>hydrological performance</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>HYDRUS 1D</topic><topic>large storm</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Phosphates</topic><topic>Ponding</topic><topic>Preferential flow</topic><topic>Retention basins</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Snowmelt</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil temperature</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Spring (season)</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Stormwater management</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Temperature preferences</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhuowen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yongchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wenming</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Yang</au><au>Li, Zhuowen</au><au>Yu, Tong</au><au>Guo, Shuai</au><au>Zhou, Yongchao</au><au>Li, Xiaochen</au><au>Zhang, Wenming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydrologic and water quality modelling of bioretention columns in cold regions</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>Bioretention is widely used in urban sustainable stormwater management; however, limited numerical research has been conducted on its performance in cold regions, particularly for winter snowmelt, spring runoff and summer large storms (&gt;50 mm) for urban flood mitigation. In this study, HYDRUS 1D was used to explore these knowledge gaps. The model was comprehensively calibrated and validated against 2‐year hydrologic and water quality data of four bioretention columns with different designs under lab‐simulated cold region conditions. The Morris method was used to measure the sensitivity and interaction of the calibrated hydraulic parameters. The model revealed that the effective hydraulic conductivity (KS) values of the soil media were similar for winter snowmelt and spring runoff when the soil temperature was around −0.5°C. Preferential flow is likely to occur in soil media during winter or spring in cold regions. The summer modelling showed that bioretention could substantially reduce peak flow, ponding depth and duration for large storm events (even for a 1:100 local storm with 83.4 mm in 4 h). The water quality modelling confirmed experimental results that the bioretention effectively removed phosphate and ammonium but had leaching issues for chloride and nitrate. Finally, optimization and recommendations for bioretention columns were provided. Bioretention is widely used in urban sustainable stormwater management. However, limited research has been conducted on its performance in cold regions, particularly for large storm events (&gt;50 mm). In this study, these aspects were explored using a numerical model, which was calibrated and validated by experimental data. This paper is useful for improving the understanding of bioretention in cold regions, particularly in the context of changing climate with more weather extremes in the near future.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.14871</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5524-4016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8101-4089</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2023-04, Vol.37 (4), p.n/a
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2805328669
source Wiley Online Library Journals
subjects Ammonium
Ammonium compounds
bioretention
Cold
cold region
Cold regions
Hydraulic conductivity
Hydrologic models
hydrological performance
Hydrology
HYDRUS 1D
large storm
Leaching
Mitigation
Modelling
Optimization
Parameter sensitivity
Phosphates
Ponding
Preferential flow
Retention basins
Runoff
Snowmelt
Soil
Soil temperature
Spring
Spring (season)
Storms
Stormwater
Stormwater management
Summer
Temperature preferences
Water management
Water quality
Winter
title Hydrologic and water quality modelling of bioretention columns in cold regions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A25%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydrologic%20and%20water%20quality%20modelling%20of%20bioretention%20columns%20in%20cold%20regions&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Yu,%20Yang&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.14871&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2805328669%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2805328669&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true