Effective of Bacterial Inoculation Azotobacter Chroococcum and Bacillus Subtillis in Inoculation Density and Available Phosphorus in Soil and Plant

A field experiment was conducted during the agricultural season 2021-2022 with an agricultural area in Al-Nouriah area / Al-Shafi’i district of Al-Diwaniyah Province. Two levels of Azotobacter (A1, A0) inoculation and non-inoculation, as well as the use of two levels of Bacillus subtilis (B1, B0) in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science 2023-04, Vol.1158 (2), p.22002
Hauptverfasser: Azzawi, Samer Sameer, Kamal, Jawad Abdl-Kadhim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 22002
container_title IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science
container_volume 1158
creator Azzawi, Samer Sameer
Kamal, Jawad Abdl-Kadhim
description A field experiment was conducted during the agricultural season 2021-2022 with an agricultural area in Al-Nouriah area / Al-Shafi’i district of Al-Diwaniyah Province. Two levels of Azotobacter (A1, A0) inoculation and non-inoculation, as well as the use of two levels of Bacillus subtilis (B1, B0) inoculation and non-inoculation, and four levels of phosphate rock fertilizer (P0, P1, P2, P3) were used. ) kg.h -1 and the interaction between them In addition to the concentration of phosphorous in soil and plants and the numerical density of Azotobacter and Bacillus. A factorial experiment was applied. according to a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The results of the statistical analysis showed the least significant difference L.S.D. The interaction treatment (Azotobacter inoculation + Bacillus inoculation + rock phosphate fertilizer) Compared with the control treatment by giving it the highest mean of (phosphorous concentration in soil and plants, number of Azotobacter and number of Bacillus bacteria) amounted to (13.647) mg.kg -1 and (3379) mg.kg -1 and (10.54) CFU/gm Soil x 10 -6 and (7.08) CFU/gm Soil x 10 -6 respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1755-1315/1158/2/022002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2804053619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2804053619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3272-70448df28c83bd05f04460c3dbc38cfe921481b2414de858e34990d95e1167393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9KwzAUxoMoOKfPYMArL2bzp13TyzmnDgQH0-uQpgnLyJqatIP5Gr6wbSeTgeDVOYfz-84H5wPgGqM7jBiLcJokI0xxEmGcsIhEiBCEyAkYHDanhx6l5-AihDVC4zSm2QB8zbRWsjZbBZ2G90LWyhth4bx0srGiNq6Ek09Xu7xfwenKOyedlM0GirLoFMbaJsBlk9dtZwI05ZH6QZXB1LuenmyFsSK3Ci5WLlQr55ueXzpje2BhRVlfgjMtbFBXP3UI3h9nb9Pn0cvr03w6eRlJSlIySlEcs0ITJhnNC5Todh4jSYtcUia1ygiOGc5JjONCsYQpGmcZKrJEYTxOaUaH4GZ_t_Luo1Gh5mvX-LK15IShGCV0jDsq3VPSuxC80rzyZiP8jmPEuwR491ve_Zl3CXDC9wm0ytu90rjq9_RstjzmeFXolqV_sP85fAO70JZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2804053619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effective of Bacterial Inoculation Azotobacter Chroococcum and Bacillus Subtillis in Inoculation Density and Available Phosphorus in Soil and Plant</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><creator>Azzawi, Samer Sameer ; Kamal, Jawad Abdl-Kadhim</creator><creatorcontrib>Azzawi, Samer Sameer ; Kamal, Jawad Abdl-Kadhim</creatorcontrib><description>A field experiment was conducted during the agricultural season 2021-2022 with an agricultural area in Al-Nouriah area / Al-Shafi’i district of Al-Diwaniyah Province. Two levels of Azotobacter (A1, A0) inoculation and non-inoculation, as well as the use of two levels of Bacillus subtilis (B1, B0) inoculation and non-inoculation, and four levels of phosphate rock fertilizer (P0, P1, P2, P3) were used. ) kg.h -1 and the interaction between them In addition to the concentration of phosphorous in soil and plants and the numerical density of Azotobacter and Bacillus. A factorial experiment was applied. according to a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The results of the statistical analysis showed the least significant difference L.S.D. The interaction treatment (Azotobacter inoculation + Bacillus inoculation + rock phosphate fertilizer) Compared with the control treatment by giving it the highest mean of (phosphorous concentration in soil and plants, number of Azotobacter and number of Bacillus bacteria) amounted to (13.647) mg.kg -1 and (3379) mg.kg -1 and (10.54) CFU/gm Soil x 10 -6 and (7.08) CFU/gm Soil x 10 -6 respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1158/2/022002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Azotobacter ; Bacillus ; Bacillus subtilis ; Bacteria ; Factorial experiments ; Fertilizers ; Inoculation ; Phosphate rock ; Phosphorous ; Phosphorus ; Planting density ; Rock phosphate ; Rocks ; Soils ; Statistical analysis ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2023-04, Vol.1158 (2), p.22002</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3272-70448df28c83bd05f04460c3dbc38cfe921481b2414de858e34990d95e1167393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3272-70448df28c83bd05f04460c3dbc38cfe921481b2414de858e34990d95e1167393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1158/2/022002/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38868,38890,53840,53867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Azzawi, Samer Sameer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, Jawad Abdl-Kadhim</creatorcontrib><title>Effective of Bacterial Inoculation Azotobacter Chroococcum and Bacillus Subtillis in Inoculation Density and Available Phosphorus in Soil and Plant</title><title>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</title><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><description>A field experiment was conducted during the agricultural season 2021-2022 with an agricultural area in Al-Nouriah area / Al-Shafi’i district of Al-Diwaniyah Province. Two levels of Azotobacter (A1, A0) inoculation and non-inoculation, as well as the use of two levels of Bacillus subtilis (B1, B0) inoculation and non-inoculation, and four levels of phosphate rock fertilizer (P0, P1, P2, P3) were used. ) kg.h -1 and the interaction between them In addition to the concentration of phosphorous in soil and plants and the numerical density of Azotobacter and Bacillus. A factorial experiment was applied. according to a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The results of the statistical analysis showed the least significant difference L.S.D. The interaction treatment (Azotobacter inoculation + Bacillus inoculation + rock phosphate fertilizer) Compared with the control treatment by giving it the highest mean of (phosphorous concentration in soil and plants, number of Azotobacter and number of Bacillus bacteria) amounted to (13.647) mg.kg -1 and (3379) mg.kg -1 and (10.54) CFU/gm Soil x 10 -6 and (7.08) CFU/gm Soil x 10 -6 respectively.</description><subject>Azotobacter</subject><subject>Bacillus</subject><subject>Bacillus subtilis</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Factorial experiments</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Phosphate rock</subject><subject>Phosphorous</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Planting density</subject><subject>Rock phosphate</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>1755-1307</issn><issn>1755-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9KwzAUxoMoOKfPYMArL2bzp13TyzmnDgQH0-uQpgnLyJqatIP5Gr6wbSeTgeDVOYfz-84H5wPgGqM7jBiLcJokI0xxEmGcsIhEiBCEyAkYHDanhx6l5-AihDVC4zSm2QB8zbRWsjZbBZ2G90LWyhth4bx0srGiNq6Ek09Xu7xfwenKOyedlM0GirLoFMbaJsBlk9dtZwI05ZH6QZXB1LuenmyFsSK3Ci5WLlQr55ueXzpje2BhRVlfgjMtbFBXP3UI3h9nb9Pn0cvr03w6eRlJSlIySlEcs0ITJhnNC5Todh4jSYtcUia1ygiOGc5JjONCsYQpGmcZKrJEYTxOaUaH4GZ_t_Luo1Gh5mvX-LK15IShGCV0jDsq3VPSuxC80rzyZiP8jmPEuwR491ve_Zl3CXDC9wm0ytu90rjq9_RstjzmeFXolqV_sP85fAO70JZE</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Azzawi, Samer Sameer</creator><creator>Kamal, Jawad Abdl-Kadhim</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Effective of Bacterial Inoculation Azotobacter Chroococcum and Bacillus Subtillis in Inoculation Density and Available Phosphorus in Soil and Plant</title><author>Azzawi, Samer Sameer ; Kamal, Jawad Abdl-Kadhim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3272-70448df28c83bd05f04460c3dbc38cfe921481b2414de858e34990d95e1167393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Azotobacter</topic><topic>Bacillus</topic><topic>Bacillus subtilis</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Factorial experiments</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Phosphate rock</topic><topic>Phosphorous</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Planting density</topic><topic>Rock phosphate</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Azzawi, Samer Sameer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, Jawad Abdl-Kadhim</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Azzawi, Samer Sameer</au><au>Kamal, Jawad Abdl-Kadhim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effective of Bacterial Inoculation Azotobacter Chroococcum and Bacillus Subtillis in Inoculation Density and Available Phosphorus in Soil and Plant</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>1158</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>22002</spage><pages>22002-</pages><issn>1755-1307</issn><eissn>1755-1315</eissn><abstract>A field experiment was conducted during the agricultural season 2021-2022 with an agricultural area in Al-Nouriah area / Al-Shafi’i district of Al-Diwaniyah Province. Two levels of Azotobacter (A1, A0) inoculation and non-inoculation, as well as the use of two levels of Bacillus subtilis (B1, B0) inoculation and non-inoculation, and four levels of phosphate rock fertilizer (P0, P1, P2, P3) were used. ) kg.h -1 and the interaction between them In addition to the concentration of phosphorous in soil and plants and the numerical density of Azotobacter and Bacillus. A factorial experiment was applied. according to a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The results of the statistical analysis showed the least significant difference L.S.D. The interaction treatment (Azotobacter inoculation + Bacillus inoculation + rock phosphate fertilizer) Compared with the control treatment by giving it the highest mean of (phosphorous concentration in soil and plants, number of Azotobacter and number of Bacillus bacteria) amounted to (13.647) mg.kg -1 and (3379) mg.kg -1 and (10.54) CFU/gm Soil x 10 -6 and (7.08) CFU/gm Soil x 10 -6 respectively.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1755-1315/1158/2/022002</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-1307
ispartof IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2023-04, Vol.1158 (2), p.22002
issn 1755-1307
1755-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2804053619
source IOP Publishing Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; IOPscience extra
subjects Azotobacter
Bacillus
Bacillus subtilis
Bacteria
Factorial experiments
Fertilizers
Inoculation
Phosphate rock
Phosphorous
Phosphorus
Planting density
Rock phosphate
Rocks
Soils
Statistical analysis
Wheat
title Effective of Bacterial Inoculation Azotobacter Chroococcum and Bacillus Subtillis in Inoculation Density and Available Phosphorus in Soil and Plant
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T01%3A34%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effective%20of%20Bacterial%20Inoculation%20Azotobacter%20Chroococcum%20and%20Bacillus%20Subtillis%20in%20Inoculation%20Density%20and%20Available%20Phosphorus%20in%20Soil%20and%20Plant&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Earth%20and%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Azzawi,%20Samer%20Sameer&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=1158&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=22002&rft.pages=22002-&rft.issn=1755-1307&rft.eissn=1755-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1755-1315/1158/2/022002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2804053619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2804053619&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true