Global digital elevation models for terrain morphology analysis in mountain environments: insights on Copernicus GLO-30 and ALOS AW3D30 for a large Alpine area

This study focuses on the quality evaluation of two of the best 1 arc-second public global digital elevation models (DEMs), Copernicus GLO-30 DEM and ALOS AW3D30 DSM, from the perspective of their capability to represent the terrain fine-scale morphology of a complex alpine landscape, located in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental earth sciences 2023-05, Vol.82 (9), p.198, Article 198
Hauptverfasser: Trevisani, Sebastiano, Skrypitsyna, T. N., Florinsky, I. V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 198
container_title Environmental earth sciences
container_volume 82
creator Trevisani, Sebastiano
Skrypitsyna, T. N.
Florinsky, I. V.
description This study focuses on the quality evaluation of two of the best 1 arc-second public global digital elevation models (DEMs), Copernicus GLO-30 DEM and ALOS AW3D30 DSM, from the perspective of their capability to represent the terrain fine-scale morphology of a complex alpine landscape, located in the Italian Trentino Province. The analysis is performed on an area of 6210 km 2 , considering a reference DEM derived from a high resolution and accurate airborne Lidar survey. The quality assessment goes beyond a conventional approach based on elevation differences statistics, computed on a pixels-by-pixel basis. An ad hoc approach for evaluating the capability to represent fine-scale morphology, including surface roughness, is adopted. Moreover, the quality analysis is performed considering the influence of local morphology and of the different land covers. The findings show that although the two global DEMs have comparable overall quality, their relative performances change according to local landscape characteristics. Copernicus DEM performance is on average better than ALOS in correspondence of urbanized areas as well as in areas without vegetation cover, with gentle slopes and relatively low short-range roughness. Meanwhile, ALOS DEM performance is slightly better than Copernicus in rougher terrain and steeper slopes. In general, both DEMs have poor performances in steep slopes, with a limited capability to describe fine-scale morphology. The adoption of these global DEMs for terrain analysis and modelling of earth surface processes should be performed carefully, considering the impact of different land covers and of local morphology, including surface roughness.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12665-023-10882-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2802194267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2802194267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-7cf707c13a553e98853bb4c7e6e3e529e9a44df5f39887ade0df0b220c94363e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUtOwzAQjRBIVKUXYGWJdcCfxEnYRQUKUqQuALG03GSSunLtYKeVehquitMi2OHN2PM-1syLomuCbwnG2Z0nlPM0xpTFBOc5jbOzaEJyzmNOi-L8957jy2jm_QaHwwgrMJ9EXwttV1KjRnVqCBU07OWgrEFb24D2qLUODeCcVGPL9WurbXdA0kh98MqjY3tnhhEHs1fOmi2Ywd8HxKtuPXgUzOa2B2dUvfNoUS1jhoNBg8pq-YrKD_YQ3uM_EmnpOkCl7pUBJB3Iq-iildrD7KdOo_enx7f5c1wtFy_zsooly_kQZ3Wb4awmTKYpgyLPU7ZaJXUGHBiktIBCJknTpi0LWCYbwE2LV5TiukgYZ8Cm0c3Jt3f2cwd-EBu7c2FIL8LeKCkSyrPAoidW7az3DlrRO7WV7iAIFmMW4pSFCFmIYxZiFLGTyAey6cD9Wf-j-gbaD40u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2802194267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global digital elevation models for terrain morphology analysis in mountain environments: insights on Copernicus GLO-30 and ALOS AW3D30 for a large Alpine area</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Trevisani, Sebastiano ; Skrypitsyna, T. N. ; Florinsky, I. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trevisani, Sebastiano ; Skrypitsyna, T. N. ; Florinsky, I. V.</creatorcontrib><description>This study focuses on the quality evaluation of two of the best 1 arc-second public global digital elevation models (DEMs), Copernicus GLO-30 DEM and ALOS AW3D30 DSM, from the perspective of their capability to represent the terrain fine-scale morphology of a complex alpine landscape, located in the Italian Trentino Province. The analysis is performed on an area of 6210 km 2 , considering a reference DEM derived from a high resolution and accurate airborne Lidar survey. The quality assessment goes beyond a conventional approach based on elevation differences statistics, computed on a pixels-by-pixel basis. An ad hoc approach for evaluating the capability to represent fine-scale morphology, including surface roughness, is adopted. Moreover, the quality analysis is performed considering the influence of local morphology and of the different land covers. The findings show that although the two global DEMs have comparable overall quality, their relative performances change according to local landscape characteristics. Copernicus DEM performance is on average better than ALOS in correspondence of urbanized areas as well as in areas without vegetation cover, with gentle slopes and relatively low short-range roughness. Meanwhile, ALOS DEM performance is slightly better than Copernicus in rougher terrain and steeper slopes. In general, both DEMs have poor performances in steep slopes, with a limited capability to describe fine-scale morphology. The adoption of these global DEMs for terrain analysis and modelling of earth surface processes should be performed carefully, considering the impact of different land covers and of local morphology, including surface roughness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-6280</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-6299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12665-023-10882-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biogeosciences ; Digital Elevation Models ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth surface ; Elevation ; Environmental Science and Engineering ; Geochemistry ; Geology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Lidar ; Morphology ; Mountain environments ; Original Article ; Pixels ; Plant cover ; Quality assessment ; Quality assurance ; Quality control ; Slopes ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Surface roughness ; Terrain analysis ; Terrestrial Pollution ; Vegetation ; Vegetation cover</subject><ispartof>Environmental earth sciences, 2023-05, Vol.82 (9), p.198, Article 198</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-7cf707c13a553e98853bb4c7e6e3e529e9a44df5f39887ade0df0b220c94363e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-7cf707c13a553e98853bb4c7e6e3e529e9a44df5f39887ade0df0b220c94363e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4964-9196 ; 0000-0003-1273-5912 ; 0000-0001-8436-7798</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12665-023-10882-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12665-023-10882-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trevisani, Sebastiano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skrypitsyna, T. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florinsky, I. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Global digital elevation models for terrain morphology analysis in mountain environments: insights on Copernicus GLO-30 and ALOS AW3D30 for a large Alpine area</title><title>Environmental earth sciences</title><addtitle>Environ Earth Sci</addtitle><description>This study focuses on the quality evaluation of two of the best 1 arc-second public global digital elevation models (DEMs), Copernicus GLO-30 DEM and ALOS AW3D30 DSM, from the perspective of their capability to represent the terrain fine-scale morphology of a complex alpine landscape, located in the Italian Trentino Province. The analysis is performed on an area of 6210 km 2 , considering a reference DEM derived from a high resolution and accurate airborne Lidar survey. The quality assessment goes beyond a conventional approach based on elevation differences statistics, computed on a pixels-by-pixel basis. An ad hoc approach for evaluating the capability to represent fine-scale morphology, including surface roughness, is adopted. Moreover, the quality analysis is performed considering the influence of local morphology and of the different land covers. The findings show that although the two global DEMs have comparable overall quality, their relative performances change according to local landscape characteristics. Copernicus DEM performance is on average better than ALOS in correspondence of urbanized areas as well as in areas without vegetation cover, with gentle slopes and relatively low short-range roughness. Meanwhile, ALOS DEM performance is slightly better than Copernicus in rougher terrain and steeper slopes. In general, both DEMs have poor performances in steep slopes, with a limited capability to describe fine-scale morphology. The adoption of these global DEMs for terrain analysis and modelling of earth surface processes should be performed carefully, considering the impact of different land covers and of local morphology, including surface roughness.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Digital Elevation Models</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth surface</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Environmental Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Mountain environments</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pixels</subject><subject>Plant cover</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Slopes</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Terrain analysis</subject><subject>Terrestrial Pollution</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation cover</subject><issn>1866-6280</issn><issn>1866-6299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UUtOwzAQjRBIVKUXYGWJdcCfxEnYRQUKUqQuALG03GSSunLtYKeVehquitMi2OHN2PM-1syLomuCbwnG2Z0nlPM0xpTFBOc5jbOzaEJyzmNOi-L8957jy2jm_QaHwwgrMJ9EXwttV1KjRnVqCBU07OWgrEFb24D2qLUODeCcVGPL9WurbXdA0kh98MqjY3tnhhEHs1fOmi2Ywd8HxKtuPXgUzOa2B2dUvfNoUS1jhoNBg8pq-YrKD_YQ3uM_EmnpOkCl7pUBJB3Iq-iildrD7KdOo_enx7f5c1wtFy_zsooly_kQZ3Wb4awmTKYpgyLPU7ZaJXUGHBiktIBCJknTpi0LWCYbwE2LV5TiukgYZ8Cm0c3Jt3f2cwd-EBu7c2FIL8LeKCkSyrPAoidW7az3DlrRO7WV7iAIFmMW4pSFCFmIYxZiFLGTyAey6cD9Wf-j-gbaD40u</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Trevisani, Sebastiano</creator><creator>Skrypitsyna, T. N.</creator><creator>Florinsky, I. V.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4964-9196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1273-5912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8436-7798</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>Global digital elevation models for terrain morphology analysis in mountain environments: insights on Copernicus GLO-30 and ALOS AW3D30 for a large Alpine area</title><author>Trevisani, Sebastiano ; Skrypitsyna, T. N. ; Florinsky, I. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-7cf707c13a553e98853bb4c7e6e3e529e9a44df5f39887ade0df0b220c94363e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Digital Elevation Models</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth surface</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Environmental Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Mountain environments</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pixels</topic><topic>Plant cover</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Slopes</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Terrain analysis</topic><topic>Terrestrial Pollution</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation cover</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trevisani, Sebastiano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skrypitsyna, T. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florinsky, I. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental earth sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trevisani, Sebastiano</au><au>Skrypitsyna, T. N.</au><au>Florinsky, I. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global digital elevation models for terrain morphology analysis in mountain environments: insights on Copernicus GLO-30 and ALOS AW3D30 for a large Alpine area</atitle><jtitle>Environmental earth sciences</jtitle><stitle>Environ Earth Sci</stitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>198</spage><pages>198-</pages><artnum>198</artnum><issn>1866-6280</issn><eissn>1866-6299</eissn><abstract>This study focuses on the quality evaluation of two of the best 1 arc-second public global digital elevation models (DEMs), Copernicus GLO-30 DEM and ALOS AW3D30 DSM, from the perspective of their capability to represent the terrain fine-scale morphology of a complex alpine landscape, located in the Italian Trentino Province. The analysis is performed on an area of 6210 km 2 , considering a reference DEM derived from a high resolution and accurate airborne Lidar survey. The quality assessment goes beyond a conventional approach based on elevation differences statistics, computed on a pixels-by-pixel basis. An ad hoc approach for evaluating the capability to represent fine-scale morphology, including surface roughness, is adopted. Moreover, the quality analysis is performed considering the influence of local morphology and of the different land covers. The findings show that although the two global DEMs have comparable overall quality, their relative performances change according to local landscape characteristics. Copernicus DEM performance is on average better than ALOS in correspondence of urbanized areas as well as in areas without vegetation cover, with gentle slopes and relatively low short-range roughness. Meanwhile, ALOS DEM performance is slightly better than Copernicus in rougher terrain and steeper slopes. In general, both DEMs have poor performances in steep slopes, with a limited capability to describe fine-scale morphology. The adoption of these global DEMs for terrain analysis and modelling of earth surface processes should be performed carefully, considering the impact of different land covers and of local morphology, including surface roughness.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12665-023-10882-7</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4964-9196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1273-5912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8436-7798</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1866-6280
ispartof Environmental earth sciences, 2023-05, Vol.82 (9), p.198, Article 198
issn 1866-6280
1866-6299
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2802194267
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Analysis
Biogeosciences
Digital Elevation Models
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earth surface
Elevation
Environmental Science and Engineering
Geochemistry
Geology
Hydrology/Water Resources
Lidar
Morphology
Mountain environments
Original Article
Pixels
Plant cover
Quality assessment
Quality assurance
Quality control
Slopes
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Surface roughness
Terrain analysis
Terrestrial Pollution
Vegetation
Vegetation cover
title Global digital elevation models for terrain morphology analysis in mountain environments: insights on Copernicus GLO-30 and ALOS AW3D30 for a large Alpine area
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A24%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20digital%20elevation%20models%20for%20terrain%20morphology%20analysis%20in%20mountain%20environments:%20insights%20on%20Copernicus%20GLO-30%20and%20ALOS%20AW3D30%20for%20a%20large%20Alpine%20area&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20earth%20sciences&rft.au=Trevisani,%20Sebastiano&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=198&rft.pages=198-&rft.artnum=198&rft.issn=1866-6280&rft.eissn=1866-6299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12665-023-10882-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2802194267%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2802194267&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true