The eruption in Fagradalsfjall (2021, Iceland): how the operational monitoring and the volcanic hazard assessment contributed to its safe access
After more than a year of unrest, a small effusive eruption commenced in Fagradalsfjall, Iceland, on 19 March 2021. The eruption lasted six months. The first six weeks were characterized by multiple fissure openings, and the remainder was dominated by effusive activity from a single crater. During t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2023-04, Vol.116 (3), p.3063-3092 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3092 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 3063 |
container_title | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 116 |
creator | Barsotti, S. Parks, M. M. Pfeffer, M. A. Óladóttir, B. A. Barnie, T. Titos, M. M. Jónsdóttir, K. Pedersen, G. B. M. Hjartardóttir, Á. R. Stefansdóttir, G. Johannsson, T. Arason, Þ. Gudmundsson, M. T. Oddsson, B. Þrastarson, R. H. Ófeigsson, B. G. Vogfjörd, K. Geirsson, H. Hjörvar, T. von Löwis, S. Petersen, G. N. Sigurðsson, E. M. |
description | After more than a year of unrest, a small effusive eruption commenced in Fagradalsfjall, Iceland, on 19 March 2021. The eruption lasted six months. The first six weeks were characterized by multiple fissure openings, and the remainder was dominated by effusive activity from a single crater. During the eruption, lava and low-level gases propagated over the complex terrain: a hyaloclastite massif with mountain peaks up to about 350 m asl with valleys in between. The area is uninhabited, but easily accessible at about 30 km distance from Reykjavík. While the eruption was ongoing, more than 356,000 tourists visited the eruptive site. To maintain low risk access to the area, it was critical to monitor the eruption (including opening of new fissures) in real-time, forecast the transport of gas and lava flow emplacement, and assess the evolving hazards. In addition to data accessibility and interpretation, managing this volcanic crisis was possible thanks to strong collaboration between the scientific institutions and civil protection agencies. The eruption presented an opportunity to tune, test and validate a variety of numerical models for hazard assessment as well as to refine and improve the delivery of information to the general public, communities living near the eruption site and decision makers. The monitoring team worked long hours during both the pre- and syn-eruptive phases for identifying low risk access areas to the eruption site and to provide a regular flow of information. This paper reviews the eruption and its associated hazards. It also provides an overview of the monitoring setup, the adopted numerical tools and communication materials disseminated to the general public regarding current exclusion zones, hazards and possible future eruptive scenarios. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11069-022-05798-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2802189098</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2802189098</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-84ffcd247e2801fe77f457032e14f283970ebce012d168894879bfc047b0f8173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAi4Krk-y2SbxJ8aNQ8KLgLaTZid2y3axJquiv8CebWsGbpznM877DPIQcM7hgAOIyMgZjVQDnBYyEkoXYIQM2EmUBsoJdMgDFWQElPO-TgxiXAIyNuRqQr8cFUgzrPjW-o01Hb81LMLVpo1uatqWnHDg7p1OLrenqsyu68O805YzvMZhNyLR05bsm-dB0LzRDP-s331rTNZYuzKcJNTUxYowr7BK1vkuhma8TZtTTJkUajUNqrM3IIdlz-Toe_c4hebq9eZzcF7OHu-nkelaYUo5TISvnbM0rgVwCcyiEq0YCSo6sclyWSgDOLQLjNRtLqSop1NxZqMQcnGSiHJKTbW8f_OsaY9JLvw75m6hzI2dSgZKZ4lvKBh9jQKf70KxM-NAM9Ma83prX2bz-Ma831eU2FPuNEwx_1f-kvgHlSYcr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2802189098</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The eruption in Fagradalsfjall (2021, Iceland): how the operational monitoring and the volcanic hazard assessment contributed to its safe access</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Barsotti, S. ; Parks, M. M. ; Pfeffer, M. A. ; Óladóttir, B. A. ; Barnie, T. ; Titos, M. M. ; Jónsdóttir, K. ; Pedersen, G. B. M. ; Hjartardóttir, Á. R. ; Stefansdóttir, G. ; Johannsson, T. ; Arason, Þ. ; Gudmundsson, M. T. ; Oddsson, B. ; Þrastarson, R. H. ; Ófeigsson, B. G. ; Vogfjörd, K. ; Geirsson, H. ; Hjörvar, T. ; von Löwis, S. ; Petersen, G. N. ; Sigurðsson, E. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barsotti, S. ; Parks, M. M. ; Pfeffer, M. A. ; Óladóttir, B. A. ; Barnie, T. ; Titos, M. M. ; Jónsdóttir, K. ; Pedersen, G. B. M. ; Hjartardóttir, Á. R. ; Stefansdóttir, G. ; Johannsson, T. ; Arason, Þ. ; Gudmundsson, M. T. ; Oddsson, B. ; Þrastarson, R. H. ; Ófeigsson, B. G. ; Vogfjörd, K. ; Geirsson, H. ; Hjörvar, T. ; von Löwis, S. ; Petersen, G. N. ; Sigurðsson, E. M.</creatorcontrib><description>After more than a year of unrest, a small effusive eruption commenced in Fagradalsfjall, Iceland, on 19 March 2021. The eruption lasted six months. The first six weeks were characterized by multiple fissure openings, and the remainder was dominated by effusive activity from a single crater. During the eruption, lava and low-level gases propagated over the complex terrain: a hyaloclastite massif with mountain peaks up to about 350 m asl with valleys in between. The area is uninhabited, but easily accessible at about 30 km distance from Reykjavík. While the eruption was ongoing, more than 356,000 tourists visited the eruptive site. To maintain low risk access to the area, it was critical to monitor the eruption (including opening of new fissures) in real-time, forecast the transport of gas and lava flow emplacement, and assess the evolving hazards. In addition to data accessibility and interpretation, managing this volcanic crisis was possible thanks to strong collaboration between the scientific institutions and civil protection agencies. The eruption presented an opportunity to tune, test and validate a variety of numerical models for hazard assessment as well as to refine and improve the delivery of information to the general public, communities living near the eruption site and decision makers. The monitoring team worked long hours during both the pre- and syn-eruptive phases for identifying low risk access areas to the eruption site and to provide a regular flow of information. This paper reviews the eruption and its associated hazards. It also provides an overview of the monitoring setup, the adopted numerical tools and communication materials disseminated to the general public regarding current exclusion zones, hazards and possible future eruptive scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05798-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Accessibility ; Aviation ; Civil Engineering ; Communication ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquakes ; Environmental Management ; Eruptions ; Exclusion zones ; Fault lines ; Gases ; Geological hazards ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Hazard assessment ; Hydrogeology ; Information flow ; Lava ; Lava flows ; Massifs ; Mathematical models ; Monitoring ; Mountains ; Natural Hazards ; Numerical models ; Original Paper ; Reviews ; Volcanic eruptions ; Volcanoes</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2023-04, Vol.116 (3), p.3063-3092</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-84ffcd247e2801fe77f457032e14f283970ebce012d168894879bfc047b0f8173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-84ffcd247e2801fe77f457032e14f283970ebce012d168894879bfc047b0f8173</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0069-9144 ; 0000-0002-1862-8512 ; 0000-0001-8615-7364 ; 0000-0003-0589-929X ; 0000-0001-5325-3368 ; 0000-0001-8683-9058 ; 0000-0002-6037-3330 ; 0000-0003-2658-1838 ; 0000-0002-9397-0326 ; 0000-0001-5750-0872 ; 0000-0002-8279-2341 ; 0000-0001-6645-0950 ; 0000-0003-0214-7324 ; 0000-0002-1626-0822 ; 0000-0002-3520-6709 ; 0000-0003-2056-1588 ; 0000-0002-1793-5633 ; 0000-0002-1689-1739</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11069-022-05798-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-022-05798-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barsotti, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeffer, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Óladóttir, B. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnie, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titos, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jónsdóttir, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, G. B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hjartardóttir, Á. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefansdóttir, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannsson, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arason, Þ.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudmundsson, M. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oddsson, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Þrastarson, R. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ófeigsson, B. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogfjörd, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geirsson, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hjörvar, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Löwis, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, G. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigurðsson, E. M.</creatorcontrib><title>The eruption in Fagradalsfjall (2021, Iceland): how the operational monitoring and the volcanic hazard assessment contributed to its safe access</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>After more than a year of unrest, a small effusive eruption commenced in Fagradalsfjall, Iceland, on 19 March 2021. The eruption lasted six months. The first six weeks were characterized by multiple fissure openings, and the remainder was dominated by effusive activity from a single crater. During the eruption, lava and low-level gases propagated over the complex terrain: a hyaloclastite massif with mountain peaks up to about 350 m asl with valleys in between. The area is uninhabited, but easily accessible at about 30 km distance from Reykjavík. While the eruption was ongoing, more than 356,000 tourists visited the eruptive site. To maintain low risk access to the area, it was critical to monitor the eruption (including opening of new fissures) in real-time, forecast the transport of gas and lava flow emplacement, and assess the evolving hazards. In addition to data accessibility and interpretation, managing this volcanic crisis was possible thanks to strong collaboration between the scientific institutions and civil protection agencies. The eruption presented an opportunity to tune, test and validate a variety of numerical models for hazard assessment as well as to refine and improve the delivery of information to the general public, communities living near the eruption site and decision makers. The monitoring team worked long hours during both the pre- and syn-eruptive phases for identifying low risk access areas to the eruption site and to provide a regular flow of information. This paper reviews the eruption and its associated hazards. It also provides an overview of the monitoring setup, the adopted numerical tools and communication materials disseminated to the general public regarding current exclusion zones, hazards and possible future eruptive scenarios.</description><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Eruptions</subject><subject>Exclusion zones</subject><subject>Fault lines</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Information flow</subject><subject>Lava</subject><subject>Lava flows</subject><subject>Massifs</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Volcanic eruptions</subject><subject>Volcanoes</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAi4Krk-y2SbxJ8aNQ8KLgLaTZid2y3axJquiv8CebWsGbpznM877DPIQcM7hgAOIyMgZjVQDnBYyEkoXYIQM2EmUBsoJdMgDFWQElPO-TgxiXAIyNuRqQr8cFUgzrPjW-o01Hb81LMLVpo1uatqWnHDg7p1OLrenqsyu68O805YzvMZhNyLR05bsm-dB0LzRDP-s331rTNZYuzKcJNTUxYowr7BK1vkuhma8TZtTTJkUajUNqrM3IIdlz-Toe_c4hebq9eZzcF7OHu-nkelaYUo5TISvnbM0rgVwCcyiEq0YCSo6sclyWSgDOLQLjNRtLqSop1NxZqMQcnGSiHJKTbW8f_OsaY9JLvw75m6hzI2dSgZKZ4lvKBh9jQKf70KxM-NAM9Ma83prX2bz-Ma831eU2FPuNEwx_1f-kvgHlSYcr</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Barsotti, S.</creator><creator>Parks, M. M.</creator><creator>Pfeffer, M. A.</creator><creator>Óladóttir, B. A.</creator><creator>Barnie, T.</creator><creator>Titos, M. M.</creator><creator>Jónsdóttir, K.</creator><creator>Pedersen, G. B. M.</creator><creator>Hjartardóttir, Á. R.</creator><creator>Stefansdóttir, G.</creator><creator>Johannsson, T.</creator><creator>Arason, Þ.</creator><creator>Gudmundsson, M. T.</creator><creator>Oddsson, B.</creator><creator>Þrastarson, R. H.</creator><creator>Ófeigsson, B. G.</creator><creator>Vogfjörd, K.</creator><creator>Geirsson, H.</creator><creator>Hjörvar, T.</creator><creator>von Löwis, S.</creator><creator>Petersen, G. N.</creator><creator>Sigurðsson, E. M.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0069-9144</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1862-8512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8615-7364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-929X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-3368</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8683-9058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6037-3330</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2658-1838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9397-0326</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5750-0872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8279-2341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6645-0950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0214-7324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1626-0822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3520-6709</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2056-1588</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1793-5633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1689-1739</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>The eruption in Fagradalsfjall (2021, Iceland): how the operational monitoring and the volcanic hazard assessment contributed to its safe access</title><author>Barsotti, S. ; Parks, M. M. ; Pfeffer, M. A. ; Óladóttir, B. A. ; Barnie, T. ; Titos, M. M. ; Jónsdóttir, K. ; Pedersen, G. B. M. ; Hjartardóttir, Á. R. ; Stefansdóttir, G. ; Johannsson, T. ; Arason, Þ. ; Gudmundsson, M. T. ; Oddsson, B. ; Þrastarson, R. H. ; Ófeigsson, B. G. ; Vogfjörd, K. ; Geirsson, H. ; Hjörvar, T. ; von Löwis, S. ; Petersen, G. N. ; Sigurðsson, E. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-84ffcd247e2801fe77f457032e14f283970ebce012d168894879bfc047b0f8173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Eruptions</topic><topic>Exclusion zones</topic><topic>Fault lines</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Information flow</topic><topic>Lava</topic><topic>Lava flows</topic><topic>Massifs</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Volcanic eruptions</topic><topic>Volcanoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barsotti, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeffer, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Óladóttir, B. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnie, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titos, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jónsdóttir, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, G. B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hjartardóttir, Á. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefansdóttir, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannsson, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arason, Þ.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudmundsson, M. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oddsson, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Þrastarson, R. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ófeigsson, B. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogfjörd, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geirsson, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hjörvar, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Löwis, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, G. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigurðsson, E. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barsotti, S.</au><au>Parks, M. M.</au><au>Pfeffer, M. A.</au><au>Óladóttir, B. A.</au><au>Barnie, T.</au><au>Titos, M. M.</au><au>Jónsdóttir, K.</au><au>Pedersen, G. B. M.</au><au>Hjartardóttir, Á. R.</au><au>Stefansdóttir, G.</au><au>Johannsson, T.</au><au>Arason, Þ.</au><au>Gudmundsson, M. T.</au><au>Oddsson, B.</au><au>Þrastarson, R. H.</au><au>Ófeigsson, B. G.</au><au>Vogfjörd, K.</au><au>Geirsson, H.</au><au>Hjörvar, T.</au><au>von Löwis, S.</au><au>Petersen, G. N.</au><au>Sigurðsson, E. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The eruption in Fagradalsfjall (2021, Iceland): how the operational monitoring and the volcanic hazard assessment contributed to its safe access</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>3063</spage><epage>3092</epage><pages>3063-3092</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>After more than a year of unrest, a small effusive eruption commenced in Fagradalsfjall, Iceland, on 19 March 2021. The eruption lasted six months. The first six weeks were characterized by multiple fissure openings, and the remainder was dominated by effusive activity from a single crater. During the eruption, lava and low-level gases propagated over the complex terrain: a hyaloclastite massif with mountain peaks up to about 350 m asl with valleys in between. The area is uninhabited, but easily accessible at about 30 km distance from Reykjavík. While the eruption was ongoing, more than 356,000 tourists visited the eruptive site. To maintain low risk access to the area, it was critical to monitor the eruption (including opening of new fissures) in real-time, forecast the transport of gas and lava flow emplacement, and assess the evolving hazards. In addition to data accessibility and interpretation, managing this volcanic crisis was possible thanks to strong collaboration between the scientific institutions and civil protection agencies. The eruption presented an opportunity to tune, test and validate a variety of numerical models for hazard assessment as well as to refine and improve the delivery of information to the general public, communities living near the eruption site and decision makers. The monitoring team worked long hours during both the pre- and syn-eruptive phases for identifying low risk access areas to the eruption site and to provide a regular flow of information. This paper reviews the eruption and its associated hazards. It also provides an overview of the monitoring setup, the adopted numerical tools and communication materials disseminated to the general public regarding current exclusion zones, hazards and possible future eruptive scenarios.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-022-05798-7</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0069-9144</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1862-8512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8615-7364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-929X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-3368</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8683-9058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6037-3330</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2658-1838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9397-0326</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5750-0872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8279-2341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6645-0950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0214-7324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1626-0822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3520-6709</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2056-1588</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1793-5633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1689-1739</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-030X |
ispartof | Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2023-04, Vol.116 (3), p.3063-3092 |
issn | 0921-030X 1573-0840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2802189098 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Accessibility Aviation Civil Engineering Communication Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquakes Environmental Management Eruptions Exclusion zones Fault lines Gases Geological hazards Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Hazard assessment Hydrogeology Information flow Lava Lava flows Massifs Mathematical models Monitoring Mountains Natural Hazards Numerical models Original Paper Reviews Volcanic eruptions Volcanoes |
title | The eruption in Fagradalsfjall (2021, Iceland): how the operational monitoring and the volcanic hazard assessment contributed to its safe access |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A57%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20eruption%20in%20Fagradalsfjall%20(2021,%20Iceland):%20how%20the%20operational%20monitoring%20and%20the%20volcanic%20hazard%20assessment%20contributed%20to%20its%20safe%20access&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Barsotti,%20S.&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=3063&rft.epage=3092&rft.pages=3063-3092&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-022-05798-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2802189098%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2802189098&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |