Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stresses in proximity girth welds

International fabrication codes and standards provide minimum distance criteria for proximity welds, although rigorous justification is lacking. These distances are either based on practical experience or mutual agreement and are often left to the engineering judgment of contractors, inspection engi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 2023-05, Vol.126 (3-4), p.1247-1259
Hauptverfasser: Bhardwaj, Sachin, Aas, Sigmund Kyrre, Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1259
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 1247
container_title International journal of advanced manufacturing technology
container_volume 126
creator Bhardwaj, Sachin
Aas, Sigmund Kyrre
Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima
description International fabrication codes and standards provide minimum distance criteria for proximity welds, although rigorous justification is lacking. These distances are either based on practical experience or mutual agreement and are often left to the engineering judgment of contractors, inspection engineers, etc., especially in cases of repair welds fabricated in proximity to existing welds. Previous studies have shown high tensile residual stresses and altered mechanical and microstructural properties between proximity welds. This article focuses on numerical and experimental quantification of residual stresses in the proximity region by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and finite element method (FEM) thermo-mechanical models. Specimens were machine welded, then repair welded at distances of 5–15 mm. A fair agreement in results was achieved between FEM and XRD. The most detrimental effect was observed at the weld root toe for the repair weld at 5 mm proximity, likely due to the high constraint and multiaxial stress state. These findings enable practitioners to propose technical justification and corrective actions while specifying minimum distance criteria for proximity welds.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00170-023-11162-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2802170020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2802170020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a0b62c61ff1fc781545f14d71f7bb62bae4e9bc00333125122a32aa6ef0929613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssTbM2ImTLlFVHhISG2BrOYldXLVJsRNo_54pQWLHyo85cz0-jF0iXCNAcZMAsAABUglE1FLgEZtgppRQgPkxm4DUpVCFLk_ZWUorwjXqcsLeFruti2Hj2t6uuW0b3g4buqjpFNpPl_qwtH3oWt55Hl0KzUCV1NM2uUQI38ZuFzah3_NliP07_3LrJp2zE2_XyV38rlP2erd4mT-Ip-f7x_ntk6iVVr2wUGlZa_QefV2UmGe5x6wp0BcVVSrrMjeragClFMocpbRKWqudh5mcaVRTdjXm0hQfA01rVt0QW3rSyBIkOQEJRMmRqmOXUnTebOnLNu4Ngjn4M6M_Q_7Mjz9ziFZjUyK4Xbr4F_1P1zc5YXOp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2802170020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stresses in proximity girth welds</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bhardwaj, Sachin ; Aas, Sigmund Kyrre ; Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhardwaj, Sachin ; Aas, Sigmund Kyrre ; Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima</creatorcontrib><description>International fabrication codes and standards provide minimum distance criteria for proximity welds, although rigorous justification is lacking. These distances are either based on practical experience or mutual agreement and are often left to the engineering judgment of contractors, inspection engineers, etc., especially in cases of repair welds fabricated in proximity to existing welds. Previous studies have shown high tensile residual stresses and altered mechanical and microstructural properties between proximity welds. This article focuses on numerical and experimental quantification of residual stresses in the proximity region by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and finite element method (FEM) thermo-mechanical models. Specimens were machine welded, then repair welded at distances of 5–15 mm. A fair agreement in results was achieved between FEM and XRD. The most detrimental effect was observed at the weld root toe for the repair weld at 5 mm proximity, likely due to the high constraint and multiaxial stress state. These findings enable practitioners to propose technical justification and corrective actions while specifying minimum distance criteria for proximity welds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00170-023-11162-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Axial stress ; CAE) and Design ; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD ; Criteria ; Engineering ; Finite element method ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; Inspection ; Mechanical Engineering ; Media Management ; Original Article ; Proximity ; Repair ; Residual stress ; X-ray diffraction</subject><ispartof>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2023-05, Vol.126 (3-4), p.1247-1259</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a0b62c61ff1fc781545f14d71f7bb62bae4e9bc00333125122a32aa6ef0929613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a0b62c61ff1fc781545f14d71f7bb62bae4e9bc00333125122a32aa6ef0929613</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2222-8199</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00170-023-11162-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00170-023-11162-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhardwaj, Sachin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aas, Sigmund Kyrre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stresses in proximity girth welds</title><title>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</title><addtitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</addtitle><description>International fabrication codes and standards provide minimum distance criteria for proximity welds, although rigorous justification is lacking. These distances are either based on practical experience or mutual agreement and are often left to the engineering judgment of contractors, inspection engineers, etc., especially in cases of repair welds fabricated in proximity to existing welds. Previous studies have shown high tensile residual stresses and altered mechanical and microstructural properties between proximity welds. This article focuses on numerical and experimental quantification of residual stresses in the proximity region by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and finite element method (FEM) thermo-mechanical models. Specimens were machine welded, then repair welded at distances of 5–15 mm. A fair agreement in results was achieved between FEM and XRD. The most detrimental effect was observed at the weld root toe for the repair weld at 5 mm proximity, likely due to the high constraint and multiaxial stress state. These findings enable practitioners to propose technical justification and corrective actions while specifying minimum distance criteria for proximity welds.</description><subject>Axial stress</subject><subject>CAE) and Design</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Media Management</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Proximity</subject><subject>Repair</subject><subject>Residual stress</subject><subject>X-ray diffraction</subject><issn>0268-3768</issn><issn>1433-3015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssTbM2ImTLlFVHhISG2BrOYldXLVJsRNo_54pQWLHyo85cz0-jF0iXCNAcZMAsAABUglE1FLgEZtgppRQgPkxm4DUpVCFLk_ZWUorwjXqcsLeFruti2Hj2t6uuW0b3g4buqjpFNpPl_qwtH3oWt55Hl0KzUCV1NM2uUQI38ZuFzah3_NliP07_3LrJp2zE2_XyV38rlP2erd4mT-Ip-f7x_ntk6iVVr2wUGlZa_QefV2UmGe5x6wp0BcVVSrrMjeragClFMocpbRKWqudh5mcaVRTdjXm0hQfA01rVt0QW3rSyBIkOQEJRMmRqmOXUnTebOnLNu4Ngjn4M6M_Q_7Mjz9ziFZjUyK4Xbr4F_1P1zc5YXOp</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Bhardwaj, Sachin</creator><creator>Aas, Sigmund Kyrre</creator><creator>Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2222-8199</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stresses in proximity girth welds</title><author>Bhardwaj, Sachin ; Aas, Sigmund Kyrre ; Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a0b62c61ff1fc781545f14d71f7bb62bae4e9bc00333125122a32aa6ef0929613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Axial stress</topic><topic>CAE) and Design</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Media Management</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Proximity</topic><topic>Repair</topic><topic>Residual stress</topic><topic>X-ray diffraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhardwaj, Sachin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aas, Sigmund Kyrre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhardwaj, Sachin</au><au>Aas, Sigmund Kyrre</au><au>Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stresses in proximity girth welds</atitle><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle><stitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</stitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>1247</spage><epage>1259</epage><pages>1247-1259</pages><issn>0268-3768</issn><eissn>1433-3015</eissn><abstract>International fabrication codes and standards provide minimum distance criteria for proximity welds, although rigorous justification is lacking. These distances are either based on practical experience or mutual agreement and are often left to the engineering judgment of contractors, inspection engineers, etc., especially in cases of repair welds fabricated in proximity to existing welds. Previous studies have shown high tensile residual stresses and altered mechanical and microstructural properties between proximity welds. This article focuses on numerical and experimental quantification of residual stresses in the proximity region by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and finite element method (FEM) thermo-mechanical models. Specimens were machine welded, then repair welded at distances of 5–15 mm. A fair agreement in results was achieved between FEM and XRD. The most detrimental effect was observed at the weld root toe for the repair weld at 5 mm proximity, likely due to the high constraint and multiaxial stress state. These findings enable practitioners to propose technical justification and corrective actions while specifying minimum distance criteria for proximity welds.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00170-023-11162-1</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2222-8199</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-3768
ispartof International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2023-05, Vol.126 (3-4), p.1247-1259
issn 0268-3768
1433-3015
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2802170020
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Axial stress
CAE) and Design
Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD
Criteria
Engineering
Finite element method
Industrial and Production Engineering
Inspection
Mechanical Engineering
Media Management
Original Article
Proximity
Repair
Residual stress
X-ray diffraction
title Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stresses in proximity girth welds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T01%3A08%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20and%20numerical%20investigation%20of%20residual%20stresses%20in%20proximity%20girth%20welds&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20technology&rft.au=Bhardwaj,%20Sachin&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=1247&rft.epage=1259&rft.pages=1247-1259&rft.issn=0268-3768&rft.eissn=1433-3015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00170-023-11162-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2802170020%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2802170020&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true