Lessons From Using Design Thinking to Develop the 2021 AACP Teachers' Seminar
Objective. To describe and evaluate how a design thinking approach aided the creation of the 2021 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Teachers' Seminar. Methods. The design thinking framework (ie, inspiration, ideation, and implementation) was used to structure the seminar devel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of pharmaceutical education 2023-03, Vol.87 (2), p.247-255 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 255 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 247 |
container_title | American journal of pharmaceutical education |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Wolcott, Michael D Castleberry, Ashley N Johnson, Chris Pick, Amy M Persky, Adam M |
description | Objective. To describe and evaluate how a design thinking approach aided the creation of the 2021 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Teachers' Seminar. Methods. The design thinking framework (ie, inspiration, ideation, and implementation) was used to structure the seminar development process from July 2020 to July 2021. Nine committee members engaged in a persona activity (ie, inspiration), a brainstorming activity (ie, ideation), and a prototyping activity (ie, implementation) to create a user-centered learning experience. Twenty-five small group facilitators were then recruited to create and deliver breakout session content. After the seminar, the team was invited to debrief their experience in a focus group and an electronic survey to evaluate the perceived impact of using design thinking in the planning process. Results. Twenty-one (62%) of the 34 committee members and small group facilitators attended the focus group, and 28 (82%) completed the electronic survey. Most agreed that design thinking was a useful approach to support the Teachers' Seminar, and they were generally positive about the experience. There was a significant increase in self-reported creative self-efficacy for coming up with novel ideas, ability to solve problems, and helping expand others' ideas. Team members identified positive attributes about the seminar and planning process as well as areas for improvement. Team members also acknowledged challenges and potential solutions for professional organizations and program developers to consider when creating user-centered experiences. Conclusion. Design thinking can be a useful framework for seminar planning and implementation to create engaging, meaningful, and valuable educator development experiences. Keywords: design thinking, faculty development, user-centered design, learning experience design, teachers' seminar |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2802085852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A743247067</galeid><sourcerecordid>A743247067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g180t-a5bb45a5238ec2650df7920db031113e239b4194d4eeac91608b1578dba007b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj09Lw0AQxRdRsFa_w4IHT5HZf8nmGKq1QkXB9hx2k0m6td2t2dTP74oiHmQOwzx-8x7vhEyYUiLLZV6ckgkA8KyUqjwnFzFuAZhUkk_I0xJjDD7S-RD2dB2d7-kdRtd7uto4__Z1jyFJH7gLBzpukHLgjFbV7IWu0DQbHOINfcW982a4JGed2UW8-tlTsp7fr2aLbPn88DirllnPNIyZUdZKZRQXGhueK2i7ouTQWhCMMYFclFayUrYSU0LJctCWqUK31gAUVokpuf72PQzh_YhxrLfhOPgUWXMNHLTSyfyX6s0Oa-e7MA6m2bvY1FUhBZcF5EWibv-h0rSpUxM8di7pfx4-AawdY1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2802085852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lessons From Using Design Thinking to Develop the 2021 AACP Teachers' Seminar</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wolcott, Michael D ; Castleberry, Ashley N ; Johnson, Chris ; Pick, Amy M ; Persky, Adam M</creator><creatorcontrib>Wolcott, Michael D ; Castleberry, Ashley N ; Johnson, Chris ; Pick, Amy M ; Persky, Adam M</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To describe and evaluate how a design thinking approach aided the creation of the 2021 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Teachers' Seminar. Methods. The design thinking framework (ie, inspiration, ideation, and implementation) was used to structure the seminar development process from July 2020 to July 2021. Nine committee members engaged in a persona activity (ie, inspiration), a brainstorming activity (ie, ideation), and a prototyping activity (ie, implementation) to create a user-centered learning experience. Twenty-five small group facilitators were then recruited to create and deliver breakout session content. After the seminar, the team was invited to debrief their experience in a focus group and an electronic survey to evaluate the perceived impact of using design thinking in the planning process. Results. Twenty-one (62%) of the 34 committee members and small group facilitators attended the focus group, and 28 (82%) completed the electronic survey. Most agreed that design thinking was a useful approach to support the Teachers' Seminar, and they were generally positive about the experience. There was a significant increase in self-reported creative self-efficacy for coming up with novel ideas, ability to solve problems, and helping expand others' ideas. Team members identified positive attributes about the seminar and planning process as well as areas for improvement. Team members also acknowledged challenges and potential solutions for professional organizations and program developers to consider when creating user-centered experiences. Conclusion. Design thinking can be a useful framework for seminar planning and implementation to create engaging, meaningful, and valuable educator development experiences. Keywords: design thinking, faculty development, user-centered design, learning experience design, teachers' seminar</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-6467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria: American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy</publisher><subject>Careers ; Committees ; Continuing education ; Design ; Design thinking ; Distance learning ; Education ; Educational aspects ; Educational Practices ; Faculty Development ; Focus groups ; Medical education ; Pharmaceutical sciences ; Pharmacists ; Pharmacy ; Planning ; Professions ; Seminars ; Teachers' workshops ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2023-03, Vol.87 (2), p.247-255</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy</rights><rights>Copyright American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2802085852?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,64364,64368,72218</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wolcott, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castleberry, Ashley N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pick, Amy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persky, Adam M</creatorcontrib><title>Lessons From Using Design Thinking to Develop the 2021 AACP Teachers' Seminar</title><title>American journal of pharmaceutical education</title><description>Objective. To describe and evaluate how a design thinking approach aided the creation of the 2021 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Teachers' Seminar. Methods. The design thinking framework (ie, inspiration, ideation, and implementation) was used to structure the seminar development process from July 2020 to July 2021. Nine committee members engaged in a persona activity (ie, inspiration), a brainstorming activity (ie, ideation), and a prototyping activity (ie, implementation) to create a user-centered learning experience. Twenty-five small group facilitators were then recruited to create and deliver breakout session content. After the seminar, the team was invited to debrief their experience in a focus group and an electronic survey to evaluate the perceived impact of using design thinking in the planning process. Results. Twenty-one (62%) of the 34 committee members and small group facilitators attended the focus group, and 28 (82%) completed the electronic survey. Most agreed that design thinking was a useful approach to support the Teachers' Seminar, and they were generally positive about the experience. There was a significant increase in self-reported creative self-efficacy for coming up with novel ideas, ability to solve problems, and helping expand others' ideas. Team members identified positive attributes about the seminar and planning process as well as areas for improvement. Team members also acknowledged challenges and potential solutions for professional organizations and program developers to consider when creating user-centered experiences. Conclusion. Design thinking can be a useful framework for seminar planning and implementation to create engaging, meaningful, and valuable educator development experiences. Keywords: design thinking, faculty development, user-centered design, learning experience design, teachers' seminar</description><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Continuing education</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design thinking</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational aspects</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Professions</subject><subject>Seminars</subject><subject>Teachers' workshops</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>0002-9459</issn><issn>1553-6467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptj09Lw0AQxRdRsFa_w4IHT5HZf8nmGKq1QkXB9hx2k0m6td2t2dTP74oiHmQOwzx-8x7vhEyYUiLLZV6ckgkA8KyUqjwnFzFuAZhUkk_I0xJjDD7S-RD2dB2d7-kdRtd7uto4__Z1jyFJH7gLBzpukHLgjFbV7IWu0DQbHOINfcW982a4JGed2UW8-tlTsp7fr2aLbPn88DirllnPNIyZUdZKZRQXGhueK2i7ouTQWhCMMYFclFayUrYSU0LJctCWqUK31gAUVokpuf72PQzh_YhxrLfhOPgUWXMNHLTSyfyX6s0Oa-e7MA6m2bvY1FUhBZcF5EWibv-h0rSpUxM8di7pfx4-AawdY1Q</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Wolcott, Michael D</creator><creator>Castleberry, Ashley N</creator><creator>Johnson, Chris</creator><creator>Pick, Amy M</creator><creator>Persky, Adam M</creator><general>American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Lessons From Using Design Thinking to Develop the 2021 AACP Teachers' Seminar</title><author>Wolcott, Michael D ; Castleberry, Ashley N ; Johnson, Chris ; Pick, Amy M ; Persky, Adam M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g180t-a5bb45a5238ec2650df7920db031113e239b4194d4eeac91608b1578dba007b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Continuing education</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design thinking</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational aspects</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Professions</topic><topic>Seminars</topic><topic>Teachers' workshops</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wolcott, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castleberry, Ashley N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pick, Amy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persky, Adam M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>American journal of pharmaceutical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wolcott, Michael D</au><au>Castleberry, Ashley N</au><au>Johnson, Chris</au><au>Pick, Amy M</au><au>Persky, Adam M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lessons From Using Design Thinking to Develop the 2021 AACP Teachers' Seminar</atitle><jtitle>American journal of pharmaceutical education</jtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>255</epage><pages>247-255</pages><issn>0002-9459</issn><eissn>1553-6467</eissn><abstract>Objective. To describe and evaluate how a design thinking approach aided the creation of the 2021 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Teachers' Seminar. Methods. The design thinking framework (ie, inspiration, ideation, and implementation) was used to structure the seminar development process from July 2020 to July 2021. Nine committee members engaged in a persona activity (ie, inspiration), a brainstorming activity (ie, ideation), and a prototyping activity (ie, implementation) to create a user-centered learning experience. Twenty-five small group facilitators were then recruited to create and deliver breakout session content. After the seminar, the team was invited to debrief their experience in a focus group and an electronic survey to evaluate the perceived impact of using design thinking in the planning process. Results. Twenty-one (62%) of the 34 committee members and small group facilitators attended the focus group, and 28 (82%) completed the electronic survey. Most agreed that design thinking was a useful approach to support the Teachers' Seminar, and they were generally positive about the experience. There was a significant increase in self-reported creative self-efficacy for coming up with novel ideas, ability to solve problems, and helping expand others' ideas. Team members identified positive attributes about the seminar and planning process as well as areas for improvement. Team members also acknowledged challenges and potential solutions for professional organizations and program developers to consider when creating user-centered experiences. Conclusion. Design thinking can be a useful framework for seminar planning and implementation to create engaging, meaningful, and valuable educator development experiences. Keywords: design thinking, faculty development, user-centered design, learning experience design, teachers' seminar</abstract><cop>Alexandria</cop><pub>American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy</pub><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9459 |
ispartof | American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2023-03, Vol.87 (2), p.247-255 |
issn | 0002-9459 1553-6467 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2802085852 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Careers Committees Continuing education Design Design thinking Distance learning Education Educational aspects Educational Practices Faculty Development Focus groups Medical education Pharmaceutical sciences Pharmacists Pharmacy Planning Professions Seminars Teachers' workshops Teaching Methods |
title | Lessons From Using Design Thinking to Develop the 2021 AACP Teachers' Seminar |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A22%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons%20From%20Using%20Design%20Thinking%20to%20Develop%20the%202021%20AACP%20Teachers'%20Seminar&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20pharmaceutical%20education&rft.au=Wolcott,%20Michael%20D&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=255&rft.pages=247-255&rft.issn=0002-9459&rft.eissn=1553-6467&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA743247067%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2802085852&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A743247067&rfr_iscdi=true |