Cats, foxes and fire: quantitative review reveals that invasive predator activity is most likely to increase shortly after fire
Background Predators and fire shape ecosystems across the globe and these two forces can interact to impact prey populations. This issue is particularly pertinent in Australia where there is considerable scientific and public interest in the post-fire impacts of two invasive predators—the feral cat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fire ecology 2023-04, Vol.19 (1), p.22, Article 22 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 22 |
container_title | Fire ecology |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Doherty, Tim S. Watchorn, Darcy J. Miritis, Vivianna Pestell, Angela J. L. Geary, William L. |
description | Background
Predators and fire shape ecosystems across the globe and these two forces can interact to impact prey populations. This issue is particularly pertinent in Australia where there is considerable scientific and public interest in the post-fire impacts of two invasive predators—the feral cat and red fox. It remains unclear, though, whether increased cat and fox activity in response to fire is a general phenomenon, or whether the responses are highly context-specific and not generalisable.
Results
We reviewed and analysed existing literature and found that a range of positive (e.g., increased activity in burnt areas), negative (decreased activity), and neutral responses have been recorded across different studies and locations. Mixed effects modelling revealed that positive responses to fire were more likely when areas were burnt more recently (shorter time since fire). The mean likelihood of increased activity by cats decreased from 41% at 0 months post-fire to 10% at 100 months post-fire, whereas the mean probability for foxes decreased from 53 to 10%. This suggests that there may be a critical time period immediately post-fire when prey are most vulnerable to elevated impacts of predators, and within which management interventions are likely to be most impactful.
Conclusions
Many of our findings can be identified as potential cases of either mechanistic or apparent context dependency (variation in recorded patterns due to observational and ecological factors). This provides a pathway for the design of future studies that will enhance our understanding of predator responses to fire, both in Australia and globally. Conservation policy and management will benefit from additional research spanning a greater range of ecosystems and fire events, along with a more comprehensive and nuanced interpretation of existing evidence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s42408-023-00183-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2800433578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2800433578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-359367b42cb384eb566c2652b80242c94b6100f55ba20660822d804f2f3022833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWGq_gKeAV1eTTDab9SbFf1DwoueQ3SY2td20SVrtya9u2hX05FxmmPm9N_AQOqfkilIpriNnnMiCMCgIoRIKcYQGtAYo6opXx3_mUzSKcU5yAdCqkgP0NdYpXmLrP03Eupti64K5weuN7pJLOrmtwcFsnfnYN6MXEaeZTth1Wx33x1UwU518wLrNsEs77CJe-pjwwr2bxQ4nn-E2GB0NjjMfUt5pm0w4vDpDJzabmtFPH6LX-7uX8WMxeX54Gt9OihYEpALKGkTVcNY2ILlpSiFaJkrWSMLysuaNoITYsmw0I0IQydhUEm6ZBcKYBBiii953Ffx6Y2JSc78JXX6pmCSEA5SVzBTrqTb4GIOxahXcUoedokTts1Z91ipnrQ5ZK5FF0Itihrs3E36t_1F9AxSkge4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2800433578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cats, foxes and fire: quantitative review reveals that invasive predator activity is most likely to increase shortly after fire</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Doherty, Tim S. ; Watchorn, Darcy J. ; Miritis, Vivianna ; Pestell, Angela J. L. ; Geary, William L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Tim S. ; Watchorn, Darcy J. ; Miritis, Vivianna ; Pestell, Angela J. L. ; Geary, William L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Predators and fire shape ecosystems across the globe and these two forces can interact to impact prey populations. This issue is particularly pertinent in Australia where there is considerable scientific and public interest in the post-fire impacts of two invasive predators—the feral cat and red fox. It remains unclear, though, whether increased cat and fox activity in response to fire is a general phenomenon, or whether the responses are highly context-specific and not generalisable.
Results
We reviewed and analysed existing literature and found that a range of positive (e.g., increased activity in burnt areas), negative (decreased activity), and neutral responses have been recorded across different studies and locations. Mixed effects modelling revealed that positive responses to fire were more likely when areas were burnt more recently (shorter time since fire). The mean likelihood of increased activity by cats decreased from 41% at 0 months post-fire to 10% at 100 months post-fire, whereas the mean probability for foxes decreased from 53 to 10%. This suggests that there may be a critical time period immediately post-fire when prey are most vulnerable to elevated impacts of predators, and within which management interventions are likely to be most impactful.
Conclusions
Many of our findings can be identified as potential cases of either mechanistic or apparent context dependency (variation in recorded patterns due to observational and ecological factors). This provides a pathway for the design of future studies that will enhance our understanding of predator responses to fire, both in Australia and globally. Conservation policy and management will benefit from additional research spanning a greater range of ecosystems and fire events, along with a more comprehensive and nuanced interpretation of existing evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1933-9747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1933-9747</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s42408-023-00183-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cats ; Context ; Ecology ; Environmental policy ; Forestry ; Foxes ; Life Sciences ; Original Research ; Predators ; Prey ; Public concern ; Strategic management</subject><ispartof>Fire ecology, 2023-04, Vol.19 (1), p.22, Article 22</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-359367b42cb384eb566c2652b80242c94b6100f55ba20660822d804f2f3022833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-359367b42cb384eb566c2652b80242c94b6100f55ba20660822d804f2f3022833</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7745-0251</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s42408-023-00183-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-023-00183-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902,41096,41464,42165,42533,51294,51551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Tim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watchorn, Darcy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miritis, Vivianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pestell, Angela J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geary, William L.</creatorcontrib><title>Cats, foxes and fire: quantitative review reveals that invasive predator activity is most likely to increase shortly after fire</title><title>Fire ecology</title><addtitle>fire ecol</addtitle><description>Background
Predators and fire shape ecosystems across the globe and these two forces can interact to impact prey populations. This issue is particularly pertinent in Australia where there is considerable scientific and public interest in the post-fire impacts of two invasive predators—the feral cat and red fox. It remains unclear, though, whether increased cat and fox activity in response to fire is a general phenomenon, or whether the responses are highly context-specific and not generalisable.
Results
We reviewed and analysed existing literature and found that a range of positive (e.g., increased activity in burnt areas), negative (decreased activity), and neutral responses have been recorded across different studies and locations. Mixed effects modelling revealed that positive responses to fire were more likely when areas were burnt more recently (shorter time since fire). The mean likelihood of increased activity by cats decreased from 41% at 0 months post-fire to 10% at 100 months post-fire, whereas the mean probability for foxes decreased from 53 to 10%. This suggests that there may be a critical time period immediately post-fire when prey are most vulnerable to elevated impacts of predators, and within which management interventions are likely to be most impactful.
Conclusions
Many of our findings can be identified as potential cases of either mechanistic or apparent context dependency (variation in recorded patterns due to observational and ecological factors). This provides a pathway for the design of future studies that will enhance our understanding of predator responses to fire, both in Australia and globally. Conservation policy and management will benefit from additional research spanning a greater range of ecosystems and fire events, along with a more comprehensive and nuanced interpretation of existing evidence.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Foxes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Public concern</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><issn>1933-9747</issn><issn>1933-9747</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWGq_gKeAV1eTTDab9SbFf1DwoueQ3SY2td20SVrtya9u2hX05FxmmPm9N_AQOqfkilIpriNnnMiCMCgIoRIKcYQGtAYo6opXx3_mUzSKcU5yAdCqkgP0NdYpXmLrP03Eupti64K5weuN7pJLOrmtwcFsnfnYN6MXEaeZTth1Wx33x1UwU518wLrNsEs77CJe-pjwwr2bxQ4nn-E2GB0NjjMfUt5pm0w4vDpDJzabmtFPH6LX-7uX8WMxeX54Gt9OihYEpALKGkTVcNY2ILlpSiFaJkrWSMLysuaNoITYsmw0I0IQydhUEm6ZBcKYBBiii953Ffx6Y2JSc78JXX6pmCSEA5SVzBTrqTb4GIOxahXcUoedokTts1Z91ipnrQ5ZK5FF0Itihrs3E36t_1F9AxSkge4</recordid><startdate>20230413</startdate><enddate>20230413</enddate><creator>Doherty, Tim S.</creator><creator>Watchorn, Darcy J.</creator><creator>Miritis, Vivianna</creator><creator>Pestell, Angela J. L.</creator><creator>Geary, William L.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7745-0251</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230413</creationdate><title>Cats, foxes and fire: quantitative review reveals that invasive predator activity is most likely to increase shortly after fire</title><author>Doherty, Tim S. ; Watchorn, Darcy J. ; Miritis, Vivianna ; Pestell, Angela J. L. ; Geary, William L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-359367b42cb384eb566c2652b80242c94b6100f55ba20660822d804f2f3022833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Foxes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Public concern</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Tim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watchorn, Darcy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miritis, Vivianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pestell, Angela J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geary, William L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Fire ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doherty, Tim S.</au><au>Watchorn, Darcy J.</au><au>Miritis, Vivianna</au><au>Pestell, Angela J. L.</au><au>Geary, William L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cats, foxes and fire: quantitative review reveals that invasive predator activity is most likely to increase shortly after fire</atitle><jtitle>Fire ecology</jtitle><stitle>fire ecol</stitle><date>2023-04-13</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><pages>22-</pages><artnum>22</artnum><issn>1933-9747</issn><eissn>1933-9747</eissn><abstract>Background
Predators and fire shape ecosystems across the globe and these two forces can interact to impact prey populations. This issue is particularly pertinent in Australia where there is considerable scientific and public interest in the post-fire impacts of two invasive predators—the feral cat and red fox. It remains unclear, though, whether increased cat and fox activity in response to fire is a general phenomenon, or whether the responses are highly context-specific and not generalisable.
Results
We reviewed and analysed existing literature and found that a range of positive (e.g., increased activity in burnt areas), negative (decreased activity), and neutral responses have been recorded across different studies and locations. Mixed effects modelling revealed that positive responses to fire were more likely when areas were burnt more recently (shorter time since fire). The mean likelihood of increased activity by cats decreased from 41% at 0 months post-fire to 10% at 100 months post-fire, whereas the mean probability for foxes decreased from 53 to 10%. This suggests that there may be a critical time period immediately post-fire when prey are most vulnerable to elevated impacts of predators, and within which management interventions are likely to be most impactful.
Conclusions
Many of our findings can be identified as potential cases of either mechanistic or apparent context dependency (variation in recorded patterns due to observational and ecological factors). This provides a pathway for the design of future studies that will enhance our understanding of predator responses to fire, both in Australia and globally. Conservation policy and management will benefit from additional research spanning a greater range of ecosystems and fire events, along with a more comprehensive and nuanced interpretation of existing evidence.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1186/s42408-023-00183-6</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7745-0251</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1933-9747 |
ispartof | Fire ecology, 2023-04, Vol.19 (1), p.22, Article 22 |
issn | 1933-9747 1933-9747 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2800433578 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Cats Context Ecology Environmental policy Forestry Foxes Life Sciences Original Research Predators Prey Public concern Strategic management |
title | Cats, foxes and fire: quantitative review reveals that invasive predator activity is most likely to increase shortly after fire |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A55%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cats,%20foxes%20and%20fire:%20quantitative%20review%20reveals%20that%20invasive%20predator%20activity%20is%20most%20likely%20to%20increase%20shortly%20after%20fire&rft.jtitle=Fire%20ecology&rft.au=Doherty,%20Tim%20S.&rft.date=2023-04-13&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.pages=22-&rft.artnum=22&rft.issn=1933-9747&rft.eissn=1933-9747&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s42408-023-00183-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2800433578%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2800433578&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |