How crop insurance influences agrochemical input use: Evidence from cotton farmers in China

Crop insurance is critical in risk management in global agricultural production (e.g. by helping stabilise farmers' incomes in the long term and reducing risk‐bearing costs). In this paper, using field survey data on cotton farmers in Xinjiang, China, we examine the influence of crop insurance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics 2023-04, Vol.67 (2), p.224-244
Hauptverfasser: Mao, Hui, Chen, Shaojian, Ying, RuiYao, Fu, Yong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 244
container_issue 2
container_start_page 224
container_title The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics
container_volume 67
creator Mao, Hui
Chen, Shaojian
Ying, RuiYao
Fu, Yong
description Crop insurance is critical in risk management in global agricultural production (e.g. by helping stabilise farmers' incomes in the long term and reducing risk‐bearing costs). In this paper, using field survey data on cotton farmers in Xinjiang, China, we examine the influence of crop insurance on farmers' behaviours regarding agrochemical inputs and aim to investigate the synergy between crop insurance and reductions in fertiliser and pesticide usage. We find evidence that crop insurance significantly negatively affects farmers' use of fertilisers and pesticides, as well as significantly positively affects their adoption of green agricultural technologies (GAT) that can replace or complement traditional fertilisers and pesticides. Moreover, our results reveal that compared with small‐scale farmers, crop insurance has a stronger effect on large‐scale farmers' use of agrochemicals. Finally, when the insured amount is higher or the relative deductible is lower, farmers are more likely to reduce fertiliser and pesticide usage and adopt GAT. Overall, this paper scientifically identifies crop insurance can improve farmers' agrochemical input behaviour, by reducing farmers' use of traditional agrochemical inputs and increasing their adoption of GAT, which is of great significance for ensuring the safety of the agricultural ecological environment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-8489.12507
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2800399244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2800399244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4067-cd7329f45141da1dfae24be0d263c93ff3d9480222ac44a056c5225548e361923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4soOKdnrwHP3fLjtUu8jTGdMhBEQfAQYpq4jrapyerYf29qRY--y_vy-LzvS75JcknwhMSaEshnKQcuJoRmeHaUjH4nx1GzHFLBs5fT5CyELcaYQk5HyevK7ZH2rkVlEzqvGm2islVnogpIvXunN6YutarivO12qAvmGi0_y6InkPWuRtrtdq5BVvna-BA5tNiUjTpPTqyqgrn46ePk-Wb5tFil64fbu8V8nWrA8YW6mDEqLGQESKFIYZWh8GZwQXOmBbOWFQI4ppQqDaBwluuM0iwDblhOBGXj5Grwbb376EzYya3rfBNPSsoxZkJQgEhNByr-NgRvrGx9WSt_kATLPkHZ5yX7vOR3gnEDDRtGu6YMfzwH4ERgYBHJB2RfVubwn6Oc388fB-8v5nd8uA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2800399244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How crop insurance influences agrochemical input use: Evidence from cotton farmers in China</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Mao, Hui ; Chen, Shaojian ; Ying, RuiYao ; Fu, Yong</creator><creatorcontrib>Mao, Hui ; Chen, Shaojian ; Ying, RuiYao ; Fu, Yong</creatorcontrib><description>Crop insurance is critical in risk management in global agricultural production (e.g. by helping stabilise farmers' incomes in the long term and reducing risk‐bearing costs). In this paper, using field survey data on cotton farmers in Xinjiang, China, we examine the influence of crop insurance on farmers' behaviours regarding agrochemical inputs and aim to investigate the synergy between crop insurance and reductions in fertiliser and pesticide usage. We find evidence that crop insurance significantly negatively affects farmers' use of fertilisers and pesticides, as well as significantly positively affects their adoption of green agricultural technologies (GAT) that can replace or complement traditional fertilisers and pesticides. Moreover, our results reveal that compared with small‐scale farmers, crop insurance has a stronger effect on large‐scale farmers' use of agrochemicals. Finally, when the insured amount is higher or the relative deductible is lower, farmers are more likely to reduce fertiliser and pesticide usage and adopt GAT. Overall, this paper scientifically identifies crop insurance can improve farmers' agrochemical input behaviour, by reducing farmers' use of traditional agrochemical inputs and increasing their adoption of GAT, which is of great significance for ensuring the safety of the agricultural ecological environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-985X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.12507</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural production ; Agricultural technology ; agrochemical use ; Agrochemicals ; Cotton ; cotton farmers ; Crop insurance ; Crops ; Farmers ; Fertilizers ; Insurance ; insurance terms ; Pesticides ; production scale ; Risk management ; Risk reduction ; Sustainable agriculture</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2023-04, Vol.67 (2), p.224-244</ispartof><rights>2023 Australasian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4067-cd7329f45141da1dfae24be0d263c93ff3d9480222ac44a056c5225548e361923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4067-cd7329f45141da1dfae24be0d263c93ff3d9480222ac44a056c5225548e361923</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4387-5256</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-8489.12507$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-8489.12507$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mao, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shaojian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, RuiYao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Yong</creatorcontrib><title>How crop insurance influences agrochemical input use: Evidence from cotton farmers in China</title><title>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</title><description>Crop insurance is critical in risk management in global agricultural production (e.g. by helping stabilise farmers' incomes in the long term and reducing risk‐bearing costs). In this paper, using field survey data on cotton farmers in Xinjiang, China, we examine the influence of crop insurance on farmers' behaviours regarding agrochemical inputs and aim to investigate the synergy between crop insurance and reductions in fertiliser and pesticide usage. We find evidence that crop insurance significantly negatively affects farmers' use of fertilisers and pesticides, as well as significantly positively affects their adoption of green agricultural technologies (GAT) that can replace or complement traditional fertilisers and pesticides. Moreover, our results reveal that compared with small‐scale farmers, crop insurance has a stronger effect on large‐scale farmers' use of agrochemicals. Finally, when the insured amount is higher or the relative deductible is lower, farmers are more likely to reduce fertiliser and pesticide usage and adopt GAT. Overall, this paper scientifically identifies crop insurance can improve farmers' agrochemical input behaviour, by reducing farmers' use of traditional agrochemical inputs and increasing their adoption of GAT, which is of great significance for ensuring the safety of the agricultural ecological environment.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agricultural technology</subject><subject>agrochemical use</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>cotton farmers</subject><subject>Crop insurance</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>insurance terms</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>production scale</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><issn>1364-985X</issn><issn>1467-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4soOKdnrwHP3fLjtUu8jTGdMhBEQfAQYpq4jrapyerYf29qRY--y_vy-LzvS75JcknwhMSaEshnKQcuJoRmeHaUjH4nx1GzHFLBs5fT5CyELcaYQk5HyevK7ZH2rkVlEzqvGm2islVnogpIvXunN6YutarivO12qAvmGi0_y6InkPWuRtrtdq5BVvna-BA5tNiUjTpPTqyqgrn46ePk-Wb5tFil64fbu8V8nWrA8YW6mDEqLGQESKFIYZWh8GZwQXOmBbOWFQI4ppQqDaBwluuM0iwDblhOBGXj5Grwbb376EzYya3rfBNPSsoxZkJQgEhNByr-NgRvrGx9WSt_kATLPkHZ5yX7vOR3gnEDDRtGu6YMfzwH4ERgYBHJB2RfVubwn6Oc388fB-8v5nd8uA</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Mao, Hui</creator><creator>Chen, Shaojian</creator><creator>Ying, RuiYao</creator><creator>Fu, Yong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4387-5256</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>How crop insurance influences agrochemical input use: Evidence from cotton farmers in China</title><author>Mao, Hui ; Chen, Shaojian ; Ying, RuiYao ; Fu, Yong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4067-cd7329f45141da1dfae24be0d263c93ff3d9480222ac44a056c5225548e361923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agricultural technology</topic><topic>agrochemical use</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>cotton farmers</topic><topic>Crop insurance</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>insurance terms</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>production scale</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mao, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shaojian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, RuiYao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Yong</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mao, Hui</au><au>Chen, Shaojian</au><au>Ying, RuiYao</au><au>Fu, Yong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How crop insurance influences agrochemical input use: Evidence from cotton farmers in China</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>224</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>224-244</pages><issn>1364-985X</issn><eissn>1467-8489</eissn><abstract>Crop insurance is critical in risk management in global agricultural production (e.g. by helping stabilise farmers' incomes in the long term and reducing risk‐bearing costs). In this paper, using field survey data on cotton farmers in Xinjiang, China, we examine the influence of crop insurance on farmers' behaviours regarding agrochemical inputs and aim to investigate the synergy between crop insurance and reductions in fertiliser and pesticide usage. We find evidence that crop insurance significantly negatively affects farmers' use of fertilisers and pesticides, as well as significantly positively affects their adoption of green agricultural technologies (GAT) that can replace or complement traditional fertilisers and pesticides. Moreover, our results reveal that compared with small‐scale farmers, crop insurance has a stronger effect on large‐scale farmers' use of agrochemicals. Finally, when the insured amount is higher or the relative deductible is lower, farmers are more likely to reduce fertiliser and pesticide usage and adopt GAT. Overall, this paper scientifically identifies crop insurance can improve farmers' agrochemical input behaviour, by reducing farmers' use of traditional agrochemical inputs and increasing their adoption of GAT, which is of great significance for ensuring the safety of the agricultural ecological environment.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8489.12507</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4387-5256</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-985X
ispartof The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2023-04, Vol.67 (2), p.224-244
issn 1364-985X
1467-8489
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2800399244
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete
subjects Agricultural economics
Agricultural production
Agricultural technology
agrochemical use
Agrochemicals
Cotton
cotton farmers
Crop insurance
Crops
Farmers
Fertilizers
Insurance
insurance terms
Pesticides
production scale
Risk management
Risk reduction
Sustainable agriculture
title How crop insurance influences agrochemical input use: Evidence from cotton farmers in China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A24%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20crop%20insurance%20influences%20agrochemical%20input%20use:%20Evidence%20from%20cotton%20farmers%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Mao,%20Hui&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=224-244&rft.issn=1364-985X&rft.eissn=1467-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8489.12507&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2800399244%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2800399244&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true