Comparing Hydrogen Peroxide and Sodium Perborate Ultraviolet Advanced Oxidation Processes for 1,4-Dioxane Removal from Tertiary Wastewater Effluent
Ultraviolet advanced oxidation processes (UV-AOPs) were compared using sodium perborate (UV/NaBO3 AOP) or hydrogen peroxide (UV/H2O2 AOP) for 1,4-dioxane removal from tertiary wastewater effluent. Both UV-AOPs were also tested with the addition of acetic acid. Results revealed that sodium perborate...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water (Basel) 2023-04, Vol.15 (7), p.1364 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1364 |
| container_title | Water (Basel) |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Shukla, Tulsi L. Duranceau, Steven J. |
| description | Ultraviolet advanced oxidation processes (UV-AOPs) were compared using sodium perborate (UV/NaBO3 AOP) or hydrogen peroxide (UV/H2O2 AOP) for 1,4-dioxane removal from tertiary wastewater effluent. Both UV-AOPs were also tested with the addition of acetic acid. Results revealed that sodium perborate performed similarly to hydrogen peroxide. The UV/NaBO3 AOP with 6 milligrams per liter (mg/L) as H2O2 resulted in 43.9 percent 1,4-dioxane removal, while an equivalent UV/H2O2 AOP showed 42.8 percent removal. Despite their similar performance, NaBO3 is approximately 3.3 times more expensive than H2O2. However, the solid form of NaBO3 can provide a major benefit to remote and mobile operations. Unlike H2O2 solution, which degrades over time and requires repeated costly shipments, NaBO3 is a convenient source of H2O2, and a long-term supply can be shipped at once and mixed into solution as needed. The addition of acetic acid to a UV/H2O2 AOP was found to enhance 1,4-dioxane removal, increasing treatment effectiveness by 5.7%. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/w15071364 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2799740433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A752312299</galeid><sourcerecordid>A752312299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-2bf83a8bfc26dad7bac5a613445b836482639510947dad88177ddff384ce86193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1rHDEMHUoKDWkO-QeGnAKd1B57xp7jsvmEQEKakOPgseXFYcba2t5N8jv6h-NlS6l0kJDee0JSVZ0wes55T3--sZZKxjvxpTpsqOS1EIId_Jd_q45TeqXFRK9USw-rP0uc1zr6sCI3HzbiCgJ5gIjv3gLRwZJfaP1m3tVGjDoDeZ5y1FuPE2SysFsdDFhyX_A6eyzkiAZSgkQcRsJ-iPrC47sOQB5hxq2eiIs4kyeI2ev4QV50yvBWhCO5dG7aQMjfq69OTwmO_8aj6vnq8ml5U9_dX98uF3e14Zzluhmd4lqNzjSd1VaO2rS6Y1yIdlTlCKrpeN8y2gtZ2koxKa11jithQHWs50fV6V53HfH3BlIeXnETQxk5NLLvpaCC84I636NWeoLBB4dlf1PcwuwNBnC-1BeybThrmn4ne7YnmIgpRXDDOvq57DowOuz-NPz7E_8EdkuGJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2799740433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Hydrogen Peroxide and Sodium Perborate Ultraviolet Advanced Oxidation Processes for 1,4-Dioxane Removal from Tertiary Wastewater Effluent</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Shukla, Tulsi L. ; Duranceau, Steven J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shukla, Tulsi L. ; Duranceau, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><description>Ultraviolet advanced oxidation processes (UV-AOPs) were compared using sodium perborate (UV/NaBO3 AOP) or hydrogen peroxide (UV/H2O2 AOP) for 1,4-dioxane removal from tertiary wastewater effluent. Both UV-AOPs were also tested with the addition of acetic acid. Results revealed that sodium perborate performed similarly to hydrogen peroxide. The UV/NaBO3 AOP with 6 milligrams per liter (mg/L) as H2O2 resulted in 43.9 percent 1,4-dioxane removal, while an equivalent UV/H2O2 AOP showed 42.8 percent removal. Despite their similar performance, NaBO3 is approximately 3.3 times more expensive than H2O2. However, the solid form of NaBO3 can provide a major benefit to remote and mobile operations. Unlike H2O2 solution, which degrades over time and requires repeated costly shipments, NaBO3 is a convenient source of H2O2, and a long-term supply can be shipped at once and mixed into solution as needed. The addition of acetic acid to a UV/H2O2 AOP was found to enhance 1,4-dioxane removal, increasing treatment effectiveness by 5.7%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w15071364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acetic acid ; Acids ; Aqueous chemistry ; California ; Carbon ; Dioxane ; Drinking water ; Effluents ; Florida ; Hydrogen peroxide ; Instrument industry ; Investigations ; Management ; Metabolism ; Oxidation ; Purification ; Sewage ; Shipments ; Sodium ; Sodium perborate ; Textiles ; Ultraviolet radiation ; United States ; Wastewater ; Wastewater oxidation ; Wastewater treatment ; Water ; Water treatment ; Water use ; Water-supply</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2023-04, Vol.15 (7), p.1364</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-2bf83a8bfc26dad7bac5a613445b836482639510947dad88177ddff384ce86193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-2bf83a8bfc26dad7bac5a613445b836482639510947dad88177ddff384ce86193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shukla, Tulsi L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duranceau, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Hydrogen Peroxide and Sodium Perborate Ultraviolet Advanced Oxidation Processes for 1,4-Dioxane Removal from Tertiary Wastewater Effluent</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>Ultraviolet advanced oxidation processes (UV-AOPs) were compared using sodium perborate (UV/NaBO3 AOP) or hydrogen peroxide (UV/H2O2 AOP) for 1,4-dioxane removal from tertiary wastewater effluent. Both UV-AOPs were also tested with the addition of acetic acid. Results revealed that sodium perborate performed similarly to hydrogen peroxide. The UV/NaBO3 AOP with 6 milligrams per liter (mg/L) as H2O2 resulted in 43.9 percent 1,4-dioxane removal, while an equivalent UV/H2O2 AOP showed 42.8 percent removal. Despite their similar performance, NaBO3 is approximately 3.3 times more expensive than H2O2. However, the solid form of NaBO3 can provide a major benefit to remote and mobile operations. Unlike H2O2 solution, which degrades over time and requires repeated costly shipments, NaBO3 is a convenient source of H2O2, and a long-term supply can be shipped at once and mixed into solution as needed. The addition of acetic acid to a UV/H2O2 AOP was found to enhance 1,4-dioxane removal, increasing treatment effectiveness by 5.7%.</description><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Aqueous chemistry</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Dioxane</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Hydrogen peroxide</subject><subject>Instrument industry</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Shipments</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Sodium perborate</subject><subject>Textiles</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater oxidation</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Water-supply</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1rHDEMHUoKDWkO-QeGnAKd1B57xp7jsvmEQEKakOPgseXFYcba2t5N8jv6h-NlS6l0kJDee0JSVZ0wes55T3--sZZKxjvxpTpsqOS1EIId_Jd_q45TeqXFRK9USw-rP0uc1zr6sCI3HzbiCgJ5gIjv3gLRwZJfaP1m3tVGjDoDeZ5y1FuPE2SysFsdDFhyX_A6eyzkiAZSgkQcRsJ-iPrC47sOQB5hxq2eiIs4kyeI2ev4QV50yvBWhCO5dG7aQMjfq69OTwmO_8aj6vnq8ml5U9_dX98uF3e14Zzluhmd4lqNzjSd1VaO2rS6Y1yIdlTlCKrpeN8y2gtZ2koxKa11jithQHWs50fV6V53HfH3BlIeXnETQxk5NLLvpaCC84I636NWeoLBB4dlf1PcwuwNBnC-1BeybThrmn4ne7YnmIgpRXDDOvq57DowOuz-NPz7E_8EdkuGJA</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Shukla, Tulsi L.</creator><creator>Duranceau, Steven J.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Comparing Hydrogen Peroxide and Sodium Perborate Ultraviolet Advanced Oxidation Processes for 1,4-Dioxane Removal from Tertiary Wastewater Effluent</title><author>Shukla, Tulsi L. ; Duranceau, Steven J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-2bf83a8bfc26dad7bac5a613445b836482639510947dad88177ddff384ce86193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Aqueous chemistry</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Dioxane</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Hydrogen peroxide</topic><topic>Instrument industry</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Shipments</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Sodium perborate</topic><topic>Textiles</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater oxidation</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Water-supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shukla, Tulsi L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duranceau, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shukla, Tulsi L.</au><au>Duranceau, Steven J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Hydrogen Peroxide and Sodium Perborate Ultraviolet Advanced Oxidation Processes for 1,4-Dioxane Removal from Tertiary Wastewater Effluent</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1364</spage><pages>1364-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>Ultraviolet advanced oxidation processes (UV-AOPs) were compared using sodium perborate (UV/NaBO3 AOP) or hydrogen peroxide (UV/H2O2 AOP) for 1,4-dioxane removal from tertiary wastewater effluent. Both UV-AOPs were also tested with the addition of acetic acid. Results revealed that sodium perborate performed similarly to hydrogen peroxide. The UV/NaBO3 AOP with 6 milligrams per liter (mg/L) as H2O2 resulted in 43.9 percent 1,4-dioxane removal, while an equivalent UV/H2O2 AOP showed 42.8 percent removal. Despite their similar performance, NaBO3 is approximately 3.3 times more expensive than H2O2. However, the solid form of NaBO3 can provide a major benefit to remote and mobile operations. Unlike H2O2 solution, which degrades over time and requires repeated costly shipments, NaBO3 is a convenient source of H2O2, and a long-term supply can be shipped at once and mixed into solution as needed. The addition of acetic acid to a UV/H2O2 AOP was found to enhance 1,4-dioxane removal, increasing treatment effectiveness by 5.7%.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w15071364</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2073-4441 |
| ispartof | Water (Basel), 2023-04, Vol.15 (7), p.1364 |
| issn | 2073-4441 2073-4441 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2799740433 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
| subjects | Acetic acid Acids Aqueous chemistry California Carbon Dioxane Drinking water Effluents Florida Hydrogen peroxide Instrument industry Investigations Management Metabolism Oxidation Purification Sewage Shipments Sodium Sodium perborate Textiles Ultraviolet radiation United States Wastewater Wastewater oxidation Wastewater treatment Water Water treatment Water use Water-supply |
| title | Comparing Hydrogen Peroxide and Sodium Perborate Ultraviolet Advanced Oxidation Processes for 1,4-Dioxane Removal from Tertiary Wastewater Effluent |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A29%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Hydrogen%20Peroxide%20and%20Sodium%20Perborate%20Ultraviolet%20Advanced%20Oxidation%20Processes%20for%201,4-Dioxane%20Removal%20from%20Tertiary%20Wastewater%20Effluent&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Shukla,%20Tulsi%20L.&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1364&rft.pages=1364-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w15071364&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA752312299%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2799740433&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A752312299&rfr_iscdi=true |