A new analytical method for impact splitting strain rate in Brazilian disc test based on SHPB
Using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) to carry out the Brazilian disk test, for the calculation of the splitting tensile strain rate of the specimen, the method in the existing literature only considers the influence of the tensile stress, while in the actual splitting tensile process, the combi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Materials and structures 2023-05, Vol.56 (4), Article 66 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | Materials and structures |
| container_volume | 56 |
| creator | Yue, Chengjun Chen, Li Yuan, Jiayi Li, Qiyao Xu, Linfeng |
| description | Using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) to carry out the Brazilian disk test, for the calculation of the splitting tensile strain rate of the specimen, the method in the existing literature only considers the influence of the tensile stress, while in the actual splitting tensile process, the combined effect of compressive stress and tensile stress leads to a large error between the calculated strain rate and the measured strain rate. Therefore, the calculation of splitting tensile strain rate by the existing method is not accurate. To solve this problem, a new analytical method considering the tension–compression coupling was proposed in this study. The true strain rate of specimens can be obtained using the classical three-wave method of SHPB test and the basic performance parameters of bars and specimens. The results of this method were verified by numerical calculation and experiment. The results show that the strain–time history curve calculated by this method is highly consistent with the numerical results in terms of numerical verification, and the error range of strain rate is 1.2–8.6%. However, the error range of strain rate obtained using the existing method is 34.4–41.2%. The rising stage of strain–time history curve calculated by this method is highly consistent with the experimental results in terms of experimental verification, and the error range of strain rate is 1.7–14.7%. While the error range of strain rate obtained using the existing method is 47.2–58.5%. The existing method of splitting tensile strain rate will overestimate the dynamic tensile strength of material and make engineering design in a dangerous state. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1617/s11527-023-02151-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2795520884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2795520884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3478937ced04dd3818613dfadc61b855b0cd4a14f639a1220edb2c4f8e760bf63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wFPA82om2Wyyx7aoFQoK6lFCNsnWlO3umkSk_nqjFbx5GN4wvDfMfAidA7mECsRVBOBUFISyXMChEAdoAlJAUUnBDnPPeF3wuhbH6CTGDSGsBqAT9DLDvfvAutfdLnmjO7x16XWwuB0C9ttRm4Tj2PmUfL_GMQXtexx0cjjrPOhP33ndY-ujwcnFhBsdncVDjx-XD_NTdNTqLrqzX52i55vrp8WyWN3f3i1mq8IwqFPBSiFrJoyzpLSWSZAVMNtqaypoJOcNMbbUULYVqzVQSpxtqClb6URFmjydoov93jEMb-_5DLUZ3kP-KSoqas4pkbLMLrp3mTDEGFyrxuC3OuwUEPWNUe0xqoxR_WBUIofYPhSzuV-78Lf6n9QXPPV1Dw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2795520884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new analytical method for impact splitting strain rate in Brazilian disc test based on SHPB</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yue, Chengjun ; Chen, Li ; Yuan, Jiayi ; Li, Qiyao ; Xu, Linfeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Yue, Chengjun ; Chen, Li ; Yuan, Jiayi ; Li, Qiyao ; Xu, Linfeng</creatorcontrib><description>Using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) to carry out the Brazilian disk test, for the calculation of the splitting tensile strain rate of the specimen, the method in the existing literature only considers the influence of the tensile stress, while in the actual splitting tensile process, the combined effect of compressive stress and tensile stress leads to a large error between the calculated strain rate and the measured strain rate. Therefore, the calculation of splitting tensile strain rate by the existing method is not accurate. To solve this problem, a new analytical method considering the tension–compression coupling was proposed in this study. The true strain rate of specimens can be obtained using the classical three-wave method of SHPB test and the basic performance parameters of bars and specimens. The results of this method were verified by numerical calculation and experiment. The results show that the strain–time history curve calculated by this method is highly consistent with the numerical results in terms of numerical verification, and the error range of strain rate is 1.2–8.6%. However, the error range of strain rate obtained using the existing method is 34.4–41.2%. The rising stage of strain–time history curve calculated by this method is highly consistent with the experimental results in terms of experimental verification, and the error range of strain rate is 1.7–14.7%. While the error range of strain rate obtained using the existing method is 47.2–58.5%. The existing method of splitting tensile strain rate will overestimate the dynamic tensile strength of material and make engineering design in a dangerous state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-5997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1871-6873</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1617/s11527-023-02151-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Building construction ; Building Materials ; Civil Engineering ; Compressive properties ; Design engineering ; Engineering ; Errors ; Machines ; Manufacturing ; Materials Science ; Original Article ; Processes ; Solid Mechanics ; Split Hopkinson pressure bars ; Splitting ; Strain rate ; Tensile strain ; Tensile strength ; Tensile stress ; Theoretical and Applied Mechanics ; True strain ; Verification</subject><ispartof>Materials and structures, 2023-05, Vol.56 (4), Article 66</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to RILEM 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3478937ced04dd3818613dfadc61b855b0cd4a14f639a1220edb2c4f8e760bf63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3478937ced04dd3818613dfadc61b855b0cd4a14f639a1220edb2c4f8e760bf63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617/s11527-023-02151-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1617/s11527-023-02151-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yue, Chengjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Jiayi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qiyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Linfeng</creatorcontrib><title>A new analytical method for impact splitting strain rate in Brazilian disc test based on SHPB</title><title>Materials and structures</title><addtitle>Mater Struct</addtitle><description>Using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) to carry out the Brazilian disk test, for the calculation of the splitting tensile strain rate of the specimen, the method in the existing literature only considers the influence of the tensile stress, while in the actual splitting tensile process, the combined effect of compressive stress and tensile stress leads to a large error between the calculated strain rate and the measured strain rate. Therefore, the calculation of splitting tensile strain rate by the existing method is not accurate. To solve this problem, a new analytical method considering the tension–compression coupling was proposed in this study. The true strain rate of specimens can be obtained using the classical three-wave method of SHPB test and the basic performance parameters of bars and specimens. The results of this method were verified by numerical calculation and experiment. The results show that the strain–time history curve calculated by this method is highly consistent with the numerical results in terms of numerical verification, and the error range of strain rate is 1.2–8.6%. However, the error range of strain rate obtained using the existing method is 34.4–41.2%. The rising stage of strain–time history curve calculated by this method is highly consistent with the experimental results in terms of experimental verification, and the error range of strain rate is 1.7–14.7%. While the error range of strain rate obtained using the existing method is 47.2–58.5%. The existing method of splitting tensile strain rate will overestimate the dynamic tensile strength of material and make engineering design in a dangerous state.</description><subject>Building construction</subject><subject>Building Materials</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Compressive properties</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Machines</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Processes</subject><subject>Solid Mechanics</subject><subject>Split Hopkinson pressure bars</subject><subject>Splitting</subject><subject>Strain rate</subject><subject>Tensile strain</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Tensile stress</subject><subject>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><subject>True strain</subject><subject>Verification</subject><issn>1359-5997</issn><issn>1871-6873</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wFPA82om2Wyyx7aoFQoK6lFCNsnWlO3umkSk_nqjFbx5GN4wvDfMfAidA7mECsRVBOBUFISyXMChEAdoAlJAUUnBDnPPeF3wuhbH6CTGDSGsBqAT9DLDvfvAutfdLnmjO7x16XWwuB0C9ttRm4Tj2PmUfL_GMQXtexx0cjjrPOhP33ndY-ujwcnFhBsdncVDjx-XD_NTdNTqLrqzX52i55vrp8WyWN3f3i1mq8IwqFPBSiFrJoyzpLSWSZAVMNtqaypoJOcNMbbUULYVqzVQSpxtqClb6URFmjydoov93jEMb-_5DLUZ3kP-KSoqas4pkbLMLrp3mTDEGFyrxuC3OuwUEPWNUe0xqoxR_WBUIofYPhSzuV-78Lf6n9QXPPV1Dw</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Yue, Chengjun</creator><creator>Chen, Li</creator><creator>Yuan, Jiayi</creator><creator>Li, Qiyao</creator><creator>Xu, Linfeng</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>A new analytical method for impact splitting strain rate in Brazilian disc test based on SHPB</title><author>Yue, Chengjun ; Chen, Li ; Yuan, Jiayi ; Li, Qiyao ; Xu, Linfeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3478937ced04dd3818613dfadc61b855b0cd4a14f639a1220edb2c4f8e760bf63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Building construction</topic><topic>Building Materials</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Compressive properties</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Machines</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Processes</topic><topic>Solid Mechanics</topic><topic>Split Hopkinson pressure bars</topic><topic>Splitting</topic><topic>Strain rate</topic><topic>Tensile strain</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Tensile stress</topic><topic>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</topic><topic>True strain</topic><topic>Verification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yue, Chengjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Jiayi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qiyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Linfeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Materials and structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yue, Chengjun</au><au>Chen, Li</au><au>Yuan, Jiayi</au><au>Li, Qiyao</au><au>Xu, Linfeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new analytical method for impact splitting strain rate in Brazilian disc test based on SHPB</atitle><jtitle>Materials and structures</jtitle><stitle>Mater Struct</stitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><artnum>66</artnum><issn>1359-5997</issn><eissn>1871-6873</eissn><abstract>Using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) to carry out the Brazilian disk test, for the calculation of the splitting tensile strain rate of the specimen, the method in the existing literature only considers the influence of the tensile stress, while in the actual splitting tensile process, the combined effect of compressive stress and tensile stress leads to a large error between the calculated strain rate and the measured strain rate. Therefore, the calculation of splitting tensile strain rate by the existing method is not accurate. To solve this problem, a new analytical method considering the tension–compression coupling was proposed in this study. The true strain rate of specimens can be obtained using the classical three-wave method of SHPB test and the basic performance parameters of bars and specimens. The results of this method were verified by numerical calculation and experiment. The results show that the strain–time history curve calculated by this method is highly consistent with the numerical results in terms of numerical verification, and the error range of strain rate is 1.2–8.6%. However, the error range of strain rate obtained using the existing method is 34.4–41.2%. The rising stage of strain–time history curve calculated by this method is highly consistent with the experimental results in terms of experimental verification, and the error range of strain rate is 1.7–14.7%. While the error range of strain rate obtained using the existing method is 47.2–58.5%. The existing method of splitting tensile strain rate will overestimate the dynamic tensile strength of material and make engineering design in a dangerous state.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1617/s11527-023-02151-7</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1359-5997 |
| ispartof | Materials and structures, 2023-05, Vol.56 (4), Article 66 |
| issn | 1359-5997 1871-6873 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2795520884 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Building construction Building Materials Civil Engineering Compressive properties Design engineering Engineering Errors Machines Manufacturing Materials Science Original Article Processes Solid Mechanics Split Hopkinson pressure bars Splitting Strain rate Tensile strain Tensile strength Tensile stress Theoretical and Applied Mechanics True strain Verification |
| title | A new analytical method for impact splitting strain rate in Brazilian disc test based on SHPB |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A32%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20analytical%20method%20for%20impact%20splitting%20strain%20rate%20in%20Brazilian%20disc%20test%20based%20on%20SHPB&rft.jtitle=Materials%20and%20structures&rft.au=Yue,%20Chengjun&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.artnum=66&rft.issn=1359-5997&rft.eissn=1871-6873&rft_id=info:doi/10.1617/s11527-023-02151-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2795520884%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2795520884&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |