A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science
Scientists are expected to engage with the public, especially when society faces challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic or climate change, but what public engagement means to scientists is not clear. We use a triangulated, mixed-methods approach combining survey and focus group data to gain insight i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) England), 2023-04, Vol.32 (3), p.389-406 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 406 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 389 |
container_title | Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Calice, Mikhaila N. Bao, Luye Beets, Becca Brossard, Dominique Scheufele, Dietram A. Feinstein, Noah Weeth Heisler, Laura Tangen, Travis Handelsman, Jo |
description | Scientists are expected to engage with the public, especially when society faces challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic or climate change, but what public engagement means to scientists is not clear. We use a triangulated, mixed-methods approach combining survey and focus group data to gain insight into how pre-tenure and tenured scientists personally conceptualize public engagement. Our findings indicate that scientists’ understanding of public engagement is similarly complex and diverse as the scholarly literature. While definitions and examples of one-way forms of engagement are the most salient for scientists, regardless of tenure status, scientists also believe public engagement with science includes two-way forms of engagement, such as citizen and community involvement in research. These findings suggest that clear definitions of public engagement are not necessarily required for its application but may be useful to guide scientists in their engagement efforts, so they align with what is expected of them. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/09636625221122285 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2794572367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_09636625221122285</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2794572367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-989ee5d7f047c667146e47d99a7f8baf8223829b4d1b400d8599fc1d412182563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EoqXwACzIEnOK7fg6VhU3qRILzJFjO6mrNgm2I8TGa_B6PAmpwmVATGc43_8fnQ-Ac4zmGAtxhRTPOSeMEIwJIZIdgCnOOc44R-oQTPf7bA9MwEmMG4RQTgk_BpOBYZQROQVuAVPwuqn7rU7OQt11odVmDas2wL6xLsSkG-ubGkbjXZN8TPHj7R12LhjXJd82EbYV7Ppy6w10Ta1rtxs4-OLTeswYdwqOKr2N7uxrzsDTzfXj8i5bPdzeLxerzORcpkxJ5RyzokJUGM4FptxRYZXSopKlriQhuSSqpBaXFCErmVKVwZZigiVhPJ-By7F3eOK5dzEVm7YPzXCyIEJRJkjOxUDhkTKhjTG4quiC3-nwWmBU7MUWf8QOmYuv5r7cOfuT-DY5APMRiIOA37P_N34CuF2BhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2794572367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Calice, Mikhaila N. ; Bao, Luye ; Beets, Becca ; Brossard, Dominique ; Scheufele, Dietram A. ; Feinstein, Noah Weeth ; Heisler, Laura ; Tangen, Travis ; Handelsman, Jo</creator><creatorcontrib>Calice, Mikhaila N. ; Bao, Luye ; Beets, Becca ; Brossard, Dominique ; Scheufele, Dietram A. ; Feinstein, Noah Weeth ; Heisler, Laura ; Tangen, Travis ; Handelsman, Jo</creatorcontrib><description>Scientists are expected to engage with the public, especially when society faces challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic or climate change, but what public engagement means to scientists is not clear. We use a triangulated, mixed-methods approach combining survey and focus group data to gain insight into how pre-tenure and tenured scientists personally conceptualize public engagement. Our findings indicate that scientists’ understanding of public engagement is similarly complex and diverse as the scholarly literature. While definitions and examples of one-way forms of engagement are the most salient for scientists, regardless of tenure status, scientists also believe public engagement with science includes two-way forms of engagement, such as citizen and community involvement in research. These findings suggest that clear definitions of public engagement are not necessarily required for its application but may be useful to guide scientists in their engagement efforts, so they align with what is expected of them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-6625</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/09636625221122285</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36154528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Citizen participation ; Climate change ; Community involvement ; Community Participation ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Humans ; Mixed methods research ; Pandemics ; Public participation ; Scientists ; Tenure</subject><ispartof>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England), 2023-04, Vol.32 (3), p.389-406</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-989ee5d7f047c667146e47d99a7f8baf8223829b4d1b400d8599fc1d412182563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-989ee5d7f047c667146e47d99a7f8baf8223829b4d1b400d8599fc1d412182563</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5296-6729 ; 0000-0002-9914-5407 ; 0000-0003-3488-5030 ; 0000-0002-3323-1281 ; 0000-0002-9188-8388 ; 0000-0003-3355-6630</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/09636625221122285$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09636625221122285$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27866,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36154528$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calice, Mikhaila N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Luye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beets, Becca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brossard, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheufele, Dietram A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feinstein, Noah Weeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heisler, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tangen, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handelsman, Jo</creatorcontrib><title>A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science</title><title>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)</title><addtitle>Public Underst Sci</addtitle><description>Scientists are expected to engage with the public, especially when society faces challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic or climate change, but what public engagement means to scientists is not clear. We use a triangulated, mixed-methods approach combining survey and focus group data to gain insight into how pre-tenure and tenured scientists personally conceptualize public engagement. Our findings indicate that scientists’ understanding of public engagement is similarly complex and diverse as the scholarly literature. While definitions and examples of one-way forms of engagement are the most salient for scientists, regardless of tenure status, scientists also believe public engagement with science includes two-way forms of engagement, such as citizen and community involvement in research. These findings suggest that clear definitions of public engagement are not necessarily required for its application but may be useful to guide scientists in their engagement efforts, so they align with what is expected of them.</description><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Community Participation</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><issn>0963-6625</issn><issn>1361-6609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EoqXwACzIEnOK7fg6VhU3qRILzJFjO6mrNgm2I8TGa_B6PAmpwmVATGc43_8fnQ-Ac4zmGAtxhRTPOSeMEIwJIZIdgCnOOc44R-oQTPf7bA9MwEmMG4RQTgk_BpOBYZQROQVuAVPwuqn7rU7OQt11odVmDas2wL6xLsSkG-ubGkbjXZN8TPHj7R12LhjXJd82EbYV7Ppy6w10Ta1rtxs4-OLTeswYdwqOKr2N7uxrzsDTzfXj8i5bPdzeLxerzORcpkxJ5RyzokJUGM4FptxRYZXSopKlriQhuSSqpBaXFCErmVKVwZZigiVhPJ-By7F3eOK5dzEVm7YPzXCyIEJRJkjOxUDhkTKhjTG4quiC3-nwWmBU7MUWf8QOmYuv5r7cOfuT-DY5APMRiIOA37P_N34CuF2BhQ</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Calice, Mikhaila N.</creator><creator>Bao, Luye</creator><creator>Beets, Becca</creator><creator>Brossard, Dominique</creator><creator>Scheufele, Dietram A.</creator><creator>Feinstein, Noah Weeth</creator><creator>Heisler, Laura</creator><creator>Tangen, Travis</creator><creator>Handelsman, Jo</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5296-6729</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-5407</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3488-5030</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3323-1281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9188-8388</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3355-6630</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science</title><author>Calice, Mikhaila N. ; Bao, Luye ; Beets, Becca ; Brossard, Dominique ; Scheufele, Dietram A. ; Feinstein, Noah Weeth ; Heisler, Laura ; Tangen, Travis ; Handelsman, Jo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-989ee5d7f047c667146e47d99a7f8baf8223829b4d1b400d8599fc1d412182563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Community Participation</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calice, Mikhaila N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Luye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beets, Becca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brossard, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheufele, Dietram A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feinstein, Noah Weeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heisler, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tangen, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handelsman, Jo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calice, Mikhaila N.</au><au>Bao, Luye</au><au>Beets, Becca</au><au>Brossard, Dominique</au><au>Scheufele, Dietram A.</au><au>Feinstein, Noah Weeth</au><au>Heisler, Laura</au><au>Tangen, Travis</au><au>Handelsman, Jo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science</atitle><jtitle>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Public Underst Sci</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>389</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>389-406</pages><issn>0963-6625</issn><eissn>1361-6609</eissn><abstract>Scientists are expected to engage with the public, especially when society faces challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic or climate change, but what public engagement means to scientists is not clear. We use a triangulated, mixed-methods approach combining survey and focus group data to gain insight into how pre-tenure and tenured scientists personally conceptualize public engagement. Our findings indicate that scientists’ understanding of public engagement is similarly complex and diverse as the scholarly literature. While definitions and examples of one-way forms of engagement are the most salient for scientists, regardless of tenure status, scientists also believe public engagement with science includes two-way forms of engagement, such as citizen and community involvement in research. These findings suggest that clear definitions of public engagement are not necessarily required for its application but may be useful to guide scientists in their engagement efforts, so they align with what is expected of them.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>36154528</pmid><doi>10.1177/09636625221122285</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5296-6729</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-5407</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3488-5030</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3323-1281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9188-8388</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3355-6630</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-6625 |
ispartof | Public understanding of science (Bristol, England), 2023-04, Vol.32 (3), p.389-406 |
issn | 0963-6625 1361-6609 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2794572367 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; PAIS Index |
subjects | Citizen participation Climate change Community involvement Community Participation COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology Humans Mixed methods research Pandemics Public participation Scientists Tenure |
title | A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T03%3A16%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20triangulated%20approach%20for%20understanding%20scientists%E2%80%99%20perceptions%20of%20public%20engagement%20with%20science&rft.jtitle=Public%20understanding%20of%20science%20(Bristol,%20England)&rft.au=Calice,%20Mikhaila%20N.&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=389&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=389-406&rft.issn=0963-6625&rft.eissn=1361-6609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/09636625221122285&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2794572367%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2794572367&rft_id=info:pmid/36154528&rft_sage_id=10.1177_09636625221122285&rfr_iscdi=true |