Contribution of machine learning in continuous improvement processes
PurposeThe aim of this study is to predict one of the key performance indicators used to improve continually production systems using machine learning techniques known by the ability to teach the machine to perform complex things as opposed to simple statistical methods by giving this machine the hi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of quality in maintenance engineering 2023-04, Vol.29 (2), p.553-567 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 567 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 553 |
container_title | Journal of quality in maintenance engineering |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Mjimer, Imane Aoula, Es-Saadia Achouyab, E.L. Hassan |
description | PurposeThe aim of this study is to predict one of the key performance indicators used to improve continually production systems using machine learning techniques known by the ability to teach the machine to perform complex things as opposed to simple statistical methods by giving this machine the historical dataset, according to the kind of machine learning the authors will use, the machine will be able to predict a new output data from the input data given by the user.Design/methodology/approachThis work is divided into six sections: In the first section, the state of art for OEE, machine learning, and regression models. In the second section, the methodology, followed by an experimental study conducted in an automotive company specialised in the manufacturing of manual transmissions.FindingsThe three models show a very high accuracy (higher than 99%), a comparison between these three models was done using three indicators, namely mean absolute error (MAE) mean square error (mean squared error and mean absolute percentage error which shows that the best model is the least angle followed by Bayesian Ridge and automatic relevance determination regression.Originality/valueAs the authors can see many works were done in the different production systems for prediction, the most relevant works were done to predict a parameter in the production system such as The prediction of part thickness in aluminium hot stamping process with partition temperature control the prediction of CO2 trapping performance the prediction of crop yield the prediction of lean manufacturing in automotive parts industry the contribution of the work will be to use the machine learning techniques to predict the key performance indicator “used to measure manufacturing efficiency” which is the overall equipment effectiveness used in the authors’ case to measure the improvement of the production system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JQME-03-2022-0019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2794540339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2794540339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f072d84d124ad1d54066ca67df47188b3b28fddfc3a4eaa830e4c97f73255c223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMtKAzEUhoMoWKsP4G7AdfTkMk1mKaX1QkUEXYc0F01pMzWZEXybPkufzAx1I7g6_-K_cD6ELglcEwLy5vHlaYaBYQqUYgDSHKEREbXEQjJ6XDSra0xrQk7RWc4rAGCNgBGaT9vYpbDsu9DGqvXVRpuPEF21djrFEN_3uxD3O1NcIfZtn6uw2ab2y21c7KqijMvZ5XN04vU6u4vfO0Zv89nr9B4vnu8eprcLbBjhHfYgqJXcEsq1JbbmMJkYPRHWc0GkXLIlld5ab5jmTmvJwHHTCC8YrWtDKRujq0NvWf7sXe7Uqu1TLJOKioaXQsaa4iIHl0ltzsl5tU1ho9O3IqAGXGrApYCpAZcacJUMHDLls6TX9t_IH8LsBxMmbjs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2794540339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contribution of machine learning in continuous improvement processes</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Mjimer, Imane ; Aoula, Es-Saadia ; Achouyab, E.L. Hassan</creator><creatorcontrib>Mjimer, Imane ; Aoula, Es-Saadia ; Achouyab, E.L. Hassan</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe aim of this study is to predict one of the key performance indicators used to improve continually production systems using machine learning techniques known by the ability to teach the machine to perform complex things as opposed to simple statistical methods by giving this machine the historical dataset, according to the kind of machine learning the authors will use, the machine will be able to predict a new output data from the input data given by the user.Design/methodology/approachThis work is divided into six sections: In the first section, the state of art for OEE, machine learning, and regression models. In the second section, the methodology, followed by an experimental study conducted in an automotive company specialised in the manufacturing of manual transmissions.FindingsThe three models show a very high accuracy (higher than 99%), a comparison between these three models was done using three indicators, namely mean absolute error (MAE) mean square error (mean squared error and mean absolute percentage error which shows that the best model is the least angle followed by Bayesian Ridge and automatic relevance determination regression.Originality/valueAs the authors can see many works were done in the different production systems for prediction, the most relevant works were done to predict a parameter in the production system such as The prediction of part thickness in aluminium hot stamping process with partition temperature control the prediction of CO2 trapping performance the prediction of crop yield the prediction of lean manufacturing in automotive parts industry the contribution of the work will be to use the machine learning techniques to predict the key performance indicator “used to measure manufacturing efficiency” which is the overall equipment effectiveness used in the authors’ case to measure the improvement of the production system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-2511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7832</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JQME-03-2022-0019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Aluminum ; Automobile industry ; Automotive parts ; Breakdowns ; Case studies ; Continuous improvement ; Crop yield ; Errors ; Hot stamping ; Indicators ; Lean manufacturing ; Machine learning ; Manufacturing ; Performance prediction ; Productivity ; Regression models ; Six Sigma ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Temperature control ; Transmissions (automotive) ; Weight reduction</subject><ispartof>Journal of quality in maintenance engineering, 2023-04, Vol.29 (2), p.553-567</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f072d84d124ad1d54066ca67df47188b3b28fddfc3a4eaa830e4c97f73255c223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f072d84d124ad1d54066ca67df47188b3b28fddfc3a4eaa830e4c97f73255c223</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0577-6820 ; 0000-0002-9768-1265</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JQME-03-2022-0019/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21695,27924,27925,53244</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mjimer, Imane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoula, Es-Saadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achouyab, E.L. Hassan</creatorcontrib><title>Contribution of machine learning in continuous improvement processes</title><title>Journal of quality in maintenance engineering</title><description>PurposeThe aim of this study is to predict one of the key performance indicators used to improve continually production systems using machine learning techniques known by the ability to teach the machine to perform complex things as opposed to simple statistical methods by giving this machine the historical dataset, according to the kind of machine learning the authors will use, the machine will be able to predict a new output data from the input data given by the user.Design/methodology/approachThis work is divided into six sections: In the first section, the state of art for OEE, machine learning, and regression models. In the second section, the methodology, followed by an experimental study conducted in an automotive company specialised in the manufacturing of manual transmissions.FindingsThe three models show a very high accuracy (higher than 99%), a comparison between these three models was done using three indicators, namely mean absolute error (MAE) mean square error (mean squared error and mean absolute percentage error which shows that the best model is the least angle followed by Bayesian Ridge and automatic relevance determination regression.Originality/valueAs the authors can see many works were done in the different production systems for prediction, the most relevant works were done to predict a parameter in the production system such as The prediction of part thickness in aluminium hot stamping process with partition temperature control the prediction of CO2 trapping performance the prediction of crop yield the prediction of lean manufacturing in automotive parts industry the contribution of the work will be to use the machine learning techniques to predict the key performance indicator “used to measure manufacturing efficiency” which is the overall equipment effectiveness used in the authors’ case to measure the improvement of the production system.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Automobile industry</subject><subject>Automotive parts</subject><subject>Breakdowns</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Continuous improvement</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Hot stamping</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Lean manufacturing</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Six Sigma</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Temperature control</subject><subject>Transmissions (automotive)</subject><subject>Weight reduction</subject><issn>1355-2511</issn><issn>1758-7832</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMtKAzEUhoMoWKsP4G7AdfTkMk1mKaX1QkUEXYc0F01pMzWZEXybPkufzAx1I7g6_-K_cD6ELglcEwLy5vHlaYaBYQqUYgDSHKEREbXEQjJ6XDSra0xrQk7RWc4rAGCNgBGaT9vYpbDsu9DGqvXVRpuPEF21djrFEN_3uxD3O1NcIfZtn6uw2ab2y21c7KqijMvZ5XN04vU6u4vfO0Zv89nr9B4vnu8eprcLbBjhHfYgqJXcEsq1JbbmMJkYPRHWc0GkXLIlld5ab5jmTmvJwHHTCC8YrWtDKRujq0NvWf7sXe7Uqu1TLJOKioaXQsaa4iIHl0ltzsl5tU1ho9O3IqAGXGrApYCpAZcacJUMHDLls6TX9t_IH8LsBxMmbjs</recordid><startdate>20230405</startdate><enddate>20230405</enddate><creator>Mjimer, Imane</creator><creator>Aoula, Es-Saadia</creator><creator>Achouyab, E.L. Hassan</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0577-6820</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-1265</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230405</creationdate><title>Contribution of machine learning in continuous improvement processes</title><author>Mjimer, Imane ; Aoula, Es-Saadia ; Achouyab, E.L. Hassan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f072d84d124ad1d54066ca67df47188b3b28fddfc3a4eaa830e4c97f73255c223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Automobile industry</topic><topic>Automotive parts</topic><topic>Breakdowns</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Continuous improvement</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Hot stamping</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Lean manufacturing</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Six Sigma</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Temperature control</topic><topic>Transmissions (automotive)</topic><topic>Weight reduction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mjimer, Imane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoula, Es-Saadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achouyab, E.L. Hassan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering & Technology Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of quality in maintenance engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mjimer, Imane</au><au>Aoula, Es-Saadia</au><au>Achouyab, E.L. Hassan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contribution of machine learning in continuous improvement processes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of quality in maintenance engineering</jtitle><date>2023-04-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>567</epage><pages>553-567</pages><issn>1355-2511</issn><eissn>1758-7832</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe aim of this study is to predict one of the key performance indicators used to improve continually production systems using machine learning techniques known by the ability to teach the machine to perform complex things as opposed to simple statistical methods by giving this machine the historical dataset, according to the kind of machine learning the authors will use, the machine will be able to predict a new output data from the input data given by the user.Design/methodology/approachThis work is divided into six sections: In the first section, the state of art for OEE, machine learning, and regression models. In the second section, the methodology, followed by an experimental study conducted in an automotive company specialised in the manufacturing of manual transmissions.FindingsThe three models show a very high accuracy (higher than 99%), a comparison between these three models was done using three indicators, namely mean absolute error (MAE) mean square error (mean squared error and mean absolute percentage error which shows that the best model is the least angle followed by Bayesian Ridge and automatic relevance determination regression.Originality/valueAs the authors can see many works were done in the different production systems for prediction, the most relevant works were done to predict a parameter in the production system such as The prediction of part thickness in aluminium hot stamping process with partition temperature control the prediction of CO2 trapping performance the prediction of crop yield the prediction of lean manufacturing in automotive parts industry the contribution of the work will be to use the machine learning techniques to predict the key performance indicator “used to measure manufacturing efficiency” which is the overall equipment effectiveness used in the authors’ case to measure the improvement of the production system.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JQME-03-2022-0019</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0577-6820</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-1265</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1355-2511 |
ispartof | Journal of quality in maintenance engineering, 2023-04, Vol.29 (2), p.553-567 |
issn | 1355-2511 1758-7832 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2794540339 |
source | Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Aluminum Automobile industry Automotive parts Breakdowns Case studies Continuous improvement Crop yield Errors Hot stamping Indicators Lean manufacturing Machine learning Manufacturing Performance prediction Productivity Regression models Six Sigma Statistical analysis Statistical methods Temperature control Transmissions (automotive) Weight reduction |
title | Contribution of machine learning in continuous improvement processes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T00%3A43%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contribution%20of%20machine%20learning%C2%A0in%C2%A0continuous%20improvement%20processes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20quality%20in%20maintenance%20engineering&rft.au=Mjimer,%20Imane&rft.date=2023-04-05&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=567&rft.pages=553-567&rft.issn=1355-2511&rft.eissn=1758-7832&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JQME-03-2022-0019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2794540339%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2794540339&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |