Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment
In this study, we first develop a framework that presents systematicity as an encompassing orientation toward the application of explicit methods in the practice of literature reviews, informed by the principles of transparency, coverage, saturation, connectedness, universalism, and coherence. We th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Organizational Research Methods 2023-04, Vol.26 (2), p.292-321 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 321 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 292 |
container_title | Organizational Research Methods |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Simsek, Zeki Fox, Brian Heavey, Ciaran |
description | In this study, we first develop a framework that presents systematicity as an encompassing orientation toward the application of explicit methods in the practice of literature reviews, informed by the principles of transparency, coverage, saturation, connectedness, universalism, and coherence. We then supplement that conceptual development with empirical insights into the reported practices of systematicity in a sample of 165 published reviews across three journals in organizational research. We finally trace implications for the future conduct of literature reviews, including the potential perils of systematicity without mindfulness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/10944281211008652 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2793364950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10944281211008652</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2793364950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-aa479bb99b6a6be3046b27a16d48eed7c1ad98a9de234e6daa594190d81759993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtLw0AQhRdRsFZ_gG8LPqfubvaS9a0Ub1AoeMHHMEmmdWuT1N2tpf56UyL0QXyaYeY7Z4ZDyCVnI86NuebMSikyLjhnLNNKHJEBV0okRgp13PXdPtkDp-QshCVjPBXKDsjb8y5ErCG60sUddQ2d-QU07rubtA2s6BMGBF--06mL6CFuPHazL4fbcEPH9M5DjdvWf1BoKjoOAUOosYnn5GQOq4AXv3VIXu9uXyYPyXR2_zgZT5My1TYmANLYorC20KALTJnUhTDAdSUzxMqUHCqbga1QpBJ1BaCs5JZVGTfKWpsOyVXvu_bt5wZDzJftxnePh1wYm6ZaWsU6ivdU6dsQPM7ztXc1-F3OWb7PL_-TX6ehvQbLtnHhoMgUy7hVZo-MeiTAAg-H__f8AUIdenA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2793364950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Simsek, Zeki ; Fox, Brian ; Heavey, Ciaran</creator><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Zeki ; Fox, Brian ; Heavey, Ciaran</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we first develop a framework that presents systematicity as an encompassing orientation toward the application of explicit methods in the practice of literature reviews, informed by the principles of transparency, coverage, saturation, connectedness, universalism, and coherence. We then supplement that conceptual development with empirical insights into the reported practices of systematicity in a sample of 165 published reviews across three journals in organizational research. We finally trace implications for the future conduct of literature reviews, including the potential perils of systematicity without mindfulness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-4281</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7425</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10944281211008652</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Literature reviews ; Research management ; Research methodology ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Organizational Research Methods, 2023-04, Vol.26 (2), p.292-321</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-aa479bb99b6a6be3046b27a16d48eed7c1ad98a9de234e6daa594190d81759993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-aa479bb99b6a6be3046b27a16d48eed7c1ad98a9de234e6daa594190d81759993</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1796-8582</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10944281211008652$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10944281211008652$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,21819,27922,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Zeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heavey, Ciaran</creatorcontrib><title>Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment</title><title>Organizational Research Methods</title><description>In this study, we first develop a framework that presents systematicity as an encompassing orientation toward the application of explicit methods in the practice of literature reviews, informed by the principles of transparency, coverage, saturation, connectedness, universalism, and coherence. We then supplement that conceptual development with empirical insights into the reported practices of systematicity in a sample of 165 published reviews across three journals in organizational research. We finally trace implications for the future conduct of literature reviews, including the potential perils of systematicity without mindfulness.</description><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Research management</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1094-4281</issn><issn>1552-7425</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kFtLw0AQhRdRsFZ_gG8LPqfubvaS9a0Ub1AoeMHHMEmmdWuT1N2tpf56UyL0QXyaYeY7Z4ZDyCVnI86NuebMSikyLjhnLNNKHJEBV0okRgp13PXdPtkDp-QshCVjPBXKDsjb8y5ErCG60sUddQ2d-QU07rubtA2s6BMGBF--06mL6CFuPHazL4fbcEPH9M5DjdvWf1BoKjoOAUOosYnn5GQOq4AXv3VIXu9uXyYPyXR2_zgZT5My1TYmANLYorC20KALTJnUhTDAdSUzxMqUHCqbga1QpBJ1BaCs5JZVGTfKWpsOyVXvu_bt5wZDzJftxnePh1wYm6ZaWsU6ivdU6dsQPM7ztXc1-F3OWb7PL_-TX6ehvQbLtnHhoMgUy7hVZo-MeiTAAg-H__f8AUIdenA</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Simsek, Zeki</creator><creator>Fox, Brian</creator><creator>Heavey, Ciaran</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1796-8582</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment</title><author>Simsek, Zeki ; Fox, Brian ; Heavey, Ciaran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-aa479bb99b6a6be3046b27a16d48eed7c1ad98a9de234e6daa594190d81759993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Research management</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Zeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heavey, Ciaran</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Organizational Research Methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simsek, Zeki</au><au>Fox, Brian</au><au>Heavey, Ciaran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Organizational Research Methods</jtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>292</spage><epage>321</epage><pages>292-321</pages><issn>1094-4281</issn><eissn>1552-7425</eissn><abstract>In this study, we first develop a framework that presents systematicity as an encompassing orientation toward the application of explicit methods in the practice of literature reviews, informed by the principles of transparency, coverage, saturation, connectedness, universalism, and coherence. We then supplement that conceptual development with empirical insights into the reported practices of systematicity in a sample of 165 published reviews across three journals in organizational research. We finally trace implications for the future conduct of literature reviews, including the potential perils of systematicity without mindfulness.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/10944281211008652</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1796-8582</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1094-4281 |
ispartof | Organizational Research Methods, 2023-04, Vol.26 (2), p.292-321 |
issn | 1094-4281 1552-7425 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2793364950 |
source | Access via SAGE |
subjects | Literature reviews Research management Research methodology Systematic review |
title | Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T09%3A34%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematicity%20in%20Organizational%20Research%20Literature%20Reviews:%20A%20Framework%20and%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20Research%20Methods&rft.au=Simsek,%20Zeki&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=292&rft.epage=321&rft.pages=292-321&rft.issn=1094-4281&rft.eissn=1552-7425&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10944281211008652&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2793364950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2793364950&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10944281211008652&rfr_iscdi=true |