Substratum selection in coral reef sponges and their interactions with other benthic organisms

Substratum preferences and contact interactions among sessile organisms can be a major determinant of biotic gradients in the structure of benthic communities on coral reefs. Sponges are a substantial component of these communities, but their substratum requirements and interactions with other benth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Coral reefs 2023-04, Vol.42 (2), p.427-442
Hauptverfasser: González-Murcia, Saúl, Ekins, Merrick, Bridge, Tom C. L., Battershill, Christopher N., Jones, Geoffrey P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 442
container_issue 2
container_start_page 427
container_title Coral reefs
container_volume 42
creator González-Murcia, Saúl
Ekins, Merrick
Bridge, Tom C. L.
Battershill, Christopher N.
Jones, Geoffrey P.
description Substratum preferences and contact interactions among sessile organisms can be a major determinant of biotic gradients in the structure of benthic communities on coral reefs. Sponges are a substantial component of these communities, but their substratum requirements and interactions with other benthic taxa are poorly understood. Here, we quantified sponge substratum preferences and interactions from 838 randomly selected photo-quadrats across different depths (5, 10 and 15 m), exposure (sheltered and exposed), and substratum topography (horizontal, inclined and vertical surfaces) on coastal coral reefs in Kimbe Bay. A high proportion (55%) of sponge colonies were associated with dead coral, unconsolidated coral rubble (7%) and calcium carbonate rock (CaCO 3 rock) (7%), even though they represented only 10%, 4% and 1% of the available substratum, respectively. Sponges interacted most frequently with algae (~ 34%), corals (~ 30%) and crustose coralline algae (CCA ~ 19%) that represented ~ 46%, ~ 18% and ~ 14% of the substratum cover, respectively. The microhabitat preferences of sponges and frequency of interactions with other taxa were mostly consistent across various exposure, depth and substratum topography conditions. Most interactions appeared to be “stand-offs” (71%) which are interactions with no clear winner or loser. However, when overgrowth occurred, sponges were usually winners, overgrowing corals (92%), CCA (81%) and macroalgae (65%). Three sponge species Dysidea sp1, Lamellodysidea cf. chlorea and Lamellodysidea chlorea accounted for 51% to 96% of the overgrowth of sponges over algae, corals and CCA, but there was no one species found to always win or lose. Our results suggest that sponges avoid other biological substrata by preferentially settling on dead coral, coral rubble and CaCO 3 rock, but when they do come into contact with algae and corals, they frequently overgrow their spacial competitors.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00338-023-02350-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2792172051</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2792172051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-74b4107bc46849dd76edf5833a7718ef90e98eb6aa77d35668e223f9211d7bc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Bz9VJ0jTtURa_YMGDejWk7XS3y26zZlLEf2_WCt48DMMwzzsDD2OXAq4FgLkhAKXKDKQ6lIZMHrGZyJXMoDL6mM3ASJnlIMtTdka0AQCtKzVj7y9jTTG4OO444Rab2PuB9wNvfHBbHhA7Tns_rJC4G1oe19iHtI8Y3A9L_LOPa-7TIvAah7juG-7Dyg097eicnXRuS3jx2-fs7f7udfGYLZ8fnha3y6xRhYqZyetcgKmbvCjzqm1NgW2nS6WcMaLErgKsSqwLl-ZW6aIoUUrVVVKINqW0mrOr6e4--I8RKdqNH8OQXlppEmYkaJEoOVFN8EQBO7sP_c6FLyvAHjzayaNNDu2PRytTSE0hSnDyEP5O_5P6BjumdoM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2792172051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Substratum selection in coral reef sponges and their interactions with other benthic organisms</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>González-Murcia, Saúl ; Ekins, Merrick ; Bridge, Tom C. L. ; Battershill, Christopher N. ; Jones, Geoffrey P.</creator><creatorcontrib>González-Murcia, Saúl ; Ekins, Merrick ; Bridge, Tom C. L. ; Battershill, Christopher N. ; Jones, Geoffrey P.</creatorcontrib><description>Substratum preferences and contact interactions among sessile organisms can be a major determinant of biotic gradients in the structure of benthic communities on coral reefs. Sponges are a substantial component of these communities, but their substratum requirements and interactions with other benthic taxa are poorly understood. Here, we quantified sponge substratum preferences and interactions from 838 randomly selected photo-quadrats across different depths (5, 10 and 15 m), exposure (sheltered and exposed), and substratum topography (horizontal, inclined and vertical surfaces) on coastal coral reefs in Kimbe Bay. A high proportion (55%) of sponge colonies were associated with dead coral, unconsolidated coral rubble (7%) and calcium carbonate rock (CaCO 3 rock) (7%), even though they represented only 10%, 4% and 1% of the available substratum, respectively. Sponges interacted most frequently with algae (~ 34%), corals (~ 30%) and crustose coralline algae (CCA ~ 19%) that represented ~ 46%, ~ 18% and ~ 14% of the substratum cover, respectively. The microhabitat preferences of sponges and frequency of interactions with other taxa were mostly consistent across various exposure, depth and substratum topography conditions. Most interactions appeared to be “stand-offs” (71%) which are interactions with no clear winner or loser. However, when overgrowth occurred, sponges were usually winners, overgrowing corals (92%), CCA (81%) and macroalgae (65%). Three sponge species Dysidea sp1, Lamellodysidea cf. chlorea and Lamellodysidea chlorea accounted for 51% to 96% of the overgrowth of sponges over algae, corals and CCA, but there was no one species found to always win or lose. Our results suggest that sponges avoid other biological substrata by preferentially settling on dead coral, coral rubble and CaCO 3 rock, but when they do come into contact with algae and corals, they frequently overgrow their spacial competitors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0722-4028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00338-023-02350-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algae ; Benthic communities ; Benthos ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Calcium ; Calcium carbonate ; Calcium carbonates ; Carbonate rocks ; Carbonates ; Colonies ; Competitors ; Coral reefs ; Corals ; Dysidea ; Ecological distribution ; Exposure ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Lamellodysidea ; Life Sciences ; Microenvironments ; Microhabitat ; Microhabitats ; Oceanography ; Seaweeds ; Sessile species ; Sponges ; Substrata ; Taxa ; Topography</subject><ispartof>Coral reefs, 2023-04, Vol.42 (2), p.427-442</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-74b4107bc46849dd76edf5833a7718ef90e98eb6aa77d35668e223f9211d7bc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-74b4107bc46849dd76edf5833a7718ef90e98eb6aa77d35668e223f9211d7bc53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3951-284X ; 0000-0002-6244-1245 ; 0000-0002-4825-462X ; 0000-0002-5586-0417 ; 0000-0002-7431-2686</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00338-023-02350-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00338-023-02350-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934,41497,42566,51328</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>González-Murcia, Saúl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekins, Merrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridge, Tom C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battershill, Christopher N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Geoffrey P.</creatorcontrib><title>Substratum selection in coral reef sponges and their interactions with other benthic organisms</title><title>Coral reefs</title><addtitle>Coral Reefs</addtitle><description>Substratum preferences and contact interactions among sessile organisms can be a major determinant of biotic gradients in the structure of benthic communities on coral reefs. Sponges are a substantial component of these communities, but their substratum requirements and interactions with other benthic taxa are poorly understood. Here, we quantified sponge substratum preferences and interactions from 838 randomly selected photo-quadrats across different depths (5, 10 and 15 m), exposure (sheltered and exposed), and substratum topography (horizontal, inclined and vertical surfaces) on coastal coral reefs in Kimbe Bay. A high proportion (55%) of sponge colonies were associated with dead coral, unconsolidated coral rubble (7%) and calcium carbonate rock (CaCO 3 rock) (7%), even though they represented only 10%, 4% and 1% of the available substratum, respectively. Sponges interacted most frequently with algae (~ 34%), corals (~ 30%) and crustose coralline algae (CCA ~ 19%) that represented ~ 46%, ~ 18% and ~ 14% of the substratum cover, respectively. The microhabitat preferences of sponges and frequency of interactions with other taxa were mostly consistent across various exposure, depth and substratum topography conditions. Most interactions appeared to be “stand-offs” (71%) which are interactions with no clear winner or loser. However, when overgrowth occurred, sponges were usually winners, overgrowing corals (92%), CCA (81%) and macroalgae (65%). Three sponge species Dysidea sp1, Lamellodysidea cf. chlorea and Lamellodysidea chlorea accounted for 51% to 96% of the overgrowth of sponges over algae, corals and CCA, but there was no one species found to always win or lose. Our results suggest that sponges avoid other biological substrata by preferentially settling on dead coral, coral rubble and CaCO 3 rock, but when they do come into contact with algae and corals, they frequently overgrow their spacial competitors.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Benthic communities</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calcium carbonate</subject><subject>Calcium carbonates</subject><subject>Carbonate rocks</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Competitors</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Corals</subject><subject>Dysidea</subject><subject>Ecological distribution</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Lamellodysidea</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microenvironments</subject><subject>Microhabitat</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><subject>Sessile species</subject><subject>Sponges</subject><subject>Substrata</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Topography</subject><issn>0722-4028</issn><issn>1432-0975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Bz9VJ0jTtURa_YMGDejWk7XS3y26zZlLEf2_WCt48DMMwzzsDD2OXAq4FgLkhAKXKDKQ6lIZMHrGZyJXMoDL6mM3ASJnlIMtTdka0AQCtKzVj7y9jTTG4OO444Rab2PuB9wNvfHBbHhA7Tns_rJC4G1oe19iHtI8Y3A9L_LOPa-7TIvAah7juG-7Dyg097eicnXRuS3jx2-fs7f7udfGYLZ8fnha3y6xRhYqZyetcgKmbvCjzqm1NgW2nS6WcMaLErgKsSqwLl-ZW6aIoUUrVVVKINqW0mrOr6e4--I8RKdqNH8OQXlppEmYkaJEoOVFN8EQBO7sP_c6FLyvAHjzayaNNDu2PRytTSE0hSnDyEP5O_5P6BjumdoM</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>González-Murcia, Saúl</creator><creator>Ekins, Merrick</creator><creator>Bridge, Tom C. L.</creator><creator>Battershill, Christopher N.</creator><creator>Jones, Geoffrey P.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3951-284X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6244-1245</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4825-462X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5586-0417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7431-2686</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Substratum selection in coral reef sponges and their interactions with other benthic organisms</title><author>González-Murcia, Saúl ; Ekins, Merrick ; Bridge, Tom C. L. ; Battershill, Christopher N. ; Jones, Geoffrey P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-74b4107bc46849dd76edf5833a7718ef90e98eb6aa77d35668e223f9211d7bc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Benthic communities</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calcium carbonate</topic><topic>Calcium carbonates</topic><topic>Carbonate rocks</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Competitors</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Corals</topic><topic>Dysidea</topic><topic>Ecological distribution</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Lamellodysidea</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microenvironments</topic><topic>Microhabitat</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><topic>Sessile species</topic><topic>Sponges</topic><topic>Substrata</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Topography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>González-Murcia, Saúl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekins, Merrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridge, Tom C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battershill, Christopher N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Geoffrey P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Coral reefs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>González-Murcia, Saúl</au><au>Ekins, Merrick</au><au>Bridge, Tom C. L.</au><au>Battershill, Christopher N.</au><au>Jones, Geoffrey P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Substratum selection in coral reef sponges and their interactions with other benthic organisms</atitle><jtitle>Coral reefs</jtitle><stitle>Coral Reefs</stitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>442</epage><pages>427-442</pages><issn>0722-4028</issn><eissn>1432-0975</eissn><abstract>Substratum preferences and contact interactions among sessile organisms can be a major determinant of biotic gradients in the structure of benthic communities on coral reefs. Sponges are a substantial component of these communities, but their substratum requirements and interactions with other benthic taxa are poorly understood. Here, we quantified sponge substratum preferences and interactions from 838 randomly selected photo-quadrats across different depths (5, 10 and 15 m), exposure (sheltered and exposed), and substratum topography (horizontal, inclined and vertical surfaces) on coastal coral reefs in Kimbe Bay. A high proportion (55%) of sponge colonies were associated with dead coral, unconsolidated coral rubble (7%) and calcium carbonate rock (CaCO 3 rock) (7%), even though they represented only 10%, 4% and 1% of the available substratum, respectively. Sponges interacted most frequently with algae (~ 34%), corals (~ 30%) and crustose coralline algae (CCA ~ 19%) that represented ~ 46%, ~ 18% and ~ 14% of the substratum cover, respectively. The microhabitat preferences of sponges and frequency of interactions with other taxa were mostly consistent across various exposure, depth and substratum topography conditions. Most interactions appeared to be “stand-offs” (71%) which are interactions with no clear winner or loser. However, when overgrowth occurred, sponges were usually winners, overgrowing corals (92%), CCA (81%) and macroalgae (65%). Three sponge species Dysidea sp1, Lamellodysidea cf. chlorea and Lamellodysidea chlorea accounted for 51% to 96% of the overgrowth of sponges over algae, corals and CCA, but there was no one species found to always win or lose. Our results suggest that sponges avoid other biological substrata by preferentially settling on dead coral, coral rubble and CaCO 3 rock, but when they do come into contact with algae and corals, they frequently overgrow their spacial competitors.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00338-023-02350-2</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3951-284X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6244-1245</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4825-462X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5586-0417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7431-2686</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0722-4028
ispartof Coral reefs, 2023-04, Vol.42 (2), p.427-442
issn 0722-4028
1432-0975
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2792172051
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Algae
Benthic communities
Benthos
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Calcium
Calcium carbonate
Calcium carbonates
Carbonate rocks
Carbonates
Colonies
Competitors
Coral reefs
Corals
Dysidea
Ecological distribution
Exposure
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Lamellodysidea
Life Sciences
Microenvironments
Microhabitat
Microhabitats
Oceanography
Seaweeds
Sessile species
Sponges
Substrata
Taxa
Topography
title Substratum selection in coral reef sponges and their interactions with other benthic organisms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T14%3A36%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Substratum%20selection%20in%20coral%20reef%20sponges%20and%20their%20interactions%20with%20other%20benthic%20organisms&rft.jtitle=Coral%20reefs&rft.au=Gonz%C3%A1lez-Murcia,%20Sa%C3%BAl&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=442&rft.pages=427-442&rft.issn=0722-4028&rft.eissn=1432-0975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00338-023-02350-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2792172051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2792172051&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true