Putting TPACK into Action in Learning Design: The Case of PeerLAND

Although previous research highlights the complementary relationship of learning design with TPACK, this is not the case for TPACK informing the development of digital learning design tools. In this paper, we present PeerLAND (Peer Evaluation of LeArNingDesigns). This learning design tool interweave...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2022-01, Vol.38 (6), p.53-74
Hauptverfasser: Papanikolaou, Kyparisia A, Makri, Katerina, Sofos, Ioannis, Tzelepi, Maria G, Zalavra, Eleni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 74
container_issue 6
container_start_page 53
container_title Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
container_volume 38
creator Papanikolaou, Kyparisia A
Makri, Katerina
Sofos, Ioannis
Tzelepi, Maria G
Zalavra, Eleni
description Although previous research highlights the complementary relationship of learning design with TPACK, this is not the case for TPACK informing the development of digital learning design tools. In this paper, we present PeerLAND (Peer Evaluation of LeArNingDesigns). This learning design tool interweaves design and peer evaluation in an integrated process based on TPACK, promoting teachers' roles as designers and reviewers. It adopts a modular design approach to support teachers as designers explicitly represent their design ideas starting from pedadogical content knowledge and gradually cultivating all the TPACK knowledge domains. The learning design process ends with peer evaluation where teachers use TPACK-based criteria to provide constructive feedback to peers. We report on a study conducted in a teacher education context to evaluate PeerLAND. Specifically, we investigate: (1) how student teachers' knowledge develops through the learning design process supported by PeerLAND, and (2) how they value peer evaluation through PeerLAND. Our findings suggest that putting TPACK into action through PeerLAND developed student teachers' knowledge in every TPACK domain, except for content knowledge. Furthermore, peer evaluation is considered advantageous to student teachers for getting timely constructive feedback and refining their designs, and several ideas for improving the peer evaluation mechanism are proposed.
doi_str_mv 10.14742/ajet.7556
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2791977974</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1369848</ericid><sourcerecordid>2791977974</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-b216951f133a8cdcf9aeade0171255740ec67afa7bea305d2b37354bbb7efb8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwsCNZYkNK8Wccs4W0fEbQocyW7V5KKkiK7Q78e1KKmO49vY_upAehc0omVCjBru0a0kRJmR-gERVCZ1JKcfiXOdHFMTqJcU3IsDMxQrfzbUptt8KLeVk947ZLPS59avtuyLgGG7pdO4XYrrobvHgHXNkIuG_wHCDU5cv0FB019iPC2d8co7e72aJ6yOrX-8eqrDPPCpoyx2iuJW0o57bwS99oC3YJhCrKpFSCgM-VbaxyYDmRS-a44lI45xQ0rrB8jC73dzeh_9pCTGbdb0M3vDRMaaqV0koM1NWe8qGPMUBjNqH9tOHbUGJ-HZmdI7NzNMAXexhC6__B2RPluS5EwX8ApUVhiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791977974</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Putting TPACK into Action in Learning Design: The Case of PeerLAND</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Papanikolaou, Kyparisia A ; Makri, Katerina ; Sofos, Ioannis ; Tzelepi, Maria G ; Zalavra, Eleni</creator><creatorcontrib>Papanikolaou, Kyparisia A ; Makri, Katerina ; Sofos, Ioannis ; Tzelepi, Maria G ; Zalavra, Eleni</creatorcontrib><description>Although previous research highlights the complementary relationship of learning design with TPACK, this is not the case for TPACK informing the development of digital learning design tools. In this paper, we present PeerLAND (Peer Evaluation of LeArNingDesigns). This learning design tool interweaves design and peer evaluation in an integrated process based on TPACK, promoting teachers' roles as designers and reviewers. It adopts a modular design approach to support teachers as designers explicitly represent their design ideas starting from pedadogical content knowledge and gradually cultivating all the TPACK knowledge domains. The learning design process ends with peer evaluation where teachers use TPACK-based criteria to provide constructive feedback to peers. We report on a study conducted in a teacher education context to evaluate PeerLAND. Specifically, we investigate: (1) how student teachers' knowledge develops through the learning design process supported by PeerLAND, and (2) how they value peer evaluation through PeerLAND. Our findings suggest that putting TPACK into action through PeerLAND developed student teachers' knowledge in every TPACK domain, except for content knowledge. Furthermore, peer evaluation is considered advantageous to student teachers for getting timely constructive feedback and refining their designs, and several ideas for improving the peer evaluation mechanism are proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1449-3098</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1449-5554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14742/ajet.7556</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wollongong: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education</publisher><subject>Educational technology ; Feedback (Response) ; Foreign Countries ; Instructional Design ; Pedagogical Content Knowledge ; Pedagogy ; Peer Evaluation ; Peer review ; Student Teachers ; Teacher Education ; Teacher Improvement ; Teacher Role ; Technological Literacy</subject><ispartof>Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2022-01, Vol.38 (6), p.53-74</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-b216951f133a8cdcf9aeade0171255740ec67afa7bea305d2b37354bbb7efb8a3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-5752-6634</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1369848$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Papanikolaou, Kyparisia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makri, Katerina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sofos, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzelepi, Maria G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zalavra, Eleni</creatorcontrib><title>Putting TPACK into Action in Learning Design: The Case of PeerLAND</title><title>Australasian Journal of Educational Technology</title><description>Although previous research highlights the complementary relationship of learning design with TPACK, this is not the case for TPACK informing the development of digital learning design tools. In this paper, we present PeerLAND (Peer Evaluation of LeArNingDesigns). This learning design tool interweaves design and peer evaluation in an integrated process based on TPACK, promoting teachers' roles as designers and reviewers. It adopts a modular design approach to support teachers as designers explicitly represent their design ideas starting from pedadogical content knowledge and gradually cultivating all the TPACK knowledge domains. The learning design process ends with peer evaluation where teachers use TPACK-based criteria to provide constructive feedback to peers. We report on a study conducted in a teacher education context to evaluate PeerLAND. Specifically, we investigate: (1) how student teachers' knowledge develops through the learning design process supported by PeerLAND, and (2) how they value peer evaluation through PeerLAND. Our findings suggest that putting TPACK into action through PeerLAND developed student teachers' knowledge in every TPACK domain, except for content knowledge. Furthermore, peer evaluation is considered advantageous to student teachers for getting timely constructive feedback and refining their designs, and several ideas for improving the peer evaluation mechanism are proposed.</description><subject>Educational technology</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Peer Evaluation</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Student Teachers</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Teacher Improvement</subject><subject>Teacher Role</subject><subject>Technological Literacy</subject><issn>1449-3098</issn><issn>1449-5554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwsCNZYkNK8Wccs4W0fEbQocyW7V5KKkiK7Q78e1KKmO49vY_upAehc0omVCjBru0a0kRJmR-gERVCZ1JKcfiXOdHFMTqJcU3IsDMxQrfzbUptt8KLeVk947ZLPS59avtuyLgGG7pdO4XYrrobvHgHXNkIuG_wHCDU5cv0FB019iPC2d8co7e72aJ6yOrX-8eqrDPPCpoyx2iuJW0o57bwS99oC3YJhCrKpFSCgM-VbaxyYDmRS-a44lI45xQ0rrB8jC73dzeh_9pCTGbdb0M3vDRMaaqV0koM1NWe8qGPMUBjNqH9tOHbUGJ-HZmdI7NzNMAXexhC6__B2RPluS5EwX8ApUVhiA</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Papanikolaou, Kyparisia A</creator><creator>Makri, Katerina</creator><creator>Sofos, Ioannis</creator><creator>Tzelepi, Maria G</creator><creator>Zalavra, Eleni</creator><general>Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5752-6634</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Putting TPACK into Action in Learning Design: The Case of PeerLAND</title><author>Papanikolaou, Kyparisia A ; Makri, Katerina ; Sofos, Ioannis ; Tzelepi, Maria G ; Zalavra, Eleni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-b216951f133a8cdcf9aeade0171255740ec67afa7bea305d2b37354bbb7efb8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Educational technology</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Peer Evaluation</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Student Teachers</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Teacher Improvement</topic><topic>Teacher Role</topic><topic>Technological Literacy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Papanikolaou, Kyparisia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makri, Katerina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sofos, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzelepi, Maria G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zalavra, Eleni</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Australasian Journal of Educational Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Papanikolaou, Kyparisia A</au><au>Makri, Katerina</au><au>Sofos, Ioannis</au><au>Tzelepi, Maria G</au><au>Zalavra, Eleni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1369848</ericid><atitle>Putting TPACK into Action in Learning Design: The Case of PeerLAND</atitle><jtitle>Australasian Journal of Educational Technology</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>53-74</pages><issn>1449-3098</issn><eissn>1449-5554</eissn><abstract>Although previous research highlights the complementary relationship of learning design with TPACK, this is not the case for TPACK informing the development of digital learning design tools. In this paper, we present PeerLAND (Peer Evaluation of LeArNingDesigns). This learning design tool interweaves design and peer evaluation in an integrated process based on TPACK, promoting teachers' roles as designers and reviewers. It adopts a modular design approach to support teachers as designers explicitly represent their design ideas starting from pedadogical content knowledge and gradually cultivating all the TPACK knowledge domains. The learning design process ends with peer evaluation where teachers use TPACK-based criteria to provide constructive feedback to peers. We report on a study conducted in a teacher education context to evaluate PeerLAND. Specifically, we investigate: (1) how student teachers' knowledge develops through the learning design process supported by PeerLAND, and (2) how they value peer evaluation through PeerLAND. Our findings suggest that putting TPACK into action through PeerLAND developed student teachers' knowledge in every TPACK domain, except for content knowledge. Furthermore, peer evaluation is considered advantageous to student teachers for getting timely constructive feedback and refining their designs, and several ideas for improving the peer evaluation mechanism are proposed.</abstract><cop>Wollongong</cop><pub>Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education</pub><doi>10.14742/ajet.7556</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5752-6634</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1449-3098
ispartof Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2022-01, Vol.38 (6), p.53-74
issn 1449-3098
1449-5554
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2791977974
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Educational technology
Feedback (Response)
Foreign Countries
Instructional Design
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Pedagogy
Peer Evaluation
Peer review
Student Teachers
Teacher Education
Teacher Improvement
Teacher Role
Technological Literacy
title Putting TPACK into Action in Learning Design: The Case of PeerLAND
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T00%3A20%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Putting%20TPACK%20into%20Action%20in%20Learning%20Design:%20The%20Case%20of%20PeerLAND&rft.jtitle=Australasian%20Journal%20of%20Educational%20Technology&rft.au=Papanikolaou,%20Kyparisia%20A&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=53-74&rft.issn=1449-3098&rft.eissn=1449-5554&rft_id=info:doi/10.14742/ajet.7556&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2791977974%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791977974&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1369848&rfr_iscdi=true