Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Multi-Scale Pore Structure Heterogeneity of Lacustrine Shale in the Gaoyou Sag, Eastern China

The success of shale oil exploration and production is highly dependent on the heterogeneous nature of the reservoir pore structure. Despite this, there remains limited research on the heterogeneity characteristics of pores at different scales in lacustrine shale oil reservoirs and the factors that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Minerals (Basel) 2023-03, Vol.13 (3), p.359
Hauptverfasser: Li, Peng, Gong, Houjian, Jiang, Zhenxue, Zhang, Fan, Liang, Zhikai, Wang, Zipeng, Wu, Yonghui, Shao, Xindi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 359
container_title Minerals (Basel)
container_volume 13
creator Li, Peng
Gong, Houjian
Jiang, Zhenxue
Zhang, Fan
Liang, Zhikai
Wang, Zipeng
Wu, Yonghui
Shao, Xindi
description The success of shale oil exploration and production is highly dependent on the heterogeneous nature of the reservoir pore structure. Despite this, there remains limited research on the heterogeneity characteristics of pores at different scales in lacustrine shale oil reservoirs and the factors that impact them. This study aims to quantitatively characterize the multi-scale pore heterogeneity differences of the lacustrine shale found in the Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag. Additionally, the study seeks to clarify the impact of the total organic carbon (TOC) and lithofacies type on pore structure heterogeneity. To achieve this, nitrogen adsorption, scanning electronic microscope (SEM), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), and other experimental means were adopted in combination with the fractal dimension model of FHH and capillary. The results show that the predominant lithofacies of the Funing Formation shale samples are mixed shale (MS) and siliceous shale (SS), with a limited presence of calcareous shale (CS). The micro-pores of lacustrine shale are dominated by inorganic mineral pores and fewer organic pores. Intragranular pores and clay mineral pores are two types of inorganic mineral pores that are widely found. Small pores (pore diameter < 50 nm) make up 89% of the pore volume (PV) and 99% of the specific surface area (SSA). The fractal dimensions D1, D2, and D3 were calculated to characterize the roughness of the pore surface, the structural complexity of small pores, and the structural complexity of large pores (pore diameter > 50 nm), respectively. The increase in the total organic carbon (TOC) resulted in a decrease in the D1, D2, PV, and SSA, while connectivity showed a slight improvement. The fractal dimension of shale across all lithofacies followed the pattern: D3 > D2 > D1. The pore structure is more complex than the pore surface, and the large pores showed a greater heterogeneity than the small pores. Among the three lithofacies, CS had the largest PV, SSA, D1, and D2, indicating the development of a more complex pore structure network. This expands the space required for shale oil occurrence. However, the connectivity of the CS lithofacies is the lowest among the three, which hinders shale oil production. Although the PV of SS is slightly lower than that of CS, its average pore diameter (AVE PD) and connectivity are significantly advantageous, making SS an ideal shale reservoir. This study provides an important reference for the reservoir ev
doi_str_mv 10.3390/min13030359
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2791677677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A750411551</galeid><sourcerecordid>A750411551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-bc40169e90366be1c4243179a79ac08cfc2547897d5f550c295fe636b5499b553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUc1qwzAMNmODla6nvYBhxy2dHcdOfSylf9CxQTfYLTiunbikdmc7h77BHnsu3aGSQEL6PklIADxiNCaEo9eDsZigpJTfgEGOSpphRr5vr-J7MAphj5JwTCY0H4DfWSu8kFF5E6KRAQq7g2uru15ZaWwDF6nofIBOw7e-iybbStEp-OG8gtvoexn7FK1U6uAaZZWJpzN2I2Qfojc2odozwVgYWwWXwp1cD7eieYFzERLLwllrrHgAd1p0QY3-_RB8Leafs1W2eV-uZ9NNJghDMatlgTDjiiPCWK2wLPKC4JKLZBJNpJY5LcoJL3dUU4pkzqlWjLCaFpzXlJIheLr0PXr306sQq73rvU0jq7zkmJVlsoQaX1BN2r0yVruYrpR0pw5GOqu0SflpSVGBMaU4EZ4vBOldCF7p6ujNQfhThVF1fk919R7yB578goM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791677677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Multi-Scale Pore Structure Heterogeneity of Lacustrine Shale in the Gaoyou Sag, Eastern China</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Li, Peng ; Gong, Houjian ; Jiang, Zhenxue ; Zhang, Fan ; Liang, Zhikai ; Wang, Zipeng ; Wu, Yonghui ; Shao, Xindi</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Peng ; Gong, Houjian ; Jiang, Zhenxue ; Zhang, Fan ; Liang, Zhikai ; Wang, Zipeng ; Wu, Yonghui ; Shao, Xindi</creatorcontrib><description>The success of shale oil exploration and production is highly dependent on the heterogeneous nature of the reservoir pore structure. Despite this, there remains limited research on the heterogeneity characteristics of pores at different scales in lacustrine shale oil reservoirs and the factors that impact them. This study aims to quantitatively characterize the multi-scale pore heterogeneity differences of the lacustrine shale found in the Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag. Additionally, the study seeks to clarify the impact of the total organic carbon (TOC) and lithofacies type on pore structure heterogeneity. To achieve this, nitrogen adsorption, scanning electronic microscope (SEM), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), and other experimental means were adopted in combination with the fractal dimension model of FHH and capillary. The results show that the predominant lithofacies of the Funing Formation shale samples are mixed shale (MS) and siliceous shale (SS), with a limited presence of calcareous shale (CS). The micro-pores of lacustrine shale are dominated by inorganic mineral pores and fewer organic pores. Intragranular pores and clay mineral pores are two types of inorganic mineral pores that are widely found. Small pores (pore diameter &lt; 50 nm) make up 89% of the pore volume (PV) and 99% of the specific surface area (SSA). The fractal dimensions D1, D2, and D3 were calculated to characterize the roughness of the pore surface, the structural complexity of small pores, and the structural complexity of large pores (pore diameter &gt; 50 nm), respectively. The increase in the total organic carbon (TOC) resulted in a decrease in the D1, D2, PV, and SSA, while connectivity showed a slight improvement. The fractal dimension of shale across all lithofacies followed the pattern: D3 &gt; D2 &gt; D1. The pore structure is more complex than the pore surface, and the large pores showed a greater heterogeneity than the small pores. Among the three lithofacies, CS had the largest PV, SSA, D1, and D2, indicating the development of a more complex pore structure network. This expands the space required for shale oil occurrence. However, the connectivity of the CS lithofacies is the lowest among the three, which hinders shale oil production. Although the PV of SS is slightly lower than that of CS, its average pore diameter (AVE PD) and connectivity are significantly advantageous, making SS an ideal shale reservoir. This study provides an important reference for the reservoir evaluation required to better develop lacustrine shale oil around the world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-163X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-163X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/min13030359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Carbon ; Carbonate minerals ; Carbonates ; Clay minerals ; Complexity ; Diameters ; Dimensions ; Fractal geometry ; Fractal models ; Fractals ; Heterogeneity ; Lithofacies ; Mercury ; Minerals ; Oil and gas exploration ; Oil exploration ; Oil production ; Oil recovery ; Oil reservoirs ; Oil shale ; Organic carbon ; Petroleum production ; Pore size ; Pores ; Porosity ; Porous materials ; Reservoirs ; Roughness ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Sedimentary rocks ; Shale ; Shale oil ; Shales ; Total organic carbon</subject><ispartof>Minerals (Basel), 2023-03, Vol.13 (3), p.359</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-bc40169e90366be1c4243179a79ac08cfc2547897d5f550c295fe636b5499b553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-bc40169e90366be1c4243179a79ac08cfc2547897d5f550c295fe636b5499b553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Houjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhenxue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Zhikai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zipeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yonghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Xindi</creatorcontrib><title>Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Multi-Scale Pore Structure Heterogeneity of Lacustrine Shale in the Gaoyou Sag, Eastern China</title><title>Minerals (Basel)</title><description>The success of shale oil exploration and production is highly dependent on the heterogeneous nature of the reservoir pore structure. Despite this, there remains limited research on the heterogeneity characteristics of pores at different scales in lacustrine shale oil reservoirs and the factors that impact them. This study aims to quantitatively characterize the multi-scale pore heterogeneity differences of the lacustrine shale found in the Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag. Additionally, the study seeks to clarify the impact of the total organic carbon (TOC) and lithofacies type on pore structure heterogeneity. To achieve this, nitrogen adsorption, scanning electronic microscope (SEM), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), and other experimental means were adopted in combination with the fractal dimension model of FHH and capillary. The results show that the predominant lithofacies of the Funing Formation shale samples are mixed shale (MS) and siliceous shale (SS), with a limited presence of calcareous shale (CS). The micro-pores of lacustrine shale are dominated by inorganic mineral pores and fewer organic pores. Intragranular pores and clay mineral pores are two types of inorganic mineral pores that are widely found. Small pores (pore diameter &lt; 50 nm) make up 89% of the pore volume (PV) and 99% of the specific surface area (SSA). The fractal dimensions D1, D2, and D3 were calculated to characterize the roughness of the pore surface, the structural complexity of small pores, and the structural complexity of large pores (pore diameter &gt; 50 nm), respectively. The increase in the total organic carbon (TOC) resulted in a decrease in the D1, D2, PV, and SSA, while connectivity showed a slight improvement. The fractal dimension of shale across all lithofacies followed the pattern: D3 &gt; D2 &gt; D1. The pore structure is more complex than the pore surface, and the large pores showed a greater heterogeneity than the small pores. Among the three lithofacies, CS had the largest PV, SSA, D1, and D2, indicating the development of a more complex pore structure network. This expands the space required for shale oil occurrence. However, the connectivity of the CS lithofacies is the lowest among the three, which hinders shale oil production. Although the PV of SS is slightly lower than that of CS, its average pore diameter (AVE PD) and connectivity are significantly advantageous, making SS an ideal shale reservoir. This study provides an important reference for the reservoir evaluation required to better develop lacustrine shale oil around the world.</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbonate minerals</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Clay minerals</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Dimensions</subject><subject>Fractal geometry</subject><subject>Fractal models</subject><subject>Fractals</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Lithofacies</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Oil and gas exploration</subject><subject>Oil exploration</subject><subject>Oil production</subject><subject>Oil recovery</subject><subject>Oil reservoirs</subject><subject>Oil shale</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Petroleum production</subject><subject>Pore size</subject><subject>Pores</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Porous materials</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Roughness</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Sedimentary rocks</subject><subject>Shale</subject><subject>Shale oil</subject><subject>Shales</subject><subject>Total organic carbon</subject><issn>2075-163X</issn><issn>2075-163X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUc1qwzAMNmODla6nvYBhxy2dHcdOfSylf9CxQTfYLTiunbikdmc7h77BHnsu3aGSQEL6PklIADxiNCaEo9eDsZigpJTfgEGOSpphRr5vr-J7MAphj5JwTCY0H4DfWSu8kFF5E6KRAQq7g2uru15ZaWwDF6nofIBOw7e-iybbStEp-OG8gtvoexn7FK1U6uAaZZWJpzN2I2Qfojc2odozwVgYWwWXwp1cD7eieYFzERLLwllrrHgAd1p0QY3-_RB8Leafs1W2eV-uZ9NNJghDMatlgTDjiiPCWK2wLPKC4JKLZBJNpJY5LcoJL3dUU4pkzqlWjLCaFpzXlJIheLr0PXr306sQq73rvU0jq7zkmJVlsoQaX1BN2r0yVruYrpR0pw5GOqu0SflpSVGBMaU4EZ4vBOldCF7p6ujNQfhThVF1fk919R7yB578goM</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Li, Peng</creator><creator>Gong, Houjian</creator><creator>Jiang, Zhenxue</creator><creator>Zhang, Fan</creator><creator>Liang, Zhikai</creator><creator>Wang, Zipeng</creator><creator>Wu, Yonghui</creator><creator>Shao, Xindi</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Multi-Scale Pore Structure Heterogeneity of Lacustrine Shale in the Gaoyou Sag, Eastern China</title><author>Li, Peng ; Gong, Houjian ; Jiang, Zhenxue ; Zhang, Fan ; Liang, Zhikai ; Wang, Zipeng ; Wu, Yonghui ; Shao, Xindi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-bc40169e90366be1c4243179a79ac08cfc2547897d5f550c295fe636b5499b553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbonate minerals</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Clay minerals</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Dimensions</topic><topic>Fractal geometry</topic><topic>Fractal models</topic><topic>Fractals</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Lithofacies</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Oil and gas exploration</topic><topic>Oil exploration</topic><topic>Oil production</topic><topic>Oil recovery</topic><topic>Oil reservoirs</topic><topic>Oil shale</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Petroleum production</topic><topic>Pore size</topic><topic>Pores</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Porous materials</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Roughness</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Sedimentary rocks</topic><topic>Shale</topic><topic>Shale oil</topic><topic>Shales</topic><topic>Total organic carbon</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Houjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhenxue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Zhikai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zipeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yonghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Xindi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Minerals (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Peng</au><au>Gong, Houjian</au><au>Jiang, Zhenxue</au><au>Zhang, Fan</au><au>Liang, Zhikai</au><au>Wang, Zipeng</au><au>Wu, Yonghui</au><au>Shao, Xindi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Multi-Scale Pore Structure Heterogeneity of Lacustrine Shale in the Gaoyou Sag, Eastern China</atitle><jtitle>Minerals (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>359</spage><pages>359-</pages><issn>2075-163X</issn><eissn>2075-163X</eissn><abstract>The success of shale oil exploration and production is highly dependent on the heterogeneous nature of the reservoir pore structure. Despite this, there remains limited research on the heterogeneity characteristics of pores at different scales in lacustrine shale oil reservoirs and the factors that impact them. This study aims to quantitatively characterize the multi-scale pore heterogeneity differences of the lacustrine shale found in the Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag. Additionally, the study seeks to clarify the impact of the total organic carbon (TOC) and lithofacies type on pore structure heterogeneity. To achieve this, nitrogen adsorption, scanning electronic microscope (SEM), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), and other experimental means were adopted in combination with the fractal dimension model of FHH and capillary. The results show that the predominant lithofacies of the Funing Formation shale samples are mixed shale (MS) and siliceous shale (SS), with a limited presence of calcareous shale (CS). The micro-pores of lacustrine shale are dominated by inorganic mineral pores and fewer organic pores. Intragranular pores and clay mineral pores are two types of inorganic mineral pores that are widely found. Small pores (pore diameter &lt; 50 nm) make up 89% of the pore volume (PV) and 99% of the specific surface area (SSA). The fractal dimensions D1, D2, and D3 were calculated to characterize the roughness of the pore surface, the structural complexity of small pores, and the structural complexity of large pores (pore diameter &gt; 50 nm), respectively. The increase in the total organic carbon (TOC) resulted in a decrease in the D1, D2, PV, and SSA, while connectivity showed a slight improvement. The fractal dimension of shale across all lithofacies followed the pattern: D3 &gt; D2 &gt; D1. The pore structure is more complex than the pore surface, and the large pores showed a greater heterogeneity than the small pores. Among the three lithofacies, CS had the largest PV, SSA, D1, and D2, indicating the development of a more complex pore structure network. This expands the space required for shale oil occurrence. However, the connectivity of the CS lithofacies is the lowest among the three, which hinders shale oil production. Although the PV of SS is slightly lower than that of CS, its average pore diameter (AVE PD) and connectivity are significantly advantageous, making SS an ideal shale reservoir. This study provides an important reference for the reservoir evaluation required to better develop lacustrine shale oil around the world.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/min13030359</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2075-163X
ispartof Minerals (Basel), 2023-03, Vol.13 (3), p.359
issn 2075-163X
2075-163X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2791677677
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adsorption
Carbon
Carbonate minerals
Carbonates
Clay minerals
Complexity
Diameters
Dimensions
Fractal geometry
Fractal models
Fractals
Heterogeneity
Lithofacies
Mercury
Minerals
Oil and gas exploration
Oil exploration
Oil production
Oil recovery
Oil reservoirs
Oil shale
Organic carbon
Petroleum production
Pore size
Pores
Porosity
Porous materials
Reservoirs
Roughness
Scanning electron microscopy
Sedimentary rocks
Shale
Shale oil
Shales
Total organic carbon
title Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Multi-Scale Pore Structure Heterogeneity of Lacustrine Shale in the Gaoyou Sag, Eastern China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A47%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characteristics%20and%20Influencing%20Factors%20of%20Multi-Scale%20Pore%20Structure%20Heterogeneity%20of%20Lacustrine%20Shale%20in%20the%20Gaoyou%20Sag,%20Eastern%20China&rft.jtitle=Minerals%20(Basel)&rft.au=Li,%20Peng&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=359&rft.pages=359-&rft.issn=2075-163X&rft.eissn=2075-163X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/min13030359&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA750411551%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791677677&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A750411551&rfr_iscdi=true