Finding Goldilocks Influencers: How Follower Count Drives Social Media Engagement
Influencers’ follower count, or indegree, is a key criterion that advertisers use when devising influencer marketing campaigns. However, whether influencers with lower or higher follower count are more effective in generating engagement remains an open question. This multimethod research effort—invo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of marketing 2023-05, Vol.87 (3), p.383-405 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 405 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 383 |
container_title | Journal of marketing |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Wies, Simone Bleier, Alexander Edeling, Alexander |
description | Influencers’ follower count, or indegree, is a key criterion that advertisers use when devising influencer marketing campaigns. However, whether influencers with lower or higher follower count are more effective in generating engagement remains an open question. This multimethod research effort—involving an observational field data analysis, based on 802 Instagram marketing campaigns featuring more than 1,700 influencers, together with an eye-tracking study and laboratory experiments—establishes conclusive evidence of an inverted U-shaped relationship between influencers’ follower count and engagement with sponsored content. A higher follower count implies broader reach but also cues a weaker relationship that reduces followers’ engagement likelihood. That is, engagement first increases, then decreases, as influencer follower count rises. The authors further test the potential moderating effects of two campaign properties: content customization and brand familiarity. Higher content customization and lower familiarity of the sponsored brand signal that influencers value their relationships with followers and thereby flatten the inverted U-shaped relationship. Managers can leverage these novel results and the related actionable guidelines to improve their influencer marketing strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00222429221125131 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2791538772</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00222429221125131</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2791538772</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-769bc97f252493462b1b3ff23640014a054d09e0f19bee6df5263b5ad33a92163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ4pziXdtxzA2VviQQQsA5ysOpUlK72AkV_55UQeoBsZc97Dcz2iHkGtgEQKlbxhBRoEYEQAkcTsgIpFCRgkSektHhHh2Ac3IRwob1g4kakZd5bcvarunCNWXduOIj0JWtms7YwvhwR5duT-euadzeeDp1nW3pg6-_TKCvrqizhj6Zss7ozK6ztdka216Ssyprgrn63WPyPp-9TZfR4_NiNb1_jAoB2EYq1nmhVYUSheYixhxyXlXIY8EYiIxJUTJtWAU6NyYuK4kxz2VWcp5phJiPyc3gu_PuszOhTTeu87aPTFFpkDxRCnsKBqrwLgRvqnTn623mv1Ng6aG59E9zvYYOGlM4W4ejIhFMcI1S9MhkQEL_9TH4f88fcAF19A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791538772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Finding Goldilocks Influencers: How Follower Count Drives Social Media Engagement</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Wies, Simone ; Bleier, Alexander ; Edeling, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Wies, Simone ; Bleier, Alexander ; Edeling, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Influencers’ follower count, or indegree, is a key criterion that advertisers use when devising influencer marketing campaigns. However, whether influencers with lower or higher follower count are more effective in generating engagement remains an open question. This multimethod research effort—involving an observational field data analysis, based on 802 Instagram marketing campaigns featuring more than 1,700 influencers, together with an eye-tracking study and laboratory experiments—establishes conclusive evidence of an inverted U-shaped relationship between influencers’ follower count and engagement with sponsored content. A higher follower count implies broader reach but also cues a weaker relationship that reduces followers’ engagement likelihood. That is, engagement first increases, then decreases, as influencer follower count rises. The authors further test the potential moderating effects of two campaign properties: content customization and brand familiarity. Higher content customization and lower familiarity of the sponsored brand signal that influencers value their relationships with followers and thereby flatten the inverted U-shaped relationship. Managers can leverage these novel results and the related actionable guidelines to improve their influencer marketing strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2429</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-7185</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00222429221125131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Advertising campaigns ; Influencer marketing ; Mixed methods research</subject><ispartof>Journal of marketing, 2023-05, Vol.87 (3), p.383-405</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-769bc97f252493462b1b3ff23640014a054d09e0f19bee6df5263b5ad33a92163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-769bc97f252493462b1b3ff23640014a054d09e0f19bee6df5263b5ad33a92163</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4712-1518</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00222429221125131$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00222429221125131$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wies, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleier, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edeling, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Finding Goldilocks Influencers: How Follower Count Drives Social Media Engagement</title><title>Journal of marketing</title><addtitle>Journal of Marketing</addtitle><description>Influencers’ follower count, or indegree, is a key criterion that advertisers use when devising influencer marketing campaigns. However, whether influencers with lower or higher follower count are more effective in generating engagement remains an open question. This multimethod research effort—involving an observational field data analysis, based on 802 Instagram marketing campaigns featuring more than 1,700 influencers, together with an eye-tracking study and laboratory experiments—establishes conclusive evidence of an inverted U-shaped relationship between influencers’ follower count and engagement with sponsored content. A higher follower count implies broader reach but also cues a weaker relationship that reduces followers’ engagement likelihood. That is, engagement first increases, then decreases, as influencer follower count rises. The authors further test the potential moderating effects of two campaign properties: content customization and brand familiarity. Higher content customization and lower familiarity of the sponsored brand signal that influencers value their relationships with followers and thereby flatten the inverted U-shaped relationship. Managers can leverage these novel results and the related actionable guidelines to improve their influencer marketing strategies.</description><subject>Advertising campaigns</subject><subject>Influencer marketing</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><issn>0022-2429</issn><issn>1547-7185</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ4pziXdtxzA2VviQQQsA5ysOpUlK72AkV_55UQeoBsZc97Dcz2iHkGtgEQKlbxhBRoEYEQAkcTsgIpFCRgkSektHhHh2Ac3IRwob1g4kakZd5bcvarunCNWXduOIj0JWtms7YwvhwR5duT-euadzeeDp1nW3pg6-_TKCvrqizhj6Zss7ozK6ztdka216Ssyprgrn63WPyPp-9TZfR4_NiNb1_jAoB2EYq1nmhVYUSheYixhxyXlXIY8EYiIxJUTJtWAU6NyYuK4kxz2VWcp5phJiPyc3gu_PuszOhTTeu87aPTFFpkDxRCnsKBqrwLgRvqnTn623mv1Ng6aG59E9zvYYOGlM4W4ejIhFMcI1S9MhkQEL_9TH4f88fcAF19A</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Wies, Simone</creator><creator>Bleier, Alexander</creator><creator>Edeling, Alexander</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4712-1518</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>Finding Goldilocks Influencers: How Follower Count Drives Social Media Engagement</title><author>Wies, Simone ; Bleier, Alexander ; Edeling, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-769bc97f252493462b1b3ff23640014a054d09e0f19bee6df5263b5ad33a92163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Advertising campaigns</topic><topic>Influencer marketing</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wies, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleier, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edeling, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of marketing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wies, Simone</au><au>Bleier, Alexander</au><au>Edeling, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Finding Goldilocks Influencers: How Follower Count Drives Social Media Engagement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marketing</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Marketing</addtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>405</epage><pages>383-405</pages><issn>0022-2429</issn><eissn>1547-7185</eissn><abstract>Influencers’ follower count, or indegree, is a key criterion that advertisers use when devising influencer marketing campaigns. However, whether influencers with lower or higher follower count are more effective in generating engagement remains an open question. This multimethod research effort—involving an observational field data analysis, based on 802 Instagram marketing campaigns featuring more than 1,700 influencers, together with an eye-tracking study and laboratory experiments—establishes conclusive evidence of an inverted U-shaped relationship between influencers’ follower count and engagement with sponsored content. A higher follower count implies broader reach but also cues a weaker relationship that reduces followers’ engagement likelihood. That is, engagement first increases, then decreases, as influencer follower count rises. The authors further test the potential moderating effects of two campaign properties: content customization and brand familiarity. Higher content customization and lower familiarity of the sponsored brand signal that influencers value their relationships with followers and thereby flatten the inverted U-shaped relationship. Managers can leverage these novel results and the related actionable guidelines to improve their influencer marketing strategies.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00222429221125131</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4712-1518</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2429 |
ispartof | Journal of marketing, 2023-05, Vol.87 (3), p.383-405 |
issn | 0022-2429 1547-7185 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2791538772 |
source | Access via SAGE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Advertising campaigns Influencer marketing Mixed methods research |
title | Finding Goldilocks Influencers: How Follower Count Drives Social Media Engagement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T08%3A02%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Finding%20Goldilocks%20Influencers:%20How%20Follower%20Count%20Drives%20Social%20Media%20Engagement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marketing&rft.au=Wies,%20Simone&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=405&rft.pages=383-405&rft.issn=0022-2429&rft.eissn=1547-7185&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00222429221125131&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2791538772%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791538772&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00222429221125131&rfr_iscdi=true |