Global Surpluses of Extraction and Slow Climate Violence: A Sociological Framework
This review article examines the concept of slow violence in relation to the current climate collapse. It outlines the extractive relationship between states in the Global North and Global South, and explores how this relationship creates and sustains disproportionate climate violence for the Global...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociological inquiry 2023-05, Vol.93 (2), p.320-340 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 340 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 320 |
container_title | Sociological inquiry |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | O'Sullivan, Aidan Omukuti, Jessica Ryder, Stacia S. |
description | This review article examines the concept of slow violence in relation to the current climate collapse. It outlines the extractive relationship between states in the Global North and Global South, and explores how this relationship creates and sustains disproportionate climate violence for the Global South. It critiques proposed adaptation and mitigation solutions for the Global South that emphasize market‐led proposals and a return on investments that mostly benefit the Global North. It argues that these proposals fail to critically engage with the root causes of vulnerability to climate change and Greenhouse Gas emissions that cause climate change. The review uses World Systems Theory to analyze the power differentials between South and North, and concepts such as the “Color Line,” “Necropolitics,” and “Slow Violence” to underline the post‐colonial character of this relationship. These provide historical context to the current hegemonic role of the Global North in carbon emission negotiations and responses. In doing so, the article highlights the need to think about climate change, and solutions to climate change, as a driver of slow violence and surplus climate violence by the Global North against the Global South. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/soin.12518 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2791485485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2791485485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-adcc1f95261ff27bdbe256ff9949847078cb2fd55982ea1a523a7dcf1c1822883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKcv_oKAb0JnkjZN6tsYbg6GA6viW0jTRDqzZiYtc__ezPrs5cLlwnfP4R4ArjGa4Fh3wTXtBBOK-QkY4YzRJOfk_RSMEEp5gkhGz8FFCBuEECU8H4HnhXWVtLDs_c72QQfoDHz47rxUXeNaKNsaltbt4cw2W9lp-NY4q1ul7-EUlk7FzX00KirMvdzqvfOfl-DMSBv01d8cg9f5w8vsMVmtF8vZdJWoNGU8kbVS2BSU5NgYwqq60oTmxhRFVvCMIcZVRUxNacGJllhSkkpWK4MV5oRwno7BzaC78-6r16ETG9f7NloKwgqccRo7UrcDpbwLwWsjdj5-4g8CI3HMTBwzE7-ZRRgP8L6x-vAPKcr18mm4-QEpm268</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791485485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global Surpluses of Extraction and Slow Climate Violence: A Sociological Framework</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>O'Sullivan, Aidan ; Omukuti, Jessica ; Ryder, Stacia S.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Aidan ; Omukuti, Jessica ; Ryder, Stacia S.</creatorcontrib><description>This review article examines the concept of slow violence in relation to the current climate collapse. It outlines the extractive relationship between states in the Global North and Global South, and explores how this relationship creates and sustains disproportionate climate violence for the Global South. It critiques proposed adaptation and mitigation solutions for the Global South that emphasize market‐led proposals and a return on investments that mostly benefit the Global North. It argues that these proposals fail to critically engage with the root causes of vulnerability to climate change and Greenhouse Gas emissions that cause climate change. The review uses World Systems Theory to analyze the power differentials between South and North, and concepts such as the “Color Line,” “Necropolitics,” and “Slow Violence” to underline the post‐colonial character of this relationship. These provide historical context to the current hegemonic role of the Global North in carbon emission negotiations and responses. In doing so, the article highlights the need to think about climate change, and solutions to climate change, as a driver of slow violence and surplus climate violence by the Global North against the Global South.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0245</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-682X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/soin.12518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Biopolitics ; Climate change ; Colonialism ; Developing countries ; Emissions ; Greenhouse gases ; Hegemony ; LDCs ; Power structure ; System theory ; Systems theory ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Sociological inquiry, 2023-05, Vol.93 (2), p.320-340</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alpha Kappa Delta: The International Sociology Honor Society.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-adcc1f95261ff27bdbe256ff9949847078cb2fd55982ea1a523a7dcf1c1822883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-adcc1f95261ff27bdbe256ff9949847078cb2fd55982ea1a523a7dcf1c1822883</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5282-0316 ; 0000-0002-3324-2175</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsoin.12518$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsoin.12518$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Aidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omukuti, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryder, Stacia S.</creatorcontrib><title>Global Surpluses of Extraction and Slow Climate Violence: A Sociological Framework</title><title>Sociological inquiry</title><description>This review article examines the concept of slow violence in relation to the current climate collapse. It outlines the extractive relationship between states in the Global North and Global South, and explores how this relationship creates and sustains disproportionate climate violence for the Global South. It critiques proposed adaptation and mitigation solutions for the Global South that emphasize market‐led proposals and a return on investments that mostly benefit the Global North. It argues that these proposals fail to critically engage with the root causes of vulnerability to climate change and Greenhouse Gas emissions that cause climate change. The review uses World Systems Theory to analyze the power differentials between South and North, and concepts such as the “Color Line,” “Necropolitics,” and “Slow Violence” to underline the post‐colonial character of this relationship. These provide historical context to the current hegemonic role of the Global North in carbon emission negotiations and responses. In doing so, the article highlights the need to think about climate change, and solutions to climate change, as a driver of slow violence and surplus climate violence by the Global North against the Global South.</description><subject>Biopolitics</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Power structure</subject><subject>System theory</subject><subject>Systems theory</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0038-0245</issn><issn>1475-682X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKcv_oKAb0JnkjZN6tsYbg6GA6viW0jTRDqzZiYtc__ezPrs5cLlwnfP4R4ArjGa4Fh3wTXtBBOK-QkY4YzRJOfk_RSMEEp5gkhGz8FFCBuEECU8H4HnhXWVtLDs_c72QQfoDHz47rxUXeNaKNsaltbt4cw2W9lp-NY4q1ul7-EUlk7FzX00KirMvdzqvfOfl-DMSBv01d8cg9f5w8vsMVmtF8vZdJWoNGU8kbVS2BSU5NgYwqq60oTmxhRFVvCMIcZVRUxNacGJllhSkkpWK4MV5oRwno7BzaC78-6r16ETG9f7NloKwgqccRo7UrcDpbwLwWsjdj5-4g8CI3HMTBwzE7-ZRRgP8L6x-vAPKcr18mm4-QEpm268</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>O'Sullivan, Aidan</creator><creator>Omukuti, Jessica</creator><creator>Ryder, Stacia S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5282-0316</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3324-2175</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Global Surpluses of Extraction and Slow Climate Violence: A Sociological Framework</title><author>O'Sullivan, Aidan ; Omukuti, Jessica ; Ryder, Stacia S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-adcc1f95261ff27bdbe256ff9949847078cb2fd55982ea1a523a7dcf1c1822883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biopolitics</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Power structure</topic><topic>System theory</topic><topic>Systems theory</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Aidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omukuti, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryder, Stacia S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociological inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Sullivan, Aidan</au><au>Omukuti, Jessica</au><au>Ryder, Stacia S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global Surpluses of Extraction and Slow Climate Violence: A Sociological Framework</atitle><jtitle>Sociological inquiry</jtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>320</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>320-340</pages><issn>0038-0245</issn><eissn>1475-682X</eissn><abstract>This review article examines the concept of slow violence in relation to the current climate collapse. It outlines the extractive relationship between states in the Global North and Global South, and explores how this relationship creates and sustains disproportionate climate violence for the Global South. It critiques proposed adaptation and mitigation solutions for the Global South that emphasize market‐led proposals and a return on investments that mostly benefit the Global North. It argues that these proposals fail to critically engage with the root causes of vulnerability to climate change and Greenhouse Gas emissions that cause climate change. The review uses World Systems Theory to analyze the power differentials between South and North, and concepts such as the “Color Line,” “Necropolitics,” and “Slow Violence” to underline the post‐colonial character of this relationship. These provide historical context to the current hegemonic role of the Global North in carbon emission negotiations and responses. In doing so, the article highlights the need to think about climate change, and solutions to climate change, as a driver of slow violence and surplus climate violence by the Global North against the Global South.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/soin.12518</doi><tpages>340</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5282-0316</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3324-2175</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-0245 |
ispartof | Sociological inquiry, 2023-05, Vol.93 (2), p.320-340 |
issn | 0038-0245 1475-682X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2791485485 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Biopolitics Climate change Colonialism Developing countries Emissions Greenhouse gases Hegemony LDCs Power structure System theory Systems theory Violence |
title | Global Surpluses of Extraction and Slow Climate Violence: A Sociological Framework |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A44%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20Surpluses%20of%20Extraction%20and%20Slow%20Climate%20Violence:%20A%20Sociological%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Sociological%20inquiry&rft.au=O'Sullivan,%20Aidan&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=320&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=320-340&rft.issn=0038-0245&rft.eissn=1475-682X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/soin.12518&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2791485485%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791485485&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |