Machine Learning–Based Profiling in Test Cheating Detection
In recent years, machine learning (ML) techniques have received more attention in detecting aberrant test‐taking behaviors due to advantages when compared to traditional data forensics methods. However, defining “True Test Cheaters” is challenging—different than other fraud detection tasks such as f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational measurement, issues and practice issues and practice, 2023-03, Vol.42 (1), p.59-75 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 75 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Educational measurement, issues and practice |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Meng, Huijuan Ma, Ye |
description | In recent years, machine learning (ML) techniques have received more attention in detecting aberrant test‐taking behaviors due to advantages when compared to traditional data forensics methods. However, defining “True Test Cheaters” is challenging—different than other fraud detection tasks such as flagging forged bank checks or credit card frauds, testing organizations are often lack of physical evidences to identify “True Test Cheaters” to train ML models. This study proposed a statistically defensible method of labeling “True Test Cheaters” in the data, demonstrated the effectiveness of using ML approaches to identify irregular statistical patterns in exam data, and established an analytical framework for evaluating and conducting real‐time ML‐based test data forensics. Classification accuracy and false negative/positive results are evaluated across different supervised‐ML techniques. The reliability and feasibility of operationally using this approach for an IT certification exam are evaluated using real data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/emip.12541 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2791064330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1371338</ericid><sourcerecordid>2791064330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2451-658cc51e2932db7b976ce816347bd100bfe9b5d3d25027223345402eb65ef5b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFY37oWAOyF17vxkmoULrfWPFruo6yEzubFT2qTOpEh3voNv6JOYGHHp3Vw49-OcyyHkFOgAmrnEtdsMgEkBe6QHSsiYpynbJz2qOMStcEiOQlhSCjJJVY9cTTO7cCVGE8x86crXr4_PmyxgHs18VbhVo0SujOYY6mi0wKxuhVus0dauKo_JQZGtAp787j55uRvPRw_x5Pn-cXQ9iS0TEuJEDq2VgCzlLDfKpCqxOISEC2VyoNQUmBqZ85xJyhRjnAspKEOTSCykGfI-Oe98N7562za_6GW19WUTqZlKgSaCc9pQFx1lfRWCx0JvvFtnfqeB6rYe3dajf-pp4LMORu_sHzh-Aq6A8zYSuvu7W-HuHyc9nj7OOs9vOz5v2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791064330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine Learning–Based Profiling in Test Cheating Detection</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Meng, Huijuan ; Ma, Ye</creator><creatorcontrib>Meng, Huijuan ; Ma, Ye</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, machine learning (ML) techniques have received more attention in detecting aberrant test‐taking behaviors due to advantages when compared to traditional data forensics methods. However, defining “True Test Cheaters” is challenging—different than other fraud detection tasks such as flagging forged bank checks or credit card frauds, testing organizations are often lack of physical evidences to identify “True Test Cheaters” to train ML models. This study proposed a statistically defensible method of labeling “True Test Cheaters” in the data, demonstrated the effectiveness of using ML approaches to identify irregular statistical patterns in exam data, and established an analytical framework for evaluating and conducting real‐time ML‐based test data forensics. Classification accuracy and false negative/positive results are evaluated across different supervised‐ML techniques. The reliability and feasibility of operationally using this approach for an IT certification exam are evaluated using real data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-3992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/emip.12541</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Wiley</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Cheating ; Educational tests & measurements ; Information Technology ; Machine learning ; Pattern Recognition ; test security ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Educational measurement, issues and practice, 2023-03, Vol.42 (1), p.59-75</ispartof><rights>2023 by the National Council on Measurement in Education.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2451-658cc51e2932db7b976ce816347bd100bfe9b5d3d25027223345402eb65ef5b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Femip.12541$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Femip.12541$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1371338$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meng, Huijuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Ye</creatorcontrib><title>Machine Learning–Based Profiling in Test Cheating Detection</title><title>Educational measurement, issues and practice</title><description>In recent years, machine learning (ML) techniques have received more attention in detecting aberrant test‐taking behaviors due to advantages when compared to traditional data forensics methods. However, defining “True Test Cheaters” is challenging—different than other fraud detection tasks such as flagging forged bank checks or credit card frauds, testing organizations are often lack of physical evidences to identify “True Test Cheaters” to train ML models. This study proposed a statistically defensible method of labeling “True Test Cheaters” in the data, demonstrated the effectiveness of using ML approaches to identify irregular statistical patterns in exam data, and established an analytical framework for evaluating and conducting real‐time ML‐based test data forensics. Classification accuracy and false negative/positive results are evaluated across different supervised‐ML techniques. The reliability and feasibility of operationally using this approach for an IT certification exam are evaluated using real data.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Cheating</subject><subject>Educational tests & measurements</subject><subject>Information Technology</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition</subject><subject>test security</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>0731-1745</issn><issn>1745-3992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFY37oWAOyF17vxkmoULrfWPFruo6yEzubFT2qTOpEh3voNv6JOYGHHp3Vw49-OcyyHkFOgAmrnEtdsMgEkBe6QHSsiYpynbJz2qOMStcEiOQlhSCjJJVY9cTTO7cCVGE8x86crXr4_PmyxgHs18VbhVo0SujOYY6mi0wKxuhVus0dauKo_JQZGtAp787j55uRvPRw_x5Pn-cXQ9iS0TEuJEDq2VgCzlLDfKpCqxOISEC2VyoNQUmBqZ85xJyhRjnAspKEOTSCykGfI-Oe98N7562za_6GW19WUTqZlKgSaCc9pQFx1lfRWCx0JvvFtnfqeB6rYe3dajf-pp4LMORu_sHzh-Aq6A8zYSuvu7W-HuHyc9nj7OOs9vOz5v2Q</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Meng, Huijuan</creator><creator>Ma, Ye</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Machine Learning–Based Profiling in Test Cheating Detection</title><author>Meng, Huijuan ; Ma, Ye</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2451-658cc51e2932db7b976ce816347bd100bfe9b5d3d25027223345402eb65ef5b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Cheating</topic><topic>Educational tests & measurements</topic><topic>Information Technology</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition</topic><topic>test security</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meng, Huijuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Ye</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational measurement, issues and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meng, Huijuan</au><au>Ma, Ye</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1371338</ericid><atitle>Machine Learning–Based Profiling in Test Cheating Detection</atitle><jtitle>Educational measurement, issues and practice</jtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>59-75</pages><issn>0731-1745</issn><eissn>1745-3992</eissn><abstract>In recent years, machine learning (ML) techniques have received more attention in detecting aberrant test‐taking behaviors due to advantages when compared to traditional data forensics methods. However, defining “True Test Cheaters” is challenging—different than other fraud detection tasks such as flagging forged bank checks or credit card frauds, testing organizations are often lack of physical evidences to identify “True Test Cheaters” to train ML models. This study proposed a statistically defensible method of labeling “True Test Cheaters” in the data, demonstrated the effectiveness of using ML approaches to identify irregular statistical patterns in exam data, and established an analytical framework for evaluating and conducting real‐time ML‐based test data forensics. Classification accuracy and false negative/positive results are evaluated across different supervised‐ML techniques. The reliability and feasibility of operationally using this approach for an IT certification exam are evaluated using real data.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/emip.12541</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0731-1745 |
ispartof | Educational measurement, issues and practice, 2023-03, Vol.42 (1), p.59-75 |
issn | 0731-1745 1745-3992 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2791064330 |
source | Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Artificial Intelligence Cheating Educational tests & measurements Information Technology Machine learning Pattern Recognition test security Testing |
title | Machine Learning–Based Profiling in Test Cheating Detection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A36%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20Learning%E2%80%93Based%20Profiling%20in%20Test%20Cheating%20Detection&rft.jtitle=Educational%20measurement,%20issues%20and%20practice&rft.au=Meng,%20Huijuan&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=59-75&rft.issn=0731-1745&rft.eissn=1745-3992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/emip.12541&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2791064330%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791064330&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1371338&rfr_iscdi=true |