5PSQ-071 Analysis of medication provided by patients
Background and ImportanceMany patients bring medication with them during their admission to hospital, which is a source of error.Aim and ObjectivesAnalyse the prescription of medicines provided by the patient and evaluate their correct use.Material and MethodsCross-sectional descriptive study of pat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice 2023-03, Vol.30 (Suppl 1), p.A137-A137 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A137 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A137 |
container_title | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Soto, I González, I Mengual Barroso, MR Rubio Cebrian, B San Miguel Torvisco, P Sollano-Sancho, I Morona Minguez, I Pousada Fonseca, A Solis Olivares, J Mateos Mateos, Y Moriel Sanchez, C |
description | Background and ImportanceMany patients bring medication with them during their admission to hospital, which is a source of error.Aim and ObjectivesAnalyse the prescription of medicines provided by the patient and evaluate their correct use.Material and MethodsCross-sectional descriptive study of patients admitted to a second level hospital on 11-11-2021 which had treatments prescribed as ‘medication provided by the patient’ (MPP). The sources of information used were: the electronic medical record and the prescription programme. The variables collected were: age, sex, prescribing service, whether or not the medication was provided, patient knowledge of the dosage of the medication provided, number of total active ingredients prescribed per patient, and medications provided, number of therapeutic duplications in the complete treatment.ResultsA total of 96 patients had a prescription for a MPP, representing 28.92% of the patients admitted to the hospital at that time. Of this total, after excluding those who could not be interviewed due to their clinical situation (Intensive Care, Resuscitation, Psychiatry, Emergency, Home Hospitalisation Unit and isolated patients), 42 patients were analysed, with a median age of 74.5 years [RIQ 70-80.75], 59.52% being male. The main prescribing service was internal medicine (59.52%) followed by surgery (16.67%) and traumatology (16.67%). Of the total number of patients with prescribed MPP, 85.71% actually provided it and 97.22% were aware of its dosage. The median number of active ingredients prescribed per patient was 13[RIQ 11-17], with the median number of MAPs being 2 [RIQ 1-2.75]. Therapeutic duplication was found between the medication provided and that of the admission in 2 patients.Conclusion and RelevanceA considerable percentage of patients admitted to the hospital provide medication, with the majority of patients belonging to the Internal Medicine Department. After the interview, it was observed that most of them controlled their medication; however, a significant percentage, despite having medication prescribed as provided, did not have it during their admission. For this reason, we consider that the patient should not provide medication as far as possible, in order to try to prevent medication errors during the hospital stay and to adjust his treatment to the hospital pharmacotherapeutic guide.References and/or AcknowledgementsConflict of InterestNo conflict of interest |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-eahp.285 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2790200912</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2790200912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1195-b3c6062f3fa07fb2a163fd90746a9dfdb9e1ab1456b3b836f1af9fe2f258e153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNLxRD10o1Gku2liH0BYG2NHshRRK2iR-1kkJ23fRH-yWxSR-rO1wOw-UQcg1sDoDy1ldFV5i-ppxxpN4U3Zzn4oxMOEszqpRMz_9uIS_JLMbSMoGYqxTVhEjx8vZKWQbfn1-LxmwPsYxJG5Lau3JjdmXbJF3ffpTOu8Qekm6ofLOLV-QimG30s5-ckvX93Xr5SFfPD0_LxYpaACWoxY1kkgcMhmXBcgMSg1MsS6VRLjirPBgLqZAWbY4ygAkqeB64yD0InJKb09thw_vex52u2n0_zIyaZ4pxxhTwgeInytbVPwBMj4b0ryE9GtKjIT0YwiMcpFyo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2790200912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>5PSQ-071 Analysis of medication provided by patients</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Soto, I ; González, I ; Mengual Barroso, MR ; Rubio Cebrian, B ; San Miguel Torvisco, P ; Sollano-Sancho, I ; Morona Minguez, I ; Pousada Fonseca, A ; Solis Olivares, J ; Mateos Mateos, Y ; Moriel Sanchez, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Soto, I ; González, I ; Mengual Barroso, MR ; Rubio Cebrian, B ; San Miguel Torvisco, P ; Sollano-Sancho, I ; Morona Minguez, I ; Pousada Fonseca, A ; Solis Olivares, J ; Mateos Mateos, Y ; Moriel Sanchez, C</creatorcontrib><description>Background and ImportanceMany patients bring medication with them during their admission to hospital, which is a source of error.Aim and ObjectivesAnalyse the prescription of medicines provided by the patient and evaluate their correct use.Material and MethodsCross-sectional descriptive study of patients admitted to a second level hospital on 11-11-2021 which had treatments prescribed as ‘medication provided by the patient’ (MPP). The sources of information used were: the electronic medical record and the prescription programme. The variables collected were: age, sex, prescribing service, whether or not the medication was provided, patient knowledge of the dosage of the medication provided, number of total active ingredients prescribed per patient, and medications provided, number of therapeutic duplications in the complete treatment.ResultsA total of 96 patients had a prescription for a MPP, representing 28.92% of the patients admitted to the hospital at that time. Of this total, after excluding those who could not be interviewed due to their clinical situation (Intensive Care, Resuscitation, Psychiatry, Emergency, Home Hospitalisation Unit and isolated patients), 42 patients were analysed, with a median age of 74.5 years [RIQ 70-80.75], 59.52% being male. The main prescribing service was internal medicine (59.52%) followed by surgery (16.67%) and traumatology (16.67%). Of the total number of patients with prescribed MPP, 85.71% actually provided it and 97.22% were aware of its dosage. The median number of active ingredients prescribed per patient was 13[RIQ 11-17], with the median number of MAPs being 2 [RIQ 1-2.75]. Therapeutic duplication was found between the medication provided and that of the admission in 2 patients.Conclusion and RelevanceA considerable percentage of patients admitted to the hospital provide medication, with the majority of patients belonging to the Internal Medicine Department. After the interview, it was observed that most of them controlled their medication; however, a significant percentage, despite having medication prescribed as provided, did not have it during their admission. For this reason, we consider that the patient should not provide medication as far as possible, in order to try to prevent medication errors during the hospital stay and to adjust his treatment to the hospital pharmacotherapeutic guide.References and/or AcknowledgementsConflict of InterestNo conflict of interest</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-9956</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-9964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-eahp.285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Conflicts of interest ; Drug dosages ; Internal medicine ; Patients ; Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</subject><ispartof>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2023-03, Vol.30 (Suppl 1), p.A137-A137</ispartof><rights>European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2023 European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soto, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mengual Barroso, MR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubio Cebrian, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Miguel Torvisco, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sollano-Sancho, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morona Minguez, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pousada Fonseca, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solis Olivares, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateos Mateos, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriel Sanchez, C</creatorcontrib><title>5PSQ-071 Analysis of medication provided by patients</title><title>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</title><addtitle>Eur J Hosp Pharm</addtitle><description>Background and ImportanceMany patients bring medication with them during their admission to hospital, which is a source of error.Aim and ObjectivesAnalyse the prescription of medicines provided by the patient and evaluate their correct use.Material and MethodsCross-sectional descriptive study of patients admitted to a second level hospital on 11-11-2021 which had treatments prescribed as ‘medication provided by the patient’ (MPP). The sources of information used were: the electronic medical record and the prescription programme. The variables collected were: age, sex, prescribing service, whether or not the medication was provided, patient knowledge of the dosage of the medication provided, number of total active ingredients prescribed per patient, and medications provided, number of therapeutic duplications in the complete treatment.ResultsA total of 96 patients had a prescription for a MPP, representing 28.92% of the patients admitted to the hospital at that time. Of this total, after excluding those who could not be interviewed due to their clinical situation (Intensive Care, Resuscitation, Psychiatry, Emergency, Home Hospitalisation Unit and isolated patients), 42 patients were analysed, with a median age of 74.5 years [RIQ 70-80.75], 59.52% being male. The main prescribing service was internal medicine (59.52%) followed by surgery (16.67%) and traumatology (16.67%). Of the total number of patients with prescribed MPP, 85.71% actually provided it and 97.22% were aware of its dosage. The median number of active ingredients prescribed per patient was 13[RIQ 11-17], with the median number of MAPs being 2 [RIQ 1-2.75]. Therapeutic duplication was found between the medication provided and that of the admission in 2 patients.Conclusion and RelevanceA considerable percentage of patients admitted to the hospital provide medication, with the majority of patients belonging to the Internal Medicine Department. After the interview, it was observed that most of them controlled their medication; however, a significant percentage, despite having medication prescribed as provided, did not have it during their admission. For this reason, we consider that the patient should not provide medication as far as possible, in order to try to prevent medication errors during the hospital stay and to adjust his treatment to the hospital pharmacotherapeutic guide.References and/or AcknowledgementsConflict of InterestNo conflict of interest</description><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</subject><issn>2047-9956</issn><issn>2047-9964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNLxRD10o1Gku2liH0BYG2NHshRRK2iR-1kkJ23fRH-yWxSR-rO1wOw-UQcg1sDoDy1ldFV5i-ppxxpN4U3Zzn4oxMOEszqpRMz_9uIS_JLMbSMoGYqxTVhEjx8vZKWQbfn1-LxmwPsYxJG5Lau3JjdmXbJF3ffpTOu8Qekm6ofLOLV-QimG30s5-ckvX93Xr5SFfPD0_LxYpaACWoxY1kkgcMhmXBcgMSg1MsS6VRLjirPBgLqZAWbY4ygAkqeB64yD0InJKb09thw_vex52u2n0_zIyaZ4pxxhTwgeInytbVPwBMj4b0ryE9GtKjIT0YwiMcpFyo</recordid><startdate>20230323</startdate><enddate>20230323</enddate><creator>Soto, I</creator><creator>González, I</creator><creator>Mengual Barroso, MR</creator><creator>Rubio Cebrian, B</creator><creator>San Miguel Torvisco, P</creator><creator>Sollano-Sancho, I</creator><creator>Morona Minguez, I</creator><creator>Pousada Fonseca, A</creator><creator>Solis Olivares, J</creator><creator>Mateos Mateos, Y</creator><creator>Moriel Sanchez, C</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230323</creationdate><title>5PSQ-071 Analysis of medication provided by patients</title><author>Soto, I ; González, I ; Mengual Barroso, MR ; Rubio Cebrian, B ; San Miguel Torvisco, P ; Sollano-Sancho, I ; Morona Minguez, I ; Pousada Fonseca, A ; Solis Olivares, J ; Mateos Mateos, Y ; Moriel Sanchez, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1195-b3c6062f3fa07fb2a163fd90746a9dfdb9e1ab1456b3b836f1af9fe2f258e153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soto, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mengual Barroso, MR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubio Cebrian, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Miguel Torvisco, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sollano-Sancho, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morona Minguez, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pousada Fonseca, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solis Olivares, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateos Mateos, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriel Sanchez, C</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soto, I</au><au>González, I</au><au>Mengual Barroso, MR</au><au>Rubio Cebrian, B</au><au>San Miguel Torvisco, P</au><au>Sollano-Sancho, I</au><au>Morona Minguez, I</au><au>Pousada Fonseca, A</au><au>Solis Olivares, J</au><au>Mateos Mateos, Y</au><au>Moriel Sanchez, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>5PSQ-071 Analysis of medication provided by patients</atitle><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Hosp Pharm</stitle><date>2023-03-23</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A137</spage><epage>A137</epage><pages>A137-A137</pages><issn>2047-9956</issn><eissn>2047-9964</eissn><abstract>Background and ImportanceMany patients bring medication with them during their admission to hospital, which is a source of error.Aim and ObjectivesAnalyse the prescription of medicines provided by the patient and evaluate their correct use.Material and MethodsCross-sectional descriptive study of patients admitted to a second level hospital on 11-11-2021 which had treatments prescribed as ‘medication provided by the patient’ (MPP). The sources of information used were: the electronic medical record and the prescription programme. The variables collected were: age, sex, prescribing service, whether or not the medication was provided, patient knowledge of the dosage of the medication provided, number of total active ingredients prescribed per patient, and medications provided, number of therapeutic duplications in the complete treatment.ResultsA total of 96 patients had a prescription for a MPP, representing 28.92% of the patients admitted to the hospital at that time. Of this total, after excluding those who could not be interviewed due to their clinical situation (Intensive Care, Resuscitation, Psychiatry, Emergency, Home Hospitalisation Unit and isolated patients), 42 patients were analysed, with a median age of 74.5 years [RIQ 70-80.75], 59.52% being male. The main prescribing service was internal medicine (59.52%) followed by surgery (16.67%) and traumatology (16.67%). Of the total number of patients with prescribed MPP, 85.71% actually provided it and 97.22% were aware of its dosage. The median number of active ingredients prescribed per patient was 13[RIQ 11-17], with the median number of MAPs being 2 [RIQ 1-2.75]. Therapeutic duplication was found between the medication provided and that of the admission in 2 patients.Conclusion and RelevanceA considerable percentage of patients admitted to the hospital provide medication, with the majority of patients belonging to the Internal Medicine Department. After the interview, it was observed that most of them controlled their medication; however, a significant percentage, despite having medication prescribed as provided, did not have it during their admission. For this reason, we consider that the patient should not provide medication as far as possible, in order to try to prevent medication errors during the hospital stay and to adjust his treatment to the hospital pharmacotherapeutic guide.References and/or AcknowledgementsConflict of InterestNo conflict of interest</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><doi>10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-eahp.285</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2047-9956 |
ispartof | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2023-03, Vol.30 (Suppl 1), p.A137-A137 |
issn | 2047-9956 2047-9964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2790200912 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Conflicts of interest Drug dosages Internal medicine Patients Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance |
title | 5PSQ-071 Analysis of medication provided by patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A19%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=5PSQ-071%E2%80%85Analysis%20of%20medication%20provided%20by%20patients&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20hospital%20pharmacy.%20Science%20and%20practice&rft.au=Soto,%20I&rft.date=2023-03-23&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A137&rft.epage=A137&rft.pages=A137-A137&rft.issn=2047-9956&rft.eissn=2047-9964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-eahp.285&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_j%3E2790200912%3C/proquest_bmj_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2790200912&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |