Innovation vs inertia: Entrepreneurial governments in 21st‐century rural Alberta
Rural development in Alberta is a long‐standing challenge, with local communities and economies often stuck between economic cycles, fiscal largesse from the Provincial Government, and a historical pattern of conservative leadership that seeks to leave the private sector unimpeded. As a result, many...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Canadian geographer 2023-04, Vol.67 (1), p.165-175 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 175 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 165 |
container_title | The Canadian geographer |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Hallstrom, Lars |
description | Rural development in Alberta is a long‐standing challenge, with local communities and economies often stuck between economic cycles, fiscal largesse from the Provincial Government, and a historical pattern of conservative leadership that seeks to leave the private sector unimpeded. As a result, many rural communities now face significant economic, social, political, and ecological challenges that, while not unique to Alberta, are marked by only modest innovation and a tendency to return to previous developmental initiatives. This paper is focused upon identifying the common challenges facing municipal government in the province, but also accounting for the inertial dynamics within municipal politics. Drawing from qualitative data collected from rural municipalities, it seeks to situate contemporary adaptive economic strategies and initiatives within the dominant public ideology of the province. This paper argues that while reform initiatives undertaken in the province broadly align with pragmatic municipalism as a necessary response to decades of neoliberal austerity and inertia, that pragmatism is tempered by a provincial rationality that limits, rather than enhances, the likelihood of meaningful change. This rationality, and its effects, are explained through four fallacies: home rule, agency, the Golden Age, and homogeneity.
Key Messages
Albertan municipalities are innovative and pragmatic, and not solely embedded in reducing costs due to budgetary constraints.
Provincial governments have a long history of limiting institutional, jurisdictional, or legislative changes that could facilitate municipal sustainability.
Choices for municipalities are structured by an institutional inertia that rhetorically emphasizes the autonomy, individualism, responsibility, and accountability of rural municipalities.
Résumé
Le développement rural en Alberta est un défi de longue date, les collectivités et les économies locales étant souvent coincées entre les cycles économiques, les largesses financières de la province et un modèle de leadership conservateur qui laisse le secteur privé libre de toute entrave. En conséquence, de nombreuses communautés rurales sont aujourd'hui confrontées à des défis socioéconomiques, politiques et écologiques importants qui, bien que n'étant pas propres à l'Alberta, sont marqués par des innovations limitées et une tendance à revenir à un mode de développement traditionnel. Cet article vise à identifier les défis communs auxquels sont conf |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cag.12822 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2789627192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2789627192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1532-3ee9b5a74006ff781c9695e149cf20c585d8b972b44aab47715dece5c42d3f6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkNFKwzAUhoMoWKcXvkHB625JmjSJd2PMORgIotchTU9HR5fWtJ30zkfwGfckZpvn5pwfvnP-w4_QI8FTEmpmzXZKqKT0CkWEM5JgnLFrFGGMZZJmXN6iu67bBYkZlxF6XzvXHExfNS4-dHHlwPeVeY6XrvfQenAw-MrU8bY5gHd7cP0Jiinp-uPPrw168GPsBx-YeZ2HbXOPbkpTd_Dw3yfo82X5sXhNNm-r9WK-SVrCU5qkACrnRrDwYVkKSazKFAfClC0ptlzyQuZK0JwxY3ImBOEFWOCW0SItM0gn6Olyt_XN1wBdr3fN4F2w1FRIlVFBFA3U7EJ9VzWMuvXV3vhRE6xPeemQlz7npRfz1XlI_wCxDmDN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2789627192</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Innovation vs inertia: Entrepreneurial governments in 21st‐century rural Alberta</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Hallstrom, Lars</creator><creatorcontrib>Hallstrom, Lars</creatorcontrib><description>Rural development in Alberta is a long‐standing challenge, with local communities and economies often stuck between economic cycles, fiscal largesse from the Provincial Government, and a historical pattern of conservative leadership that seeks to leave the private sector unimpeded. As a result, many rural communities now face significant economic, social, political, and ecological challenges that, while not unique to Alberta, are marked by only modest innovation and a tendency to return to previous developmental initiatives. This paper is focused upon identifying the common challenges facing municipal government in the province, but also accounting for the inertial dynamics within municipal politics. Drawing from qualitative data collected from rural municipalities, it seeks to situate contemporary adaptive economic strategies and initiatives within the dominant public ideology of the province. This paper argues that while reform initiatives undertaken in the province broadly align with pragmatic municipalism as a necessary response to decades of neoliberal austerity and inertia, that pragmatism is tempered by a provincial rationality that limits, rather than enhances, the likelihood of meaningful change. This rationality, and its effects, are explained through four fallacies: home rule, agency, the Golden Age, and homogeneity.
Key Messages
Albertan municipalities are innovative and pragmatic, and not solely embedded in reducing costs due to budgetary constraints.
Provincial governments have a long history of limiting institutional, jurisdictional, or legislative changes that could facilitate municipal sustainability.
Choices for municipalities are structured by an institutional inertia that rhetorically emphasizes the autonomy, individualism, responsibility, and accountability of rural municipalities.
Résumé
Le développement rural en Alberta est un défi de longue date, les collectivités et les économies locales étant souvent coincées entre les cycles économiques, les largesses financières de la province et un modèle de leadership conservateur qui laisse le secteur privé libre de toute entrave. En conséquence, de nombreuses communautés rurales sont aujourd'hui confrontées à des défis socioéconomiques, politiques et écologiques importants qui, bien que n'étant pas propres à l'Alberta, sont marqués par des innovations limitées et une tendance à revenir à un mode de développement traditionnel. Cet article vise à identifier les défis communs auxquels sont confrontés les administrations municipales de la province, mais aussi à tenir compte de la tendance à l'inertie de la politique municipale. S'appuyant sur des données qualitatives recueillies auprès de municipalités rurales, nous cherchons à contextualiser les stratégies et projets économiques innovants par rapport à l'idéologie dominante. Nos résultats suggèrent que les projets municipaux innovants s'intègrent largement au municipalisme pragmatique, après des décennies d'austérité. De plus, ce pragmatisme est contraint par la rationalité ambiante du gouvernement provincial qui limite la probabilité de changements significatifs. Cette rationalité, et ses effets, sont expliqués à travers quatre sophismes: la règle du domicile, l'agentivité, l'âge d'or et l'homogénéité.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-3658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cag.12822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Toronto: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alberta rurale ; Business cycles ; development ; développement ; Ecological effects ; economy ; Fallacies ; Homogeneity ; Inertia ; innovation ; Innovations ; Leadership ; Local communities ; Local government ; Local politics ; municipal ; Municipal government ; Municipalities ; municipalité ; Neoliberalism ; Political leadership ; Pragmatism ; Private sector ; Provinces ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative research ; Rationality ; rural Alberta ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Rural development ; Subnational government ; économie</subject><ispartof>The Canadian geographer, 2023-04, Vol.67 (1), p.165-175</ispartof><rights>2023 Canadian Association of Geographers / L'Association canadienne des géographes.</rights><rights>2023 Canadian Association of Geographers / L'Association canadienne des géographes</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcag.12822$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcag.12822$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hallstrom, Lars</creatorcontrib><title>Innovation vs inertia: Entrepreneurial governments in 21st‐century rural Alberta</title><title>The Canadian geographer</title><description>Rural development in Alberta is a long‐standing challenge, with local communities and economies often stuck between economic cycles, fiscal largesse from the Provincial Government, and a historical pattern of conservative leadership that seeks to leave the private sector unimpeded. As a result, many rural communities now face significant economic, social, political, and ecological challenges that, while not unique to Alberta, are marked by only modest innovation and a tendency to return to previous developmental initiatives. This paper is focused upon identifying the common challenges facing municipal government in the province, but also accounting for the inertial dynamics within municipal politics. Drawing from qualitative data collected from rural municipalities, it seeks to situate contemporary adaptive economic strategies and initiatives within the dominant public ideology of the province. This paper argues that while reform initiatives undertaken in the province broadly align with pragmatic municipalism as a necessary response to decades of neoliberal austerity and inertia, that pragmatism is tempered by a provincial rationality that limits, rather than enhances, the likelihood of meaningful change. This rationality, and its effects, are explained through four fallacies: home rule, agency, the Golden Age, and homogeneity.
Key Messages
Albertan municipalities are innovative and pragmatic, and not solely embedded in reducing costs due to budgetary constraints.
Provincial governments have a long history of limiting institutional, jurisdictional, or legislative changes that could facilitate municipal sustainability.
Choices for municipalities are structured by an institutional inertia that rhetorically emphasizes the autonomy, individualism, responsibility, and accountability of rural municipalities.
Résumé
Le développement rural en Alberta est un défi de longue date, les collectivités et les économies locales étant souvent coincées entre les cycles économiques, les largesses financières de la province et un modèle de leadership conservateur qui laisse le secteur privé libre de toute entrave. En conséquence, de nombreuses communautés rurales sont aujourd'hui confrontées à des défis socioéconomiques, politiques et écologiques importants qui, bien que n'étant pas propres à l'Alberta, sont marqués par des innovations limitées et une tendance à revenir à un mode de développement traditionnel. Cet article vise à identifier les défis communs auxquels sont confrontés les administrations municipales de la province, mais aussi à tenir compte de la tendance à l'inertie de la politique municipale. S'appuyant sur des données qualitatives recueillies auprès de municipalités rurales, nous cherchons à contextualiser les stratégies et projets économiques innovants par rapport à l'idéologie dominante. Nos résultats suggèrent que les projets municipaux innovants s'intègrent largement au municipalisme pragmatique, après des décennies d'austérité. De plus, ce pragmatisme est contraint par la rationalité ambiante du gouvernement provincial qui limite la probabilité de changements significatifs. Cette rationalité, et ses effets, sont expliqués à travers quatre sophismes: la règle du domicile, l'agentivité, l'âge d'or et l'homogénéité.</description><subject>Alberta rurale</subject><subject>Business cycles</subject><subject>development</subject><subject>développement</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>economy</subject><subject>Fallacies</subject><subject>Homogeneity</subject><subject>Inertia</subject><subject>innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Local politics</subject><subject>municipal</subject><subject>Municipal government</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>municipalité</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Political leadership</subject><subject>Pragmatism</subject><subject>Private sector</subject><subject>Provinces</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>rural Alberta</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><subject>Subnational government</subject><subject>économie</subject><issn>0008-3658</issn><issn>1541-0064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNotkNFKwzAUhoMoWKcXvkHB625JmjSJd2PMORgIotchTU9HR5fWtJ30zkfwGfckZpvn5pwfvnP-w4_QI8FTEmpmzXZKqKT0CkWEM5JgnLFrFGGMZZJmXN6iu67bBYkZlxF6XzvXHExfNS4-dHHlwPeVeY6XrvfQenAw-MrU8bY5gHd7cP0Jiinp-uPPrw168GPsBx-YeZ2HbXOPbkpTd_Dw3yfo82X5sXhNNm-r9WK-SVrCU5qkACrnRrDwYVkKSazKFAfClC0ptlzyQuZK0JwxY3ImBOEFWOCW0SItM0gn6Olyt_XN1wBdr3fN4F2w1FRIlVFBFA3U7EJ9VzWMuvXV3vhRE6xPeemQlz7npRfz1XlI_wCxDmDN</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Hallstrom, Lars</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Innovation vs inertia: Entrepreneurial governments in 21st‐century rural Alberta</title><author>Hallstrom, Lars</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1532-3ee9b5a74006ff781c9695e149cf20c585d8b972b44aab47715dece5c42d3f6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Alberta rurale</topic><topic>Business cycles</topic><topic>development</topic><topic>développement</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>economy</topic><topic>Fallacies</topic><topic>Homogeneity</topic><topic>Inertia</topic><topic>innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Local politics</topic><topic>municipal</topic><topic>Municipal government</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>municipalité</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Political leadership</topic><topic>Pragmatism</topic><topic>Private sector</topic><topic>Provinces</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>rural Alberta</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><topic>Subnational government</topic><topic>économie</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hallstrom, Lars</creatorcontrib><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Canadian geographer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hallstrom, Lars</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Innovation vs inertia: Entrepreneurial governments in 21st‐century rural Alberta</atitle><jtitle>The Canadian geographer</jtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>165-175</pages><issn>0008-3658</issn><eissn>1541-0064</eissn><abstract>Rural development in Alberta is a long‐standing challenge, with local communities and economies often stuck between economic cycles, fiscal largesse from the Provincial Government, and a historical pattern of conservative leadership that seeks to leave the private sector unimpeded. As a result, many rural communities now face significant economic, social, political, and ecological challenges that, while not unique to Alberta, are marked by only modest innovation and a tendency to return to previous developmental initiatives. This paper is focused upon identifying the common challenges facing municipal government in the province, but also accounting for the inertial dynamics within municipal politics. Drawing from qualitative data collected from rural municipalities, it seeks to situate contemporary adaptive economic strategies and initiatives within the dominant public ideology of the province. This paper argues that while reform initiatives undertaken in the province broadly align with pragmatic municipalism as a necessary response to decades of neoliberal austerity and inertia, that pragmatism is tempered by a provincial rationality that limits, rather than enhances, the likelihood of meaningful change. This rationality, and its effects, are explained through four fallacies: home rule, agency, the Golden Age, and homogeneity.
Key Messages
Albertan municipalities are innovative and pragmatic, and not solely embedded in reducing costs due to budgetary constraints.
Provincial governments have a long history of limiting institutional, jurisdictional, or legislative changes that could facilitate municipal sustainability.
Choices for municipalities are structured by an institutional inertia that rhetorically emphasizes the autonomy, individualism, responsibility, and accountability of rural municipalities.
Résumé
Le développement rural en Alberta est un défi de longue date, les collectivités et les économies locales étant souvent coincées entre les cycles économiques, les largesses financières de la province et un modèle de leadership conservateur qui laisse le secteur privé libre de toute entrave. En conséquence, de nombreuses communautés rurales sont aujourd'hui confrontées à des défis socioéconomiques, politiques et écologiques importants qui, bien que n'étant pas propres à l'Alberta, sont marqués par des innovations limitées et une tendance à revenir à un mode de développement traditionnel. Cet article vise à identifier les défis communs auxquels sont confrontés les administrations municipales de la province, mais aussi à tenir compte de la tendance à l'inertie de la politique municipale. S'appuyant sur des données qualitatives recueillies auprès de municipalités rurales, nous cherchons à contextualiser les stratégies et projets économiques innovants par rapport à l'idéologie dominante. Nos résultats suggèrent que les projets municipaux innovants s'intègrent largement au municipalisme pragmatique, après des décennies d'austérité. De plus, ce pragmatisme est contraint par la rationalité ambiante du gouvernement provincial qui limite la probabilité de changements significatifs. Cette rationalité, et ses effets, sont expliqués à travers quatre sophismes: la règle du domicile, l'agentivité, l'âge d'or et l'homogénéité.</abstract><cop>Toronto</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/cag.12822</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-3658 |
ispartof | The Canadian geographer, 2023-04, Vol.67 (1), p.165-175 |
issn | 0008-3658 1541-0064 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2789627192 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Alberta rurale Business cycles development développement Ecological effects economy Fallacies Homogeneity Inertia innovation Innovations Leadership Local communities Local government Local politics municipal Municipal government Municipalities municipalité Neoliberalism Political leadership Pragmatism Private sector Provinces Qualitative analysis Qualitative research Rationality rural Alberta Rural areas Rural communities Rural development Subnational government économie |
title | Innovation vs inertia: Entrepreneurial governments in 21st‐century rural Alberta |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T07%3A18%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Innovation%20vs%20inertia:%20Entrepreneurial%20governments%20in%2021st%E2%80%90century%20rural%20Alberta&rft.jtitle=The%20Canadian%20geographer&rft.au=Hallstrom,%20Lars&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=165-175&rft.issn=0008-3658&rft.eissn=1541-0064&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cag.12822&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2789627192%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2789627192&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |