Does interception evaporation occur from both sides of leaves at the wet Japanese cypress canopy during and after rainfall?

The interception by the lower (abaxial) side of needle leaves not only contributes to the forest evapotranspiration but will also cause a diffusion barrier of CO2 over the stomata and depresses the plant gas exchange. This study combined the eddy covariance (EC) technique and leaf wetness measuremen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecohydrology 2023-03, Vol.16 (2), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Jiao, Linjie, Kosugi, Yoshiko, Sempuku, Yuichi, Chang, Ting‐Wei, Chen, Siyu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Ecohydrology
container_volume 16
creator Jiao, Linjie
Kosugi, Yoshiko
Sempuku, Yuichi
Chang, Ting‐Wei
Chen, Siyu
description The interception by the lower (abaxial) side of needle leaves not only contributes to the forest evapotranspiration but will also cause a diffusion barrier of CO2 over the stomata and depresses the plant gas exchange. This study combined the eddy covariance (EC) technique and leaf wetness measurement with a soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer (SVAT) multilayer model to examine the occurrence of interception evaporation from both sides of leaves at a Japanese cypress forest canopy relating to rainfall intensity and different wetting periods. We compared the measured latent heat flux (λE) with the simulated wet canopy λE with two models that interception evaporation only happens from the upper (adaxial) side of leaves and both sides of leaves. Both models showed a low λE during the rainfall as the EC data did. The simulated λE at the wet period after rainfall indicates that the interception evaporation from both sides of leaves is more likely to happen after heavy rainfall (>15 mm/12 h). However, for the most frequent small rainfall events (0–5 mm/12 h) at this site, interception evaporation is more likely to occur only from the adaxial side than both sides, which helps the wet leaves to maintain stomata opening and process CO2 uptake after rainfall.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/eco.2495
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2788860686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2788860686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-2bfed843fa7eef096dfb8d4e4d5a30b85602fe2fbe44a6daf5b0cd1ce161ce3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMoOKfgnxDw4qUzTdssPYnM-YvBLnoOafLFdXRJTdqN4j9vtok3L9_7HB6-F16ErlMySQmhd6DchOZlcYJGaZmxhBQlPf1jnp-jixDWhLA0L7IR-n50EHBtO_AK2q52FsNWts7LAzuleo-NdxtcuW6FQ62j7gxuQG4jyQ53K8A76PCbbKWFAFgNrYcQsJLWtQPWva_tJ5ZWY2liDfaytkY2zf0lOosZ4Oo3x-jjaf4-e0kWy-fX2cMiUbTMioRWBjTPMyOnAIaUTJuK6xxyXciMVLxghBqgpoI8l0xLU1RE6VRByuLJqmyMbo5_W---egidWLve21gp6JRzzgjjLFq3R0t5F4IHI1pfb6QfRErEfloRpxX7aaOaHNVd3cDwryfms-XB_wHllH1y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2788860686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does interception evaporation occur from both sides of leaves at the wet Japanese cypress canopy during and after rainfall?</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Jiao, Linjie ; Kosugi, Yoshiko ; Sempuku, Yuichi ; Chang, Ting‐Wei ; Chen, Siyu</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Linjie ; Kosugi, Yoshiko ; Sempuku, Yuichi ; Chang, Ting‐Wei ; Chen, Siyu</creatorcontrib><description>The interception by the lower (abaxial) side of needle leaves not only contributes to the forest evapotranspiration but will also cause a diffusion barrier of CO2 over the stomata and depresses the plant gas exchange. This study combined the eddy covariance (EC) technique and leaf wetness measurement with a soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer (SVAT) multilayer model to examine the occurrence of interception evaporation from both sides of leaves at a Japanese cypress forest canopy relating to rainfall intensity and different wetting periods. We compared the measured latent heat flux (λE) with the simulated wet canopy λE with two models that interception evaporation only happens from the upper (adaxial) side of leaves and both sides of leaves. Both models showed a low λE during the rainfall as the EC data did. The simulated λE at the wet period after rainfall indicates that the interception evaporation from both sides of leaves is more likely to happen after heavy rainfall (&gt;15 mm/12 h). However, for the most frequent small rainfall events (0–5 mm/12 h) at this site, interception evaporation is more likely to occur only from the adaxial side than both sides, which helps the wet leaves to maintain stomata opening and process CO2 uptake after rainfall.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1936-0584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-0592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eco.2495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Atmospheric models ; Canopies ; Canopy ; Carbon dioxide ; Diffusion barriers ; eddy covariance ; Evaporation ; Evapotranspiration ; Gas exchange ; Heat flux ; Heat transfer ; Interception ; Latent heat ; latent heat flux ; leaf wetness ; Leaves ; multilayer model ; Multilayers ; Pine needles ; Plant cover ; Precipitation ; Rainfall ; Rainfall intensity ; Stomata ; Uptake ; Wetting</subject><ispartof>Ecohydrology, 2023-03, Vol.16 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-2bfed843fa7eef096dfb8d4e4d5a30b85602fe2fbe44a6daf5b0cd1ce161ce3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-2bfed843fa7eef096dfb8d4e4d5a30b85602fe2fbe44a6daf5b0cd1ce161ce3b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7312-7502 ; 0000-0003-3157-1044</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feco.2495$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feco.2495$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Linjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosugi, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sempuku, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Ting‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Siyu</creatorcontrib><title>Does interception evaporation occur from both sides of leaves at the wet Japanese cypress canopy during and after rainfall?</title><title>Ecohydrology</title><description>The interception by the lower (abaxial) side of needle leaves not only contributes to the forest evapotranspiration but will also cause a diffusion barrier of CO2 over the stomata and depresses the plant gas exchange. This study combined the eddy covariance (EC) technique and leaf wetness measurement with a soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer (SVAT) multilayer model to examine the occurrence of interception evaporation from both sides of leaves at a Japanese cypress forest canopy relating to rainfall intensity and different wetting periods. We compared the measured latent heat flux (λE) with the simulated wet canopy λE with two models that interception evaporation only happens from the upper (adaxial) side of leaves and both sides of leaves. Both models showed a low λE during the rainfall as the EC data did. The simulated λE at the wet period after rainfall indicates that the interception evaporation from both sides of leaves is more likely to happen after heavy rainfall (&gt;15 mm/12 h). However, for the most frequent small rainfall events (0–5 mm/12 h) at this site, interception evaporation is more likely to occur only from the adaxial side than both sides, which helps the wet leaves to maintain stomata opening and process CO2 uptake after rainfall.</description><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Canopy</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Diffusion barriers</subject><subject>eddy covariance</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Gas exchange</subject><subject>Heat flux</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Interception</subject><subject>Latent heat</subject><subject>latent heat flux</subject><subject>leaf wetness</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>multilayer model</subject><subject>Multilayers</subject><subject>Pine needles</subject><subject>Plant cover</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall intensity</subject><subject>Stomata</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Wetting</subject><issn>1936-0584</issn><issn>1936-0592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMoOKfgnxDw4qUzTdssPYnM-YvBLnoOafLFdXRJTdqN4j9vtok3L9_7HB6-F16ErlMySQmhd6DchOZlcYJGaZmxhBQlPf1jnp-jixDWhLA0L7IR-n50EHBtO_AK2q52FsNWts7LAzuleo-NdxtcuW6FQ62j7gxuQG4jyQ53K8A76PCbbKWFAFgNrYcQsJLWtQPWva_tJ5ZWY2liDfaytkY2zf0lOosZ4Oo3x-jjaf4-e0kWy-fX2cMiUbTMioRWBjTPMyOnAIaUTJuK6xxyXciMVLxghBqgpoI8l0xLU1RE6VRByuLJqmyMbo5_W---egidWLve21gp6JRzzgjjLFq3R0t5F4IHI1pfb6QfRErEfloRpxX7aaOaHNVd3cDwryfms-XB_wHllH1y</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Jiao, Linjie</creator><creator>Kosugi, Yoshiko</creator><creator>Sempuku, Yuichi</creator><creator>Chang, Ting‐Wei</creator><creator>Chen, Siyu</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-7502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3157-1044</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Does interception evaporation occur from both sides of leaves at the wet Japanese cypress canopy during and after rainfall?</title><author>Jiao, Linjie ; Kosugi, Yoshiko ; Sempuku, Yuichi ; Chang, Ting‐Wei ; Chen, Siyu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-2bfed843fa7eef096dfb8d4e4d5a30b85602fe2fbe44a6daf5b0cd1ce161ce3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Canopy</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Diffusion barriers</topic><topic>eddy covariance</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Gas exchange</topic><topic>Heat flux</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Interception</topic><topic>Latent heat</topic><topic>latent heat flux</topic><topic>leaf wetness</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>multilayer model</topic><topic>Multilayers</topic><topic>Pine needles</topic><topic>Plant cover</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall intensity</topic><topic>Stomata</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Wetting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Linjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosugi, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sempuku, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Ting‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Siyu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecohydrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiao, Linjie</au><au>Kosugi, Yoshiko</au><au>Sempuku, Yuichi</au><au>Chang, Ting‐Wei</au><au>Chen, Siyu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does interception evaporation occur from both sides of leaves at the wet Japanese cypress canopy during and after rainfall?</atitle><jtitle>Ecohydrology</jtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1936-0584</issn><eissn>1936-0592</eissn><abstract>The interception by the lower (abaxial) side of needle leaves not only contributes to the forest evapotranspiration but will also cause a diffusion barrier of CO2 over the stomata and depresses the plant gas exchange. This study combined the eddy covariance (EC) technique and leaf wetness measurement with a soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer (SVAT) multilayer model to examine the occurrence of interception evaporation from both sides of leaves at a Japanese cypress forest canopy relating to rainfall intensity and different wetting periods. We compared the measured latent heat flux (λE) with the simulated wet canopy λE with two models that interception evaporation only happens from the upper (adaxial) side of leaves and both sides of leaves. Both models showed a low λE during the rainfall as the EC data did. The simulated λE at the wet period after rainfall indicates that the interception evaporation from both sides of leaves is more likely to happen after heavy rainfall (&gt;15 mm/12 h). However, for the most frequent small rainfall events (0–5 mm/12 h) at this site, interception evaporation is more likely to occur only from the adaxial side than both sides, which helps the wet leaves to maintain stomata opening and process CO2 uptake after rainfall.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/eco.2495</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-7502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3157-1044</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1936-0584
ispartof Ecohydrology, 2023-03, Vol.16 (2), p.n/a
issn 1936-0584
1936-0592
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2788860686
source Wiley Journals
subjects Atmospheric models
Canopies
Canopy
Carbon dioxide
Diffusion barriers
eddy covariance
Evaporation
Evapotranspiration
Gas exchange
Heat flux
Heat transfer
Interception
Latent heat
latent heat flux
leaf wetness
Leaves
multilayer model
Multilayers
Pine needles
Plant cover
Precipitation
Rainfall
Rainfall intensity
Stomata
Uptake
Wetting
title Does interception evaporation occur from both sides of leaves at the wet Japanese cypress canopy during and after rainfall?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A27%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20interception%20evaporation%20occur%20from%20both%20sides%20of%20leaves%20at%20the%20wet%20Japanese%20cypress%20canopy%20during%20and%20after%20rainfall?&rft.jtitle=Ecohydrology&rft.au=Jiao,%20Linjie&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1936-0584&rft.eissn=1936-0592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eco.2495&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2788860686%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2788860686&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true