Does interception evaporation occur from both sides of leaves at the wet Japanese cypress canopy during and after rainfall?
The interception by the lower (abaxial) side of needle leaves not only contributes to the forest evapotranspiration but will also cause a diffusion barrier of CO2 over the stomata and depresses the plant gas exchange. This study combined the eddy covariance (EC) technique and leaf wetness measuremen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecohydrology 2023-03, Vol.16 (2), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Ecohydrology |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Jiao, Linjie Kosugi, Yoshiko Sempuku, Yuichi Chang, Ting‐Wei Chen, Siyu |
description | The interception by the lower (abaxial) side of needle leaves not only contributes to the forest evapotranspiration but will also cause a diffusion barrier of CO2 over the stomata and depresses the plant gas exchange. This study combined the eddy covariance (EC) technique and leaf wetness measurement with a soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer (SVAT) multilayer model to examine the occurrence of interception evaporation from both sides of leaves at a Japanese cypress forest canopy relating to rainfall intensity and different wetting periods. We compared the measured latent heat flux (λE) with the simulated wet canopy λE with two models that interception evaporation only happens from the upper (adaxial) side of leaves and both sides of leaves. Both models showed a low λE during the rainfall as the EC data did. The simulated λE at the wet period after rainfall indicates that the interception evaporation from both sides of leaves is more likely to happen after heavy rainfall (>15 mm/12 h). However, for the most frequent small rainfall events (0–5 mm/12 h) at this site, interception evaporation is more likely to occur only from the adaxial side than both sides, which helps the wet leaves to maintain stomata opening and process CO2 uptake after rainfall. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/eco.2495 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2788860686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2788860686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-2bfed843fa7eef096dfb8d4e4d5a30b85602fe2fbe44a6daf5b0cd1ce161ce3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMoOKfgnxDw4qUzTdssPYnM-YvBLnoOafLFdXRJTdqN4j9vtok3L9_7HB6-F16ErlMySQmhd6DchOZlcYJGaZmxhBQlPf1jnp-jixDWhLA0L7IR-n50EHBtO_AK2q52FsNWts7LAzuleo-NdxtcuW6FQ62j7gxuQG4jyQ53K8A76PCbbKWFAFgNrYcQsJLWtQPWva_tJ5ZWY2liDfaytkY2zf0lOosZ4Oo3x-jjaf4-e0kWy-fX2cMiUbTMioRWBjTPMyOnAIaUTJuK6xxyXciMVLxghBqgpoI8l0xLU1RE6VRByuLJqmyMbo5_W---egidWLve21gp6JRzzgjjLFq3R0t5F4IHI1pfb6QfRErEfloRpxX7aaOaHNVd3cDwryfms-XB_wHllH1y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2788860686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does interception evaporation occur from both sides of leaves at the wet Japanese cypress canopy during and after rainfall?</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Jiao, Linjie ; Kosugi, Yoshiko ; Sempuku, Yuichi ; Chang, Ting‐Wei ; Chen, Siyu</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Linjie ; Kosugi, Yoshiko ; Sempuku, Yuichi ; Chang, Ting‐Wei ; Chen, Siyu</creatorcontrib><description>The interception by the lower (abaxial) side of needle leaves not only contributes to the forest evapotranspiration but will also cause a diffusion barrier of CO2 over the stomata and depresses the plant gas exchange. This study combined the eddy covariance (EC) technique and leaf wetness measurement with a soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer (SVAT) multilayer model to examine the occurrence of interception evaporation from both sides of leaves at a Japanese cypress forest canopy relating to rainfall intensity and different wetting periods. We compared the measured latent heat flux (λE) with the simulated wet canopy λE with two models that interception evaporation only happens from the upper (adaxial) side of leaves and both sides of leaves. Both models showed a low λE during the rainfall as the EC data did. The simulated λE at the wet period after rainfall indicates that the interception evaporation from both sides of leaves is more likely to happen after heavy rainfall (>15 mm/12 h). However, for the most frequent small rainfall events (0–5 mm/12 h) at this site, interception evaporation is more likely to occur only from the adaxial side than both sides, which helps the wet leaves to maintain stomata opening and process CO2 uptake after rainfall.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1936-0584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-0592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eco.2495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Atmospheric models ; Canopies ; Canopy ; Carbon dioxide ; Diffusion barriers ; eddy covariance ; Evaporation ; Evapotranspiration ; Gas exchange ; Heat flux ; Heat transfer ; Interception ; Latent heat ; latent heat flux ; leaf wetness ; Leaves ; multilayer model ; Multilayers ; Pine needles ; Plant cover ; Precipitation ; Rainfall ; Rainfall intensity ; Stomata ; Uptake ; Wetting</subject><ispartof>Ecohydrology, 2023-03, Vol.16 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-2bfed843fa7eef096dfb8d4e4d5a30b85602fe2fbe44a6daf5b0cd1ce161ce3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-2bfed843fa7eef096dfb8d4e4d5a30b85602fe2fbe44a6daf5b0cd1ce161ce3b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7312-7502 ; 0000-0003-3157-1044</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feco.2495$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feco.2495$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Linjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosugi, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sempuku, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Ting‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Siyu</creatorcontrib><title>Does interception evaporation occur from both sides of leaves at the wet Japanese cypress canopy during and after rainfall?</title><title>Ecohydrology</title><description>The interception by the lower (abaxial) side of needle leaves not only contributes to the forest evapotranspiration but will also cause a diffusion barrier of CO2 over the stomata and depresses the plant gas exchange. This study combined the eddy covariance (EC) technique and leaf wetness measurement with a soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer (SVAT) multilayer model to examine the occurrence of interception evaporation from both sides of leaves at a Japanese cypress forest canopy relating to rainfall intensity and different wetting periods. We compared the measured latent heat flux (λE) with the simulated wet canopy λE with two models that interception evaporation only happens from the upper (adaxial) side of leaves and both sides of leaves. Both models showed a low λE during the rainfall as the EC data did. The simulated λE at the wet period after rainfall indicates that the interception evaporation from both sides of leaves is more likely to happen after heavy rainfall (>15 mm/12 h). However, for the most frequent small rainfall events (0–5 mm/12 h) at this site, interception evaporation is more likely to occur only from the adaxial side than both sides, which helps the wet leaves to maintain stomata opening and process CO2 uptake after rainfall.</description><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Canopy</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Diffusion barriers</subject><subject>eddy covariance</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Gas exchange</subject><subject>Heat flux</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Interception</subject><subject>Latent heat</subject><subject>latent heat flux</subject><subject>leaf wetness</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>multilayer model</subject><subject>Multilayers</subject><subject>Pine needles</subject><subject>Plant cover</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall intensity</subject><subject>Stomata</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Wetting</subject><issn>1936-0584</issn><issn>1936-0592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMoOKfgnxDw4qUzTdssPYnM-YvBLnoOafLFdXRJTdqN4j9vtok3L9_7HB6-F16ErlMySQmhd6DchOZlcYJGaZmxhBQlPf1jnp-jixDWhLA0L7IR-n50EHBtO_AK2q52FsNWts7LAzuleo-NdxtcuW6FQ62j7gxuQG4jyQ53K8A76PCbbKWFAFgNrYcQsJLWtQPWva_tJ5ZWY2liDfaytkY2zf0lOosZ4Oo3x-jjaf4-e0kWy-fX2cMiUbTMioRWBjTPMyOnAIaUTJuK6xxyXciMVLxghBqgpoI8l0xLU1RE6VRByuLJqmyMbo5_W---egidWLve21gp6JRzzgjjLFq3R0t5F4IHI1pfb6QfRErEfloRpxX7aaOaHNVd3cDwryfms-XB_wHllH1y</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Jiao, Linjie</creator><creator>Kosugi, Yoshiko</creator><creator>Sempuku, Yuichi</creator><creator>Chang, Ting‐Wei</creator><creator>Chen, Siyu</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-7502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3157-1044</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Does interception evaporation occur from both sides of leaves at the wet Japanese cypress canopy during and after rainfall?</title><author>Jiao, Linjie ; Kosugi, Yoshiko ; Sempuku, Yuichi ; Chang, Ting‐Wei ; Chen, Siyu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-2bfed843fa7eef096dfb8d4e4d5a30b85602fe2fbe44a6daf5b0cd1ce161ce3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Canopy</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Diffusion barriers</topic><topic>eddy covariance</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Gas exchange</topic><topic>Heat flux</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Interception</topic><topic>Latent heat</topic><topic>latent heat flux</topic><topic>leaf wetness</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>multilayer model</topic><topic>Multilayers</topic><topic>Pine needles</topic><topic>Plant cover</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall intensity</topic><topic>Stomata</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Wetting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Linjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosugi, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sempuku, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Ting‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Siyu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecohydrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiao, Linjie</au><au>Kosugi, Yoshiko</au><au>Sempuku, Yuichi</au><au>Chang, Ting‐Wei</au><au>Chen, Siyu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does interception evaporation occur from both sides of leaves at the wet Japanese cypress canopy during and after rainfall?</atitle><jtitle>Ecohydrology</jtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1936-0584</issn><eissn>1936-0592</eissn><abstract>The interception by the lower (abaxial) side of needle leaves not only contributes to the forest evapotranspiration but will also cause a diffusion barrier of CO2 over the stomata and depresses the plant gas exchange. This study combined the eddy covariance (EC) technique and leaf wetness measurement with a soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer (SVAT) multilayer model to examine the occurrence of interception evaporation from both sides of leaves at a Japanese cypress forest canopy relating to rainfall intensity and different wetting periods. We compared the measured latent heat flux (λE) with the simulated wet canopy λE with two models that interception evaporation only happens from the upper (adaxial) side of leaves and both sides of leaves. Both models showed a low λE during the rainfall as the EC data did. The simulated λE at the wet period after rainfall indicates that the interception evaporation from both sides of leaves is more likely to happen after heavy rainfall (>15 mm/12 h). However, for the most frequent small rainfall events (0–5 mm/12 h) at this site, interception evaporation is more likely to occur only from the adaxial side than both sides, which helps the wet leaves to maintain stomata opening and process CO2 uptake after rainfall.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/eco.2495</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-7502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3157-1044</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1936-0584 |
ispartof | Ecohydrology, 2023-03, Vol.16 (2), p.n/a |
issn | 1936-0584 1936-0592 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2788860686 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Atmospheric models Canopies Canopy Carbon dioxide Diffusion barriers eddy covariance Evaporation Evapotranspiration Gas exchange Heat flux Heat transfer Interception Latent heat latent heat flux leaf wetness Leaves multilayer model Multilayers Pine needles Plant cover Precipitation Rainfall Rainfall intensity Stomata Uptake Wetting |
title | Does interception evaporation occur from both sides of leaves at the wet Japanese cypress canopy during and after rainfall? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A27%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20interception%20evaporation%20occur%20from%20both%20sides%20of%20leaves%20at%20the%20wet%20Japanese%20cypress%20canopy%20during%20and%20after%20rainfall?&rft.jtitle=Ecohydrology&rft.au=Jiao,%20Linjie&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1936-0584&rft.eissn=1936-0592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eco.2495&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2788860686%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2788860686&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |