Dispossession through land titling: Legal loopholes and shadow procedures to urbanized forestlands in the Yucatán Peninsula
Under certain circumstances, land titling, property regime changes, and land‐use conversions yield substantial profits. Yet few people possess the wealth, knowledge, and networks to benefit from these procedures. In the Yucatán Peninsula, a region recently targeted as a prominent investment location...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of agrarian change 2023-04, Vol.23 (2), p.346-364 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 364 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 346 |
container_title | Journal of agrarian change |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela |
description | Under certain circumstances, land titling, property regime changes, and land‐use conversions yield substantial profits. Yet few people possess the wealth, knowledge, and networks to benefit from these procedures. In the Yucatán Peninsula, a region recently targeted as a prominent investment location by the Mexican national government (mainly with the “Tren Maya” megaproject) and the private capital, forestlands collectively owned as ejidos by Mayan peasants are on the trend to complete privatization. Against the arguments of neo‐institutional economists that in the 1990s promoted legal reforms and justified land‐titling programmes worldwide to make available credit for uncapitalized peasants, individual land titling of commonly held lands in Mexico increased the overall economic value of the land, but not the investment in economic activities related to farmland and indigenous communities. Instead, those policies enabled land grabbing, dispossession, and urbanization. In this article, I describe recent private‐led initiatives of ejido land titling that have redefined agricultural land's uses, meanings, and values for capitalist accumulation. In doing so, I explain how and why Mayan ejidatarios have been excluded from the monetary benefits of land titling, a top‐bottom dispossession process only accomplished through shadow procedures and former privatization of ejidos' common lands. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/joac.12520 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2788685210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2788685210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-9c7e923b2533ece0bb0fb1460ac207ba921ad0faa9ca7e04d5a7447ab550fdcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAMxysEEmNw4QkicUPqcNJvbtP41qRxgAOnyk3TNVNoStJqGuJleBZejJQijvhiy_75b-vveacUZtTFxUYjn1EWMdjzJjRMqA9BHO__1VF66B1ZuwGgWUSzifdxJW2rrRXWSt2Qrja6X9dEYVOSTnZKNutLshRrVERp3dZaCUuGoa2x1FvSGs1F2RvX7TTpTYGNfBclqbRrdYOMJXLQFeSl59h9fTbkUTSysb3CY--gQmXFyW-ees8310-LO3-5ur1fzJc-D4CCn_FEZCwoWBQEggsoCqgKGsaAnEFSYMYollAhZhwTAWEZYRKGCRZRBFXJi2DqnY267tu33v2Vb3RvGncyZ0maxmnEKDjqfKS4cYYYUeWtka9odjmFfHA3H9zNf9x1MB3hrVRi9w-ZP6zmi3HnGzragGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2788685210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dispossession through land titling: Legal loopholes and shadow procedures to urbanized forestlands in the Yucatán Peninsula</title><source>EBSCO Business Source Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</creator><creatorcontrib>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><description>Under certain circumstances, land titling, property regime changes, and land‐use conversions yield substantial profits. Yet few people possess the wealth, knowledge, and networks to benefit from these procedures. In the Yucatán Peninsula, a region recently targeted as a prominent investment location by the Mexican national government (mainly with the “Tren Maya” megaproject) and the private capital, forestlands collectively owned as ejidos by Mayan peasants are on the trend to complete privatization. Against the arguments of neo‐institutional economists that in the 1990s promoted legal reforms and justified land‐titling programmes worldwide to make available credit for uncapitalized peasants, individual land titling of commonly held lands in Mexico increased the overall economic value of the land, but not the investment in economic activities related to farmland and indigenous communities. Instead, those policies enabled land grabbing, dispossession, and urbanization. In this article, I describe recent private‐led initiatives of ejido land titling that have redefined agricultural land's uses, meanings, and values for capitalist accumulation. In doing so, I explain how and why Mayan ejidatarios have been excluded from the monetary benefits of land titling, a top‐bottom dispossession process only accomplished through shadow procedures and former privatization of ejidos' common lands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-0358</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/joac.12520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Capitalism ; Central government ; Common lands ; communal lands enclosures ; dispossession ; Economic activity ; Economics ; Indigenous peoples ; Investments ; land grabbing ; Land reform ; land titling ; Land use ; land‐use regulations ; Legal reform ; Peasants ; Privatization ; Profits ; Property ; Rural communities ; Shadows ; urban sprawl ; Urbanization ; Value ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>Journal of agrarian change, 2023-04, Vol.23 (2), p.346-364</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-9c7e923b2533ece0bb0fb1460ac207ba921ad0faa9ca7e04d5a7447ab550fdcb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-9c7e923b2533ece0bb0fb1460ac207ba921ad0faa9ca7e04d5a7447ab550fdcb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0853-0439</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjoac.12520$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjoac.12520$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><title>Dispossession through land titling: Legal loopholes and shadow procedures to urbanized forestlands in the Yucatán Peninsula</title><title>Journal of agrarian change</title><description>Under certain circumstances, land titling, property regime changes, and land‐use conversions yield substantial profits. Yet few people possess the wealth, knowledge, and networks to benefit from these procedures. In the Yucatán Peninsula, a region recently targeted as a prominent investment location by the Mexican national government (mainly with the “Tren Maya” megaproject) and the private capital, forestlands collectively owned as ejidos by Mayan peasants are on the trend to complete privatization. Against the arguments of neo‐institutional economists that in the 1990s promoted legal reforms and justified land‐titling programmes worldwide to make available credit for uncapitalized peasants, individual land titling of commonly held lands in Mexico increased the overall economic value of the land, but not the investment in economic activities related to farmland and indigenous communities. Instead, those policies enabled land grabbing, dispossession, and urbanization. In this article, I describe recent private‐led initiatives of ejido land titling that have redefined agricultural land's uses, meanings, and values for capitalist accumulation. In doing so, I explain how and why Mayan ejidatarios have been excluded from the monetary benefits of land titling, a top‐bottom dispossession process only accomplished through shadow procedures and former privatization of ejidos' common lands.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Central government</subject><subject>Common lands</subject><subject>communal lands enclosures</subject><subject>dispossession</subject><subject>Economic activity</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>land grabbing</subject><subject>Land reform</subject><subject>land titling</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>land‐use regulations</subject><subject>Legal reform</subject><subject>Peasants</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Property</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Shadows</subject><subject>urban sprawl</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Value</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>1471-0358</issn><issn>1471-0366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAMxysEEmNw4QkicUPqcNJvbtP41qRxgAOnyk3TNVNoStJqGuJleBZejJQijvhiy_75b-vveacUZtTFxUYjn1EWMdjzJjRMqA9BHO__1VF66B1ZuwGgWUSzifdxJW2rrRXWSt2Qrja6X9dEYVOSTnZKNutLshRrVERp3dZaCUuGoa2x1FvSGs1F2RvX7TTpTYGNfBclqbRrdYOMJXLQFeSl59h9fTbkUTSysb3CY--gQmXFyW-ees8310-LO3-5ur1fzJc-D4CCn_FEZCwoWBQEggsoCqgKGsaAnEFSYMYollAhZhwTAWEZYRKGCRZRBFXJi2DqnY267tu33v2Vb3RvGncyZ0maxmnEKDjqfKS4cYYYUeWtka9odjmFfHA3H9zNf9x1MB3hrVRi9w-ZP6zmi3HnGzragGw</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-0439</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Dispossession through land titling: Legal loopholes and shadow procedures to urbanized forestlands in the Yucatán Peninsula</title><author>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-9c7e923b2533ece0bb0fb1460ac207ba921ad0faa9ca7e04d5a7447ab550fdcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Central government</topic><topic>Common lands</topic><topic>communal lands enclosures</topic><topic>dispossession</topic><topic>Economic activity</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>land grabbing</topic><topic>Land reform</topic><topic>land titling</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>land‐use regulations</topic><topic>Legal reform</topic><topic>Peasants</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Property</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Shadows</topic><topic>urban sprawl</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Value</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of agrarian change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dispossession through land titling: Legal loopholes and shadow procedures to urbanized forestlands in the Yucatán Peninsula</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agrarian change</jtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>364</epage><pages>346-364</pages><issn>1471-0358</issn><eissn>1471-0366</eissn><abstract>Under certain circumstances, land titling, property regime changes, and land‐use conversions yield substantial profits. Yet few people possess the wealth, knowledge, and networks to benefit from these procedures. In the Yucatán Peninsula, a region recently targeted as a prominent investment location by the Mexican national government (mainly with the “Tren Maya” megaproject) and the private capital, forestlands collectively owned as ejidos by Mayan peasants are on the trend to complete privatization. Against the arguments of neo‐institutional economists that in the 1990s promoted legal reforms and justified land‐titling programmes worldwide to make available credit for uncapitalized peasants, individual land titling of commonly held lands in Mexico increased the overall economic value of the land, but not the investment in economic activities related to farmland and indigenous communities. Instead, those policies enabled land grabbing, dispossession, and urbanization. In this article, I describe recent private‐led initiatives of ejido land titling that have redefined agricultural land's uses, meanings, and values for capitalist accumulation. In doing so, I explain how and why Mayan ejidatarios have been excluded from the monetary benefits of land titling, a top‐bottom dispossession process only accomplished through shadow procedures and former privatization of ejidos' common lands.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/joac.12520</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-0439</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-0358 |
ispartof | Journal of agrarian change, 2023-04, Vol.23 (2), p.346-364 |
issn | 1471-0358 1471-0366 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2788685210 |
source | EBSCO Business Source Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Agricultural land Capitalism Central government Common lands communal lands enclosures dispossession Economic activity Economics Indigenous peoples Investments land grabbing Land reform land titling Land use land‐use regulations Legal reform Peasants Privatization Profits Property Rural communities Shadows urban sprawl Urbanization Value Wealth |
title | Dispossession through land titling: Legal loopholes and shadow procedures to urbanized forestlands in the Yucatán Peninsula |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T21%3A52%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dispossession%20through%20land%20titling:%20Legal%20loopholes%20and%20shadow%20procedures%20to%20urbanized%20forestlands%20in%20the%20Yucat%C3%A1n%20Peninsula&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agrarian%20change&rft.au=Torres%E2%80%90Mazuera,%20Gabriela&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=364&rft.pages=346-364&rft.issn=1471-0358&rft.eissn=1471-0366&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/joac.12520&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2788685210%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2788685210&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |