Dispossession through land titling: Legal loopholes and shadow procedures to urbanized forestlands in the Yucatán Peninsula

Under certain circumstances, land titling, property regime changes, and land‐use conversions yield substantial profits. Yet few people possess the wealth, knowledge, and networks to benefit from these procedures. In the Yucatán Peninsula, a region recently targeted as a prominent investment location...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of agrarian change 2023-04, Vol.23 (2), p.346-364
1. Verfasser: Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 364
container_issue 2
container_start_page 346
container_title Journal of agrarian change
container_volume 23
creator Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela
description Under certain circumstances, land titling, property regime changes, and land‐use conversions yield substantial profits. Yet few people possess the wealth, knowledge, and networks to benefit from these procedures. In the Yucatán Peninsula, a region recently targeted as a prominent investment location by the Mexican national government (mainly with the “Tren Maya” megaproject) and the private capital, forestlands collectively owned as ejidos by Mayan peasants are on the trend to complete privatization. Against the arguments of neo‐institutional economists that in the 1990s promoted legal reforms and justified land‐titling programmes worldwide to make available credit for uncapitalized peasants, individual land titling of commonly held lands in Mexico increased the overall economic value of the land, but not the investment in economic activities related to farmland and indigenous communities. Instead, those policies enabled land grabbing, dispossession, and urbanization. In this article, I describe recent private‐led initiatives of ejido land titling that have redefined agricultural land's uses, meanings, and values for capitalist accumulation. In doing so, I explain how and why Mayan ejidatarios have been excluded from the monetary benefits of land titling, a top‐bottom dispossession process only accomplished through shadow procedures and former privatization of ejidos' common lands.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/joac.12520
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2788685210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2788685210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-9c7e923b2533ece0bb0fb1460ac207ba921ad0faa9ca7e04d5a7447ab550fdcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAMxysEEmNw4QkicUPqcNJvbtP41qRxgAOnyk3TNVNoStJqGuJleBZejJQijvhiy_75b-vveacUZtTFxUYjn1EWMdjzJjRMqA9BHO__1VF66B1ZuwGgWUSzifdxJW2rrRXWSt2Qrja6X9dEYVOSTnZKNutLshRrVERp3dZaCUuGoa2x1FvSGs1F2RvX7TTpTYGNfBclqbRrdYOMJXLQFeSl59h9fTbkUTSysb3CY--gQmXFyW-ees8310-LO3-5ur1fzJc-D4CCn_FEZCwoWBQEggsoCqgKGsaAnEFSYMYollAhZhwTAWEZYRKGCRZRBFXJi2DqnY267tu33v2Vb3RvGncyZ0maxmnEKDjqfKS4cYYYUeWtka9odjmFfHA3H9zNf9x1MB3hrVRi9w-ZP6zmi3HnGzragGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2788685210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dispossession through land titling: Legal loopholes and shadow procedures to urbanized forestlands in the Yucatán Peninsula</title><source>EBSCO Business Source Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</creator><creatorcontrib>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><description>Under certain circumstances, land titling, property regime changes, and land‐use conversions yield substantial profits. Yet few people possess the wealth, knowledge, and networks to benefit from these procedures. In the Yucatán Peninsula, a region recently targeted as a prominent investment location by the Mexican national government (mainly with the “Tren Maya” megaproject) and the private capital, forestlands collectively owned as ejidos by Mayan peasants are on the trend to complete privatization. Against the arguments of neo‐institutional economists that in the 1990s promoted legal reforms and justified land‐titling programmes worldwide to make available credit for uncapitalized peasants, individual land titling of commonly held lands in Mexico increased the overall economic value of the land, but not the investment in economic activities related to farmland and indigenous communities. Instead, those policies enabled land grabbing, dispossession, and urbanization. In this article, I describe recent private‐led initiatives of ejido land titling that have redefined agricultural land's uses, meanings, and values for capitalist accumulation. In doing so, I explain how and why Mayan ejidatarios have been excluded from the monetary benefits of land titling, a top‐bottom dispossession process only accomplished through shadow procedures and former privatization of ejidos' common lands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-0358</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/joac.12520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Capitalism ; Central government ; Common lands ; communal lands enclosures ; dispossession ; Economic activity ; Economics ; Indigenous peoples ; Investments ; land grabbing ; Land reform ; land titling ; Land use ; land‐use regulations ; Legal reform ; Peasants ; Privatization ; Profits ; Property ; Rural communities ; Shadows ; urban sprawl ; Urbanization ; Value ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>Journal of agrarian change, 2023-04, Vol.23 (2), p.346-364</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-9c7e923b2533ece0bb0fb1460ac207ba921ad0faa9ca7e04d5a7447ab550fdcb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-9c7e923b2533ece0bb0fb1460ac207ba921ad0faa9ca7e04d5a7447ab550fdcb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0853-0439</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjoac.12520$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjoac.12520$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><title>Dispossession through land titling: Legal loopholes and shadow procedures to urbanized forestlands in the Yucatán Peninsula</title><title>Journal of agrarian change</title><description>Under certain circumstances, land titling, property regime changes, and land‐use conversions yield substantial profits. Yet few people possess the wealth, knowledge, and networks to benefit from these procedures. In the Yucatán Peninsula, a region recently targeted as a prominent investment location by the Mexican national government (mainly with the “Tren Maya” megaproject) and the private capital, forestlands collectively owned as ejidos by Mayan peasants are on the trend to complete privatization. Against the arguments of neo‐institutional economists that in the 1990s promoted legal reforms and justified land‐titling programmes worldwide to make available credit for uncapitalized peasants, individual land titling of commonly held lands in Mexico increased the overall economic value of the land, but not the investment in economic activities related to farmland and indigenous communities. Instead, those policies enabled land grabbing, dispossession, and urbanization. In this article, I describe recent private‐led initiatives of ejido land titling that have redefined agricultural land's uses, meanings, and values for capitalist accumulation. In doing so, I explain how and why Mayan ejidatarios have been excluded from the monetary benefits of land titling, a top‐bottom dispossession process only accomplished through shadow procedures and former privatization of ejidos' common lands.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Central government</subject><subject>Common lands</subject><subject>communal lands enclosures</subject><subject>dispossession</subject><subject>Economic activity</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>land grabbing</subject><subject>Land reform</subject><subject>land titling</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>land‐use regulations</subject><subject>Legal reform</subject><subject>Peasants</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Property</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Shadows</subject><subject>urban sprawl</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Value</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>1471-0358</issn><issn>1471-0366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAMxysEEmNw4QkicUPqcNJvbtP41qRxgAOnyk3TNVNoStJqGuJleBZejJQijvhiy_75b-vveacUZtTFxUYjn1EWMdjzJjRMqA9BHO__1VF66B1ZuwGgWUSzifdxJW2rrRXWSt2Qrja6X9dEYVOSTnZKNutLshRrVERp3dZaCUuGoa2x1FvSGs1F2RvX7TTpTYGNfBclqbRrdYOMJXLQFeSl59h9fTbkUTSysb3CY--gQmXFyW-ees8310-LO3-5ur1fzJc-D4CCn_FEZCwoWBQEggsoCqgKGsaAnEFSYMYollAhZhwTAWEZYRKGCRZRBFXJi2DqnY267tu33v2Vb3RvGncyZ0maxmnEKDjqfKS4cYYYUeWtka9odjmFfHA3H9zNf9x1MB3hrVRi9w-ZP6zmi3HnGzragGw</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-0439</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Dispossession through land titling: Legal loopholes and shadow procedures to urbanized forestlands in the Yucatán Peninsula</title><author>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-9c7e923b2533ece0bb0fb1460ac207ba921ad0faa9ca7e04d5a7447ab550fdcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Central government</topic><topic>Common lands</topic><topic>communal lands enclosures</topic><topic>dispossession</topic><topic>Economic activity</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>land grabbing</topic><topic>Land reform</topic><topic>land titling</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>land‐use regulations</topic><topic>Legal reform</topic><topic>Peasants</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Property</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Shadows</topic><topic>urban sprawl</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Value</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of agrarian change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torres‐Mazuera, Gabriela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dispossession through land titling: Legal loopholes and shadow procedures to urbanized forestlands in the Yucatán Peninsula</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agrarian change</jtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>364</epage><pages>346-364</pages><issn>1471-0358</issn><eissn>1471-0366</eissn><abstract>Under certain circumstances, land titling, property regime changes, and land‐use conversions yield substantial profits. Yet few people possess the wealth, knowledge, and networks to benefit from these procedures. In the Yucatán Peninsula, a region recently targeted as a prominent investment location by the Mexican national government (mainly with the “Tren Maya” megaproject) and the private capital, forestlands collectively owned as ejidos by Mayan peasants are on the trend to complete privatization. Against the arguments of neo‐institutional economists that in the 1990s promoted legal reforms and justified land‐titling programmes worldwide to make available credit for uncapitalized peasants, individual land titling of commonly held lands in Mexico increased the overall economic value of the land, but not the investment in economic activities related to farmland and indigenous communities. Instead, those policies enabled land grabbing, dispossession, and urbanization. In this article, I describe recent private‐led initiatives of ejido land titling that have redefined agricultural land's uses, meanings, and values for capitalist accumulation. In doing so, I explain how and why Mayan ejidatarios have been excluded from the monetary benefits of land titling, a top‐bottom dispossession process only accomplished through shadow procedures and former privatization of ejidos' common lands.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/joac.12520</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-0439</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-0358
ispartof Journal of agrarian change, 2023-04, Vol.23 (2), p.346-364
issn 1471-0358
1471-0366
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2788685210
source EBSCO Business Source Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Agricultural land
Capitalism
Central government
Common lands
communal lands enclosures
dispossession
Economic activity
Economics
Indigenous peoples
Investments
land grabbing
Land reform
land titling
Land use
land‐use regulations
Legal reform
Peasants
Privatization
Profits
Property
Rural communities
Shadows
urban sprawl
Urbanization
Value
Wealth
title Dispossession through land titling: Legal loopholes and shadow procedures to urbanized forestlands in the Yucatán Peninsula
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T21%3A52%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dispossession%20through%20land%20titling:%20Legal%20loopholes%20and%20shadow%20procedures%20to%20urbanized%20forestlands%20in%20the%20Yucat%C3%A1n%20Peninsula&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agrarian%20change&rft.au=Torres%E2%80%90Mazuera,%20Gabriela&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=364&rft.pages=346-364&rft.issn=1471-0358&rft.eissn=1471-0366&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/joac.12520&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2788685210%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2788685210&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true