Magris, Grillparzer e il katechon

In Claudio Magris’s first pioneering study The Habsburg Myth in Modern Austrian Literature published by Einaudi in 1963, the poet of Habsburg legitimacy Franz Grillparzer represents the keystone of the proposed historiographical reconstruction: in particular, Magris recognises the peculiar character...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prospero (Trieste, Italy) Italy), 2019-01 (24)
1. Verfasser: Foi, Maria Carolina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:ita
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 24
container_start_page
container_title Prospero (Trieste, Italy)
container_volume
creator Foi, Maria Carolina
description In Claudio Magris’s first pioneering study The Habsburg Myth in Modern Austrian Literature published by Einaudi in 1963, the poet of Habsburg legitimacy Franz Grillparzer represents the keystone of the proposed historiographical reconstruction: in particular, Magris recognises the peculiar characters of the myth in Grillparzer’s dramatic works. This article reinterprets the masterpiece of the Austrian playwright entitled Ein Bruderzwist in Habsburg taking its cue from Carl Schmitt, who associated the main character of Grillparzer’s drama with the enigmatical figure of the katechon, i.e. the braking power mentioned in a letter by Paul of Tarsus. From the political-philosophical perspective of the article, the Holy Roman Emperor Rudolf II is not so much the personification of Magris’s characterization of the “myth” as the holder of a braking power who fails (as his antagonists) because he must act. Therefore, the crucial moment in the genesis of the “Habsburg myth” lies not so much in the protagonist himself as in the construction of the dramatic action.
doi_str_mv 10.13137/2283-6438/29622
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2786881937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2786881937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27868819373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNij0LwjAUAB-iYNHujhFXa_Neaj5m8WNxcy9BoraGtiZ18dfrIM5OB3cHMEO-QoFC5URaZLIQOicjiQaQ_MwQEkQSGUldjCGNseaco1JrbUwC86O9hiou2T5U3nc2vFxgjlWe3W3vzre2mcLoYn106ZcTWOy2p80h60L7eLrYl3X7DM0nlaS01BqNUOK_6w2oXTQK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2786881937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magris, Grillparzer e il katechon</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Foi, Maria Carolina</creator><creatorcontrib>Foi, Maria Carolina</creatorcontrib><description>In Claudio Magris’s first pioneering study The Habsburg Myth in Modern Austrian Literature published by Einaudi in 1963, the poet of Habsburg legitimacy Franz Grillparzer represents the keystone of the proposed historiographical reconstruction: in particular, Magris recognises the peculiar characters of the myth in Grillparzer’s dramatic works. This article reinterprets the masterpiece of the Austrian playwright entitled Ein Bruderzwist in Habsburg taking its cue from Carl Schmitt, who associated the main character of Grillparzer’s drama with the enigmatical figure of the katechon, i.e. the braking power mentioned in a letter by Paul of Tarsus. From the political-philosophical perspective of the article, the Holy Roman Emperor Rudolf II is not so much the personification of Magris’s characterization of the “myth” as the holder of a braking power who fails (as his antagonists) because he must act. Therefore, the crucial moment in the genesis of the “Habsburg myth” lies not so much in the protagonist himself as in the construction of the dramatic action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1123-2684</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2283-6438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13137/2283-6438/29622</identifier><language>ita</language><publisher>Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste</publisher><subject>Austrian literature ; Literary characters</subject><ispartof>Prospero (Trieste, Italy), 2019-01 (24)</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Foi, Maria Carolina</creatorcontrib><title>Magris, Grillparzer e il katechon</title><title>Prospero (Trieste, Italy)</title><description>In Claudio Magris’s first pioneering study The Habsburg Myth in Modern Austrian Literature published by Einaudi in 1963, the poet of Habsburg legitimacy Franz Grillparzer represents the keystone of the proposed historiographical reconstruction: in particular, Magris recognises the peculiar characters of the myth in Grillparzer’s dramatic works. This article reinterprets the masterpiece of the Austrian playwright entitled Ein Bruderzwist in Habsburg taking its cue from Carl Schmitt, who associated the main character of Grillparzer’s drama with the enigmatical figure of the katechon, i.e. the braking power mentioned in a letter by Paul of Tarsus. From the political-philosophical perspective of the article, the Holy Roman Emperor Rudolf II is not so much the personification of Magris’s characterization of the “myth” as the holder of a braking power who fails (as his antagonists) because he must act. Therefore, the crucial moment in the genesis of the “Habsburg myth” lies not so much in the protagonist himself as in the construction of the dramatic action.</description><subject>Austrian literature</subject><subject>Literary characters</subject><issn>1123-2684</issn><issn>2283-6438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNij0LwjAUAB-iYNHujhFXa_Neaj5m8WNxcy9BoraGtiZ18dfrIM5OB3cHMEO-QoFC5URaZLIQOicjiQaQ_MwQEkQSGUldjCGNseaco1JrbUwC86O9hiou2T5U3nc2vFxgjlWe3W3vzre2mcLoYn106ZcTWOy2p80h60L7eLrYl3X7DM0nlaS01BqNUOK_6w2oXTQK</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Foi, Maria Carolina</creator><general>EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste</general><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Magris, Grillparzer e il katechon</title><author>Foi, Maria Carolina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27868819373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ita</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Austrian literature</topic><topic>Literary characters</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Foi, Maria Carolina</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><jtitle>Prospero (Trieste, Italy)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Foi, Maria Carolina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magris, Grillparzer e il katechon</atitle><jtitle>Prospero (Trieste, Italy)</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><issue>24</issue><issn>1123-2684</issn><eissn>2283-6438</eissn><abstract>In Claudio Magris’s first pioneering study The Habsburg Myth in Modern Austrian Literature published by Einaudi in 1963, the poet of Habsburg legitimacy Franz Grillparzer represents the keystone of the proposed historiographical reconstruction: in particular, Magris recognises the peculiar characters of the myth in Grillparzer’s dramatic works. This article reinterprets the masterpiece of the Austrian playwright entitled Ein Bruderzwist in Habsburg taking its cue from Carl Schmitt, who associated the main character of Grillparzer’s drama with the enigmatical figure of the katechon, i.e. the braking power mentioned in a letter by Paul of Tarsus. From the political-philosophical perspective of the article, the Holy Roman Emperor Rudolf II is not so much the personification of Magris’s characterization of the “myth” as the holder of a braking power who fails (as his antagonists) because he must act. Therefore, the crucial moment in the genesis of the “Habsburg myth” lies not so much in the protagonist himself as in the construction of the dramatic action.</abstract><cop>Trieste</cop><pub>EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste</pub><doi>10.13137/2283-6438/29622</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1123-2684
ispartof Prospero (Trieste, Italy), 2019-01 (24)
issn 1123-2684
2283-6438
language ita
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2786881937
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Austrian literature
Literary characters
title Magris, Grillparzer e il katechon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T21%3A16%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magris,%20Grillparzer%20e%20il%20katechon&rft.jtitle=Prospero%20(Trieste,%20Italy)&rft.au=Foi,%20Maria%20Carolina&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.issue=24&rft.issn=1123-2684&rft.eissn=2283-6438&rft_id=info:doi/10.13137/2283-6438/29622&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2786881937%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2786881937&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true