Differential response to DMI, QoI and SDHI fungicides in wheat and signal grass blast populations from Minas Gerais, Brazil
Fungicides play an important role in wheat blast management in Brazil. To determine whether the reported patterns of fungicide resistance are present in Pyricularia oryzae populations from wheat and signal grass grown in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, we characterized the sensitivity of a contemporary...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant pathology 2023-04, Vol.72 (3), p.449-467 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 467 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 449 |
container_title | Plant pathology |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Cazón, Luis Ignácio Ascari, João Paulo Santos, Gustavo Bilibio Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros |
description | Fungicides play an important role in wheat blast management in Brazil. To determine whether the reported patterns of fungicide resistance are present in Pyricularia oryzae populations from wheat and signal grass grown in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, we characterized the sensitivity of a contemporary collection (2018 and 2019) of 64 fungal isolates to seven fungicides belonging to DMI (tebuconazole and epoxiconazole), QoI (azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin) and SDHI (bixafen, fluxapyroxad and benzovindiflupyr) groups. We further assessed if the differential sensitivity of selected isolates affected disease control using commercial doses of the fungicides applied protectively (prior to inoculation) on the heads of potted plants. Despite finding relatively low levels of in vitro sensitivity to some of the fungicides (e.g., azoxystrobin, fluxapyroxad and bixafen), control efficacies (percentage reductions in head blast severity) were significantly higher than the untreated plants and not affected by the sensitivity of the strain to all fungicides but azoxystrobin. The levels of head blast control for some of the fungicides (>70%) in the greenhouse were similar to or higher than previously reported in the field. The molecular data for a set of isolates representing different fungicide sensitivity levels were generally not predictive of the phenotype. The wheat‐infecting isolates were less sensitive than signal grass‐infecting isolates to all fungicides including azoxystrobin. Our study not only confirms previous reports of low sensitivity to some fungicides, but it also suggests options among site‐specific fungicides, most notably tebuconazole and benzovindiflupyr, that can still be used under an antiresistance strategy such as coformulation with multisite fungicides.
Wheat and signal grass blast isolates varied in their in vitro sensitivity levels to seven fungicides. Low‐ or high‐sensitivity isolates were effectively controlled in the in planta inoculations by some of the fungicides. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ppa.13678 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2785203414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2785203414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-c971ea8d75f930d6a7a125b9861c0cae224bfba59d5b7637ae6774666e51b16d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFPwjAYxRujiYge_A-aeDJh0HZrux0RFJZAxKjn5dvWYcnYZruFoP-8lXn1u7zD93svLw-hW0rG1N2kaWBMfSHDMzRwyj2f8OgcDQjxmUdCwS7RlbU7QiiPonCAvue6KJRRVauhxEbZpq6swm2N5-t4hF_qGEOV49f5MsZFV211pnNlsa7w4UNBe3pava2ceWvAWpyWYFvc1E1XQqtdGC5MvcdrXYHFC2VA2xF-MPCly2t0UUBp1c2fDtH70-PbbOmtnhfxbLryMhbJ0MsiSRWEueRF5JNcgATKeBqFgmYkA8VYkBYp8CjnqRS-BCWkDIQQitOUitwfors-tzH1Z6dsm-zqzrjKNmEy5Iz4AQ0cdd9TmamtNapIGqP3YI4JJcnvtonbNjlt69hJzx50qY7_g8lmM-0dP1BWesc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785203414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential response to DMI, QoI and SDHI fungicides in wheat and signal grass blast populations from Minas Gerais, Brazil</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Cazón, Luis Ignácio ; Ascari, João Paulo ; Santos, Gustavo Bilibio ; Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</creator><creatorcontrib>Cazón, Luis Ignácio ; Ascari, João Paulo ; Santos, Gustavo Bilibio ; Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</creatorcontrib><description>Fungicides play an important role in wheat blast management in Brazil. To determine whether the reported patterns of fungicide resistance are present in Pyricularia oryzae populations from wheat and signal grass grown in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, we characterized the sensitivity of a contemporary collection (2018 and 2019) of 64 fungal isolates to seven fungicides belonging to DMI (tebuconazole and epoxiconazole), QoI (azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin) and SDHI (bixafen, fluxapyroxad and benzovindiflupyr) groups. We further assessed if the differential sensitivity of selected isolates affected disease control using commercial doses of the fungicides applied protectively (prior to inoculation) on the heads of potted plants. Despite finding relatively low levels of in vitro sensitivity to some of the fungicides (e.g., azoxystrobin, fluxapyroxad and bixafen), control efficacies (percentage reductions in head blast severity) were significantly higher than the untreated plants and not affected by the sensitivity of the strain to all fungicides but azoxystrobin. The levels of head blast control for some of the fungicides (>70%) in the greenhouse were similar to or higher than previously reported in the field. The molecular data for a set of isolates representing different fungicide sensitivity levels were generally not predictive of the phenotype. The wheat‐infecting isolates were less sensitive than signal grass‐infecting isolates to all fungicides including azoxystrobin. Our study not only confirms previous reports of low sensitivity to some fungicides, but it also suggests options among site‐specific fungicides, most notably tebuconazole and benzovindiflupyr, that can still be used under an antiresistance strategy such as coformulation with multisite fungicides.
Wheat and signal grass blast isolates varied in their in vitro sensitivity levels to seven fungicides. Low‐ or high‐sensitivity isolates were effectively controlled in the in planta inoculations by some of the fungicides.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ppa.13678</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Azoxystrobin ; Blast ; chemical control ; Disease control ; Epoxiconazole ; fungicide resistance ; Fungicides ; Grasses ; Inoculation ; Magnaporthe oryzae ; Pesticides ; Phenotypes ; Populations ; Tebuconazole ; Triticum aestivum ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Plant pathology, 2023-04, Vol.72 (3), p.449-467</ispartof><rights>2022 British Society for Plant Pathology.</rights><rights>Plant Pathology © 2023 British Society for Plant Pathology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-c971ea8d75f930d6a7a125b9861c0cae224bfba59d5b7637ae6774666e51b16d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-c971ea8d75f930d6a7a125b9861c0cae224bfba59d5b7637ae6774666e51b16d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1207-5806 ; 0000-0003-4398-409X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fppa.13678$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fppa.13678$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cazón, Luis Ignácio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ascari, João Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Gustavo Bilibio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</creatorcontrib><title>Differential response to DMI, QoI and SDHI fungicides in wheat and signal grass blast populations from Minas Gerais, Brazil</title><title>Plant pathology</title><description>Fungicides play an important role in wheat blast management in Brazil. To determine whether the reported patterns of fungicide resistance are present in Pyricularia oryzae populations from wheat and signal grass grown in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, we characterized the sensitivity of a contemporary collection (2018 and 2019) of 64 fungal isolates to seven fungicides belonging to DMI (tebuconazole and epoxiconazole), QoI (azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin) and SDHI (bixafen, fluxapyroxad and benzovindiflupyr) groups. We further assessed if the differential sensitivity of selected isolates affected disease control using commercial doses of the fungicides applied protectively (prior to inoculation) on the heads of potted plants. Despite finding relatively low levels of in vitro sensitivity to some of the fungicides (e.g., azoxystrobin, fluxapyroxad and bixafen), control efficacies (percentage reductions in head blast severity) were significantly higher than the untreated plants and not affected by the sensitivity of the strain to all fungicides but azoxystrobin. The levels of head blast control for some of the fungicides (>70%) in the greenhouse were similar to or higher than previously reported in the field. The molecular data for a set of isolates representing different fungicide sensitivity levels were generally not predictive of the phenotype. The wheat‐infecting isolates were less sensitive than signal grass‐infecting isolates to all fungicides including azoxystrobin. Our study not only confirms previous reports of low sensitivity to some fungicides, but it also suggests options among site‐specific fungicides, most notably tebuconazole and benzovindiflupyr, that can still be used under an antiresistance strategy such as coformulation with multisite fungicides.
Wheat and signal grass blast isolates varied in their in vitro sensitivity levels to seven fungicides. Low‐ or high‐sensitivity isolates were effectively controlled in the in planta inoculations by some of the fungicides.</description><subject>Azoxystrobin</subject><subject>Blast</subject><subject>chemical control</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Epoxiconazole</subject><subject>fungicide resistance</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Magnaporthe oryzae</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Tebuconazole</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0032-0862</issn><issn>1365-3059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFPwjAYxRujiYge_A-aeDJh0HZrux0RFJZAxKjn5dvWYcnYZruFoP-8lXn1u7zD93svLw-hW0rG1N2kaWBMfSHDMzRwyj2f8OgcDQjxmUdCwS7RlbU7QiiPonCAvue6KJRRVauhxEbZpq6swm2N5-t4hF_qGEOV49f5MsZFV211pnNlsa7w4UNBe3pava2ceWvAWpyWYFvc1E1XQqtdGC5MvcdrXYHFC2VA2xF-MPCly2t0UUBp1c2fDtH70-PbbOmtnhfxbLryMhbJ0MsiSRWEueRF5JNcgATKeBqFgmYkA8VYkBYp8CjnqRS-BCWkDIQQitOUitwfors-tzH1Z6dsm-zqzrjKNmEy5Iz4AQ0cdd9TmamtNapIGqP3YI4JJcnvtonbNjlt69hJzx50qY7_g8lmM-0dP1BWesc</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Cazón, Luis Ignácio</creator><creator>Ascari, João Paulo</creator><creator>Santos, Gustavo Bilibio</creator><creator>Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1207-5806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4398-409X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Differential response to DMI, QoI and SDHI fungicides in wheat and signal grass blast populations from Minas Gerais, Brazil</title><author>Cazón, Luis Ignácio ; Ascari, João Paulo ; Santos, Gustavo Bilibio ; Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-c971ea8d75f930d6a7a125b9861c0cae224bfba59d5b7637ae6774666e51b16d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Azoxystrobin</topic><topic>Blast</topic><topic>chemical control</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Epoxiconazole</topic><topic>fungicide resistance</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Magnaporthe oryzae</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Tebuconazole</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cazón, Luis Ignácio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ascari, João Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Gustavo Bilibio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cazón, Luis Ignácio</au><au>Ascari, João Paulo</au><au>Santos, Gustavo Bilibio</au><au>Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential response to DMI, QoI and SDHI fungicides in wheat and signal grass blast populations from Minas Gerais, Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>467</epage><pages>449-467</pages><issn>0032-0862</issn><eissn>1365-3059</eissn><abstract>Fungicides play an important role in wheat blast management in Brazil. To determine whether the reported patterns of fungicide resistance are present in Pyricularia oryzae populations from wheat and signal grass grown in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, we characterized the sensitivity of a contemporary collection (2018 and 2019) of 64 fungal isolates to seven fungicides belonging to DMI (tebuconazole and epoxiconazole), QoI (azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin) and SDHI (bixafen, fluxapyroxad and benzovindiflupyr) groups. We further assessed if the differential sensitivity of selected isolates affected disease control using commercial doses of the fungicides applied protectively (prior to inoculation) on the heads of potted plants. Despite finding relatively low levels of in vitro sensitivity to some of the fungicides (e.g., azoxystrobin, fluxapyroxad and bixafen), control efficacies (percentage reductions in head blast severity) were significantly higher than the untreated plants and not affected by the sensitivity of the strain to all fungicides but azoxystrobin. The levels of head blast control for some of the fungicides (>70%) in the greenhouse were similar to or higher than previously reported in the field. The molecular data for a set of isolates representing different fungicide sensitivity levels were generally not predictive of the phenotype. The wheat‐infecting isolates were less sensitive than signal grass‐infecting isolates to all fungicides including azoxystrobin. Our study not only confirms previous reports of low sensitivity to some fungicides, but it also suggests options among site‐specific fungicides, most notably tebuconazole and benzovindiflupyr, that can still be used under an antiresistance strategy such as coformulation with multisite fungicides.
Wheat and signal grass blast isolates varied in their in vitro sensitivity levels to seven fungicides. Low‐ or high‐sensitivity isolates were effectively controlled in the in planta inoculations by some of the fungicides.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ppa.13678</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1207-5806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4398-409X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-0862 |
ispartof | Plant pathology, 2023-04, Vol.72 (3), p.449-467 |
issn | 0032-0862 1365-3059 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2785203414 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Azoxystrobin Blast chemical control Disease control Epoxiconazole fungicide resistance Fungicides Grasses Inoculation Magnaporthe oryzae Pesticides Phenotypes Populations Tebuconazole Triticum aestivum Wheat |
title | Differential response to DMI, QoI and SDHI fungicides in wheat and signal grass blast populations from Minas Gerais, Brazil |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A10%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20response%20to%20DMI,%20QoI%20and%20SDHI%20fungicides%20in%20wheat%20and%20signal%20grass%20blast%20populations%20from%20Minas%20Gerais,%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Plant%20pathology&rft.au=Caz%C3%B3n,%20Luis%20Ign%C3%A1cio&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=467&rft.pages=449-467&rft.issn=0032-0862&rft.eissn=1365-3059&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ppa.13678&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2785203414%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785203414&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |