Differential response to DMI, QoI and SDHI fungicides in wheat and signal grass blast populations from Minas Gerais, Brazil

Fungicides play an important role in wheat blast management in Brazil. To determine whether the reported patterns of fungicide resistance are present in Pyricularia oryzae populations from wheat and signal grass grown in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, we characterized the sensitivity of a contemporary...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant pathology 2023-04, Vol.72 (3), p.449-467
Hauptverfasser: Cazón, Luis Ignácio, Ascari, João Paulo, Santos, Gustavo Bilibio, Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 467
container_issue 3
container_start_page 449
container_title Plant pathology
container_volume 72
creator Cazón, Luis Ignácio
Ascari, João Paulo
Santos, Gustavo Bilibio
Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros
description Fungicides play an important role in wheat blast management in Brazil. To determine whether the reported patterns of fungicide resistance are present in Pyricularia oryzae populations from wheat and signal grass grown in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, we characterized the sensitivity of a contemporary collection (2018 and 2019) of 64 fungal isolates to seven fungicides belonging to DMI (tebuconazole and epoxiconazole), QoI (azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin) and SDHI (bixafen, fluxapyroxad and benzovindiflupyr) groups. We further assessed if the differential sensitivity of selected isolates affected disease control using commercial doses of the fungicides applied protectively (prior to inoculation) on the heads of potted plants. Despite finding relatively low levels of in vitro sensitivity to some of the fungicides (e.g., azoxystrobin, fluxapyroxad and bixafen), control efficacies (percentage reductions in head blast severity) were significantly higher than the untreated plants and not affected by the sensitivity of the strain to all fungicides but azoxystrobin. The levels of head blast control for some of the fungicides (>70%) in the greenhouse were similar to or higher than previously reported in the field. The molecular data for a set of isolates representing different fungicide sensitivity levels were generally not predictive of the phenotype. The wheat‐infecting isolates were less sensitive than signal grass‐infecting isolates to all fungicides including azoxystrobin. Our study not only confirms previous reports of low sensitivity to some fungicides, but it also suggests options among site‐specific fungicides, most notably tebuconazole and benzovindiflupyr, that can still be used under an antiresistance strategy such as coformulation with multisite fungicides. Wheat and signal grass blast isolates varied in their in vitro sensitivity levels to seven fungicides. Low‐ or high‐sensitivity isolates were effectively controlled in the in planta inoculations by some of the fungicides.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ppa.13678
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2785203414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2785203414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-c971ea8d75f930d6a7a125b9861c0cae224bfba59d5b7637ae6774666e51b16d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFPwjAYxRujiYge_A-aeDJh0HZrux0RFJZAxKjn5dvWYcnYZruFoP-8lXn1u7zD93svLw-hW0rG1N2kaWBMfSHDMzRwyj2f8OgcDQjxmUdCwS7RlbU7QiiPonCAvue6KJRRVauhxEbZpq6swm2N5-t4hF_qGEOV49f5MsZFV211pnNlsa7w4UNBe3pava2ceWvAWpyWYFvc1E1XQqtdGC5MvcdrXYHFC2VA2xF-MPCly2t0UUBp1c2fDtH70-PbbOmtnhfxbLryMhbJ0MsiSRWEueRF5JNcgATKeBqFgmYkA8VYkBYp8CjnqRS-BCWkDIQQitOUitwfors-tzH1Z6dsm-zqzrjKNmEy5Iz4AQ0cdd9TmamtNapIGqP3YI4JJcnvtonbNjlt69hJzx50qY7_g8lmM-0dP1BWesc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785203414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential response to DMI, QoI and SDHI fungicides in wheat and signal grass blast populations from Minas Gerais, Brazil</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Cazón, Luis Ignácio ; Ascari, João Paulo ; Santos, Gustavo Bilibio ; Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</creator><creatorcontrib>Cazón, Luis Ignácio ; Ascari, João Paulo ; Santos, Gustavo Bilibio ; Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</creatorcontrib><description>Fungicides play an important role in wheat blast management in Brazil. To determine whether the reported patterns of fungicide resistance are present in Pyricularia oryzae populations from wheat and signal grass grown in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, we characterized the sensitivity of a contemporary collection (2018 and 2019) of 64 fungal isolates to seven fungicides belonging to DMI (tebuconazole and epoxiconazole), QoI (azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin) and SDHI (bixafen, fluxapyroxad and benzovindiflupyr) groups. We further assessed if the differential sensitivity of selected isolates affected disease control using commercial doses of the fungicides applied protectively (prior to inoculation) on the heads of potted plants. Despite finding relatively low levels of in vitro sensitivity to some of the fungicides (e.g., azoxystrobin, fluxapyroxad and bixafen), control efficacies (percentage reductions in head blast severity) were significantly higher than the untreated plants and not affected by the sensitivity of the strain to all fungicides but azoxystrobin. The levels of head blast control for some of the fungicides (&gt;70%) in the greenhouse were similar to or higher than previously reported in the field. The molecular data for a set of isolates representing different fungicide sensitivity levels were generally not predictive of the phenotype. The wheat‐infecting isolates were less sensitive than signal grass‐infecting isolates to all fungicides including azoxystrobin. Our study not only confirms previous reports of low sensitivity to some fungicides, but it also suggests options among site‐specific fungicides, most notably tebuconazole and benzovindiflupyr, that can still be used under an antiresistance strategy such as coformulation with multisite fungicides. Wheat and signal grass blast isolates varied in their in vitro sensitivity levels to seven fungicides. Low‐ or high‐sensitivity isolates were effectively controlled in the in planta inoculations by some of the fungicides.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ppa.13678</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Azoxystrobin ; Blast ; chemical control ; Disease control ; Epoxiconazole ; fungicide resistance ; Fungicides ; Grasses ; Inoculation ; Magnaporthe oryzae ; Pesticides ; Phenotypes ; Populations ; Tebuconazole ; Triticum aestivum ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Plant pathology, 2023-04, Vol.72 (3), p.449-467</ispartof><rights>2022 British Society for Plant Pathology.</rights><rights>Plant Pathology © 2023 British Society for Plant Pathology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-c971ea8d75f930d6a7a125b9861c0cae224bfba59d5b7637ae6774666e51b16d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-c971ea8d75f930d6a7a125b9861c0cae224bfba59d5b7637ae6774666e51b16d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1207-5806 ; 0000-0003-4398-409X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fppa.13678$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fppa.13678$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cazón, Luis Ignácio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ascari, João Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Gustavo Bilibio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</creatorcontrib><title>Differential response to DMI, QoI and SDHI fungicides in wheat and signal grass blast populations from Minas Gerais, Brazil</title><title>Plant pathology</title><description>Fungicides play an important role in wheat blast management in Brazil. To determine whether the reported patterns of fungicide resistance are present in Pyricularia oryzae populations from wheat and signal grass grown in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, we characterized the sensitivity of a contemporary collection (2018 and 2019) of 64 fungal isolates to seven fungicides belonging to DMI (tebuconazole and epoxiconazole), QoI (azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin) and SDHI (bixafen, fluxapyroxad and benzovindiflupyr) groups. We further assessed if the differential sensitivity of selected isolates affected disease control using commercial doses of the fungicides applied protectively (prior to inoculation) on the heads of potted plants. Despite finding relatively low levels of in vitro sensitivity to some of the fungicides (e.g., azoxystrobin, fluxapyroxad and bixafen), control efficacies (percentage reductions in head blast severity) were significantly higher than the untreated plants and not affected by the sensitivity of the strain to all fungicides but azoxystrobin. The levels of head blast control for some of the fungicides (&gt;70%) in the greenhouse were similar to or higher than previously reported in the field. The molecular data for a set of isolates representing different fungicide sensitivity levels were generally not predictive of the phenotype. The wheat‐infecting isolates were less sensitive than signal grass‐infecting isolates to all fungicides including azoxystrobin. Our study not only confirms previous reports of low sensitivity to some fungicides, but it also suggests options among site‐specific fungicides, most notably tebuconazole and benzovindiflupyr, that can still be used under an antiresistance strategy such as coformulation with multisite fungicides. Wheat and signal grass blast isolates varied in their in vitro sensitivity levels to seven fungicides. Low‐ or high‐sensitivity isolates were effectively controlled in the in planta inoculations by some of the fungicides.</description><subject>Azoxystrobin</subject><subject>Blast</subject><subject>chemical control</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Epoxiconazole</subject><subject>fungicide resistance</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Magnaporthe oryzae</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Tebuconazole</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0032-0862</issn><issn>1365-3059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFPwjAYxRujiYge_A-aeDJh0HZrux0RFJZAxKjn5dvWYcnYZruFoP-8lXn1u7zD93svLw-hW0rG1N2kaWBMfSHDMzRwyj2f8OgcDQjxmUdCwS7RlbU7QiiPonCAvue6KJRRVauhxEbZpq6swm2N5-t4hF_qGEOV49f5MsZFV211pnNlsa7w4UNBe3pava2ceWvAWpyWYFvc1E1XQqtdGC5MvcdrXYHFC2VA2xF-MPCly2t0UUBp1c2fDtH70-PbbOmtnhfxbLryMhbJ0MsiSRWEueRF5JNcgATKeBqFgmYkA8VYkBYp8CjnqRS-BCWkDIQQitOUitwfors-tzH1Z6dsm-zqzrjKNmEy5Iz4AQ0cdd9TmamtNapIGqP3YI4JJcnvtonbNjlt69hJzx50qY7_g8lmM-0dP1BWesc</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Cazón, Luis Ignácio</creator><creator>Ascari, João Paulo</creator><creator>Santos, Gustavo Bilibio</creator><creator>Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1207-5806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4398-409X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Differential response to DMI, QoI and SDHI fungicides in wheat and signal grass blast populations from Minas Gerais, Brazil</title><author>Cazón, Luis Ignácio ; Ascari, João Paulo ; Santos, Gustavo Bilibio ; Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-c971ea8d75f930d6a7a125b9861c0cae224bfba59d5b7637ae6774666e51b16d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Azoxystrobin</topic><topic>Blast</topic><topic>chemical control</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Epoxiconazole</topic><topic>fungicide resistance</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Magnaporthe oryzae</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Tebuconazole</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cazón, Luis Ignácio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ascari, João Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Gustavo Bilibio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cazón, Luis Ignácio</au><au>Ascari, João Paulo</au><au>Santos, Gustavo Bilibio</au><au>Del Ponte, Emerson Medeiros</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential response to DMI, QoI and SDHI fungicides in wheat and signal grass blast populations from Minas Gerais, Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>467</epage><pages>449-467</pages><issn>0032-0862</issn><eissn>1365-3059</eissn><abstract>Fungicides play an important role in wheat blast management in Brazil. To determine whether the reported patterns of fungicide resistance are present in Pyricularia oryzae populations from wheat and signal grass grown in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, we characterized the sensitivity of a contemporary collection (2018 and 2019) of 64 fungal isolates to seven fungicides belonging to DMI (tebuconazole and epoxiconazole), QoI (azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin) and SDHI (bixafen, fluxapyroxad and benzovindiflupyr) groups. We further assessed if the differential sensitivity of selected isolates affected disease control using commercial doses of the fungicides applied protectively (prior to inoculation) on the heads of potted plants. Despite finding relatively low levels of in vitro sensitivity to some of the fungicides (e.g., azoxystrobin, fluxapyroxad and bixafen), control efficacies (percentage reductions in head blast severity) were significantly higher than the untreated plants and not affected by the sensitivity of the strain to all fungicides but azoxystrobin. The levels of head blast control for some of the fungicides (&gt;70%) in the greenhouse were similar to or higher than previously reported in the field. The molecular data for a set of isolates representing different fungicide sensitivity levels were generally not predictive of the phenotype. The wheat‐infecting isolates were less sensitive than signal grass‐infecting isolates to all fungicides including azoxystrobin. Our study not only confirms previous reports of low sensitivity to some fungicides, but it also suggests options among site‐specific fungicides, most notably tebuconazole and benzovindiflupyr, that can still be used under an antiresistance strategy such as coformulation with multisite fungicides. Wheat and signal grass blast isolates varied in their in vitro sensitivity levels to seven fungicides. Low‐ or high‐sensitivity isolates were effectively controlled in the in planta inoculations by some of the fungicides.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ppa.13678</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1207-5806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4398-409X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-0862
ispartof Plant pathology, 2023-04, Vol.72 (3), p.449-467
issn 0032-0862
1365-3059
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2785203414
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Azoxystrobin
Blast
chemical control
Disease control
Epoxiconazole
fungicide resistance
Fungicides
Grasses
Inoculation
Magnaporthe oryzae
Pesticides
Phenotypes
Populations
Tebuconazole
Triticum aestivum
Wheat
title Differential response to DMI, QoI and SDHI fungicides in wheat and signal grass blast populations from Minas Gerais, Brazil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A10%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20response%20to%20DMI,%20QoI%20and%20SDHI%20fungicides%20in%20wheat%20and%20signal%20grass%20blast%20populations%20from%20Minas%20Gerais,%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Plant%20pathology&rft.au=Caz%C3%B3n,%20Luis%20Ign%C3%A1cio&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=467&rft.pages=449-467&rft.issn=0032-0862&rft.eissn=1365-3059&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ppa.13678&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2785203414%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785203414&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true