The Perfect Paramour: Predicting Intention to Own a Sex Doll

We conducted a survey of U.S. respondents using Survey Monkey in July of 2021. Our primary interest was in predicting interest in owning a sex doll. The sample consisted of 569 respondents, roughly split between men and women. The response variable was respondents’ perceived chances of purchasing a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sexuality & culture 2023-04, Vol.27 (2), p.674-692
Hauptverfasser: DeMaris, Alfred, McGovern, Virginia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 692
container_issue 2
container_start_page 674
container_title Sexuality & culture
container_volume 27
creator DeMaris, Alfred
McGovern, Virginia
description We conducted a survey of U.S. respondents using Survey Monkey in July of 2021. Our primary interest was in predicting interest in owning a sex doll. The sample consisted of 569 respondents, roughly split between men and women. The response variable was respondents’ perceived chances of purchasing a sex doll in the future, on a scale from 0 to 100%. On the whole, men were more likely to intend to buy a sex doll: average estimated percent chance of buying a doll was 18% for males and 12% for females, a significant difference. However, fully 47% of men and 37% of women expressed some chance that they would buy a sex doll at some point in the future. The largest gender differences in perception of advantages/disadvantages of men or women owning dolls were that women were more likely to say they lead to objectification of real women and men were more likely to see an advantage for women in that they could engage in sexual practices with it that a real man/woman might object to. A multivariate model using Tobit regression revealed that gender, age, relationship status, and perceived advantages/disadvantages in owning a doll were all significant predictors of intention to own one. Aside from the aforesaid gender difference, intentions of buying a doll were higher for younger individuals and the unmarried, regardless whether the latter were in a romantic relationship already. For men, only perceived advantages were related to intentions to own a sex doll. For women, both perceived advantages and disadvantages of ownership influenced their intentions. Surprisingly, the overall gender difference in intended sex-doll ownership was comparatively small relative to other effects. Hence, future research should take a more gender-balanced approach to the study of interest in sex dolls.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12119-022-10034-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2785012486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A740379995</galeid><sourcerecordid>A740379995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-ef414e378c93e4167300dba0559db38fbf3f4502022475ef46f5cdb282fc887e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLwzAYhoMoOKd_wKuA1505tql4M-ZpMNjAeR3a9MvsaNOZdKj_3mgFEURykQPP8-XlReickgklJLsMlFGaJ4SxJN65SNgBGtGcp4lQjB3GM8llIqngx-gkhC0hVNI0HaHr9TPgFXgLpserwhdtt_dXeOWhqk1fuw2eux5cX3cO9x1evjpc4Ed4wzdd05yiI1s0Ac6-9zF6urtdzx6SxfJ-PpsuEsNV2idgBRXAM2VyDoKmGSekKgsiZV6VXNnSciskYTG9yGSkUytNVTLFrFEqAz5GF8Pcne9e9hB6vY0pXfxSs0xJQplQ6Q-1KRrQtbNd7wvT1sHoaSYIz_I8l5Ga_EHFVUFbm86BreP7L4ENgvFdCB6s3vm6Lfy7pkR_lq-H8nWMr7_K1yxKfJBChN0G_E_if6wPLnCDXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785012486</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Perfect Paramour: Predicting Intention to Own a Sex Doll</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>DeMaris, Alfred ; McGovern, Virginia</creator><creatorcontrib>DeMaris, Alfred ; McGovern, Virginia</creatorcontrib><description>We conducted a survey of U.S. respondents using Survey Monkey in July of 2021. Our primary interest was in predicting interest in owning a sex doll. The sample consisted of 569 respondents, roughly split between men and women. The response variable was respondents’ perceived chances of purchasing a sex doll in the future, on a scale from 0 to 100%. On the whole, men were more likely to intend to buy a sex doll: average estimated percent chance of buying a doll was 18% for males and 12% for females, a significant difference. However, fully 47% of men and 37% of women expressed some chance that they would buy a sex doll at some point in the future. The largest gender differences in perception of advantages/disadvantages of men or women owning dolls were that women were more likely to say they lead to objectification of real women and men were more likely to see an advantage for women in that they could engage in sexual practices with it that a real man/woman might object to. A multivariate model using Tobit regression revealed that gender, age, relationship status, and perceived advantages/disadvantages in owning a doll were all significant predictors of intention to own one. Aside from the aforesaid gender difference, intentions of buying a doll were higher for younger individuals and the unmarried, regardless whether the latter were in a romantic relationship already. For men, only perceived advantages were related to intentions to own a sex doll. For women, both perceived advantages and disadvantages of ownership influenced their intentions. Surprisingly, the overall gender difference in intended sex-doll ownership was comparatively small relative to other effects. Hence, future research should take a more gender-balanced approach to the study of interest in sex dolls.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1095-5143</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4822</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12119-022-10034-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Dolls ; Gender differences ; Gender relations ; Men ; Original Article ; Ownership ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Psychology ; Regional and Cultural Studies ; Romantic relationships ; Sex differences ; Sexual behavior ; Social Sciences ; Women</subject><ispartof>Sexuality &amp; culture, 2023-04, Vol.27 (2), p.674-692</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-ef414e378c93e4167300dba0559db38fbf3f4502022475ef46f5cdb282fc887e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-ef414e378c93e4167300dba0559db38fbf3f4502022475ef46f5cdb282fc887e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12119-022-10034-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12119-022-10034-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27323,27903,27904,33753,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeMaris, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Virginia</creatorcontrib><title>The Perfect Paramour: Predicting Intention to Own a Sex Doll</title><title>Sexuality &amp; culture</title><addtitle>Sexuality &amp; Culture</addtitle><description>We conducted a survey of U.S. respondents using Survey Monkey in July of 2021. Our primary interest was in predicting interest in owning a sex doll. The sample consisted of 569 respondents, roughly split between men and women. The response variable was respondents’ perceived chances of purchasing a sex doll in the future, on a scale from 0 to 100%. On the whole, men were more likely to intend to buy a sex doll: average estimated percent chance of buying a doll was 18% for males and 12% for females, a significant difference. However, fully 47% of men and 37% of women expressed some chance that they would buy a sex doll at some point in the future. The largest gender differences in perception of advantages/disadvantages of men or women owning dolls were that women were more likely to say they lead to objectification of real women and men were more likely to see an advantage for women in that they could engage in sexual practices with it that a real man/woman might object to. A multivariate model using Tobit regression revealed that gender, age, relationship status, and perceived advantages/disadvantages in owning a doll were all significant predictors of intention to own one. Aside from the aforesaid gender difference, intentions of buying a doll were higher for younger individuals and the unmarried, regardless whether the latter were in a romantic relationship already. For men, only perceived advantages were related to intentions to own a sex doll. For women, both perceived advantages and disadvantages of ownership influenced their intentions. Surprisingly, the overall gender difference in intended sex-doll ownership was comparatively small relative to other effects. Hence, future research should take a more gender-balanced approach to the study of interest in sex dolls.</description><subject>Dolls</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gender relations</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Regional and Cultural Studies</subject><subject>Romantic relationships</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1095-5143</issn><issn>1936-4822</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtLwzAYhoMoOKd_wKuA1505tql4M-ZpMNjAeR3a9MvsaNOZdKj_3mgFEURykQPP8-XlReickgklJLsMlFGaJ4SxJN65SNgBGtGcp4lQjB3GM8llIqngx-gkhC0hVNI0HaHr9TPgFXgLpserwhdtt_dXeOWhqk1fuw2eux5cX3cO9x1evjpc4Ed4wzdd05yiI1s0Ac6-9zF6urtdzx6SxfJ-PpsuEsNV2idgBRXAM2VyDoKmGSekKgsiZV6VXNnSciskYTG9yGSkUytNVTLFrFEqAz5GF8Pcne9e9hB6vY0pXfxSs0xJQplQ6Q-1KRrQtbNd7wvT1sHoaSYIz_I8l5Ga_EHFVUFbm86BreP7L4ENgvFdCB6s3vm6Lfy7pkR_lq-H8nWMr7_K1yxKfJBChN0G_E_if6wPLnCDXA</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>DeMaris, Alfred</creator><creator>McGovern, Virginia</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>The Perfect Paramour: Predicting Intention to Own a Sex Doll</title><author>DeMaris, Alfred ; McGovern, Virginia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-ef414e378c93e4167300dba0559db38fbf3f4502022475ef46f5cdb282fc887e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Dolls</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gender relations</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Regional and Cultural Studies</topic><topic>Romantic relationships</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeMaris, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Virginia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's &amp; Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sexuality &amp; culture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeMaris, Alfred</au><au>McGovern, Virginia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Perfect Paramour: Predicting Intention to Own a Sex Doll</atitle><jtitle>Sexuality &amp; culture</jtitle><stitle>Sexuality &amp; Culture</stitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>674</spage><epage>692</epage><pages>674-692</pages><issn>1095-5143</issn><eissn>1936-4822</eissn><abstract>We conducted a survey of U.S. respondents using Survey Monkey in July of 2021. Our primary interest was in predicting interest in owning a sex doll. The sample consisted of 569 respondents, roughly split between men and women. The response variable was respondents’ perceived chances of purchasing a sex doll in the future, on a scale from 0 to 100%. On the whole, men were more likely to intend to buy a sex doll: average estimated percent chance of buying a doll was 18% for males and 12% for females, a significant difference. However, fully 47% of men and 37% of women expressed some chance that they would buy a sex doll at some point in the future. The largest gender differences in perception of advantages/disadvantages of men or women owning dolls were that women were more likely to say they lead to objectification of real women and men were more likely to see an advantage for women in that they could engage in sexual practices with it that a real man/woman might object to. A multivariate model using Tobit regression revealed that gender, age, relationship status, and perceived advantages/disadvantages in owning a doll were all significant predictors of intention to own one. Aside from the aforesaid gender difference, intentions of buying a doll were higher for younger individuals and the unmarried, regardless whether the latter were in a romantic relationship already. For men, only perceived advantages were related to intentions to own a sex doll. For women, both perceived advantages and disadvantages of ownership influenced their intentions. Surprisingly, the overall gender difference in intended sex-doll ownership was comparatively small relative to other effects. Hence, future research should take a more gender-balanced approach to the study of interest in sex dolls.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12119-022-10034-2</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1095-5143
ispartof Sexuality & culture, 2023-04, Vol.27 (2), p.674-692
issn 1095-5143
1936-4822
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2785012486
source SpringerLink Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Dolls
Gender differences
Gender relations
Men
Original Article
Ownership
Personality and Social Psychology
Psychology
Regional and Cultural Studies
Romantic relationships
Sex differences
Sexual behavior
Social Sciences
Women
title The Perfect Paramour: Predicting Intention to Own a Sex Doll
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T08%3A59%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Perfect%20Paramour:%20Predicting%20Intention%20to%20Own%20a%20Sex%20Doll&rft.jtitle=Sexuality%20&%20culture&rft.au=DeMaris,%20Alfred&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=674&rft.epage=692&rft.pages=674-692&rft.issn=1095-5143&rft.eissn=1936-4822&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12119-022-10034-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA740379995%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785012486&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A740379995&rfr_iscdi=true