The Perfect Paramour: Predicting Intention to Own a Sex Doll
We conducted a survey of U.S. respondents using Survey Monkey in July of 2021. Our primary interest was in predicting interest in owning a sex doll. The sample consisted of 569 respondents, roughly split between men and women. The response variable was respondents’ perceived chances of purchasing a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sexuality & culture 2023-04, Vol.27 (2), p.674-692 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 692 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 674 |
container_title | Sexuality & culture |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | DeMaris, Alfred McGovern, Virginia |
description | We conducted a survey of U.S. respondents using Survey Monkey in July of 2021. Our primary interest was in predicting interest in owning a sex doll. The sample consisted of 569 respondents, roughly split between men and women. The response variable was respondents’ perceived chances of purchasing a sex doll in the future, on a scale from 0 to 100%. On the whole, men were more likely to intend to buy a sex doll: average estimated percent chance of buying a doll was 18% for males and 12% for females, a significant difference. However, fully 47% of men and 37% of women expressed some chance that they would buy a sex doll at some point in the future. The largest gender differences in perception of advantages/disadvantages of men or women owning dolls were that women were more likely to say they lead to objectification of real women and men were more likely to see an advantage for women in that they could engage in sexual practices with it that a real man/woman might object to. A multivariate model using Tobit regression revealed that gender, age, relationship status, and perceived advantages/disadvantages in owning a doll were all significant predictors of intention to own one. Aside from the aforesaid gender difference, intentions of buying a doll were higher for younger individuals and the unmarried, regardless whether the latter were in a romantic relationship already. For men, only perceived advantages were related to intentions to own a sex doll. For women, both perceived advantages and disadvantages of ownership influenced their intentions. Surprisingly, the overall gender difference in intended sex-doll ownership was comparatively small relative to other effects. Hence, future research should take a more gender-balanced approach to the study of interest in sex dolls. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12119-022-10034-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2785012486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A740379995</galeid><sourcerecordid>A740379995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-ef414e378c93e4167300dba0559db38fbf3f4502022475ef46f5cdb282fc887e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLwzAYhoMoOKd_wKuA1505tql4M-ZpMNjAeR3a9MvsaNOZdKj_3mgFEURykQPP8-XlReickgklJLsMlFGaJ4SxJN65SNgBGtGcp4lQjB3GM8llIqngx-gkhC0hVNI0HaHr9TPgFXgLpserwhdtt_dXeOWhqk1fuw2eux5cX3cO9x1evjpc4Ed4wzdd05yiI1s0Ac6-9zF6urtdzx6SxfJ-PpsuEsNV2idgBRXAM2VyDoKmGSekKgsiZV6VXNnSciskYTG9yGSkUytNVTLFrFEqAz5GF8Pcne9e9hB6vY0pXfxSs0xJQplQ6Q-1KRrQtbNd7wvT1sHoaSYIz_I8l5Ga_EHFVUFbm86BreP7L4ENgvFdCB6s3vm6Lfy7pkR_lq-H8nWMr7_K1yxKfJBChN0G_E_if6wPLnCDXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785012486</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Perfect Paramour: Predicting Intention to Own a Sex Doll</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>DeMaris, Alfred ; McGovern, Virginia</creator><creatorcontrib>DeMaris, Alfred ; McGovern, Virginia</creatorcontrib><description>We conducted a survey of U.S. respondents using Survey Monkey in July of 2021. Our primary interest was in predicting interest in owning a sex doll. The sample consisted of 569 respondents, roughly split between men and women. The response variable was respondents’ perceived chances of purchasing a sex doll in the future, on a scale from 0 to 100%. On the whole, men were more likely to intend to buy a sex doll: average estimated percent chance of buying a doll was 18% for males and 12% for females, a significant difference. However, fully 47% of men and 37% of women expressed some chance that they would buy a sex doll at some point in the future. The largest gender differences in perception of advantages/disadvantages of men or women owning dolls were that women were more likely to say they lead to objectification of real women and men were more likely to see an advantage for women in that they could engage in sexual practices with it that a real man/woman might object to. A multivariate model using Tobit regression revealed that gender, age, relationship status, and perceived advantages/disadvantages in owning a doll were all significant predictors of intention to own one. Aside from the aforesaid gender difference, intentions of buying a doll were higher for younger individuals and the unmarried, regardless whether the latter were in a romantic relationship already. For men, only perceived advantages were related to intentions to own a sex doll. For women, both perceived advantages and disadvantages of ownership influenced their intentions. Surprisingly, the overall gender difference in intended sex-doll ownership was comparatively small relative to other effects. Hence, future research should take a more gender-balanced approach to the study of interest in sex dolls.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1095-5143</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4822</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12119-022-10034-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Dolls ; Gender differences ; Gender relations ; Men ; Original Article ; Ownership ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Psychology ; Regional and Cultural Studies ; Romantic relationships ; Sex differences ; Sexual behavior ; Social Sciences ; Women</subject><ispartof>Sexuality & culture, 2023-04, Vol.27 (2), p.674-692</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-ef414e378c93e4167300dba0559db38fbf3f4502022475ef46f5cdb282fc887e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-ef414e378c93e4167300dba0559db38fbf3f4502022475ef46f5cdb282fc887e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12119-022-10034-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12119-022-10034-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27323,27903,27904,33753,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeMaris, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Virginia</creatorcontrib><title>The Perfect Paramour: Predicting Intention to Own a Sex Doll</title><title>Sexuality & culture</title><addtitle>Sexuality & Culture</addtitle><description>We conducted a survey of U.S. respondents using Survey Monkey in July of 2021. Our primary interest was in predicting interest in owning a sex doll. The sample consisted of 569 respondents, roughly split between men and women. The response variable was respondents’ perceived chances of purchasing a sex doll in the future, on a scale from 0 to 100%. On the whole, men were more likely to intend to buy a sex doll: average estimated percent chance of buying a doll was 18% for males and 12% for females, a significant difference. However, fully 47% of men and 37% of women expressed some chance that they would buy a sex doll at some point in the future. The largest gender differences in perception of advantages/disadvantages of men or women owning dolls were that women were more likely to say they lead to objectification of real women and men were more likely to see an advantage for women in that they could engage in sexual practices with it that a real man/woman might object to. A multivariate model using Tobit regression revealed that gender, age, relationship status, and perceived advantages/disadvantages in owning a doll were all significant predictors of intention to own one. Aside from the aforesaid gender difference, intentions of buying a doll were higher for younger individuals and the unmarried, regardless whether the latter were in a romantic relationship already. For men, only perceived advantages were related to intentions to own a sex doll. For women, both perceived advantages and disadvantages of ownership influenced their intentions. Surprisingly, the overall gender difference in intended sex-doll ownership was comparatively small relative to other effects. Hence, future research should take a more gender-balanced approach to the study of interest in sex dolls.</description><subject>Dolls</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gender relations</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Regional and Cultural Studies</subject><subject>Romantic relationships</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1095-5143</issn><issn>1936-4822</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtLwzAYhoMoOKd_wKuA1505tql4M-ZpMNjAeR3a9MvsaNOZdKj_3mgFEURykQPP8-XlReickgklJLsMlFGaJ4SxJN65SNgBGtGcp4lQjB3GM8llIqngx-gkhC0hVNI0HaHr9TPgFXgLpserwhdtt_dXeOWhqk1fuw2eux5cX3cO9x1evjpc4Ed4wzdd05yiI1s0Ac6-9zF6urtdzx6SxfJ-PpsuEsNV2idgBRXAM2VyDoKmGSekKgsiZV6VXNnSciskYTG9yGSkUytNVTLFrFEqAz5GF8Pcne9e9hB6vY0pXfxSs0xJQplQ6Q-1KRrQtbNd7wvT1sHoaSYIz_I8l5Ga_EHFVUFbm86BreP7L4ENgvFdCB6s3vm6Lfy7pkR_lq-H8nWMr7_K1yxKfJBChN0G_E_if6wPLnCDXA</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>DeMaris, Alfred</creator><creator>McGovern, Virginia</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>The Perfect Paramour: Predicting Intention to Own a Sex Doll</title><author>DeMaris, Alfred ; McGovern, Virginia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-ef414e378c93e4167300dba0559db38fbf3f4502022475ef46f5cdb282fc887e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Dolls</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gender relations</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Regional and Cultural Studies</topic><topic>Romantic relationships</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeMaris, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Virginia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sexuality & culture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeMaris, Alfred</au><au>McGovern, Virginia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Perfect Paramour: Predicting Intention to Own a Sex Doll</atitle><jtitle>Sexuality & culture</jtitle><stitle>Sexuality & Culture</stitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>674</spage><epage>692</epage><pages>674-692</pages><issn>1095-5143</issn><eissn>1936-4822</eissn><abstract>We conducted a survey of U.S. respondents using Survey Monkey in July of 2021. Our primary interest was in predicting interest in owning a sex doll. The sample consisted of 569 respondents, roughly split between men and women. The response variable was respondents’ perceived chances of purchasing a sex doll in the future, on a scale from 0 to 100%. On the whole, men were more likely to intend to buy a sex doll: average estimated percent chance of buying a doll was 18% for males and 12% for females, a significant difference. However, fully 47% of men and 37% of women expressed some chance that they would buy a sex doll at some point in the future. The largest gender differences in perception of advantages/disadvantages of men or women owning dolls were that women were more likely to say they lead to objectification of real women and men were more likely to see an advantage for women in that they could engage in sexual practices with it that a real man/woman might object to. A multivariate model using Tobit regression revealed that gender, age, relationship status, and perceived advantages/disadvantages in owning a doll were all significant predictors of intention to own one. Aside from the aforesaid gender difference, intentions of buying a doll were higher for younger individuals and the unmarried, regardless whether the latter were in a romantic relationship already. For men, only perceived advantages were related to intentions to own a sex doll. For women, both perceived advantages and disadvantages of ownership influenced their intentions. Surprisingly, the overall gender difference in intended sex-doll ownership was comparatively small relative to other effects. Hence, future research should take a more gender-balanced approach to the study of interest in sex dolls.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12119-022-10034-2</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1095-5143 |
ispartof | Sexuality & culture, 2023-04, Vol.27 (2), p.674-692 |
issn | 1095-5143 1936-4822 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2785012486 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Dolls Gender differences Gender relations Men Original Article Ownership Personality and Social Psychology Psychology Regional and Cultural Studies Romantic relationships Sex differences Sexual behavior Social Sciences Women |
title | The Perfect Paramour: Predicting Intention to Own a Sex Doll |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T08%3A59%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Perfect%20Paramour:%20Predicting%20Intention%20to%20Own%20a%20Sex%20Doll&rft.jtitle=Sexuality%20&%20culture&rft.au=DeMaris,%20Alfred&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=674&rft.epage=692&rft.pages=674-692&rft.issn=1095-5143&rft.eissn=1936-4822&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12119-022-10034-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA740379995%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785012486&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A740379995&rfr_iscdi=true |