“Whose demand?” The co-construction of markets, demand and gender in development-oriented crop breeding

Advancing women’s empowerment and gender equality in agriculture is a recognised development goal, also within crop breeding. Increasingly, breeding teams are expected to use ‘market-based’ approaches to design more ‘demand-led’ and ‘gender-responsive’ crop varieties. Based on an institutional ethno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agriculture and human values 2023-03, Vol.40 (1), p.83-100
Hauptverfasser: Tarjem, Ida Arff, Westengen, Ola Tveitereid, Wisborg, Poul, Glaab, Katharina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100
container_issue 1
container_start_page 83
container_title Agriculture and human values
container_volume 40
creator Tarjem, Ida Arff
Westengen, Ola Tveitereid
Wisborg, Poul
Glaab, Katharina
description Advancing women’s empowerment and gender equality in agriculture is a recognised development goal, also within crop breeding. Increasingly, breeding teams are expected to use ‘market-based’ approaches to design more ‘demand-led’ and ‘gender-responsive’ crop varieties. Based on an institutional ethnography that includes high-profile development-oriented breeding initiatives, we unpack these terms using perspectives from political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies. By conceptualising the market as an ongoing, relational performance made up of discourses, practices and human and nonhuman actors, we trace how the market is understood as an effective socioeconomic institution for soliciting demand, but also becomes a normative agenda. Construed as a demand variable, the relational and structural dimensions of gender are rendered less visible, which might strengthen rather than transform power relations’ status quo. On the other hand, a feminist science and technology perspective broadens the field of vision not only to the gendered dimensions of crop breeding, but also to the nonhuman actors, such as the crops and traits falling outside the market sphere of interest. By putting political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies into conversation, the article contributes to the development of a feminist political agronomy.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10460-022-10337-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2784998150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2784998150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7ba42d4acb9b5f535f2b64d10cf301c95f0820c531054ad1924d14462b6bc1683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EEqXwApwsccUwXpI4J4QQm1SJSxHcrMRx2nSxg50i9dYHgZfrk-CSStw4jEaa-f5ZfoTOKVxRgOw6UBApEGCMUOA8I-sDNKBJxojkaXqIBiBlTkDI92N0EsIMAGQGbIDm283X29QFgyuzLGx1s9184_HUYO2IdjZ0fqW7xlnsarws_Nx04XKP4l1MjK2Mx42NxU-zcO3S2I4438RkKqy9a3HpjakaOzlFR3WxCOZsn4fo9eF-fPdERi-Pz3e3I6J5nnYkKwvBKlHoMi-TOuFJzcpUVBR0zYHqPKlBMtAJp5CIoqI5i00h0kiVmqaSD9FFP7f17mNlQqdmbuVtXKlYJkWeS5pApFhPxRtD8KZWrW_ii2tFQe1MVb2pKpqqfk1V6yjivShE2E6M_xv9j-oHTjV86Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2784998150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Whose demand?” The co-construction of markets, demand and gender in development-oriented crop breeding</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tarjem, Ida Arff ; Westengen, Ola Tveitereid ; Wisborg, Poul ; Glaab, Katharina</creator><creatorcontrib>Tarjem, Ida Arff ; Westengen, Ola Tveitereid ; Wisborg, Poul ; Glaab, Katharina</creatorcontrib><description>Advancing women’s empowerment and gender equality in agriculture is a recognised development goal, also within crop breeding. Increasingly, breeding teams are expected to use ‘market-based’ approaches to design more ‘demand-led’ and ‘gender-responsive’ crop varieties. Based on an institutional ethnography that includes high-profile development-oriented breeding initiatives, we unpack these terms using perspectives from political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies. By conceptualising the market as an ongoing, relational performance made up of discourses, practices and human and nonhuman actors, we trace how the market is understood as an effective socioeconomic institution for soliciting demand, but also becomes a normative agenda. Construed as a demand variable, the relational and structural dimensions of gender are rendered less visible, which might strengthen rather than transform power relations’ status quo. On the other hand, a feminist science and technology perspective broadens the field of vision not only to the gendered dimensions of crop breeding, but also to the nonhuman actors, such as the crops and traits falling outside the market sphere of interest. By putting political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies into conversation, the article contributes to the development of a feminist political agronomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10460-022-10337-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural development ; Agricultural Economics ; Agricultural Ethics ; Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Crops ; Demand ; Development Studies ; Education ; Empowerment ; Environmental Sociology ; Ethnography ; Feminism ; Gender ; Gender inequality ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Markets ; multidisciplinary ; Philosophy ; Plant breeding ; Politics ; Power ; Science ; Science and technology ; Sustainable Development</subject><ispartof>Agriculture and human values, 2023-03, Vol.40 (1), p.83-100</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7ba42d4acb9b5f535f2b64d10cf301c95f0820c531054ad1924d14462b6bc1683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7ba42d4acb9b5f535f2b64d10cf301c95f0820c531054ad1924d14462b6bc1683</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8550-407X ; 0000-0002-0818-7522 ; 0000-0001-6481-5178 ; 0000-0001-6609-7325</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-022-10337-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-022-10337-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27323,27903,27904,33753,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tarjem, Ida Arff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westengen, Ola Tveitereid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisborg, Poul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glaab, Katharina</creatorcontrib><title>“Whose demand?” The co-construction of markets, demand and gender in development-oriented crop breeding</title><title>Agriculture and human values</title><addtitle>Agric Hum Values</addtitle><description>Advancing women’s empowerment and gender equality in agriculture is a recognised development goal, also within crop breeding. Increasingly, breeding teams are expected to use ‘market-based’ approaches to design more ‘demand-led’ and ‘gender-responsive’ crop varieties. Based on an institutional ethnography that includes high-profile development-oriented breeding initiatives, we unpack these terms using perspectives from political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies. By conceptualising the market as an ongoing, relational performance made up of discourses, practices and human and nonhuman actors, we trace how the market is understood as an effective socioeconomic institution for soliciting demand, but also becomes a normative agenda. Construed as a demand variable, the relational and structural dimensions of gender are rendered less visible, which might strengthen rather than transform power relations’ status quo. On the other hand, a feminist science and technology perspective broadens the field of vision not only to the gendered dimensions of crop breeding, but also to the nonhuman actors, such as the crops and traits falling outside the market sphere of interest. By putting political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies into conversation, the article contributes to the development of a feminist political agronomy.</description><subject>Agricultural development</subject><subject>Agricultural Economics</subject><subject>Agricultural Ethics</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Development Studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Environmental Sociology</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science and technology</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><issn>0889-048X</issn><issn>1572-8366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EEqXwApwsccUwXpI4J4QQm1SJSxHcrMRx2nSxg50i9dYHgZfrk-CSStw4jEaa-f5ZfoTOKVxRgOw6UBApEGCMUOA8I-sDNKBJxojkaXqIBiBlTkDI92N0EsIMAGQGbIDm283X29QFgyuzLGx1s9184_HUYO2IdjZ0fqW7xlnsarws_Nx04XKP4l1MjK2Mx42NxU-zcO3S2I4438RkKqy9a3HpjakaOzlFR3WxCOZsn4fo9eF-fPdERi-Pz3e3I6J5nnYkKwvBKlHoMi-TOuFJzcpUVBR0zYHqPKlBMtAJp5CIoqI5i00h0kiVmqaSD9FFP7f17mNlQqdmbuVtXKlYJkWeS5pApFhPxRtD8KZWrW_ii2tFQe1MVb2pKpqqfk1V6yjivShE2E6M_xv9j-oHTjV86Q</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Tarjem, Ida Arff</creator><creator>Westengen, Ola Tveitereid</creator><creator>Wisborg, Poul</creator><creator>Glaab, Katharina</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-407X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-7522</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-5178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6609-7325</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>“Whose demand?” The co-construction of markets, demand and gender in development-oriented crop breeding</title><author>Tarjem, Ida Arff ; Westengen, Ola Tveitereid ; Wisborg, Poul ; Glaab, Katharina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7ba42d4acb9b5f535f2b64d10cf301c95f0820c531054ad1924d14462b6bc1683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural development</topic><topic>Agricultural Economics</topic><topic>Agricultural Ethics</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Development Studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Environmental Sociology</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science and technology</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tarjem, Ida Arff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westengen, Ola Tveitereid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisborg, Poul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glaab, Katharina</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Agriculture and human values</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tarjem, Ida Arff</au><au>Westengen, Ola Tveitereid</au><au>Wisborg, Poul</au><au>Glaab, Katharina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Whose demand?” The co-construction of markets, demand and gender in development-oriented crop breeding</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture and human values</jtitle><stitle>Agric Hum Values</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>83-100</pages><issn>0889-048X</issn><eissn>1572-8366</eissn><abstract>Advancing women’s empowerment and gender equality in agriculture is a recognised development goal, also within crop breeding. Increasingly, breeding teams are expected to use ‘market-based’ approaches to design more ‘demand-led’ and ‘gender-responsive’ crop varieties. Based on an institutional ethnography that includes high-profile development-oriented breeding initiatives, we unpack these terms using perspectives from political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies. By conceptualising the market as an ongoing, relational performance made up of discourses, practices and human and nonhuman actors, we trace how the market is understood as an effective socioeconomic institution for soliciting demand, but also becomes a normative agenda. Construed as a demand variable, the relational and structural dimensions of gender are rendered less visible, which might strengthen rather than transform power relations’ status quo. On the other hand, a feminist science and technology perspective broadens the field of vision not only to the gendered dimensions of crop breeding, but also to the nonhuman actors, such as the crops and traits falling outside the market sphere of interest. By putting political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies into conversation, the article contributes to the development of a feminist political agronomy.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10460-022-10337-y</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-407X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-7522</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-5178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6609-7325</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-048X
ispartof Agriculture and human values, 2023-03, Vol.40 (1), p.83-100
issn 0889-048X
1572-8366
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2784998150
source Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agricultural development
Agricultural Economics
Agricultural Ethics
Agriculture
Agronomy
Crops
Demand
Development Studies
Education
Empowerment
Environmental Sociology
Ethnography
Feminism
Gender
Gender inequality
Humanities and Social Sciences
Markets
multidisciplinary
Philosophy
Plant breeding
Politics
Power
Science
Science and technology
Sustainable Development
title “Whose demand?” The co-construction of markets, demand and gender in development-oriented crop breeding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CWhose%20demand?%E2%80%9D%20The%20co-construction%20of%20markets,%20demand%20and%20gender%20in%20development-oriented%20crop%20breeding&rft.jtitle=Agriculture%20and%20human%20values&rft.au=Tarjem,%20Ida%20Arff&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=83-100&rft.issn=0889-048X&rft.eissn=1572-8366&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10460-022-10337-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2784998150%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2784998150&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true