“Whose demand?” The co-construction of markets, demand and gender in development-oriented crop breeding
Advancing women’s empowerment and gender equality in agriculture is a recognised development goal, also within crop breeding. Increasingly, breeding teams are expected to use ‘market-based’ approaches to design more ‘demand-led’ and ‘gender-responsive’ crop varieties. Based on an institutional ethno...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agriculture and human values 2023-03, Vol.40 (1), p.83-100 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 100 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 83 |
container_title | Agriculture and human values |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Tarjem, Ida Arff Westengen, Ola Tveitereid Wisborg, Poul Glaab, Katharina |
description | Advancing women’s empowerment and gender equality in agriculture is a recognised development goal, also within crop breeding. Increasingly, breeding teams are expected to use ‘market-based’ approaches to design more ‘demand-led’ and ‘gender-responsive’ crop varieties. Based on an institutional ethnography that includes high-profile development-oriented breeding initiatives, we unpack these terms using perspectives from political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies. By conceptualising the market as an ongoing, relational performance made up of discourses, practices and human and nonhuman actors, we trace how the market is understood as an effective socioeconomic institution for soliciting demand, but also becomes a normative agenda. Construed as a demand variable, the relational and structural dimensions of gender are rendered less visible, which might strengthen rather than transform power relations’ status quo. On the other hand, a feminist science and technology perspective broadens the field of vision not only to the gendered dimensions of crop breeding, but also to the nonhuman actors, such as the crops and traits falling outside the market sphere of interest. By putting political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies into conversation, the article contributes to the development of a feminist political agronomy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10460-022-10337-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2784998150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2784998150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7ba42d4acb9b5f535f2b64d10cf301c95f0820c531054ad1924d14462b6bc1683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EEqXwApwsccUwXpI4J4QQm1SJSxHcrMRx2nSxg50i9dYHgZfrk-CSStw4jEaa-f5ZfoTOKVxRgOw6UBApEGCMUOA8I-sDNKBJxojkaXqIBiBlTkDI92N0EsIMAGQGbIDm283X29QFgyuzLGx1s9184_HUYO2IdjZ0fqW7xlnsarws_Nx04XKP4l1MjK2Mx42NxU-zcO3S2I4438RkKqy9a3HpjakaOzlFR3WxCOZsn4fo9eF-fPdERi-Pz3e3I6J5nnYkKwvBKlHoMi-TOuFJzcpUVBR0zYHqPKlBMtAJp5CIoqI5i00h0kiVmqaSD9FFP7f17mNlQqdmbuVtXKlYJkWeS5pApFhPxRtD8KZWrW_ii2tFQe1MVb2pKpqqfk1V6yjivShE2E6M_xv9j-oHTjV86Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2784998150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Whose demand?” The co-construction of markets, demand and gender in development-oriented crop breeding</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tarjem, Ida Arff ; Westengen, Ola Tveitereid ; Wisborg, Poul ; Glaab, Katharina</creator><creatorcontrib>Tarjem, Ida Arff ; Westengen, Ola Tveitereid ; Wisborg, Poul ; Glaab, Katharina</creatorcontrib><description>Advancing women’s empowerment and gender equality in agriculture is a recognised development goal, also within crop breeding. Increasingly, breeding teams are expected to use ‘market-based’ approaches to design more ‘demand-led’ and ‘gender-responsive’ crop varieties. Based on an institutional ethnography that includes high-profile development-oriented breeding initiatives, we unpack these terms using perspectives from political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies. By conceptualising the market as an ongoing, relational performance made up of discourses, practices and human and nonhuman actors, we trace how the market is understood as an effective socioeconomic institution for soliciting demand, but also becomes a normative agenda. Construed as a demand variable, the relational and structural dimensions of gender are rendered less visible, which might strengthen rather than transform power relations’ status quo. On the other hand, a feminist science and technology perspective broadens the field of vision not only to the gendered dimensions of crop breeding, but also to the nonhuman actors, such as the crops and traits falling outside the market sphere of interest. By putting political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies into conversation, the article contributes to the development of a feminist political agronomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10460-022-10337-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural development ; Agricultural Economics ; Agricultural Ethics ; Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Crops ; Demand ; Development Studies ; Education ; Empowerment ; Environmental Sociology ; Ethnography ; Feminism ; Gender ; Gender inequality ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Markets ; multidisciplinary ; Philosophy ; Plant breeding ; Politics ; Power ; Science ; Science and technology ; Sustainable Development</subject><ispartof>Agriculture and human values, 2023-03, Vol.40 (1), p.83-100</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7ba42d4acb9b5f535f2b64d10cf301c95f0820c531054ad1924d14462b6bc1683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7ba42d4acb9b5f535f2b64d10cf301c95f0820c531054ad1924d14462b6bc1683</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8550-407X ; 0000-0002-0818-7522 ; 0000-0001-6481-5178 ; 0000-0001-6609-7325</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-022-10337-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-022-10337-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27323,27903,27904,33753,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tarjem, Ida Arff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westengen, Ola Tveitereid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisborg, Poul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glaab, Katharina</creatorcontrib><title>“Whose demand?” The co-construction of markets, demand and gender in development-oriented crop breeding</title><title>Agriculture and human values</title><addtitle>Agric Hum Values</addtitle><description>Advancing women’s empowerment and gender equality in agriculture is a recognised development goal, also within crop breeding. Increasingly, breeding teams are expected to use ‘market-based’ approaches to design more ‘demand-led’ and ‘gender-responsive’ crop varieties. Based on an institutional ethnography that includes high-profile development-oriented breeding initiatives, we unpack these terms using perspectives from political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies. By conceptualising the market as an ongoing, relational performance made up of discourses, practices and human and nonhuman actors, we trace how the market is understood as an effective socioeconomic institution for soliciting demand, but also becomes a normative agenda. Construed as a demand variable, the relational and structural dimensions of gender are rendered less visible, which might strengthen rather than transform power relations’ status quo. On the other hand, a feminist science and technology perspective broadens the field of vision not only to the gendered dimensions of crop breeding, but also to the nonhuman actors, such as the crops and traits falling outside the market sphere of interest. By putting political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies into conversation, the article contributes to the development of a feminist political agronomy.</description><subject>Agricultural development</subject><subject>Agricultural Economics</subject><subject>Agricultural Ethics</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Development Studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Environmental Sociology</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science and technology</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><issn>0889-048X</issn><issn>1572-8366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EEqXwApwsccUwXpI4J4QQm1SJSxHcrMRx2nSxg50i9dYHgZfrk-CSStw4jEaa-f5ZfoTOKVxRgOw6UBApEGCMUOA8I-sDNKBJxojkaXqIBiBlTkDI92N0EsIMAGQGbIDm283X29QFgyuzLGx1s9184_HUYO2IdjZ0fqW7xlnsarws_Nx04XKP4l1MjK2Mx42NxU-zcO3S2I4438RkKqy9a3HpjakaOzlFR3WxCOZsn4fo9eF-fPdERi-Pz3e3I6J5nnYkKwvBKlHoMi-TOuFJzcpUVBR0zYHqPKlBMtAJp5CIoqI5i00h0kiVmqaSD9FFP7f17mNlQqdmbuVtXKlYJkWeS5pApFhPxRtD8KZWrW_ii2tFQe1MVb2pKpqqfk1V6yjivShE2E6M_xv9j-oHTjV86Q</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Tarjem, Ida Arff</creator><creator>Westengen, Ola Tveitereid</creator><creator>Wisborg, Poul</creator><creator>Glaab, Katharina</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-407X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-7522</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-5178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6609-7325</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>“Whose demand?” The co-construction of markets, demand and gender in development-oriented crop breeding</title><author>Tarjem, Ida Arff ; Westengen, Ola Tveitereid ; Wisborg, Poul ; Glaab, Katharina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7ba42d4acb9b5f535f2b64d10cf301c95f0820c531054ad1924d14462b6bc1683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural development</topic><topic>Agricultural Economics</topic><topic>Agricultural Ethics</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Development Studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Environmental Sociology</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science and technology</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tarjem, Ida Arff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westengen, Ola Tveitereid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisborg, Poul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glaab, Katharina</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Agriculture and human values</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tarjem, Ida Arff</au><au>Westengen, Ola Tveitereid</au><au>Wisborg, Poul</au><au>Glaab, Katharina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Whose demand?” The co-construction of markets, demand and gender in development-oriented crop breeding</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture and human values</jtitle><stitle>Agric Hum Values</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>83-100</pages><issn>0889-048X</issn><eissn>1572-8366</eissn><abstract>Advancing women’s empowerment and gender equality in agriculture is a recognised development goal, also within crop breeding. Increasingly, breeding teams are expected to use ‘market-based’ approaches to design more ‘demand-led’ and ‘gender-responsive’ crop varieties. Based on an institutional ethnography that includes high-profile development-oriented breeding initiatives, we unpack these terms using perspectives from political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies. By conceptualising the market as an ongoing, relational performance made up of discourses, practices and human and nonhuman actors, we trace how the market is understood as an effective socioeconomic institution for soliciting demand, but also becomes a normative agenda. Construed as a demand variable, the relational and structural dimensions of gender are rendered less visible, which might strengthen rather than transform power relations’ status quo. On the other hand, a feminist science and technology perspective broadens the field of vision not only to the gendered dimensions of crop breeding, but also to the nonhuman actors, such as the crops and traits falling outside the market sphere of interest. By putting political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies into conversation, the article contributes to the development of a feminist political agronomy.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10460-022-10337-y</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-407X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-7522</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-5178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6609-7325</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0889-048X |
ispartof | Agriculture and human values, 2023-03, Vol.40 (1), p.83-100 |
issn | 0889-048X 1572-8366 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2784998150 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agricultural development Agricultural Economics Agricultural Ethics Agriculture Agronomy Crops Demand Development Studies Education Empowerment Environmental Sociology Ethnography Feminism Gender Gender inequality Humanities and Social Sciences Markets multidisciplinary Philosophy Plant breeding Politics Power Science Science and technology Sustainable Development |
title | “Whose demand?” The co-construction of markets, demand and gender in development-oriented crop breeding |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CWhose%20demand?%E2%80%9D%20The%20co-construction%20of%20markets,%20demand%20and%20gender%20in%20development-oriented%20crop%20breeding&rft.jtitle=Agriculture%20and%20human%20values&rft.au=Tarjem,%20Ida%20Arff&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=83-100&rft.issn=0889-048X&rft.eissn=1572-8366&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10460-022-10337-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2784998150%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2784998150&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |