Identifying and prioritising process portfolio for sustaining an effective business process management lifecycle

This study aims to develop a pipeline for identifying and prioritising the processes to include in business process management (BPM) initiatives by considering the obstacles for giving equal importance to the processes performed in businesses. The paper proposes the use of a process classification f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis 2023-01, Vol.30 (1-2), p.24-43
Hauptverfasser: Özdağoğlu, Güzin, Özdağoğlu, Aşkın, Damar, Muhammet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 43
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 24
container_title Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis
container_volume 30
creator Özdağoğlu, Güzin
Özdağoğlu, Aşkın
Damar, Muhammet
description This study aims to develop a pipeline for identifying and prioritising the processes to include in business process management (BPM) initiatives by considering the obstacles for giving equal importance to the processes performed in businesses. The paper proposes the use of a process classification framework as a reference for process identification and fuzzy multi‐criteria decision‐making methods for prioritising the processes. A real‐life application is presented, which adopts APQC Process Identification Framework, Fuzzy‐SWARA for weighting the criteria, and six additional methods for prioritising the processes. The approach would assist the executives in maintaining the BPM lifecycle by presenting a roadmap, especially for organisations that do not have much experience in this field. Methodological depth, richness and recency would provide guidelines for investigating the best set of processes to include in the architecture initially, not in the analysis or redesign phases.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mcda.1798
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2782847940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2782847940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2278-c09c9a40fb4c6b2aaa44ab3cae33639fa6b69ee028548d02fe8f66b7e76a94c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EEqUw8A0sMTGkdRzXiceq_KtUxAKz5TjnylUSBzsB9dvjNF2Z7nT6vXd3D6H7lCxSQuiy0ZVapLkoLtAsJUIkacbJ5div8kTQlF2jmxAOhJBilbEZ6rYVtL01R9vusWor3HnrvO1tGAeddxpCwJ3zvXG1ddg4j8MQemXbSYHBGNC9_QFcDlF0ws-yRrVqD01cgGsbqaOu4RZdGVUHuDvXOfp6ef7cvCW7j9ftZr1LNKV5kWgitFCMmJJpXlKlFGOqzLSCLOOZMIqXXAAQWqxYURFqoDCclznkXAmmaTZHD5NvPOZ7gNDLgxt8G1fK6E8LlgtGIvU4Udq7EDwYGf9vlD_KlMgxUDkGKsdAI7uc2F9bw_F_UL5vntYnxR_fW3s5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2782847940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying and prioritising process portfolio for sustaining an effective business process management lifecycle</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Özdağoğlu, Güzin ; Özdağoğlu, Aşkın ; Damar, Muhammet</creator><creatorcontrib>Özdağoğlu, Güzin ; Özdağoğlu, Aşkın ; Damar, Muhammet</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to develop a pipeline for identifying and prioritising the processes to include in business process management (BPM) initiatives by considering the obstacles for giving equal importance to the processes performed in businesses. The paper proposes the use of a process classification framework as a reference for process identification and fuzzy multi‐criteria decision‐making methods for prioritising the processes. A real‐life application is presented, which adopts APQC Process Identification Framework, Fuzzy‐SWARA for weighting the criteria, and six additional methods for prioritising the processes. The approach would assist the executives in maintaining the BPM lifecycle by presenting a roadmap, especially for organisations that do not have much experience in this field. Methodological depth, richness and recency would provide guidelines for investigating the best set of processes to include in the architecture initially, not in the analysis or redesign phases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mcda.1798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>APQC Process Classification Framework ; BPM lifecycle ; fuzzy MCDM ; process identification ; process portfolio selection</subject><ispartof>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 2023-01, Vol.30 (1-2), p.24-43</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2278-c09c9a40fb4c6b2aaa44ab3cae33639fa6b69ee028548d02fe8f66b7e76a94c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2278-c09c9a40fb4c6b2aaa44ab3cae33639fa6b69ee028548d02fe8f66b7e76a94c23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3055-3055 ; 0000-0002-3985-3073 ; 0000-0001-5299-0622</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmcda.1798$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmcda.1798$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Özdağoğlu, Güzin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdağoğlu, Aşkın</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damar, Muhammet</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying and prioritising process portfolio for sustaining an effective business process management lifecycle</title><title>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</title><description>This study aims to develop a pipeline for identifying and prioritising the processes to include in business process management (BPM) initiatives by considering the obstacles for giving equal importance to the processes performed in businesses. The paper proposes the use of a process classification framework as a reference for process identification and fuzzy multi‐criteria decision‐making methods for prioritising the processes. A real‐life application is presented, which adopts APQC Process Identification Framework, Fuzzy‐SWARA for weighting the criteria, and six additional methods for prioritising the processes. The approach would assist the executives in maintaining the BPM lifecycle by presenting a roadmap, especially for organisations that do not have much experience in this field. Methodological depth, richness and recency would provide guidelines for investigating the best set of processes to include in the architecture initially, not in the analysis or redesign phases.</description><subject>APQC Process Classification Framework</subject><subject>BPM lifecycle</subject><subject>fuzzy MCDM</subject><subject>process identification</subject><subject>process portfolio selection</subject><issn>1057-9214</issn><issn>1099-1360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EEqUw8A0sMTGkdRzXiceq_KtUxAKz5TjnylUSBzsB9dvjNF2Z7nT6vXd3D6H7lCxSQuiy0ZVapLkoLtAsJUIkacbJ5div8kTQlF2jmxAOhJBilbEZ6rYVtL01R9vusWor3HnrvO1tGAeddxpCwJ3zvXG1ddg4j8MQemXbSYHBGNC9_QFcDlF0ws-yRrVqD01cgGsbqaOu4RZdGVUHuDvXOfp6ef7cvCW7j9ftZr1LNKV5kWgitFCMmJJpXlKlFGOqzLSCLOOZMIqXXAAQWqxYURFqoDCclznkXAmmaTZHD5NvPOZ7gNDLgxt8G1fK6E8LlgtGIvU4Udq7EDwYGf9vlD_KlMgxUDkGKsdAI7uc2F9bw_F_UL5vntYnxR_fW3s5</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Özdağoğlu, Güzin</creator><creator>Özdağoğlu, Aşkın</creator><creator>Damar, Muhammet</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-3055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3985-3073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5299-0622</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Identifying and prioritising process portfolio for sustaining an effective business process management lifecycle</title><author>Özdağoğlu, Güzin ; Özdağoğlu, Aşkın ; Damar, Muhammet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2278-c09c9a40fb4c6b2aaa44ab3cae33639fa6b69ee028548d02fe8f66b7e76a94c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>APQC Process Classification Framework</topic><topic>BPM lifecycle</topic><topic>fuzzy MCDM</topic><topic>process identification</topic><topic>process portfolio selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Özdağoğlu, Güzin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdağoğlu, Aşkın</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damar, Muhammet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Özdağoğlu, Güzin</au><au>Özdağoğlu, Aşkın</au><au>Damar, Muhammet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying and prioritising process portfolio for sustaining an effective business process management lifecycle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</jtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>24-43</pages><issn>1057-9214</issn><eissn>1099-1360</eissn><abstract>This study aims to develop a pipeline for identifying and prioritising the processes to include in business process management (BPM) initiatives by considering the obstacles for giving equal importance to the processes performed in businesses. The paper proposes the use of a process classification framework as a reference for process identification and fuzzy multi‐criteria decision‐making methods for prioritising the processes. A real‐life application is presented, which adopts APQC Process Identification Framework, Fuzzy‐SWARA for weighting the criteria, and six additional methods for prioritising the processes. The approach would assist the executives in maintaining the BPM lifecycle by presenting a roadmap, especially for organisations that do not have much experience in this field. Methodological depth, richness and recency would provide guidelines for investigating the best set of processes to include in the architecture initially, not in the analysis or redesign phases.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/mcda.1798</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-3055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3985-3073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5299-0622</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9214
ispartof Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 2023-01, Vol.30 (1-2), p.24-43
issn 1057-9214
1099-1360
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2782847940
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects APQC Process Classification Framework
BPM lifecycle
fuzzy MCDM
process identification
process portfolio selection
title Identifying and prioritising process portfolio for sustaining an effective business process management lifecycle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T04%3A32%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20and%20prioritising%20process%20portfolio%20for%20sustaining%20an%20effective%20business%20process%20management%20lifecycle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20multi-criteria%20decision%20analysis&rft.au=%C3%96zda%C4%9Fo%C4%9Flu,%20G%C3%BCzin&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=24-43&rft.issn=1057-9214&rft.eissn=1099-1360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mcda.1798&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2782847940%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2782847940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true