Secondary forest succession drives differential responses of bacterial communities and interactions rather than bacterial functional groups in the rhizosphere and bulk soils in a subalpine region
Background and aims Community dynamics, functions and driving factors of rhizosphere and bulk soil bacteria during secondary forest succession remain poorly understood in subalpine regions. Methods Three typical successional stages (grassland, shrubland and secondary forest) were selected to analyse...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 2023-03, Vol.484 (1-2), p.293-312 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 312 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 293 |
| container_title | Plant and soil |
| container_volume | 484 |
| creator | Zhang, Xiaoying Zhao, Wenqiang Kou, Yongping Liu, Yanjiao He, Heliang Liu, Qing |
| description | Background and aims
Community dynamics, functions and driving factors of rhizosphere and bulk soil bacteria during secondary forest succession remain poorly understood in subalpine regions.
Methods
Three typical successional stages (grassland, shrubland and secondary forest) were selected to analyse bacterial communities, functions and interactions in the rhizosphere and bulk soils using high-throughput sequencing technology.
Results
The results showed no significant difference in the bacterial
α-
diversity in the rhizosphere soil, whereas the bacterial
α-
diversity in the bulk soil of the grassland was significantly lower than that of the shrubland and secondary forest. Bacterial
β-
diversity in the rhizosphere soil differed significantly among the three succession stages, while the bacterial
β-
diversity in the bulk soil in the shrubland and secondary forest was significantly different from that in the grassland. However, the potential bacterial functions of the carbon, nitrogen and sulfate cycles revealed a consistent response in the rhizosphere and bulk soils to secondary forest succession. The soil total phosphorus, ammonium nitrogen, ratio of carbon to phosphorus and pH were the main factors affecting bacterial communities and potential functional groups. Bacterial network complexity was highest in the secondary forest rhizosphere soil and the shrubland bulk soil. Different keystone bacteria were detected in the rhizosphere and bulk soils among the three successional stages; they play major role in maintaining ecosystem function and community structure.
Conclusion
Our results demonstrate that the bacterial communities and interactions in the rhizosphere and bulk soils respond differently to secondary forest succession, while the bacterial functional groups revealed a consistent response. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11104-022-05788-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2782557026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A739664661</galeid><sourcerecordid>A739664661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-7b051786f6f86bcb5129a800e5a9472d34e2773ed52161030410a4206aa3db763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU2LFDEQDaLguPoHPAU891pJOknPcVnUFRY8qOAtpLsrM1l7kjbpFvTv-cesmRb0JDkkqfdB8R5jLwVcCwD7ugohoG1Ayga07bpGP2I7oa1qNCjzmO0AFEF2_-Upe1brA5z_wuzYr4845DT68oOHXLAuvK7DgLXGnPhY4nesfIwhYMG0RD9x4sw5VRrnwHs_LFjO4yGfTmuKSyTAp5HHRAChZFN58csRC1-OPv0jCWu64PQ8lLzOlUTEQV6O8WeuM0nw4tWv01dec5wuDE8b9n6aYyImHsjgOXsS_FTxxZ_7in1---bT7V1z_-Hd-9ub-2ZQulsa24MWtjPBhM70Q6-F3PsOALXft1aOqkVprcJRUzICFLQCfCvBeK_G3hp1xV5tvnPJ31bKyj3ktdD-1UnbSa0tyDPremMd_IQuppAXCoLOiKdIWWOINL-xam9Ma4wggdwEQ8m1FgxuLvFEjTgB7tyu29p11K67tOs0idQmqkROByx_d_mP6jcKHqyB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2782557026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Secondary forest succession drives differential responses of bacterial communities and interactions rather than bacterial functional groups in the rhizosphere and bulk soils in a subalpine region</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zhang, Xiaoying ; Zhao, Wenqiang ; Kou, Yongping ; Liu, Yanjiao ; He, Heliang ; Liu, Qing</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiaoying ; Zhao, Wenqiang ; Kou, Yongping ; Liu, Yanjiao ; He, Heliang ; Liu, Qing</creatorcontrib><description>Background and aims
Community dynamics, functions and driving factors of rhizosphere and bulk soil bacteria during secondary forest succession remain poorly understood in subalpine regions.
Methods
Three typical successional stages (grassland, shrubland and secondary forest) were selected to analyse bacterial communities, functions and interactions in the rhizosphere and bulk soils using high-throughput sequencing technology.
Results
The results showed no significant difference in the bacterial
α-
diversity in the rhizosphere soil, whereas the bacterial
α-
diversity in the bulk soil of the grassland was significantly lower than that of the shrubland and secondary forest. Bacterial
β-
diversity in the rhizosphere soil differed significantly among the three succession stages, while the bacterial
β-
diversity in the bulk soil in the shrubland and secondary forest was significantly different from that in the grassland. However, the potential bacterial functions of the carbon, nitrogen and sulfate cycles revealed a consistent response in the rhizosphere and bulk soils to secondary forest succession. The soil total phosphorus, ammonium nitrogen, ratio of carbon to phosphorus and pH were the main factors affecting bacterial communities and potential functional groups. Bacterial network complexity was highest in the secondary forest rhizosphere soil and the shrubland bulk soil. Different keystone bacteria were detected in the rhizosphere and bulk soils among the three successional stages; they play major role in maintaining ecosystem function and community structure.
Conclusion
Our results demonstrate that the bacterial communities and interactions in the rhizosphere and bulk soils respond differently to secondary forest succession, while the bacterial functional groups revealed a consistent response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-022-05788-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Ammonium ; Analysis ; Bacteria ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon ; Carbon cycle ; Community structure ; Deforestation ; Ecological function ; Ecological succession ; Ecology ; Forests ; Functional groups ; Grasslands ; Identification and classification ; Life Sciences ; Next-generation sequencing ; Nitrogen ; Phosphorus ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Research Article ; Rhizosphere ; Shrublands ; Soil bacteria ; Soil dynamics ; Soil microbiology ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Soil structure ; Soils ; Structure-function relationships</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2023-03, Vol.484 (1-2), p.293-312</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-7b051786f6f86bcb5129a800e5a9472d34e2773ed52161030410a4206aa3db763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-7b051786f6f86bcb5129a800e5a9472d34e2773ed52161030410a4206aa3db763</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7046-0307</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11104-022-05788-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11104-022-05788-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wenqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kou, Yongping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yanjiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Heliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qing</creatorcontrib><title>Secondary forest succession drives differential responses of bacterial communities and interactions rather than bacterial functional groups in the rhizosphere and bulk soils in a subalpine region</title><title>Plant and soil</title><addtitle>Plant Soil</addtitle><description>Background and aims
Community dynamics, functions and driving factors of rhizosphere and bulk soil bacteria during secondary forest succession remain poorly understood in subalpine regions.
Methods
Three typical successional stages (grassland, shrubland and secondary forest) were selected to analyse bacterial communities, functions and interactions in the rhizosphere and bulk soils using high-throughput sequencing technology.
Results
The results showed no significant difference in the bacterial
α-
diversity in the rhizosphere soil, whereas the bacterial
α-
diversity in the bulk soil of the grassland was significantly lower than that of the shrubland and secondary forest. Bacterial
β-
diversity in the rhizosphere soil differed significantly among the three succession stages, while the bacterial
β-
diversity in the bulk soil in the shrubland and secondary forest was significantly different from that in the grassland. However, the potential bacterial functions of the carbon, nitrogen and sulfate cycles revealed a consistent response in the rhizosphere and bulk soils to secondary forest succession. The soil total phosphorus, ammonium nitrogen, ratio of carbon to phosphorus and pH were the main factors affecting bacterial communities and potential functional groups. Bacterial network complexity was highest in the secondary forest rhizosphere soil and the shrubland bulk soil. Different keystone bacteria were detected in the rhizosphere and bulk soils among the three successional stages; they play major role in maintaining ecosystem function and community structure.
Conclusion
Our results demonstrate that the bacterial communities and interactions in the rhizosphere and bulk soils respond differently to secondary forest succession, while the bacterial functional groups revealed a consistent response.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecological succession</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Functional groups</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Next-generation sequencing</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Rhizosphere</subject><subject>Shrublands</subject><subject>Soil bacteria</subject><subject>Soil dynamics</subject><subject>Soil microbiology</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Soil structure</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Structure-function relationships</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU2LFDEQDaLguPoHPAU891pJOknPcVnUFRY8qOAtpLsrM1l7kjbpFvTv-cesmRb0JDkkqfdB8R5jLwVcCwD7ugohoG1Ayga07bpGP2I7oa1qNCjzmO0AFEF2_-Upe1brA5z_wuzYr4845DT68oOHXLAuvK7DgLXGnPhY4nesfIwhYMG0RD9x4sw5VRrnwHs_LFjO4yGfTmuKSyTAp5HHRAChZFN58csRC1-OPv0jCWu64PQ8lLzOlUTEQV6O8WeuM0nw4tWv01dec5wuDE8b9n6aYyImHsjgOXsS_FTxxZ_7in1---bT7V1z_-Hd-9ub-2ZQulsa24MWtjPBhM70Q6-F3PsOALXft1aOqkVprcJRUzICFLQCfCvBeK_G3hp1xV5tvnPJ31bKyj3ktdD-1UnbSa0tyDPremMd_IQuppAXCoLOiKdIWWOINL-xam9Ma4wggdwEQ8m1FgxuLvFEjTgB7tyu29p11K67tOs0idQmqkROByx_d_mP6jcKHqyB</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Zhang, Xiaoying</creator><creator>Zhao, Wenqiang</creator><creator>Kou, Yongping</creator><creator>Liu, Yanjiao</creator><creator>He, Heliang</creator><creator>Liu, Qing</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7046-0307</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Secondary forest succession drives differential responses of bacterial communities and interactions rather than bacterial functional groups in the rhizosphere and bulk soils in a subalpine region</title><author>Zhang, Xiaoying ; Zhao, Wenqiang ; Kou, Yongping ; Liu, Yanjiao ; He, Heliang ; Liu, Qing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-7b051786f6f86bcb5129a800e5a9472d34e2773ed52161030410a4206aa3db763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecological succession</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Functional groups</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Next-generation sequencing</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Rhizosphere</topic><topic>Shrublands</topic><topic>Soil bacteria</topic><topic>Soil dynamics</topic><topic>Soil microbiology</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Soil structure</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Structure-function relationships</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wenqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kou, Yongping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yanjiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Heliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Xiaoying</au><au>Zhao, Wenqiang</au><au>Kou, Yongping</au><au>Liu, Yanjiao</au><au>He, Heliang</au><au>Liu, Qing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Secondary forest succession drives differential responses of bacterial communities and interactions rather than bacterial functional groups in the rhizosphere and bulk soils in a subalpine region</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><stitle>Plant Soil</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>484</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>293-312</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><abstract>Background and aims
Community dynamics, functions and driving factors of rhizosphere and bulk soil bacteria during secondary forest succession remain poorly understood in subalpine regions.
Methods
Three typical successional stages (grassland, shrubland and secondary forest) were selected to analyse bacterial communities, functions and interactions in the rhizosphere and bulk soils using high-throughput sequencing technology.
Results
The results showed no significant difference in the bacterial
α-
diversity in the rhizosphere soil, whereas the bacterial
α-
diversity in the bulk soil of the grassland was significantly lower than that of the shrubland and secondary forest. Bacterial
β-
diversity in the rhizosphere soil differed significantly among the three succession stages, while the bacterial
β-
diversity in the bulk soil in the shrubland and secondary forest was significantly different from that in the grassland. However, the potential bacterial functions of the carbon, nitrogen and sulfate cycles revealed a consistent response in the rhizosphere and bulk soils to secondary forest succession. The soil total phosphorus, ammonium nitrogen, ratio of carbon to phosphorus and pH were the main factors affecting bacterial communities and potential functional groups. Bacterial network complexity was highest in the secondary forest rhizosphere soil and the shrubland bulk soil. Different keystone bacteria were detected in the rhizosphere and bulk soils among the three successional stages; they play major role in maintaining ecosystem function and community structure.
Conclusion
Our results demonstrate that the bacterial communities and interactions in the rhizosphere and bulk soils respond differently to secondary forest succession, while the bacterial functional groups revealed a consistent response.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-022-05788-5</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7046-0307</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0032-079X |
| ispartof | Plant and soil, 2023-03, Vol.484 (1-2), p.293-312 |
| issn | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2782557026 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Agriculture Ammonium Analysis Bacteria Biomedical and Life Sciences Carbon Carbon cycle Community structure Deforestation Ecological function Ecological succession Ecology Forests Functional groups Grasslands Identification and classification Life Sciences Next-generation sequencing Nitrogen Phosphorus Plant Physiology Plant Sciences Research Article Rhizosphere Shrublands Soil bacteria Soil dynamics Soil microbiology Soil microorganisms Soil Science & Conservation Soil structure Soils Structure-function relationships |
| title | Secondary forest succession drives differential responses of bacterial communities and interactions rather than bacterial functional groups in the rhizosphere and bulk soils in a subalpine region |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A54%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Secondary%20forest%20succession%20drives%20differential%20responses%20of%20bacterial%20communities%20and%20interactions%20rather%20than%20bacterial%20functional%20groups%20in%20the%20rhizosphere%20and%20bulk%20soils%20in%20a%20subalpine%20region&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Zhang,%20Xiaoying&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=484&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=293-312&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-022-05788-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA739664661%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2782557026&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A739664661&rfr_iscdi=true |