A reliability allocation method for agricultural machinery based on AHP‐IFM
In the product design phase, the available product failure data are limited, and the weight allocation method is often used to assign reliability targets to each unit. The integrated factors method (IFM) can calculate the reliability allocation weights considering multiple influencing factors simult...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quality and reliability engineering international 2023-04, Vol.39 (3), p.687-705 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 705 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 687 |
container_title | Quality and reliability engineering international |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Dai, Mengchu Chen, Chao Zhou, Le Liang, Yundong |
description | In the product design phase, the available product failure data are limited, and the weight allocation method is often used to assign reliability targets to each unit. The integrated factors method (IFM) can calculate the reliability allocation weights considering multiple influencing factors simultaneously, but it cannot reflect the difference in the importance of each factor and each unit. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) can calculate the relative importance weights of each factor and each unit. Combining the AHP with the IFM can make the IFM more adaptable to the system and more accurate for reliability allocation. However, the current combination method can cause two problems: the invalidation of the influencing factor weights and the imbalance of the unit weights. To address these two shortcomings, the AHP‐IFM proposed in this paper introduces a weight weakening factor and exponentially corrects the unit weights for units, which can better apply the relative importance weights of each influencing factor and each unit to the reliability allocation. The effectiveness of the AHP‐IFM is verified by comparison with existing methods and data. Finally, an AHP‐IFM applicable to agricultural machinery is proposed, and the reliability allocation of a no‐till seeder is used as a case to verify the feasibility of the AHP‐IFM. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/qre.3251 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2781525700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2781525700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-8b9feac5166942a44656f89437025e295027b28bc96471acff8ec521c07a89783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1KAzEUhuEgCtYqeAkBN26mJpnJJFmW0tpCiz_oOmTSxKakTZvMUGbnJXiNXolT69bV2TycD14AbjEaYITIwz6aQU4oPgM9jITIcJnzc9BDrOAZR5hdgquU1gh1WPAeWAxhNN6pynlXt1B5H7SqXdjCjalXYQltiFB9RKcbXzdRebhReuW2JrawUsksYUeH0-fvz6_ZZHENLqzyydz83T54n4zfRtNs_vQ4Gw3nmSYixxmvhDVKU1yWoiCqKEpaWi6KnCFCDREUEVYRXmlRFgwrbS03mhKsEVNcMJ73wd3p7y6GfWNSLdehidtuUhLGMSWUIdSp-5PSMaQUjZW76DYqthIjeYwlu1jyGKuj2YkenDftv06-vI5__Q8gXmn8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2781525700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A reliability allocation method for agricultural machinery based on AHP‐IFM</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Dai, Mengchu ; Chen, Chao ; Zhou, Le ; Liang, Yundong</creator><creatorcontrib>Dai, Mengchu ; Chen, Chao ; Zhou, Le ; Liang, Yundong</creatorcontrib><description>In the product design phase, the available product failure data are limited, and the weight allocation method is often used to assign reliability targets to each unit. The integrated factors method (IFM) can calculate the reliability allocation weights considering multiple influencing factors simultaneously, but it cannot reflect the difference in the importance of each factor and each unit. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) can calculate the relative importance weights of each factor and each unit. Combining the AHP with the IFM can make the IFM more adaptable to the system and more accurate for reliability allocation. However, the current combination method can cause two problems: the invalidation of the influencing factor weights and the imbalance of the unit weights. To address these two shortcomings, the AHP‐IFM proposed in this paper introduces a weight weakening factor and exponentially corrects the unit weights for units, which can better apply the relative importance weights of each influencing factor and each unit to the reliability allocation. The effectiveness of the AHP‐IFM is verified by comparison with existing methods and data. Finally, an AHP‐IFM applicable to agricultural machinery is proposed, and the reliability allocation of a no‐till seeder is used as a case to verify the feasibility of the AHP‐IFM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-8017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/qre.3251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural equipment ; agricultural machinery ; AHP ; Analytic hierarchy process ; Farm machinery ; FMECA ; Hierarchies ; IFM ; Mathematical analysis ; Product design ; reliability allocation ; Reliability aspects</subject><ispartof>Quality and reliability engineering international, 2023-04, Vol.39 (3), p.687-705</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-8b9feac5166942a44656f89437025e295027b28bc96471acff8ec521c07a89783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-8b9feac5166942a44656f89437025e295027b28bc96471acff8ec521c07a89783</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3789-6149</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fqre.3251$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fqre.3251$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dai, Mengchu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Le</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yundong</creatorcontrib><title>A reliability allocation method for agricultural machinery based on AHP‐IFM</title><title>Quality and reliability engineering international</title><description>In the product design phase, the available product failure data are limited, and the weight allocation method is often used to assign reliability targets to each unit. The integrated factors method (IFM) can calculate the reliability allocation weights considering multiple influencing factors simultaneously, but it cannot reflect the difference in the importance of each factor and each unit. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) can calculate the relative importance weights of each factor and each unit. Combining the AHP with the IFM can make the IFM more adaptable to the system and more accurate for reliability allocation. However, the current combination method can cause two problems: the invalidation of the influencing factor weights and the imbalance of the unit weights. To address these two shortcomings, the AHP‐IFM proposed in this paper introduces a weight weakening factor and exponentially corrects the unit weights for units, which can better apply the relative importance weights of each influencing factor and each unit to the reliability allocation. The effectiveness of the AHP‐IFM is verified by comparison with existing methods and data. Finally, an AHP‐IFM applicable to agricultural machinery is proposed, and the reliability allocation of a no‐till seeder is used as a case to verify the feasibility of the AHP‐IFM.</description><subject>Agricultural equipment</subject><subject>agricultural machinery</subject><subject>AHP</subject><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>Farm machinery</subject><subject>FMECA</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>IFM</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Product design</subject><subject>reliability allocation</subject><subject>Reliability aspects</subject><issn>0748-8017</issn><issn>1099-1638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M1KAzEUhuEgCtYqeAkBN26mJpnJJFmW0tpCiz_oOmTSxKakTZvMUGbnJXiNXolT69bV2TycD14AbjEaYITIwz6aQU4oPgM9jITIcJnzc9BDrOAZR5hdgquU1gh1WPAeWAxhNN6pynlXt1B5H7SqXdjCjalXYQltiFB9RKcbXzdRebhReuW2JrawUsksYUeH0-fvz6_ZZHENLqzyydz83T54n4zfRtNs_vQ4Gw3nmSYixxmvhDVKU1yWoiCqKEpaWi6KnCFCDREUEVYRXmlRFgwrbS03mhKsEVNcMJ73wd3p7y6GfWNSLdehidtuUhLGMSWUIdSp-5PSMaQUjZW76DYqthIjeYwlu1jyGKuj2YkenDftv06-vI5__Q8gXmn8</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Dai, Mengchu</creator><creator>Chen, Chao</creator><creator>Zhou, Le</creator><creator>Liang, Yundong</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3789-6149</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>A reliability allocation method for agricultural machinery based on AHP‐IFM</title><author>Dai, Mengchu ; Chen, Chao ; Zhou, Le ; Liang, Yundong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-8b9feac5166942a44656f89437025e295027b28bc96471acff8ec521c07a89783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural equipment</topic><topic>agricultural machinery</topic><topic>AHP</topic><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>Farm machinery</topic><topic>FMECA</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>IFM</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Product design</topic><topic>reliability allocation</topic><topic>Reliability aspects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dai, Mengchu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Le</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yundong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Quality and reliability engineering international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dai, Mengchu</au><au>Chen, Chao</au><au>Zhou, Le</au><au>Liang, Yundong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A reliability allocation method for agricultural machinery based on AHP‐IFM</atitle><jtitle>Quality and reliability engineering international</jtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>687</spage><epage>705</epage><pages>687-705</pages><issn>0748-8017</issn><eissn>1099-1638</eissn><abstract>In the product design phase, the available product failure data are limited, and the weight allocation method is often used to assign reliability targets to each unit. The integrated factors method (IFM) can calculate the reliability allocation weights considering multiple influencing factors simultaneously, but it cannot reflect the difference in the importance of each factor and each unit. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) can calculate the relative importance weights of each factor and each unit. Combining the AHP with the IFM can make the IFM more adaptable to the system and more accurate for reliability allocation. However, the current combination method can cause two problems: the invalidation of the influencing factor weights and the imbalance of the unit weights. To address these two shortcomings, the AHP‐IFM proposed in this paper introduces a weight weakening factor and exponentially corrects the unit weights for units, which can better apply the relative importance weights of each influencing factor and each unit to the reliability allocation. The effectiveness of the AHP‐IFM is verified by comparison with existing methods and data. Finally, an AHP‐IFM applicable to agricultural machinery is proposed, and the reliability allocation of a no‐till seeder is used as a case to verify the feasibility of the AHP‐IFM.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/qre.3251</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3789-6149</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0748-8017 |
ispartof | Quality and reliability engineering international, 2023-04, Vol.39 (3), p.687-705 |
issn | 0748-8017 1099-1638 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2781525700 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Agricultural equipment agricultural machinery AHP Analytic hierarchy process Farm machinery FMECA Hierarchies IFM Mathematical analysis Product design reliability allocation Reliability aspects |
title | A reliability allocation method for agricultural machinery based on AHP‐IFM |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A06%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20reliability%20allocation%20method%20for%20agricultural%20machinery%20based%20on%20AHP%E2%80%90IFM&rft.jtitle=Quality%20and%20reliability%20engineering%20international&rft.au=Dai,%20Mengchu&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=687&rft.epage=705&rft.pages=687-705&rft.issn=0748-8017&rft.eissn=1099-1638&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/qre.3251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2781525700%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2781525700&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |