The analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in wastewater sludges and biosolids: which adsorbents should be used for the cleanup of extracts?

The analysis of PFAS in wastewater treatment sludges and biosolids is an evolving practice for which a widely recognized standard method does not currently exist. While a number of analytical techniques have been reported in the literature, individual methods were found to not be broadly applicable...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science water research & technology 2023-03, Vol.9 (3), p.794-805
Hauptverfasser: Ozelcaglayan, Ali Can, Parker, Wayne J., Pham, Anh Le-Tuan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 805
container_issue 3
container_start_page 794
container_title Environmental science water research & technology
container_volume 9
creator Ozelcaglayan, Ali Can
Parker, Wayne J.
Pham, Anh Le-Tuan
description The analysis of PFAS in wastewater treatment sludges and biosolids is an evolving practice for which a widely recognized standard method does not currently exist. While a number of analytical techniques have been reported in the literature, individual methods were found to not be broadly applicable over a range of sludge/biosolid matrices. This study critically examined the method employed to clean up biosolid extracts prior to LC-MS/MS analysis, which was determined to be crucial to obtaining acceptable chromatogram quality and recoveries of a range of PFAS and associated surrogates. When ENVI-Carb was employed alone or in combination with WAX, as described in US EPA Draft Method 1633, precipitates were formed when methanolic extracts were reconstituted with water, preventing direct analysis by LC-MS/MS. Centrifugation and filtration of reconstituted extracts to remove precipitates did not sufficiently eliminate interferences to allow PFAS quantification. The use of blends of adsorbents (ENVI-Carb, PSA, C18) with different adsorptive properties that could remove a broader range of interfering substances was evaluated. A blend consisting of 1000 mg ENVI-Carb, 500 mg PSA and 500 mg C18 was found to effectively eliminate background interference while providing an optimal trade-off between chromatogram quality and PFAS recovery. When integrated into the overall analytical method, the recoveries of PFAS were between 40% and 160% except for some precursors when six different biosolids were analyzed. The cleanup method developed in this study has the potential to facilitate the analysis of PFAS in a broad range of sludge and biosolid matrices.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/D2EW00617K
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2781127448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2781127448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-85856c2f6ae1cf9a3b48aa36acc1c76cbc98855693ec74d71f3d3c3e3e84ec923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1OwzAQhC0EElXphSewxA0pYMf5cbggVMqPqMSliGPkOGuaYuLgdVTyILwvqYrgtKuZb3ekIeSUswvORHF5Gy9eGct4_nRAJjFLRcQTXhz-7YwdkxnihjHGMzFaYkK-V2ugqlV2wAapM7QDH41CTTtnB2N7552y74Ol2FcYVKsBadPSrcIAWxXAU7R9_Taqu6OqcehsU-MV3a4bvaaqRucraANSXLvejgjQHqGmxnkaxnBtQbV9t8uGr-CVDnh9Qo6Msgiz3zklL3eL1fwhWj7fP85vlpGO0yJEMpVppmOTKeDaFEpUiVRKZEprrvNMV7qQMk2zQoDOkzrnRtRCCxAgE9BFLKbkbP-38-6zBwzlxvV-bAPLOJecx3mSyJE631PaO0QPpux886H8UHJW7pov_5sXP98zeO4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2781127448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in wastewater sludges and biosolids: which adsorbents should be used for the cleanup of extracts?</title><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals</source><creator>Ozelcaglayan, Ali Can ; Parker, Wayne J. ; Pham, Anh Le-Tuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ozelcaglayan, Ali Can ; Parker, Wayne J. ; Pham, Anh Le-Tuan</creatorcontrib><description>The analysis of PFAS in wastewater treatment sludges and biosolids is an evolving practice for which a widely recognized standard method does not currently exist. While a number of analytical techniques have been reported in the literature, individual methods were found to not be broadly applicable over a range of sludge/biosolid matrices. This study critically examined the method employed to clean up biosolid extracts prior to LC-MS/MS analysis, which was determined to be crucial to obtaining acceptable chromatogram quality and recoveries of a range of PFAS and associated surrogates. When ENVI-Carb was employed alone or in combination with WAX, as described in US EPA Draft Method 1633, precipitates were formed when methanolic extracts were reconstituted with water, preventing direct analysis by LC-MS/MS. Centrifugation and filtration of reconstituted extracts to remove precipitates did not sufficiently eliminate interferences to allow PFAS quantification. The use of blends of adsorbents (ENVI-Carb, PSA, C18) with different adsorptive properties that could remove a broader range of interfering substances was evaluated. A blend consisting of 1000 mg ENVI-Carb, 500 mg PSA and 500 mg C18 was found to effectively eliminate background interference while providing an optimal trade-off between chromatogram quality and PFAS recovery. When integrated into the overall analytical method, the recoveries of PFAS were between 40% and 160% except for some precursors when six different biosolids were analyzed. The cleanup method developed in this study has the potential to facilitate the analysis of PFAS in a broad range of sludge and biosolid matrices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2053-1400</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-1419</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/D2EW00617K</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Adsorbents ; Adsorption ; Adsorptivity ; Analysis ; Analytical methods ; Biosolids ; Centrifugation ; Centrifuging ; Perfluoroalkyl &amp; polyfluoroalkyl substances ; Precipitates ; Sludge ; Solid wastes ; Wastewater treatment</subject><ispartof>Environmental science water research &amp; technology, 2023-03, Vol.9 (3), p.794-805</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-85856c2f6ae1cf9a3b48aa36acc1c76cbc98855693ec74d71f3d3c3e3e84ec923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-85856c2f6ae1cf9a3b48aa36acc1c76cbc98855693ec74d71f3d3c3e3e84ec923</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5661-6280</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ozelcaglayan, Ali Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Wayne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pham, Anh Le-Tuan</creatorcontrib><title>The analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in wastewater sludges and biosolids: which adsorbents should be used for the cleanup of extracts?</title><title>Environmental science water research &amp; technology</title><description>The analysis of PFAS in wastewater treatment sludges and biosolids is an evolving practice for which a widely recognized standard method does not currently exist. While a number of analytical techniques have been reported in the literature, individual methods were found to not be broadly applicable over a range of sludge/biosolid matrices. This study critically examined the method employed to clean up biosolid extracts prior to LC-MS/MS analysis, which was determined to be crucial to obtaining acceptable chromatogram quality and recoveries of a range of PFAS and associated surrogates. When ENVI-Carb was employed alone or in combination with WAX, as described in US EPA Draft Method 1633, precipitates were formed when methanolic extracts were reconstituted with water, preventing direct analysis by LC-MS/MS. Centrifugation and filtration of reconstituted extracts to remove precipitates did not sufficiently eliminate interferences to allow PFAS quantification. The use of blends of adsorbents (ENVI-Carb, PSA, C18) with different adsorptive properties that could remove a broader range of interfering substances was evaluated. A blend consisting of 1000 mg ENVI-Carb, 500 mg PSA and 500 mg C18 was found to effectively eliminate background interference while providing an optimal trade-off between chromatogram quality and PFAS recovery. When integrated into the overall analytical method, the recoveries of PFAS were between 40% and 160% except for some precursors when six different biosolids were analyzed. The cleanup method developed in this study has the potential to facilitate the analysis of PFAS in a broad range of sludge and biosolid matrices.</description><subject>Adsorbents</subject><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Adsorptivity</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Analytical methods</subject><subject>Biosolids</subject><subject>Centrifugation</subject><subject>Centrifuging</subject><subject>Perfluoroalkyl &amp; polyfluoroalkyl substances</subject><subject>Precipitates</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Solid wastes</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><issn>2053-1400</issn><issn>2053-1419</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkM1OwzAQhC0EElXphSewxA0pYMf5cbggVMqPqMSliGPkOGuaYuLgdVTyILwvqYrgtKuZb3ekIeSUswvORHF5Gy9eGct4_nRAJjFLRcQTXhz-7YwdkxnihjHGMzFaYkK-V2ugqlV2wAapM7QDH41CTTtnB2N7552y74Ol2FcYVKsBadPSrcIAWxXAU7R9_Taqu6OqcehsU-MV3a4bvaaqRucraANSXLvejgjQHqGmxnkaxnBtQbV9t8uGr-CVDnh9Qo6Msgiz3zklL3eL1fwhWj7fP85vlpGO0yJEMpVppmOTKeDaFEpUiVRKZEprrvNMV7qQMk2zQoDOkzrnRtRCCxAgE9BFLKbkbP-38-6zBwzlxvV-bAPLOJecx3mSyJE631PaO0QPpux886H8UHJW7pov_5sXP98zeO4</recordid><startdate>20230302</startdate><enddate>20230302</enddate><creator>Ozelcaglayan, Ali Can</creator><creator>Parker, Wayne J.</creator><creator>Pham, Anh Le-Tuan</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5661-6280</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230302</creationdate><title>The analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in wastewater sludges and biosolids: which adsorbents should be used for the cleanup of extracts?</title><author>Ozelcaglayan, Ali Can ; Parker, Wayne J. ; Pham, Anh Le-Tuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-85856c2f6ae1cf9a3b48aa36acc1c76cbc98855693ec74d71f3d3c3e3e84ec923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adsorbents</topic><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Adsorptivity</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Analytical methods</topic><topic>Biosolids</topic><topic>Centrifugation</topic><topic>Centrifuging</topic><topic>Perfluoroalkyl &amp; polyfluoroalkyl substances</topic><topic>Precipitates</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Solid wastes</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ozelcaglayan, Ali Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Wayne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pham, Anh Le-Tuan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science water research &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ozelcaglayan, Ali Can</au><au>Parker, Wayne J.</au><au>Pham, Anh Le-Tuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in wastewater sludges and biosolids: which adsorbents should be used for the cleanup of extracts?</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science water research &amp; technology</jtitle><date>2023-03-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>794</spage><epage>805</epage><pages>794-805</pages><issn>2053-1400</issn><eissn>2053-1419</eissn><abstract>The analysis of PFAS in wastewater treatment sludges and biosolids is an evolving practice for which a widely recognized standard method does not currently exist. While a number of analytical techniques have been reported in the literature, individual methods were found to not be broadly applicable over a range of sludge/biosolid matrices. This study critically examined the method employed to clean up biosolid extracts prior to LC-MS/MS analysis, which was determined to be crucial to obtaining acceptable chromatogram quality and recoveries of a range of PFAS and associated surrogates. When ENVI-Carb was employed alone or in combination with WAX, as described in US EPA Draft Method 1633, precipitates were formed when methanolic extracts were reconstituted with water, preventing direct analysis by LC-MS/MS. Centrifugation and filtration of reconstituted extracts to remove precipitates did not sufficiently eliminate interferences to allow PFAS quantification. The use of blends of adsorbents (ENVI-Carb, PSA, C18) with different adsorptive properties that could remove a broader range of interfering substances was evaluated. A blend consisting of 1000 mg ENVI-Carb, 500 mg PSA and 500 mg C18 was found to effectively eliminate background interference while providing an optimal trade-off between chromatogram quality and PFAS recovery. When integrated into the overall analytical method, the recoveries of PFAS were between 40% and 160% except for some precursors when six different biosolids were analyzed. The cleanup method developed in this study has the potential to facilitate the analysis of PFAS in a broad range of sludge and biosolid matrices.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><doi>10.1039/D2EW00617K</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5661-6280</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2053-1400
ispartof Environmental science water research & technology, 2023-03, Vol.9 (3), p.794-805
issn 2053-1400
2053-1419
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2781127448
source Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals
subjects Adsorbents
Adsorption
Adsorptivity
Analysis
Analytical methods
Biosolids
Centrifugation
Centrifuging
Perfluoroalkyl & polyfluoroalkyl substances
Precipitates
Sludge
Solid wastes
Wastewater treatment
title The analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in wastewater sludges and biosolids: which adsorbents should be used for the cleanup of extracts?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T11%3A59%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20analysis%20of%20per-%20and%20polyfluoroalkyl%20substances%20in%20wastewater%20sludges%20and%20biosolids:%20which%20adsorbents%20should%20be%20used%20for%20the%20cleanup%20of%20extracts?&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20water%20research%20&%20technology&rft.au=Ozelcaglayan,%20Ali%20Can&rft.date=2023-03-02&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=794&rft.epage=805&rft.pages=794-805&rft.issn=2053-1400&rft.eissn=2053-1419&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/D2EW00617K&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2781127448%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2781127448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true