Performance of the renal resistive index and usual clinical indicators in predicting persistent AKI
Early recognition of persistent acute kidney injury (AKI) could optimize management and prevent deterioration of kidney function. The Doppler-based renal resistive index (RI) has shown promising results for predicting persistent AKI in preliminary studies. Here, we aimed to evaluate the performance...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Renal failure 2022-12, Vol.44 (1), p.2038-2048 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2048 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 2038 |
container_title | Renal failure |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Fu, You He, Cong Jia, Lijing Ge, Chen Long, Ling Bai, Yinxiang Zhang, Na Du, Quansheng Shen, Limin Zhao, Heling |
description | Early recognition of persistent acute kidney injury (AKI) could optimize management and prevent deterioration of kidney function. The Doppler-based renal resistive index (RI) has shown promising results for predicting persistent AKI in preliminary studies. Here, we aimed to evaluate the performance of renal RI, clinical indicators, and their combinations to predict short-term kidney prognosis in septic shock patients.
We performed a retrospective study based on data from a prospective study in a single-center general ICU between November 2017 and October 2018. Patients with septic shock were included. Clinical indicators were evaluated immediately at inclusion, and renal RI was measured within the first 12 h of ICU admission after hemodynamic stabilization. Persistent AKI was defined as AKI without recovery within 72 h. A multivariable logistic regression was used to select significant variables associated with persistent AKI. The discriminative power was evaluated by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Overall, 102 patients were included, 39 of whom had persistent AKI. Renal RI was higher in the persistent AKI patients than in those without persistent AKI: 0.70 ± 0.05 vs. 0.66 ± 0.05; p = 0.001. The performance of RI to predict persistent AKI was poor, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.699 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.600-0.786]. A clinical prediction model combining serum creatinine at inclusion and the nonrenal SOFA score showed a better prediction ability for nonrecovery, with an AUROC of 0.877 (95% CI 0.797-0.933, p = 0.0012). The addition of renal RI to this model did not improve the predictive performance.
The Doppler-based renal resistive index performed poorly in predicting persistent AKI and did not improve the clinical prediction provided by a combination of serum creatinine at inclusion and the nonrenal SOFA score in patients with septic shock. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2147437 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2780608481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8f4c1121184e46028ff6277585518333</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2780608481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-176b1a500e838e9cb0500af65c4276352a71fa011aef6a1b1adff9c5f84946a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1vEzEQtRCIpoGfgLQSFy4b_G3vBVFVUCIqwQEkbpbjHaeONnawd1v67_E2Aakc8GE89rx5Gvs9hF4RvCJY47dYa4kp_bGiNa4o4Yoz9QQtiKCilZh3T9FixrQz6Aydl7LDmAit6HN0xiTTnBO5QO4rZJ_y3kYHTfLNeANNhmiHGksoY7iFJsQefjU29s1UplpxQ4jB1aQW6j6mXGraHDLU4xjitjlAnpshjs3F5_UL9MzbocDL075E3z9--Hb5qb3-crW-vLhunWDd2BIlN8QKjEEzDZ3b4JpbL4XjVEkmqFXEW0yIBS8tqdje-84Jr3nHpdVsidZH3j7ZnTnksLf53iQbzMNFyltj8xjcAEZ77gihhGgOvP6j9l5SpYQWgmhW1xK9O3Idps0eelefku3wiPRxJYYbs023ppNKdXIe5s2JIKefE5TR7ENxMAw2QpqKoYopLqsQuEJf_wPdpSlXDWaUxhJrrklFiSPK5VRKBv93GILNbAnzxxJmtoQ5WaL2vT_2hfgg9F3KQ29Gez-k7HPVPRTD_k_xG1-Cu8E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2780608481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of the renal resistive index and usual clinical indicators in predicting persistent AKI</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fu, You ; He, Cong ; Jia, Lijing ; Ge, Chen ; Long, Ling ; Bai, Yinxiang ; Zhang, Na ; Du, Quansheng ; Shen, Limin ; Zhao, Heling</creator><creatorcontrib>Fu, You ; He, Cong ; Jia, Lijing ; Ge, Chen ; Long, Ling ; Bai, Yinxiang ; Zhang, Na ; Du, Quansheng ; Shen, Limin ; Zhao, Heling</creatorcontrib><description>Early recognition of persistent acute kidney injury (AKI) could optimize management and prevent deterioration of kidney function. The Doppler-based renal resistive index (RI) has shown promising results for predicting persistent AKI in preliminary studies. Here, we aimed to evaluate the performance of renal RI, clinical indicators, and their combinations to predict short-term kidney prognosis in septic shock patients.
We performed a retrospective study based on data from a prospective study in a single-center general ICU between November 2017 and October 2018. Patients with septic shock were included. Clinical indicators were evaluated immediately at inclusion, and renal RI was measured within the first 12 h of ICU admission after hemodynamic stabilization. Persistent AKI was defined as AKI without recovery within 72 h. A multivariable logistic regression was used to select significant variables associated with persistent AKI. The discriminative power was evaluated by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Overall, 102 patients were included, 39 of whom had persistent AKI. Renal RI was higher in the persistent AKI patients than in those without persistent AKI: 0.70 ± 0.05 vs. 0.66 ± 0.05; p = 0.001. The performance of RI to predict persistent AKI was poor, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.699 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.600-0.786]. A clinical prediction model combining serum creatinine at inclusion and the nonrenal SOFA score showed a better prediction ability for nonrecovery, with an AUROC of 0.877 (95% CI 0.797-0.933, p = 0.0012). The addition of renal RI to this model did not improve the predictive performance.
The Doppler-based renal resistive index performed poorly in predicting persistent AKI and did not improve the clinical prediction provided by a combination of serum creatinine at inclusion and the nonrenal SOFA score in patients with septic shock.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-022X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-6049</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2147437</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36384416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Acute kidney injury ; Clinical Study ; Creatinine ; critical care ; kidney prognosis ; Kidneys ; Performance evaluation ; Prediction models ; Renal function ; renal resistive index ; Sepsis ; Septic shock ; ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Renal failure, 2022-12, Vol.44 (1), p.2038-2048</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2022 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-176b1a500e838e9cb0500af65c4276352a71fa011aef6a1b1adff9c5f84946a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-176b1a500e838e9cb0500af65c4276352a71fa011aef6a1b1adff9c5f84946a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9677968/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9677968/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,27481,27903,27904,53769,53771,59119,59120</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fu, You</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Cong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Lijing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Yinxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Quansheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Limin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Heling</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of the renal resistive index and usual clinical indicators in predicting persistent AKI</title><title>Renal failure</title><description>Early recognition of persistent acute kidney injury (AKI) could optimize management and prevent deterioration of kidney function. The Doppler-based renal resistive index (RI) has shown promising results for predicting persistent AKI in preliminary studies. Here, we aimed to evaluate the performance of renal RI, clinical indicators, and their combinations to predict short-term kidney prognosis in septic shock patients.
We performed a retrospective study based on data from a prospective study in a single-center general ICU between November 2017 and October 2018. Patients with septic shock were included. Clinical indicators were evaluated immediately at inclusion, and renal RI was measured within the first 12 h of ICU admission after hemodynamic stabilization. Persistent AKI was defined as AKI without recovery within 72 h. A multivariable logistic regression was used to select significant variables associated with persistent AKI. The discriminative power was evaluated by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Overall, 102 patients were included, 39 of whom had persistent AKI. Renal RI was higher in the persistent AKI patients than in those without persistent AKI: 0.70 ± 0.05 vs. 0.66 ± 0.05; p = 0.001. The performance of RI to predict persistent AKI was poor, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.699 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.600-0.786]. A clinical prediction model combining serum creatinine at inclusion and the nonrenal SOFA score showed a better prediction ability for nonrecovery, with an AUROC of 0.877 (95% CI 0.797-0.933, p = 0.0012). The addition of renal RI to this model did not improve the predictive performance.
The Doppler-based renal resistive index performed poorly in predicting persistent AKI and did not improve the clinical prediction provided by a combination of serum creatinine at inclusion and the nonrenal SOFA score in patients with septic shock.</description><subject>Acute kidney injury</subject><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>critical care</subject><subject>kidney prognosis</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Renal function</subject><subject>renal resistive index</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Septic shock</subject><subject>ultrasonography</subject><issn>0886-022X</issn><issn>1525-6049</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1vEzEQtRCIpoGfgLQSFy4b_G3vBVFVUCIqwQEkbpbjHaeONnawd1v67_E2Aakc8GE89rx5Gvs9hF4RvCJY47dYa4kp_bGiNa4o4Yoz9QQtiKCilZh3T9FixrQz6Aydl7LDmAit6HN0xiTTnBO5QO4rZJ_y3kYHTfLNeANNhmiHGksoY7iFJsQefjU29s1UplpxQ4jB1aQW6j6mXGraHDLU4xjitjlAnpshjs3F5_UL9MzbocDL075E3z9--Hb5qb3-crW-vLhunWDd2BIlN8QKjEEzDZ3b4JpbL4XjVEkmqFXEW0yIBS8tqdje-84Jr3nHpdVsidZH3j7ZnTnksLf53iQbzMNFyltj8xjcAEZ77gihhGgOvP6j9l5SpYQWgmhW1xK9O3Idps0eelefku3wiPRxJYYbs023ppNKdXIe5s2JIKefE5TR7ENxMAw2QpqKoYopLqsQuEJf_wPdpSlXDWaUxhJrrklFiSPK5VRKBv93GILNbAnzxxJmtoQ5WaL2vT_2hfgg9F3KQ29Gez-k7HPVPRTD_k_xG1-Cu8E</recordid><startdate>20221231</startdate><enddate>20221231</enddate><creator>Fu, You</creator><creator>He, Cong</creator><creator>Jia, Lijing</creator><creator>Ge, Chen</creator><creator>Long, Ling</creator><creator>Bai, Yinxiang</creator><creator>Zhang, Na</creator><creator>Du, Quansheng</creator><creator>Shen, Limin</creator><creator>Zhao, Heling</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221231</creationdate><title>Performance of the renal resistive index and usual clinical indicators in predicting persistent AKI</title><author>Fu, You ; He, Cong ; Jia, Lijing ; Ge, Chen ; Long, Ling ; Bai, Yinxiang ; Zhang, Na ; Du, Quansheng ; Shen, Limin ; Zhao, Heling</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-176b1a500e838e9cb0500af65c4276352a71fa011aef6a1b1adff9c5f84946a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acute kidney injury</topic><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>critical care</topic><topic>kidney prognosis</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Renal function</topic><topic>renal resistive index</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Septic shock</topic><topic>ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fu, You</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Cong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Lijing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Yinxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Quansheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Limin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Heling</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Renal failure</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fu, You</au><au>He, Cong</au><au>Jia, Lijing</au><au>Ge, Chen</au><au>Long, Ling</au><au>Bai, Yinxiang</au><au>Zhang, Na</au><au>Du, Quansheng</au><au>Shen, Limin</au><au>Zhao, Heling</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of the renal resistive index and usual clinical indicators in predicting persistent AKI</atitle><jtitle>Renal failure</jtitle><date>2022-12-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2038</spage><epage>2048</epage><pages>2038-2048</pages><issn>0886-022X</issn><eissn>1525-6049</eissn><abstract>Early recognition of persistent acute kidney injury (AKI) could optimize management and prevent deterioration of kidney function. The Doppler-based renal resistive index (RI) has shown promising results for predicting persistent AKI in preliminary studies. Here, we aimed to evaluate the performance of renal RI, clinical indicators, and their combinations to predict short-term kidney prognosis in septic shock patients.
We performed a retrospective study based on data from a prospective study in a single-center general ICU between November 2017 and October 2018. Patients with septic shock were included. Clinical indicators were evaluated immediately at inclusion, and renal RI was measured within the first 12 h of ICU admission after hemodynamic stabilization. Persistent AKI was defined as AKI without recovery within 72 h. A multivariable logistic regression was used to select significant variables associated with persistent AKI. The discriminative power was evaluated by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Overall, 102 patients were included, 39 of whom had persistent AKI. Renal RI was higher in the persistent AKI patients than in those without persistent AKI: 0.70 ± 0.05 vs. 0.66 ± 0.05; p = 0.001. The performance of RI to predict persistent AKI was poor, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.699 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.600-0.786]. A clinical prediction model combining serum creatinine at inclusion and the nonrenal SOFA score showed a better prediction ability for nonrecovery, with an AUROC of 0.877 (95% CI 0.797-0.933, p = 0.0012). The addition of renal RI to this model did not improve the predictive performance.
The Doppler-based renal resistive index performed poorly in predicting persistent AKI and did not improve the clinical prediction provided by a combination of serum creatinine at inclusion and the nonrenal SOFA score in patients with septic shock.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>36384416</pmid><doi>10.1080/0886022X.2022.2147437</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0886-022X |
ispartof | Renal failure, 2022-12, Vol.44 (1), p.2038-2048 |
issn | 0886-022X 1525-6049 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2780608481 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Taylor & Francis Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acute kidney injury Clinical Study Creatinine critical care kidney prognosis Kidneys Performance evaluation Prediction models Renal function renal resistive index Sepsis Septic shock ultrasonography |
title | Performance of the renal resistive index and usual clinical indicators in predicting persistent AKI |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A45%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20the%20renal%20resistive%20index%20and%20usual%20clinical%20indicators%20in%20predicting%20persistent%20AKI&rft.jtitle=Renal%20failure&rft.au=Fu,%20You&rft.date=2022-12-31&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2038&rft.epage=2048&rft.pages=2038-2048&rft.issn=0886-022X&rft.eissn=1525-6049&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0886022X.2022.2147437&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2780608481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2780608481&rft_id=info:pmid/36384416&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8f4c1121184e46028ff6277585518333&rfr_iscdi=true |