Prediction of temperature separation of a nitrogen-driven vortex tube with linear, kNN, SVM, and RF regression models
In this study, the performance of a counter-flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube (RHVT) was investigated experimentally using working fluid nitrogen, and the thermal performance was modeled using different modeling methods with these experimental results. Each method was compared with the others. The vari...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neural computing & applications 2023-03, Vol.35 (8), p.6281-6291 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6291 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 6281 |
container_title | Neural computing & applications |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Kaya, Hüseyin Guler, Evrim Kırmacı, Volkan |
description | In this study, the performance of a counter-flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube (RHVT) was investigated experimentally using working fluid nitrogen, and the thermal performance was modeled using different modeling methods with these experimental results. Each method was compared with the others. The variation of ΔT, which is the measure of temperature separation in RHVT, was investigated by using nozzle number, the thermal conductivity of nozzle material, inlet pressure, specific heat, and density of working fluid. In the study, the prediction models of linear, k-nearest neighbor (kNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) regression were trained with measured thermal performance using a specific portion of the experimental data and tested with the remaining data. Two different train and test datasets were used with the ratio of experimental data as 90–10% and 80–20%, respectively. The highest accuracy ratio was determined at the end of the four methods with SVM regression as 96.01% when using the train and test datasets as 90–10%, respectively. The percent accuracy of the other models under the same conditions was calculated as 95.7, 90.87, and 78.36% for RF, kNN, and linear, respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00521-022-08030-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2780571493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2780571493</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-dfe7b953f586d5710351cab42c853755998bc9cd1de1e6ca0b0a9eeb79624e983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssa1hHMdJvEQVBaRSEK-t5SSTktLGxXYK_D0pqcSO1Yw0956RDiGnHM45QHrhAWTEGUQRgwwEsGSPDHgsBBMgs30yABV35yQWh-TI-wUAxEkmB6R9cFjWRahtQ21FA67W6ExoHVKPa9Otu4uhTR2cnWPDSldvsKEb6wJ-0dDmSD_r8EaXdYPGjej7bDaiT693I2qakj5OqMO5Q--3pJUtcemPyUFllh5PdnNIXiZXz-MbNr2_vh1fTlkRxSqwssI0V1JUMktKmXIQkhcmj6MikyKVUqksL1RR8hI5JoWBHIxCzFOVRDGqTAzJWc9dO_vRog96YVvXdC91lGbQIWMlulTUpwpnvXdY6bWrV8Z9aw56q1f3enWnV__q1UlXEn3Jd-Fmju4P_U_rB9F0feo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2780571493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of temperature separation of a nitrogen-driven vortex tube with linear, kNN, SVM, and RF regression models</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kaya, Hüseyin ; Guler, Evrim ; Kırmacı, Volkan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Hüseyin ; Guler, Evrim ; Kırmacı, Volkan</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the performance of a counter-flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube (RHVT) was investigated experimentally using working fluid nitrogen, and the thermal performance was modeled using different modeling methods with these experimental results. Each method was compared with the others. The variation of ΔT, which is the measure of temperature separation in RHVT, was investigated by using nozzle number, the thermal conductivity of nozzle material, inlet pressure, specific heat, and density of working fluid. In the study, the prediction models of linear, k-nearest neighbor (kNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) regression were trained with measured thermal performance using a specific portion of the experimental data and tested with the remaining data. Two different train and test datasets were used with the ratio of experimental data as 90–10% and 80–20%, respectively. The highest accuracy ratio was determined at the end of the four methods with SVM regression as 96.01% when using the train and test datasets as 90–10%, respectively. The percent accuracy of the other models under the same conditions was calculated as 95.7, 90.87, and 78.36% for RF, kNN, and linear, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-0643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00521-022-08030-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Artificial Intelligence ; Computational Biology/Bioinformatics ; Computational Science and Engineering ; Computer Science ; Counterflow ; Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery ; Datasets ; Image Processing and Computer Vision ; Inlet pressure ; Nitrogen ; Nozzles ; Original Article ; Prediction models ; Probability and Statistics in Computer Science ; Regression models ; Separation ; Support vector machines ; Thermal conductivity ; Working fluids</subject><ispartof>Neural computing & applications, 2023-03, Vol.35 (8), p.6281-6291</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-dfe7b953f586d5710351cab42c853755998bc9cd1de1e6ca0b0a9eeb79624e983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-dfe7b953f586d5710351cab42c853755998bc9cd1de1e6ca0b0a9eeb79624e983</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7076-1911</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00521-022-08030-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00521-022-08030-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guler, Evrim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kırmacı, Volkan</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of temperature separation of a nitrogen-driven vortex tube with linear, kNN, SVM, and RF regression models</title><title>Neural computing & applications</title><addtitle>Neural Comput & Applic</addtitle><description>In this study, the performance of a counter-flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube (RHVT) was investigated experimentally using working fluid nitrogen, and the thermal performance was modeled using different modeling methods with these experimental results. Each method was compared with the others. The variation of ΔT, which is the measure of temperature separation in RHVT, was investigated by using nozzle number, the thermal conductivity of nozzle material, inlet pressure, specific heat, and density of working fluid. In the study, the prediction models of linear, k-nearest neighbor (kNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) regression were trained with measured thermal performance using a specific portion of the experimental data and tested with the remaining data. Two different train and test datasets were used with the ratio of experimental data as 90–10% and 80–20%, respectively. The highest accuracy ratio was determined at the end of the four methods with SVM regression as 96.01% when using the train and test datasets as 90–10%, respectively. The percent accuracy of the other models under the same conditions was calculated as 95.7, 90.87, and 78.36% for RF, kNN, and linear, respectively.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computational Biology/Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Computational Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Counterflow</subject><subject>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Image Processing and Computer Vision</subject><subject>Inlet pressure</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nozzles</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Probability and Statistics in Computer Science</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Thermal conductivity</subject><subject>Working fluids</subject><issn>0941-0643</issn><issn>1433-3058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssa1hHMdJvEQVBaRSEK-t5SSTktLGxXYK_D0pqcSO1Yw0956RDiGnHM45QHrhAWTEGUQRgwwEsGSPDHgsBBMgs30yABV35yQWh-TI-wUAxEkmB6R9cFjWRahtQ21FA67W6ExoHVKPa9Otu4uhTR2cnWPDSldvsKEb6wJ-0dDmSD_r8EaXdYPGjej7bDaiT693I2qakj5OqMO5Q--3pJUtcemPyUFllh5PdnNIXiZXz-MbNr2_vh1fTlkRxSqwssI0V1JUMktKmXIQkhcmj6MikyKVUqksL1RR8hI5JoWBHIxCzFOVRDGqTAzJWc9dO_vRog96YVvXdC91lGbQIWMlulTUpwpnvXdY6bWrV8Z9aw56q1f3enWnV__q1UlXEn3Jd-Fmju4P_U_rB9F0feo</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Kaya, Hüseyin</creator><creator>Guler, Evrim</creator><creator>Kırmacı, Volkan</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-1911</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Prediction of temperature separation of a nitrogen-driven vortex tube with linear, kNN, SVM, and RF regression models</title><author>Kaya, Hüseyin ; Guler, Evrim ; Kırmacı, Volkan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-dfe7b953f586d5710351cab42c853755998bc9cd1de1e6ca0b0a9eeb79624e983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computational Biology/Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Computational Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Counterflow</topic><topic>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Image Processing and Computer Vision</topic><topic>Inlet pressure</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nozzles</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Probability and Statistics in Computer Science</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Thermal conductivity</topic><topic>Working fluids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guler, Evrim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kırmacı, Volkan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Neural computing & applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaya, Hüseyin</au><au>Guler, Evrim</au><au>Kırmacı, Volkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of temperature separation of a nitrogen-driven vortex tube with linear, kNN, SVM, and RF regression models</atitle><jtitle>Neural computing & applications</jtitle><stitle>Neural Comput & Applic</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>6281</spage><epage>6291</epage><pages>6281-6291</pages><issn>0941-0643</issn><eissn>1433-3058</eissn><abstract>In this study, the performance of a counter-flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube (RHVT) was investigated experimentally using working fluid nitrogen, and the thermal performance was modeled using different modeling methods with these experimental results. Each method was compared with the others. The variation of ΔT, which is the measure of temperature separation in RHVT, was investigated by using nozzle number, the thermal conductivity of nozzle material, inlet pressure, specific heat, and density of working fluid. In the study, the prediction models of linear, k-nearest neighbor (kNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) regression were trained with measured thermal performance using a specific portion of the experimental data and tested with the remaining data. Two different train and test datasets were used with the ratio of experimental data as 90–10% and 80–20%, respectively. The highest accuracy ratio was determined at the end of the four methods with SVM regression as 96.01% when using the train and test datasets as 90–10%, respectively. The percent accuracy of the other models under the same conditions was calculated as 95.7, 90.87, and 78.36% for RF, kNN, and linear, respectively.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00521-022-08030-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-1911</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0941-0643 |
ispartof | Neural computing & applications, 2023-03, Vol.35 (8), p.6281-6291 |
issn | 0941-0643 1433-3058 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2780571493 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Accuracy Artificial Intelligence Computational Biology/Bioinformatics Computational Science and Engineering Computer Science Counterflow Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Datasets Image Processing and Computer Vision Inlet pressure Nitrogen Nozzles Original Article Prediction models Probability and Statistics in Computer Science Regression models Separation Support vector machines Thermal conductivity Working fluids |
title | Prediction of temperature separation of a nitrogen-driven vortex tube with linear, kNN, SVM, and RF regression models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T08%3A37%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20temperature%20separation%20of%20a%20nitrogen-driven%20vortex%20tube%20with%20linear,%20kNN,%20SVM,%20and%20RF%20regression%20models&rft.jtitle=Neural%20computing%20&%20applications&rft.au=Kaya,%20H%C3%BCseyin&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=6281&rft.epage=6291&rft.pages=6281-6291&rft.issn=0941-0643&rft.eissn=1433-3058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00521-022-08030-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2780571493%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2780571493&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |