Prediction of temperature separation of a nitrogen-driven vortex tube with linear, kNN, SVM, and RF regression models

In this study, the performance of a counter-flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube (RHVT) was investigated experimentally using working fluid nitrogen, and the thermal performance was modeled using different modeling methods with these experimental results. Each method was compared with the others. The vari...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neural computing & applications 2023-03, Vol.35 (8), p.6281-6291
Hauptverfasser: Kaya, Hüseyin, Guler, Evrim, Kırmacı, Volkan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6291
container_issue 8
container_start_page 6281
container_title Neural computing & applications
container_volume 35
creator Kaya, Hüseyin
Guler, Evrim
Kırmacı, Volkan
description In this study, the performance of a counter-flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube (RHVT) was investigated experimentally using working fluid nitrogen, and the thermal performance was modeled using different modeling methods with these experimental results. Each method was compared with the others. The variation of ΔT, which is the measure of temperature separation in RHVT, was investigated by using nozzle number, the thermal conductivity of nozzle material, inlet pressure, specific heat, and density of working fluid. In the study, the prediction models of linear, k-nearest neighbor (kNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) regression were trained with measured thermal performance using a specific portion of the experimental data and tested with the remaining data. Two different train and test datasets were used with the ratio of experimental data as 90–10% and 80–20%, respectively. The highest accuracy ratio was determined at the end of the four methods with SVM regression as 96.01% when using the train and test datasets as 90–10%, respectively. The percent accuracy of the other models under the same conditions was calculated as 95.7, 90.87, and 78.36% for RF, kNN, and linear, respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00521-022-08030-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2780571493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2780571493</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-dfe7b953f586d5710351cab42c853755998bc9cd1de1e6ca0b0a9eeb79624e983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssa1hHMdJvEQVBaRSEK-t5SSTktLGxXYK_D0pqcSO1Yw0956RDiGnHM45QHrhAWTEGUQRgwwEsGSPDHgsBBMgs30yABV35yQWh-TI-wUAxEkmB6R9cFjWRahtQ21FA67W6ExoHVKPa9Otu4uhTR2cnWPDSldvsKEb6wJ-0dDmSD_r8EaXdYPGjej7bDaiT693I2qakj5OqMO5Q--3pJUtcemPyUFllh5PdnNIXiZXz-MbNr2_vh1fTlkRxSqwssI0V1JUMktKmXIQkhcmj6MikyKVUqksL1RR8hI5JoWBHIxCzFOVRDGqTAzJWc9dO_vRog96YVvXdC91lGbQIWMlulTUpwpnvXdY6bWrV8Z9aw56q1f3enWnV__q1UlXEn3Jd-Fmju4P_U_rB9F0feo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2780571493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of temperature separation of a nitrogen-driven vortex tube with linear, kNN, SVM, and RF regression models</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kaya, Hüseyin ; Guler, Evrim ; Kırmacı, Volkan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Hüseyin ; Guler, Evrim ; Kırmacı, Volkan</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the performance of a counter-flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube (RHVT) was investigated experimentally using working fluid nitrogen, and the thermal performance was modeled using different modeling methods with these experimental results. Each method was compared with the others. The variation of ΔT, which is the measure of temperature separation in RHVT, was investigated by using nozzle number, the thermal conductivity of nozzle material, inlet pressure, specific heat, and density of working fluid. In the study, the prediction models of linear, k-nearest neighbor (kNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) regression were trained with measured thermal performance using a specific portion of the experimental data and tested with the remaining data. Two different train and test datasets were used with the ratio of experimental data as 90–10% and 80–20%, respectively. The highest accuracy ratio was determined at the end of the four methods with SVM regression as 96.01% when using the train and test datasets as 90–10%, respectively. The percent accuracy of the other models under the same conditions was calculated as 95.7, 90.87, and 78.36% for RF, kNN, and linear, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-0643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00521-022-08030-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Artificial Intelligence ; Computational Biology/Bioinformatics ; Computational Science and Engineering ; Computer Science ; Counterflow ; Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery ; Datasets ; Image Processing and Computer Vision ; Inlet pressure ; Nitrogen ; Nozzles ; Original Article ; Prediction models ; Probability and Statistics in Computer Science ; Regression models ; Separation ; Support vector machines ; Thermal conductivity ; Working fluids</subject><ispartof>Neural computing &amp; applications, 2023-03, Vol.35 (8), p.6281-6291</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-dfe7b953f586d5710351cab42c853755998bc9cd1de1e6ca0b0a9eeb79624e983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-dfe7b953f586d5710351cab42c853755998bc9cd1de1e6ca0b0a9eeb79624e983</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7076-1911</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00521-022-08030-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00521-022-08030-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guler, Evrim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kırmacı, Volkan</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of temperature separation of a nitrogen-driven vortex tube with linear, kNN, SVM, and RF regression models</title><title>Neural computing &amp; applications</title><addtitle>Neural Comput &amp; Applic</addtitle><description>In this study, the performance of a counter-flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube (RHVT) was investigated experimentally using working fluid nitrogen, and the thermal performance was modeled using different modeling methods with these experimental results. Each method was compared with the others. The variation of ΔT, which is the measure of temperature separation in RHVT, was investigated by using nozzle number, the thermal conductivity of nozzle material, inlet pressure, specific heat, and density of working fluid. In the study, the prediction models of linear, k-nearest neighbor (kNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) regression were trained with measured thermal performance using a specific portion of the experimental data and tested with the remaining data. Two different train and test datasets were used with the ratio of experimental data as 90–10% and 80–20%, respectively. The highest accuracy ratio was determined at the end of the four methods with SVM regression as 96.01% when using the train and test datasets as 90–10%, respectively. The percent accuracy of the other models under the same conditions was calculated as 95.7, 90.87, and 78.36% for RF, kNN, and linear, respectively.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computational Biology/Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Computational Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Counterflow</subject><subject>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Image Processing and Computer Vision</subject><subject>Inlet pressure</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nozzles</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Probability and Statistics in Computer Science</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Thermal conductivity</subject><subject>Working fluids</subject><issn>0941-0643</issn><issn>1433-3058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssa1hHMdJvEQVBaRSEK-t5SSTktLGxXYK_D0pqcSO1Yw0956RDiGnHM45QHrhAWTEGUQRgwwEsGSPDHgsBBMgs30yABV35yQWh-TI-wUAxEkmB6R9cFjWRahtQ21FA67W6ExoHVKPa9Otu4uhTR2cnWPDSldvsKEb6wJ-0dDmSD_r8EaXdYPGjej7bDaiT693I2qakj5OqMO5Q--3pJUtcemPyUFllh5PdnNIXiZXz-MbNr2_vh1fTlkRxSqwssI0V1JUMktKmXIQkhcmj6MikyKVUqksL1RR8hI5JoWBHIxCzFOVRDGqTAzJWc9dO_vRog96YVvXdC91lGbQIWMlulTUpwpnvXdY6bWrV8Z9aw56q1f3enWnV__q1UlXEn3Jd-Fmju4P_U_rB9F0feo</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Kaya, Hüseyin</creator><creator>Guler, Evrim</creator><creator>Kırmacı, Volkan</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-1911</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Prediction of temperature separation of a nitrogen-driven vortex tube with linear, kNN, SVM, and RF regression models</title><author>Kaya, Hüseyin ; Guler, Evrim ; Kırmacı, Volkan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-dfe7b953f586d5710351cab42c853755998bc9cd1de1e6ca0b0a9eeb79624e983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computational Biology/Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Computational Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Counterflow</topic><topic>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Image Processing and Computer Vision</topic><topic>Inlet pressure</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nozzles</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Probability and Statistics in Computer Science</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Thermal conductivity</topic><topic>Working fluids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guler, Evrim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kırmacı, Volkan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Neural computing &amp; applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaya, Hüseyin</au><au>Guler, Evrim</au><au>Kırmacı, Volkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of temperature separation of a nitrogen-driven vortex tube with linear, kNN, SVM, and RF regression models</atitle><jtitle>Neural computing &amp; applications</jtitle><stitle>Neural Comput &amp; Applic</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>6281</spage><epage>6291</epage><pages>6281-6291</pages><issn>0941-0643</issn><eissn>1433-3058</eissn><abstract>In this study, the performance of a counter-flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube (RHVT) was investigated experimentally using working fluid nitrogen, and the thermal performance was modeled using different modeling methods with these experimental results. Each method was compared with the others. The variation of ΔT, which is the measure of temperature separation in RHVT, was investigated by using nozzle number, the thermal conductivity of nozzle material, inlet pressure, specific heat, and density of working fluid. In the study, the prediction models of linear, k-nearest neighbor (kNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) regression were trained with measured thermal performance using a specific portion of the experimental data and tested with the remaining data. Two different train and test datasets were used with the ratio of experimental data as 90–10% and 80–20%, respectively. The highest accuracy ratio was determined at the end of the four methods with SVM regression as 96.01% when using the train and test datasets as 90–10%, respectively. The percent accuracy of the other models under the same conditions was calculated as 95.7, 90.87, and 78.36% for RF, kNN, and linear, respectively.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00521-022-08030-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-1911</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-0643
ispartof Neural computing & applications, 2023-03, Vol.35 (8), p.6281-6291
issn 0941-0643
1433-3058
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2780571493
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Accuracy
Artificial Intelligence
Computational Biology/Bioinformatics
Computational Science and Engineering
Computer Science
Counterflow
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Datasets
Image Processing and Computer Vision
Inlet pressure
Nitrogen
Nozzles
Original Article
Prediction models
Probability and Statistics in Computer Science
Regression models
Separation
Support vector machines
Thermal conductivity
Working fluids
title Prediction of temperature separation of a nitrogen-driven vortex tube with linear, kNN, SVM, and RF regression models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T08%3A37%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20temperature%20separation%20of%20a%20nitrogen-driven%20vortex%20tube%20with%20linear,%20kNN,%20SVM,%20and%20RF%20regression%20models&rft.jtitle=Neural%20computing%20&%20applications&rft.au=Kaya,%20H%C3%BCseyin&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=6281&rft.epage=6291&rft.pages=6281-6291&rft.issn=0941-0643&rft.eissn=1433-3058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00521-022-08030-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2780571493%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2780571493&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true