Remote sensing-based energy balance for lettuce in an arid environment: influence of management scenarios on irrigation and evapotranspiration modeling

Efficient irrigation is critical for managing scarce water resources where precipitation is minimal. Field-scale irrigation is largely unaccounted for in landscape evapotranspiration models, primarily due to the unavailability of data and the lack of water balance components in energy balance-based...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Irrigation science 2023-03, Vol.41 (2), p.197-214
Hauptverfasser: Dhungel, Ramesh, Anderson, Ray G., French, Andrew N., Skaggs, Todd H., Saber, Mazin, Sanchez, Charles A., Scudiero, Elia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 214
container_issue 2
container_start_page 197
container_title Irrigation science
container_volume 41
creator Dhungel, Ramesh
Anderson, Ray G.
French, Andrew N.
Skaggs, Todd H.
Saber, Mazin
Sanchez, Charles A.
Scudiero, Elia
description Efficient irrigation is critical for managing scarce water resources where precipitation is minimal. Field-scale irrigation is largely unaccounted for in landscape evapotranspiration models, primarily due to the unavailability of data and the lack of water balance components in energy balance-based evapotranspiration models. To overcome these challenges, we implemented a remote sensing-based energy and water balance model BAITSSS (Backward-Averaged Iterative Two-Source Surface temperature Solution) to calculate evapotranspiration (ET) and irrigation requirements of winter lettuce in the arid environment of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Predicted evapotranspiration and irrigation were compared against data from twelve eddy covariance (EC) sites for wide range of soil hydraulic properties operating between 2016 and 2020 and the applied irrigation, respectively. BAITSSS estimated evapotranspiration and irrigation based on vegetative formation, weather demand, soil hydraulic characteristics, and predefined management allowed depletion (MAD) (0.4–0.6). Ground-based weather data, Sentinel-2-based vegetation indices, and SSURGO (NRCS soil survey database) soil moisture characteristics were model inputs. The results showed mean seasonal ET from BAITSSS and EC were comparable, differing on average by about 7% based on a constant rooting depth (500 mm) and MAD of 0.5 for entire crop growth stages. Variations in daily and seasonal ET were mainly due to differences in applied and model-simulated irrigation. Seasonal values of applied and simulated irrigation closely agreed (~ 6%) in most sites, though some sites applied irrigation more effectively than others. Overall, this study provided insight into consumptive water use and field-scale irrigation practices, as well as the capabilities and limitations of model-simulated ET and irrigation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00271-023-00848-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2780245197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2780245197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-298f7c2d381c3f2d3a6692bf96150a1f812f2a6dd94f08371cae5f5534983d0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKBDEQRYMoOD5-wFXAdTSPfiTuZPAFA4LoOmS6K02G7mRMegbmS_xd07bgTghUqJx7q8JF6IrRG0ZpfZso5TUjlAtCqSwkUUdowQrBCRNMHaMFFQUnNZPyFJ2ltKGU1ZUsFujrDYYwAk7gk_MdWZsELQYPsTvgtemNbwDbEHEP47jLd-exySe6idq7GPwAfrzLfdvvYKKDxYPxpoPpAacGfKZDwsFjF6PrzOjCZJIN9mYbxmh82ro4t4fQQp8XuUAn1vQJLn_rOfp4fHhfPpPV69PL8n5FmvyvkXAlbd3wVkjWCJurqSrF11ZVrKSGWcm45aZqW1VYKkXNGgOlLUtRKCla2opzdD37bmP43EEa9Sbsos8jNa8l5UXJVJ0pPlNNDClFsHob3WDiQTOqpwD0HIDOAeifALTKIjGLUoZ9B_HP-h_VNzdTjCU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2780245197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Remote sensing-based energy balance for lettuce in an arid environment: influence of management scenarios on irrigation and evapotranspiration modeling</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dhungel, Ramesh ; Anderson, Ray G. ; French, Andrew N. ; Skaggs, Todd H. ; Saber, Mazin ; Sanchez, Charles A. ; Scudiero, Elia</creator><creatorcontrib>Dhungel, Ramesh ; Anderson, Ray G. ; French, Andrew N. ; Skaggs, Todd H. ; Saber, Mazin ; Sanchez, Charles A. ; Scudiero, Elia</creatorcontrib><description>Efficient irrigation is critical for managing scarce water resources where precipitation is minimal. Field-scale irrigation is largely unaccounted for in landscape evapotranspiration models, primarily due to the unavailability of data and the lack of water balance components in energy balance-based evapotranspiration models. To overcome these challenges, we implemented a remote sensing-based energy and water balance model BAITSSS (Backward-Averaged Iterative Two-Source Surface temperature Solution) to calculate evapotranspiration (ET) and irrigation requirements of winter lettuce in the arid environment of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Predicted evapotranspiration and irrigation were compared against data from twelve eddy covariance (EC) sites for wide range of soil hydraulic properties operating between 2016 and 2020 and the applied irrigation, respectively. BAITSSS estimated evapotranspiration and irrigation based on vegetative formation, weather demand, soil hydraulic characteristics, and predefined management allowed depletion (MAD) (0.4–0.6). Ground-based weather data, Sentinel-2-based vegetation indices, and SSURGO (NRCS soil survey database) soil moisture characteristics were model inputs. The results showed mean seasonal ET from BAITSSS and EC were comparable, differing on average by about 7% based on a constant rooting depth (500 mm) and MAD of 0.5 for entire crop growth stages. Variations in daily and seasonal ET were mainly due to differences in applied and model-simulated irrigation. Seasonal values of applied and simulated irrigation closely agreed (~ 6%) in most sites, though some sites applied irrigation more effectively than others. Overall, this study provided insight into consumptive water use and field-scale irrigation practices, as well as the capabilities and limitations of model-simulated ET and irrigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-7188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00271-023-00848-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Aquatic Pollution ; Arid environments ; Arid zones ; Aridity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Climate Change ; Crop growth ; Depletion ; Energy balance ; Environment ; Evapotranspiration ; Hydraulic properties ; Irrigation ; Irrigation efficiency ; Irrigation practices ; Irrigation requirements ; Irrigation water ; Iterative methods ; Life Sciences ; Meteorological data ; Moisture effects ; Original Paper ; Remote sensing ; River basins ; Simulation ; Soil ; Soil moisture ; Soil properties ; Soil surveys ; Surface temperature ; Sustainable Development ; Temperature requirements ; Vegetation index ; Waste Water Technology ; Water balance ; Water Industry/Water Technologies ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Water resources ; Water scarcity ; Water use ; Weather</subject><ispartof>Irrigation science, 2023-03, Vol.41 (2), p.197-214</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023</rights><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-298f7c2d381c3f2d3a6692bf96150a1f812f2a6dd94f08371cae5f5534983d0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-298f7c2d381c3f2d3a6692bf96150a1f812f2a6dd94f08371cae5f5534983d0d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00271-023-00848-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00271-023-00848-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dhungel, Ramesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Ray G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Andrew N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skaggs, Todd H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saber, Mazin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Charles A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scudiero, Elia</creatorcontrib><title>Remote sensing-based energy balance for lettuce in an arid environment: influence of management scenarios on irrigation and evapotranspiration modeling</title><title>Irrigation science</title><addtitle>Irrig Sci</addtitle><description>Efficient irrigation is critical for managing scarce water resources where precipitation is minimal. Field-scale irrigation is largely unaccounted for in landscape evapotranspiration models, primarily due to the unavailability of data and the lack of water balance components in energy balance-based evapotranspiration models. To overcome these challenges, we implemented a remote sensing-based energy and water balance model BAITSSS (Backward-Averaged Iterative Two-Source Surface temperature Solution) to calculate evapotranspiration (ET) and irrigation requirements of winter lettuce in the arid environment of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Predicted evapotranspiration and irrigation were compared against data from twelve eddy covariance (EC) sites for wide range of soil hydraulic properties operating between 2016 and 2020 and the applied irrigation, respectively. BAITSSS estimated evapotranspiration and irrigation based on vegetative formation, weather demand, soil hydraulic characteristics, and predefined management allowed depletion (MAD) (0.4–0.6). Ground-based weather data, Sentinel-2-based vegetation indices, and SSURGO (NRCS soil survey database) soil moisture characteristics were model inputs. The results showed mean seasonal ET from BAITSSS and EC were comparable, differing on average by about 7% based on a constant rooting depth (500 mm) and MAD of 0.5 for entire crop growth stages. Variations in daily and seasonal ET were mainly due to differences in applied and model-simulated irrigation. Seasonal values of applied and simulated irrigation closely agreed (~ 6%) in most sites, though some sites applied irrigation more effectively than others. Overall, this study provided insight into consumptive water use and field-scale irrigation practices, as well as the capabilities and limitations of model-simulated ET and irrigation.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Arid environments</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Crop growth</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Energy balance</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Hydraulic properties</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Irrigation efficiency</subject><subject>Irrigation practices</subject><subject>Irrigation requirements</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>Iterative methods</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Meteorological data</subject><subject>Moisture effects</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil surveys</subject><subject>Surface temperature</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Temperature requirements</subject><subject>Vegetation index</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water balance</subject><subject>Water Industry/Water Technologies</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water scarcity</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>0342-7188</issn><issn>1432-1319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKBDEQRYMoOD5-wFXAdTSPfiTuZPAFA4LoOmS6K02G7mRMegbmS_xd07bgTghUqJx7q8JF6IrRG0ZpfZso5TUjlAtCqSwkUUdowQrBCRNMHaMFFQUnNZPyFJ2ltKGU1ZUsFujrDYYwAk7gk_MdWZsELQYPsTvgtemNbwDbEHEP47jLd-exySe6idq7GPwAfrzLfdvvYKKDxYPxpoPpAacGfKZDwsFjF6PrzOjCZJIN9mYbxmh82ro4t4fQQp8XuUAn1vQJLn_rOfp4fHhfPpPV69PL8n5FmvyvkXAlbd3wVkjWCJurqSrF11ZVrKSGWcm45aZqW1VYKkXNGgOlLUtRKCla2opzdD37bmP43EEa9Sbsos8jNa8l5UXJVJ0pPlNNDClFsHob3WDiQTOqpwD0HIDOAeifALTKIjGLUoZ9B_HP-h_VNzdTjCU</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Dhungel, Ramesh</creator><creator>Anderson, Ray G.</creator><creator>French, Andrew N.</creator><creator>Skaggs, Todd H.</creator><creator>Saber, Mazin</creator><creator>Sanchez, Charles A.</creator><creator>Scudiero, Elia</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Remote sensing-based energy balance for lettuce in an arid environment: influence of management scenarios on irrigation and evapotranspiration modeling</title><author>Dhungel, Ramesh ; Anderson, Ray G. ; French, Andrew N. ; Skaggs, Todd H. ; Saber, Mazin ; Sanchez, Charles A. ; Scudiero, Elia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-298f7c2d381c3f2d3a6692bf96150a1f812f2a6dd94f08371cae5f5534983d0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Arid environments</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Crop growth</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Energy balance</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Hydraulic properties</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Irrigation efficiency</topic><topic>Irrigation practices</topic><topic>Irrigation requirements</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>Iterative methods</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Meteorological data</topic><topic>Moisture effects</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil surveys</topic><topic>Surface temperature</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Temperature requirements</topic><topic>Vegetation index</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water balance</topic><topic>Water Industry/Water Technologies</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water scarcity</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dhungel, Ramesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Ray G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Andrew N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skaggs, Todd H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saber, Mazin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Charles A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scudiero, Elia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Irrigation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dhungel, Ramesh</au><au>Anderson, Ray G.</au><au>French, Andrew N.</au><au>Skaggs, Todd H.</au><au>Saber, Mazin</au><au>Sanchez, Charles A.</au><au>Scudiero, Elia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Remote sensing-based energy balance for lettuce in an arid environment: influence of management scenarios on irrigation and evapotranspiration modeling</atitle><jtitle>Irrigation science</jtitle><stitle>Irrig Sci</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>214</epage><pages>197-214</pages><issn>0342-7188</issn><eissn>1432-1319</eissn><abstract>Efficient irrigation is critical for managing scarce water resources where precipitation is minimal. Field-scale irrigation is largely unaccounted for in landscape evapotranspiration models, primarily due to the unavailability of data and the lack of water balance components in energy balance-based evapotranspiration models. To overcome these challenges, we implemented a remote sensing-based energy and water balance model BAITSSS (Backward-Averaged Iterative Two-Source Surface temperature Solution) to calculate evapotranspiration (ET) and irrigation requirements of winter lettuce in the arid environment of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Predicted evapotranspiration and irrigation were compared against data from twelve eddy covariance (EC) sites for wide range of soil hydraulic properties operating between 2016 and 2020 and the applied irrigation, respectively. BAITSSS estimated evapotranspiration and irrigation based on vegetative formation, weather demand, soil hydraulic characteristics, and predefined management allowed depletion (MAD) (0.4–0.6). Ground-based weather data, Sentinel-2-based vegetation indices, and SSURGO (NRCS soil survey database) soil moisture characteristics were model inputs. The results showed mean seasonal ET from BAITSSS and EC were comparable, differing on average by about 7% based on a constant rooting depth (500 mm) and MAD of 0.5 for entire crop growth stages. Variations in daily and seasonal ET were mainly due to differences in applied and model-simulated irrigation. Seasonal values of applied and simulated irrigation closely agreed (~ 6%) in most sites, though some sites applied irrigation more effectively than others. Overall, this study provided insight into consumptive water use and field-scale irrigation practices, as well as the capabilities and limitations of model-simulated ET and irrigation.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00271-023-00848-9</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0342-7188
ispartof Irrigation science, 2023-03, Vol.41 (2), p.197-214
issn 0342-7188
1432-1319
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2780245197
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agriculture
Aquatic Pollution
Arid environments
Arid zones
Aridity
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Climate Change
Crop growth
Depletion
Energy balance
Environment
Evapotranspiration
Hydraulic properties
Irrigation
Irrigation efficiency
Irrigation practices
Irrigation requirements
Irrigation water
Iterative methods
Life Sciences
Meteorological data
Moisture effects
Original Paper
Remote sensing
River basins
Simulation
Soil
Soil moisture
Soil properties
Soil surveys
Surface temperature
Sustainable Development
Temperature requirements
Vegetation index
Waste Water Technology
Water balance
Water Industry/Water Technologies
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
Water resources
Water scarcity
Water use
Weather
title Remote sensing-based energy balance for lettuce in an arid environment: influence of management scenarios on irrigation and evapotranspiration modeling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A13%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Remote%20sensing-based%20energy%20balance%20for%20lettuce%20in%20an%20arid%20environment:%20influence%20of%20management%20scenarios%20on%20irrigation%20and%20evapotranspiration%20modeling&rft.jtitle=Irrigation%20science&rft.au=Dhungel,%20Ramesh&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=214&rft.pages=197-214&rft.issn=0342-7188&rft.eissn=1432-1319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00271-023-00848-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2780245197%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2780245197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true