Oil Onshore Pipeline Quantitative Risk Assessment under Fire and Explosion Scenarios

Pipeline is one of the safest and most cost-effective means of transportation for hydrocarbons. However, hydrocarbon releases and the subsequent fires and explosions, are presented as persistent events. Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) enables one to address the risk and to prevent these events. I...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Processes 2023-02, Vol.11 (2), p.557
Hauptverfasser: Hernández-Báez, Álvaro, Torres, Esperanza Susana, Amaya-Gómez, Rafael, Pradilla, Diego
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 557
container_title Processes
container_volume 11
creator Hernández-Báez, Álvaro
Torres, Esperanza Susana
Amaya-Gómez, Rafael
Pradilla, Diego
description Pipeline is one of the safest and most cost-effective means of transportation for hydrocarbons. However, hydrocarbon releases and the subsequent fires and explosions, are presented as persistent events. Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) enables one to address the risk and to prevent these events. In this regard, different approaches have been proposed for pipelines, but few studies are focused on oil transportation. This paper presents a methodology for performing QRA for onshore oil pipelines, which is based on the calculation of individual and societal risk indicators. This methodology is illustrated using an authentic case study of a segment of 17.53 km of the length of an onshore oil pipeline located in the southwest of Colombia, considering jet and pool fire scenarios. The results show that the Individual Risk Per Annum (IRPA) for operation (and maintenance) and administrative workers are 6.14 × 10−4 and 8.52 × 10−5 yr−1, respectively. The IRPA for people close to the pipeline is between 2.31 × 10−4 and 2.60 × 10−4 yr−1. The IRPA for workers is tolerable, while for people may be classified as unacceptable. The societal risk was represented using the F–N curve, indicating that risk is unacceptable and nearby populations could be relocated.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/pr11020557
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2779652043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A742893677</galeid><sourcerecordid>A742893677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2595ecaa375f0020968b32987058e4b49e54673b01e9d5633988439b8e80edd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaJgqb34CwLehK3ZZLNJjqW0Kgj1o56X7O6spm6TNcmK_nsjFXTmMMPw3puZh9B5TuaMKXI1-DwnlHAujtCEUioyJXJx_K8_RbMQdiSFypnk5QRtN6bHGxtenQd8bwbojQX8MGobTdTRfAB-NOENL0KAEPZgIx5tCx6vTSJo2-LV59C7YJzFTw1Y7Y0LZ-ik032A2W-douf1aru8ye4217fLxV3WMFbEjHLFodGaCd6RdLgqZc2okoJwCUVdKOBFKVhNclAtL9OPUhZM1RIkgbalbIouDrqDd-8jhFjt3OhtWllRIVTJKSlYQs0PqBfdQ2Vs56LXTcoW9qZxFjqT5gtRUKlYKUQiXB4IjXcheOiqwZu99l9VTqofp6s_p9k39T1upw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779652043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oil Onshore Pipeline Quantitative Risk Assessment under Fire and Explosion Scenarios</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Hernández-Báez, Álvaro ; Torres, Esperanza Susana ; Amaya-Gómez, Rafael ; Pradilla, Diego</creator><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Báez, Álvaro ; Torres, Esperanza Susana ; Amaya-Gómez, Rafael ; Pradilla, Diego</creatorcontrib><description>Pipeline is one of the safest and most cost-effective means of transportation for hydrocarbons. However, hydrocarbon releases and the subsequent fires and explosions, are presented as persistent events. Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) enables one to address the risk and to prevent these events. In this regard, different approaches have been proposed for pipelines, but few studies are focused on oil transportation. This paper presents a methodology for performing QRA for onshore oil pipelines, which is based on the calculation of individual and societal risk indicators. This methodology is illustrated using an authentic case study of a segment of 17.53 km of the length of an onshore oil pipeline located in the southwest of Colombia, considering jet and pool fire scenarios. The results show that the Individual Risk Per Annum (IRPA) for operation (and maintenance) and administrative workers are 6.14 × 10−4 and 8.52 × 10−5 yr−1, respectively. The IRPA for people close to the pipeline is between 2.31 × 10−4 and 2.60 × 10−4 yr−1. The IRPA for workers is tolerable, while for people may be classified as unacceptable. The societal risk was represented using the F–N curve, indicating that risk is unacceptable and nearby populations could be relocated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pr11020557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Cathodic protection ; Crude oil ; Decision making ; Explosions ; Hydrocarbons ; Oil ; Petroleum pipelines ; Pipe lines ; Pipelines ; Pool fires ; Risk assessment ; Transportation ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds</subject><ispartof>Processes, 2023-02, Vol.11 (2), p.557</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2595ecaa375f0020968b32987058e4b49e54673b01e9d5633988439b8e80edd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2595ecaa375f0020968b32987058e4b49e54673b01e9d5633988439b8e80edd23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3726-503X ; 0000-0001-8810-9526 ; 0000-0003-4343-248X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Báez, Álvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Esperanza Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaya-Gómez, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradilla, Diego</creatorcontrib><title>Oil Onshore Pipeline Quantitative Risk Assessment under Fire and Explosion Scenarios</title><title>Processes</title><description>Pipeline is one of the safest and most cost-effective means of transportation for hydrocarbons. However, hydrocarbon releases and the subsequent fires and explosions, are presented as persistent events. Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) enables one to address the risk and to prevent these events. In this regard, different approaches have been proposed for pipelines, but few studies are focused on oil transportation. This paper presents a methodology for performing QRA for onshore oil pipelines, which is based on the calculation of individual and societal risk indicators. This methodology is illustrated using an authentic case study of a segment of 17.53 km of the length of an onshore oil pipeline located in the southwest of Colombia, considering jet and pool fire scenarios. The results show that the Individual Risk Per Annum (IRPA) for operation (and maintenance) and administrative workers are 6.14 × 10−4 and 8.52 × 10−5 yr−1, respectively. The IRPA for people close to the pipeline is between 2.31 × 10−4 and 2.60 × 10−4 yr−1. The IRPA for workers is tolerable, while for people may be classified as unacceptable. The societal risk was represented using the F–N curve, indicating that risk is unacceptable and nearby populations could be relocated.</description><subject>Cathodic protection</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Oil</subject><subject>Petroleum pipelines</subject><subject>Pipe lines</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>Pool fires</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><issn>2227-9717</issn><issn>2227-9717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaJgqb34CwLehK3ZZLNJjqW0Kgj1o56X7O6spm6TNcmK_nsjFXTmMMPw3puZh9B5TuaMKXI1-DwnlHAujtCEUioyJXJx_K8_RbMQdiSFypnk5QRtN6bHGxtenQd8bwbojQX8MGobTdTRfAB-NOENL0KAEPZgIx5tCx6vTSJo2-LV59C7YJzFTw1Y7Y0LZ-ik032A2W-douf1aru8ye4217fLxV3WMFbEjHLFodGaCd6RdLgqZc2okoJwCUVdKOBFKVhNclAtL9OPUhZM1RIkgbalbIouDrqDd-8jhFjt3OhtWllRIVTJKSlYQs0PqBfdQ2Vs56LXTcoW9qZxFjqT5gtRUKlYKUQiXB4IjXcheOiqwZu99l9VTqofp6s_p9k39T1upw</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Hernández-Báez, Álvaro</creator><creator>Torres, Esperanza Susana</creator><creator>Amaya-Gómez, Rafael</creator><creator>Pradilla, Diego</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-503X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8810-9526</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4343-248X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Oil Onshore Pipeline Quantitative Risk Assessment under Fire and Explosion Scenarios</title><author>Hernández-Báez, Álvaro ; Torres, Esperanza Susana ; Amaya-Gómez, Rafael ; Pradilla, Diego</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2595ecaa375f0020968b32987058e4b49e54673b01e9d5633988439b8e80edd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cathodic protection</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Oil</topic><topic>Petroleum pipelines</topic><topic>Pipe lines</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>Pool fires</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Báez, Álvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Esperanza Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaya-Gómez, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradilla, Diego</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hernández-Báez, Álvaro</au><au>Torres, Esperanza Susana</au><au>Amaya-Gómez, Rafael</au><au>Pradilla, Diego</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oil Onshore Pipeline Quantitative Risk Assessment under Fire and Explosion Scenarios</atitle><jtitle>Processes</jtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>557</spage><pages>557-</pages><issn>2227-9717</issn><eissn>2227-9717</eissn><abstract>Pipeline is one of the safest and most cost-effective means of transportation for hydrocarbons. However, hydrocarbon releases and the subsequent fires and explosions, are presented as persistent events. Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) enables one to address the risk and to prevent these events. In this regard, different approaches have been proposed for pipelines, but few studies are focused on oil transportation. This paper presents a methodology for performing QRA for onshore oil pipelines, which is based on the calculation of individual and societal risk indicators. This methodology is illustrated using an authentic case study of a segment of 17.53 km of the length of an onshore oil pipeline located in the southwest of Colombia, considering jet and pool fire scenarios. The results show that the Individual Risk Per Annum (IRPA) for operation (and maintenance) and administrative workers are 6.14 × 10−4 and 8.52 × 10−5 yr−1, respectively. The IRPA for people close to the pipeline is between 2.31 × 10−4 and 2.60 × 10−4 yr−1. The IRPA for workers is tolerable, while for people may be classified as unacceptable. The societal risk was represented using the F–N curve, indicating that risk is unacceptable and nearby populations could be relocated.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/pr11020557</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-503X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8810-9526</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4343-248X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2227-9717
ispartof Processes, 2023-02, Vol.11 (2), p.557
issn 2227-9717
2227-9717
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2779652043
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Cathodic protection
Crude oil
Decision making
Explosions
Hydrocarbons
Oil
Petroleum pipelines
Pipe lines
Pipelines
Pool fires
Risk assessment
Transportation
VOCs
Volatile organic compounds
title Oil Onshore Pipeline Quantitative Risk Assessment under Fire and Explosion Scenarios
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A41%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oil%20Onshore%20Pipeline%20Quantitative%20Risk%20Assessment%20under%20Fire%20and%20Explosion%20Scenarios&rft.jtitle=Processes&rft.au=Hern%C3%A1ndez-B%C3%A1ez,%20%C3%81lvaro&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=557&rft.pages=557-&rft.issn=2227-9717&rft.eissn=2227-9717&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pr11020557&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA742893677%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779652043&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A742893677&rfr_iscdi=true