Optimizing Friction Welding Parameters in AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel and Commercial Copper Dissimilar Joints
By using fusion welding to weld AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel (ASS) and commercial copper, the creation of brittle intermetallic in the weld region that compromises the strength of the joints is the primary challenge. However, friction welding is a suitable method for joining these two materia...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Coatings (Basel) 2023-02, Vol.13 (2), p.261 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 261 |
| container_title | Coatings (Basel) |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Paventhan, R. Thirumalaikumarasamy, D. Kantumuchu, Venkata Charan Ahmed, Omar Shabbir Abbas, Mohamed Alahmadi, Ahmad Aziz Alwetaishi, Mamdooh Alzaed, Ali Nasser Ramachandran, Chidambaram Seshadri |
| description | By using fusion welding to weld AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel (ASS) and commercial copper, the creation of brittle intermetallic in the weld region that compromises the strength of the joints is the primary challenge. However, friction welding is a suitable method for joining these two materials because no obvious defects are produced at the joints. The joint strength is significantly influenced by the friction-welding-process variables including the pressure of friction, pressure of forging, time of friction, and time of forging. Throughout this study, a central composite factorial design-based empirical relationship-building effort was carried out to determine the tensile strengths of friction-welded AISI 304 austenitic stainless steels (ASS) and commercial copper alloys dissimilar joints from the process variables. The process conditions were optimized employing response surface methods in order to attain the joint’s optimum tensile strength. This research revealed that the greatest tensile strength of the joint created with the friction pressure of 60 MPa, forging pressure of 60 MPa, friction duration of 4 s, and forging time of 4 s, correspondingly, was 489 MPa. As a result, the intermetallic formation at the interface could be identified. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/coatings13020261 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2779527517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A743012252</galeid><sourcerecordid>A743012252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-883240da717b180228898229cd3093ed810c1a2015ec5a89c794f16b96f2529d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUc9LwzAULqLgmLt7DHjezI-2SY5lOp0MJkzxWLL0dWS0SU3Sg_71ZsyD-N7hfXx8Pw4vy24JXjAm8b12Khp7CIRhimlJLrIJxVzOy5zQyz_4OpuFcMRpJGGCyEk2bodoevOd3GjljY7GWfQBXXMiXpVXPUTwARmLqvVujRjOUTWGCNZEo9EuKmM7CCEhgA4p26Cl63vw2qguwWEAjx5MCKmkUx69OGNjuMmuWtUFmP3eafa-enxbPs8326f1strMNStonAvBaI4bxQnfE4EpFUIKSqVuGJYMGkGwJopiUoAulJCay7wl5V6WLS2obNg0uzvnDt59jhBifXSjt6myppzLgvKC8KRanFUH1UFtbOuiVzptA73RzkJrEl_xnGFCU3Ay4LNBexeCh7YevOmV_6oJrk8Pqf8_hP0ANVF-jw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779527517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing Friction Welding Parameters in AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel and Commercial Copper Dissimilar Joints</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Paventhan, R. ; Thirumalaikumarasamy, D. ; Kantumuchu, Venkata Charan ; Ahmed, Omar Shabbir ; Abbas, Mohamed ; Alahmadi, Ahmad Aziz ; Alwetaishi, Mamdooh ; Alzaed, Ali Nasser ; Ramachandran, Chidambaram Seshadri</creator><creatorcontrib>Paventhan, R. ; Thirumalaikumarasamy, D. ; Kantumuchu, Venkata Charan ; Ahmed, Omar Shabbir ; Abbas, Mohamed ; Alahmadi, Ahmad Aziz ; Alwetaishi, Mamdooh ; Alzaed, Ali Nasser ; Ramachandran, Chidambaram Seshadri</creatorcontrib><description>By using fusion welding to weld AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel (ASS) and commercial copper, the creation of brittle intermetallic in the weld region that compromises the strength of the joints is the primary challenge. However, friction welding is a suitable method for joining these two materials because no obvious defects are produced at the joints. The joint strength is significantly influenced by the friction-welding-process variables including the pressure of friction, pressure of forging, time of friction, and time of forging. Throughout this study, a central composite factorial design-based empirical relationship-building effort was carried out to determine the tensile strengths of friction-welded AISI 304 austenitic stainless steels (ASS) and commercial copper alloys dissimilar joints from the process variables. The process conditions were optimized employing response surface methods in order to attain the joint’s optimum tensile strength. This research revealed that the greatest tensile strength of the joint created with the friction pressure of 60 MPa, forging pressure of 60 MPa, friction duration of 4 s, and forging time of 4 s, correspondingly, was 489 MPa. As a result, the intermetallic formation at the interface could be identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-6412</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-6412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/coatings13020261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alloys ; Austenitic stainless steels ; Copper ; Copper alloys ; Copper base alloys ; Corrosion potential ; Dissimilar material joining ; Efficiency ; Factorial design ; Forging ; Friction welding ; Fusion welding ; Interfaces ; Intermetallic compounds ; Investigations ; Mechanical properties ; Microstructure ; Optimization ; Powder metallurgy ; Process variables ; Radiation ; Response surface methodology ; Stainless steel ; Tensile strength ; Welding ; Welding parameters ; Yield stress</subject><ispartof>Coatings (Basel), 2023-02, Vol.13 (2), p.261</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-883240da717b180228898229cd3093ed810c1a2015ec5a89c794f16b96f2529d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-883240da717b180228898229cd3093ed810c1a2015ec5a89c794f16b96f2529d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3141-2900 ; 0000-0001-5053-4324 ; 0000-0001-7342-5833 ; 0000-0002-1996-7671</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paventhan, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thirumalaikumarasamy, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kantumuchu, Venkata Charan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Omar Shabbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alahmadi, Ahmad Aziz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alwetaishi, Mamdooh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzaed, Ali Nasser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramachandran, Chidambaram Seshadri</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing Friction Welding Parameters in AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel and Commercial Copper Dissimilar Joints</title><title>Coatings (Basel)</title><description>By using fusion welding to weld AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel (ASS) and commercial copper, the creation of brittle intermetallic in the weld region that compromises the strength of the joints is the primary challenge. However, friction welding is a suitable method for joining these two materials because no obvious defects are produced at the joints. The joint strength is significantly influenced by the friction-welding-process variables including the pressure of friction, pressure of forging, time of friction, and time of forging. Throughout this study, a central composite factorial design-based empirical relationship-building effort was carried out to determine the tensile strengths of friction-welded AISI 304 austenitic stainless steels (ASS) and commercial copper alloys dissimilar joints from the process variables. The process conditions were optimized employing response surface methods in order to attain the joint’s optimum tensile strength. This research revealed that the greatest tensile strength of the joint created with the friction pressure of 60 MPa, forging pressure of 60 MPa, friction duration of 4 s, and forging time of 4 s, correspondingly, was 489 MPa. As a result, the intermetallic formation at the interface could be identified.</description><subject>Alloys</subject><subject>Austenitic stainless steels</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Copper alloys</subject><subject>Copper base alloys</subject><subject>Corrosion potential</subject><subject>Dissimilar material joining</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Factorial design</subject><subject>Forging</subject><subject>Friction welding</subject><subject>Fusion welding</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>Intermetallic compounds</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Microstructure</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Powder metallurgy</subject><subject>Process variables</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Response surface methodology</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Welding</subject><subject>Welding parameters</subject><subject>Yield stress</subject><issn>2079-6412</issn><issn>2079-6412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUc9LwzAULqLgmLt7DHjezI-2SY5lOp0MJkzxWLL0dWS0SU3Sg_71ZsyD-N7hfXx8Pw4vy24JXjAm8b12Khp7CIRhimlJLrIJxVzOy5zQyz_4OpuFcMRpJGGCyEk2bodoevOd3GjljY7GWfQBXXMiXpVXPUTwARmLqvVujRjOUTWGCNZEo9EuKmM7CCEhgA4p26Cl63vw2qguwWEAjx5MCKmkUx69OGNjuMmuWtUFmP3eafa-enxbPs8326f1strMNStonAvBaI4bxQnfE4EpFUIKSqVuGJYMGkGwJopiUoAulJCay7wl5V6WLS2obNg0uzvnDt59jhBifXSjt6myppzLgvKC8KRanFUH1UFtbOuiVzptA73RzkJrEl_xnGFCU3Ay4LNBexeCh7YevOmV_6oJrk8Pqf8_hP0ANVF-jw</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Paventhan, R.</creator><creator>Thirumalaikumarasamy, D.</creator><creator>Kantumuchu, Venkata Charan</creator><creator>Ahmed, Omar Shabbir</creator><creator>Abbas, Mohamed</creator><creator>Alahmadi, Ahmad Aziz</creator><creator>Alwetaishi, Mamdooh</creator><creator>Alzaed, Ali Nasser</creator><creator>Ramachandran, Chidambaram Seshadri</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3141-2900</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5053-4324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7342-5833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1996-7671</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Optimizing Friction Welding Parameters in AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel and Commercial Copper Dissimilar Joints</title><author>Paventhan, R. ; Thirumalaikumarasamy, D. ; Kantumuchu, Venkata Charan ; Ahmed, Omar Shabbir ; Abbas, Mohamed ; Alahmadi, Ahmad Aziz ; Alwetaishi, Mamdooh ; Alzaed, Ali Nasser ; Ramachandran, Chidambaram Seshadri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-883240da717b180228898229cd3093ed810c1a2015ec5a89c794f16b96f2529d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Alloys</topic><topic>Austenitic stainless steels</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Copper alloys</topic><topic>Copper base alloys</topic><topic>Corrosion potential</topic><topic>Dissimilar material joining</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Factorial design</topic><topic>Forging</topic><topic>Friction welding</topic><topic>Fusion welding</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>Intermetallic compounds</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Microstructure</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Powder metallurgy</topic><topic>Process variables</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Response surface methodology</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Welding</topic><topic>Welding parameters</topic><topic>Yield stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paventhan, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thirumalaikumarasamy, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kantumuchu, Venkata Charan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Omar Shabbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alahmadi, Ahmad Aziz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alwetaishi, Mamdooh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzaed, Ali Nasser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramachandran, Chidambaram Seshadri</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Coatings (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paventhan, R.</au><au>Thirumalaikumarasamy, D.</au><au>Kantumuchu, Venkata Charan</au><au>Ahmed, Omar Shabbir</au><au>Abbas, Mohamed</au><au>Alahmadi, Ahmad Aziz</au><au>Alwetaishi, Mamdooh</au><au>Alzaed, Ali Nasser</au><au>Ramachandran, Chidambaram Seshadri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing Friction Welding Parameters in AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel and Commercial Copper Dissimilar Joints</atitle><jtitle>Coatings (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>261</spage><pages>261-</pages><issn>2079-6412</issn><eissn>2079-6412</eissn><abstract>By using fusion welding to weld AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel (ASS) and commercial copper, the creation of brittle intermetallic in the weld region that compromises the strength of the joints is the primary challenge. However, friction welding is a suitable method for joining these two materials because no obvious defects are produced at the joints. The joint strength is significantly influenced by the friction-welding-process variables including the pressure of friction, pressure of forging, time of friction, and time of forging. Throughout this study, a central composite factorial design-based empirical relationship-building effort was carried out to determine the tensile strengths of friction-welded AISI 304 austenitic stainless steels (ASS) and commercial copper alloys dissimilar joints from the process variables. The process conditions were optimized employing response surface methods in order to attain the joint’s optimum tensile strength. This research revealed that the greatest tensile strength of the joint created with the friction pressure of 60 MPa, forging pressure of 60 MPa, friction duration of 4 s, and forging time of 4 s, correspondingly, was 489 MPa. As a result, the intermetallic formation at the interface could be identified.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/coatings13020261</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3141-2900</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5053-4324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7342-5833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1996-7671</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2079-6412 |
| ispartof | Coatings (Basel), 2023-02, Vol.13 (2), p.261 |
| issn | 2079-6412 2079-6412 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2779527517 |
| source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Alloys Austenitic stainless steels Copper Copper alloys Copper base alloys Corrosion potential Dissimilar material joining Efficiency Factorial design Forging Friction welding Fusion welding Interfaces Intermetallic compounds Investigations Mechanical properties Microstructure Optimization Powder metallurgy Process variables Radiation Response surface methodology Stainless steel Tensile strength Welding Welding parameters Yield stress |
| title | Optimizing Friction Welding Parameters in AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel and Commercial Copper Dissimilar Joints |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T11%3A24%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20Friction%20Welding%20Parameters%20in%20AISI%20304%20Austenitic%20Stainless%20Steel%20and%20Commercial%20Copper%20Dissimilar%20Joints&rft.jtitle=Coatings%20(Basel)&rft.au=Paventhan,%20R.&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=261&rft.pages=261-&rft.issn=2079-6412&rft.eissn=2079-6412&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/coatings13020261&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA743012252%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779527517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A743012252&rfr_iscdi=true |