Short-Sale Constraints, Differences of Opinion, and Overvaluation
Miller (1977) hypothesizes that dispersion of investor opinion in the presence of short-sale constraints leads to stock price overvaluation. However, previous empirical tests of Miller's hypothesis examine the valuation effects of only one of these two necessary conditions. We examine the valua...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of financial and quantitative analysis 2006-06, Vol.41 (2), p.455-487 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 487 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 455 |
container_title | Journal of financial and quantitative analysis |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Boehme, Rodney D. Danielsen, Bartley R. Sorescu, Sorin M. |
description | Miller (1977) hypothesizes that dispersion of investor opinion in the presence of short-sale constraints leads to stock price overvaluation. However, previous empirical tests of Miller's hypothesis examine the valuation effects of only one of these two necessary conditions. We examine the valuation effects of the interaction between differences of opinion and shortsale constraints. We find robust evidence of significant overvaluation for stocks that are subject to both conditions simultaneously. Stocks are not systematically overvalued when either one of these two conditions is not met. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022109000002143 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2779442313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022109000002143</cupid><jstor_id>27647255</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27647255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-b6432c9a32840f7f38d945e1624cc551fb721c66ada3181c993b980440ae4c2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gAch4NXozv7NHkurVSgUbfW6bDYbTW2TupsW_fYmptSDOJeB-b038xiEzgFfAwZ5M8OYEMAKt0WA0QPUA8lFLBSIQ9RrcdzyY3QSwuJHRXAPDWZvla_jmVm6aFiVofamKOtwFY2KPHfeldaFqMqj6booi6q8ikyZRdOt81uz3Ji6GZ2io9wsgzvb9T56vrudD-_jyXT8MBxMYstJUsepYJRYZShJGM5lTpNMMe5AEGYt55CnkoAVwmSGQgJWKZqqBDOGjWOWZLSPLru9a199bFyo9aLa-LI5qYmUijFCgTYq6FTWVyF4l-u1L1bGf2nAuv2U_vOpxnPReRahrvzeQKRgknDe8LjjRajd554b_66FpJJrMX7U4xd4YsM56FGjp7sMZpX6Int1v1H_T_ENGLmAvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779442313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short-Sale Constraints, Differences of Opinion, and Overvaluation</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Boehme, Rodney D. ; Danielsen, Bartley R. ; Sorescu, Sorin M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boehme, Rodney D. ; Danielsen, Bartley R. ; Sorescu, Sorin M.</creatorcontrib><description>Miller (1977) hypothesizes that dispersion of investor opinion in the presence of short-sale constraints leads to stock price overvaluation. However, previous empirical tests of Miller's hypothesis examine the valuation effects of only one of these two necessary conditions. We examine the valuation effects of the interaction between differences of opinion and shortsale constraints. We find robust evidence of significant overvaluation for stocks that are subject to both conditions simultaneously. Stocks are not systematically overvalued when either one of these two conditions is not met.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1090</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-6916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022109000002143</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analytical forecasting ; Fees ; Financial portfolios ; Financial securities ; Investor behavior ; Investors ; Modeling ; Proxy reporting ; Proxy statements ; Quantitative analysis ; Short sales ; Stock prices ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 2006-06, Vol.41 (2), p.455-487</ispartof><rights>Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2006</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 School of Business Administration</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-b6432c9a32840f7f38d945e1624cc551fb721c66ada3181c993b980440ae4c2d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-b6432c9a32840f7f38d945e1624cc551fb721c66ada3181c993b980440ae4c2d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27647255$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000002143/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,27923,27924,55627,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boehme, Rodney D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danielsen, Bartley R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorescu, Sorin M.</creatorcontrib><title>Short-Sale Constraints, Differences of Opinion, and Overvaluation</title><title>Journal of financial and quantitative analysis</title><addtitle>J. Financ. Quant. Anal</addtitle><description>Miller (1977) hypothesizes that dispersion of investor opinion in the presence of short-sale constraints leads to stock price overvaluation. However, previous empirical tests of Miller's hypothesis examine the valuation effects of only one of these two necessary conditions. We examine the valuation effects of the interaction between differences of opinion and shortsale constraints. We find robust evidence of significant overvaluation for stocks that are subject to both conditions simultaneously. Stocks are not systematically overvalued when either one of these two conditions is not met.</description><subject>Analytical forecasting</subject><subject>Fees</subject><subject>Financial portfolios</subject><subject>Financial securities</subject><subject>Investor behavior</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Proxy reporting</subject><subject>Proxy statements</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Short sales</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>0022-1090</issn><issn>1756-6916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gAch4NXozv7NHkurVSgUbfW6bDYbTW2TupsW_fYmptSDOJeB-b038xiEzgFfAwZ5M8OYEMAKt0WA0QPUA8lFLBSIQ9RrcdzyY3QSwuJHRXAPDWZvla_jmVm6aFiVofamKOtwFY2KPHfeldaFqMqj6booi6q8ikyZRdOt81uz3Ji6GZ2io9wsgzvb9T56vrudD-_jyXT8MBxMYstJUsepYJRYZShJGM5lTpNMMe5AEGYt55CnkoAVwmSGQgJWKZqqBDOGjWOWZLSPLru9a199bFyo9aLa-LI5qYmUijFCgTYq6FTWVyF4l-u1L1bGf2nAuv2U_vOpxnPReRahrvzeQKRgknDe8LjjRajd554b_66FpJJrMX7U4xd4YsM56FGjp7sMZpX6Int1v1H_T_ENGLmAvw</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>Boehme, Rodney D.</creator><creator>Danielsen, Bartley R.</creator><creator>Sorescu, Sorin M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>University of Washington School of Business Administration, University of Utah David Eccles School of Business, and New York University Leonard N. Stern School of Business</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>Short-Sale Constraints, Differences of Opinion, and Overvaluation</title><author>Boehme, Rodney D. ; Danielsen, Bartley R. ; Sorescu, Sorin M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-b6432c9a32840f7f38d945e1624cc551fb721c66ada3181c993b980440ae4c2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Analytical forecasting</topic><topic>Fees</topic><topic>Financial portfolios</topic><topic>Financial securities</topic><topic>Investor behavior</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Proxy reporting</topic><topic>Proxy statements</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Short sales</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boehme, Rodney D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danielsen, Bartley R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorescu, Sorin M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of financial and quantitative analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boehme, Rodney D.</au><au>Danielsen, Bartley R.</au><au>Sorescu, Sorin M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short-Sale Constraints, Differences of Opinion, and Overvaluation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of financial and quantitative analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J. Financ. Quant. Anal</addtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>455</spage><epage>487</epage><pages>455-487</pages><issn>0022-1090</issn><eissn>1756-6916</eissn><abstract>Miller (1977) hypothesizes that dispersion of investor opinion in the presence of short-sale constraints leads to stock price overvaluation. However, previous empirical tests of Miller's hypothesis examine the valuation effects of only one of these two necessary conditions. We examine the valuation effects of the interaction between differences of opinion and shortsale constraints. We find robust evidence of significant overvaluation for stocks that are subject to both conditions simultaneously. Stocks are not systematically overvalued when either one of these two conditions is not met.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022109000002143</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1090 |
ispartof | Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 2006-06, Vol.41 (2), p.455-487 |
issn | 0022-1090 1756-6916 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2779442313 |
source | Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Analytical forecasting Fees Financial portfolios Financial securities Investor behavior Investors Modeling Proxy reporting Proxy statements Quantitative analysis Short sales Stock prices Valuation |
title | Short-Sale Constraints, Differences of Opinion, and Overvaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A19%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-Sale%20Constraints,%20Differences%20of%20Opinion,%20and%20Overvaluation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20financial%20and%20quantitative%20analysis&rft.au=Boehme,%20Rodney%20D.&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=487&rft.pages=455-487&rft.issn=0022-1090&rft.eissn=1756-6916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022109000002143&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27647255%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779442313&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022109000002143&rft_jstor_id=27647255&rfr_iscdi=true |