An Assessment of the Feasibility of Phytoextraction for the Stripping of Bioavailable Metals from Contaminated Soils

Phytoextraction has been proposed in many papers as a low‐cost method for remediating contaminated soil. However, if national regulation is based on total metal(loid) concentrations in soil, phytoextraction is generally infeasible because of the long time required for remediation. Assessing phytoext...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2023-03, Vol.42 (3), p.558-565
Hauptverfasser: Santa‐Cruz, Javier, Robinson, Brett, Krutyakov, Yurii A., Shapoval, Olga A., Peñaloza, Patricia, Yáñez, Carolina, Neaman, Alexander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 565
container_issue 3
container_start_page 558
container_title Environmental toxicology and chemistry
container_volume 42
creator Santa‐Cruz, Javier
Robinson, Brett
Krutyakov, Yurii A.
Shapoval, Olga A.
Peñaloza, Patricia
Yáñez, Carolina
Neaman, Alexander
description Phytoextraction has been proposed in many papers as a low‐cost method for remediating contaminated soil. However, if national regulation is based on total metal(loid) concentrations in soil, phytoextraction is generally infeasible because of the long time required for remediation. Assessing phytoextraction requires determination of the dynamic rate of metal removal from soil. Phytoextraction may be feasible if the main goal is to reduce the soluble fraction of the metal(loid) with the goal of reducing bioavailability. However, it has been reported that there is a large mass balance mismatch between the reduction of the soluble metal fraction in contaminated soil and metal uptake by plants. Several studies report that the decrease of soluble fraction of metals in soil is higher than can be accounted for by plant uptake. In other words, studies generally overestimate the feasibility of bioavailable contaminant stripping. Therefore, a more rigorous approach is advisable to ensure that papers on bioavailable contaminant stripping include relevant information on mass balances. Furthermore, to implement the concept of bioavailable contaminant stripping, regulations must distinguish between the bioavailable fraction and the total metal concentration in soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:558–565. © 2022 SETAC
doi_str_mv 10.1002/etc.5554
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2779316344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2779316344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-f17266d5d3fa77d41eedc06cbbb2da58ec2087f8b0eb65bf3f1a3b7a4c3893133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9PwyAYBnBiNG5OEz-BIfHipRNK6Z_jXJyazGgyPTfQvjiWtlRg6r69bFNvnkhefjwveRA6p2RMCYmvwVdjznlygIaU8zjKU5ofoiHJGImyOM0H6MS5FSE0LYriGA1YyvOYcjpEftLhiXPgXAudx0ZhvwQ8A-G01I32m-3oebnxBr68FZXXpsPK2B1beKv7XndvW3SjjfgQuhGyAfwIXjQOK2taPDWdF63uhIcaL4xu3Ck6UuEazn7OEXqd3b5M76P5093DdDKPKpazJFI0_D2tec2UyLI6oQB1RdJKShnXgudQxSTPVC4JyJRLxRQVTGYiCc8LRhkboct9bm_N-xqcL1dmbbuwsoyzLJCUJUlQV3tVWeOcBVX2VrfCbkpKym29Zai33NYb6MVP4Fq2UP_B3z4DiPbgUzew-TeoDGYX-A2jEYVi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779316344</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Assessment of the Feasibility of Phytoextraction for the Stripping of Bioavailable Metals from Contaminated Soils</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Santa‐Cruz, Javier ; Robinson, Brett ; Krutyakov, Yurii A. ; Shapoval, Olga A. ; Peñaloza, Patricia ; Yáñez, Carolina ; Neaman, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Santa‐Cruz, Javier ; Robinson, Brett ; Krutyakov, Yurii A. ; Shapoval, Olga A. ; Peñaloza, Patricia ; Yáñez, Carolina ; Neaman, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Phytoextraction has been proposed in many papers as a low‐cost method for remediating contaminated soil. However, if national regulation is based on total metal(loid) concentrations in soil, phytoextraction is generally infeasible because of the long time required for remediation. Assessing phytoextraction requires determination of the dynamic rate of metal removal from soil. Phytoextraction may be feasible if the main goal is to reduce the soluble fraction of the metal(loid) with the goal of reducing bioavailability. However, it has been reported that there is a large mass balance mismatch between the reduction of the soluble metal fraction in contaminated soil and metal uptake by plants. Several studies report that the decrease of soluble fraction of metals in soil is higher than can be accounted for by plant uptake. In other words, studies generally overestimate the feasibility of bioavailable contaminant stripping. Therefore, a more rigorous approach is advisable to ensure that papers on bioavailable contaminant stripping include relevant information on mass balances. Furthermore, to implement the concept of bioavailable contaminant stripping, regulations must distinguish between the bioavailable fraction and the total metal concentration in soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:558–565. © 2022 SETAC</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/etc.5554</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36582151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bioavailability ; bioavailable contaminant stripping ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Contaminants ; Feasibility Studies ; Mass balance ; metal ; Metal concentrations ; metalloid ; Metals ; Metals - analysis ; Metals, Heavy ; Microbalances ; Phytoextraction ; phytoremediation ; Plants ; Reduction (metal working) ; remediation ; Soil ; Soil contamination ; Soil dynamics ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; Soil pollution ; Soil remediation ; Soils</subject><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2023-03, Vol.42 (3), p.558-565</ispartof><rights>2022 SETAC</rights><rights>2022 SETAC.</rights><rights>2023 SETAC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-f17266d5d3fa77d41eedc06cbbb2da58ec2087f8b0eb65bf3f1a3b7a4c3893133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-f17266d5d3fa77d41eedc06cbbb2da58ec2087f8b0eb65bf3f1a3b7a4c3893133</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1819-0872</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fetc.5554$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fetc.5554$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santa‐Cruz, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krutyakov, Yurii A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapoval, Olga A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peñaloza, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yáñez, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neaman, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>An Assessment of the Feasibility of Phytoextraction for the Stripping of Bioavailable Metals from Contaminated Soils</title><title>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</title><addtitle>Environ Toxicol Chem</addtitle><description>Phytoextraction has been proposed in many papers as a low‐cost method for remediating contaminated soil. However, if national regulation is based on total metal(loid) concentrations in soil, phytoextraction is generally infeasible because of the long time required for remediation. Assessing phytoextraction requires determination of the dynamic rate of metal removal from soil. Phytoextraction may be feasible if the main goal is to reduce the soluble fraction of the metal(loid) with the goal of reducing bioavailability. However, it has been reported that there is a large mass balance mismatch between the reduction of the soluble metal fraction in contaminated soil and metal uptake by plants. Several studies report that the decrease of soluble fraction of metals in soil is higher than can be accounted for by plant uptake. In other words, studies generally overestimate the feasibility of bioavailable contaminant stripping. Therefore, a more rigorous approach is advisable to ensure that papers on bioavailable contaminant stripping include relevant information on mass balances. Furthermore, to implement the concept of bioavailable contaminant stripping, regulations must distinguish between the bioavailable fraction and the total metal concentration in soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:558–565. © 2022 SETAC</description><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>bioavailable contaminant stripping</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Mass balance</subject><subject>metal</subject><subject>Metal concentrations</subject><subject>metalloid</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Metals - analysis</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy</subject><subject>Microbalances</subject><subject>Phytoextraction</subject><subject>phytoremediation</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Reduction (metal working)</subject><subject>remediation</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil dynamics</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Soil remediation</subject><subject>Soils</subject><issn>0730-7268</issn><issn>1552-8618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E9PwyAYBnBiNG5OEz-BIfHipRNK6Z_jXJyazGgyPTfQvjiWtlRg6r69bFNvnkhefjwveRA6p2RMCYmvwVdjznlygIaU8zjKU5ofoiHJGImyOM0H6MS5FSE0LYriGA1YyvOYcjpEftLhiXPgXAudx0ZhvwQ8A-G01I32m-3oebnxBr68FZXXpsPK2B1beKv7XndvW3SjjfgQuhGyAfwIXjQOK2taPDWdF63uhIcaL4xu3Ck6UuEazn7OEXqd3b5M76P5093DdDKPKpazJFI0_D2tec2UyLI6oQB1RdJKShnXgudQxSTPVC4JyJRLxRQVTGYiCc8LRhkboct9bm_N-xqcL1dmbbuwsoyzLJCUJUlQV3tVWeOcBVX2VrfCbkpKym29Zai33NYb6MVP4Fq2UP_B3z4DiPbgUzew-TeoDGYX-A2jEYVi</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Santa‐Cruz, Javier</creator><creator>Robinson, Brett</creator><creator>Krutyakov, Yurii A.</creator><creator>Shapoval, Olga A.</creator><creator>Peñaloza, Patricia</creator><creator>Yáñez, Carolina</creator><creator>Neaman, Alexander</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1819-0872</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>An Assessment of the Feasibility of Phytoextraction for the Stripping of Bioavailable Metals from Contaminated Soils</title><author>Santa‐Cruz, Javier ; Robinson, Brett ; Krutyakov, Yurii A. ; Shapoval, Olga A. ; Peñaloza, Patricia ; Yáñez, Carolina ; Neaman, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-f17266d5d3fa77d41eedc06cbbb2da58ec2087f8b0eb65bf3f1a3b7a4c3893133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>bioavailable contaminant stripping</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Mass balance</topic><topic>metal</topic><topic>Metal concentrations</topic><topic>metalloid</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Metals - analysis</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy</topic><topic>Microbalances</topic><topic>Phytoextraction</topic><topic>phytoremediation</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Reduction (metal working)</topic><topic>remediation</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil dynamics</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Soil remediation</topic><topic>Soils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santa‐Cruz, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krutyakov, Yurii A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapoval, Olga A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peñaloza, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yáñez, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neaman, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santa‐Cruz, Javier</au><au>Robinson, Brett</au><au>Krutyakov, Yurii A.</au><au>Shapoval, Olga A.</au><au>Peñaloza, Patricia</au><au>Yáñez, Carolina</au><au>Neaman, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Assessment of the Feasibility of Phytoextraction for the Stripping of Bioavailable Metals from Contaminated Soils</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Toxicol Chem</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>558</spage><epage>565</epage><pages>558-565</pages><issn>0730-7268</issn><eissn>1552-8618</eissn><abstract>Phytoextraction has been proposed in many papers as a low‐cost method for remediating contaminated soil. However, if national regulation is based on total metal(loid) concentrations in soil, phytoextraction is generally infeasible because of the long time required for remediation. Assessing phytoextraction requires determination of the dynamic rate of metal removal from soil. Phytoextraction may be feasible if the main goal is to reduce the soluble fraction of the metal(loid) with the goal of reducing bioavailability. However, it has been reported that there is a large mass balance mismatch between the reduction of the soluble metal fraction in contaminated soil and metal uptake by plants. Several studies report that the decrease of soluble fraction of metals in soil is higher than can be accounted for by plant uptake. In other words, studies generally overestimate the feasibility of bioavailable contaminant stripping. Therefore, a more rigorous approach is advisable to ensure that papers on bioavailable contaminant stripping include relevant information on mass balances. Furthermore, to implement the concept of bioavailable contaminant stripping, regulations must distinguish between the bioavailable fraction and the total metal concentration in soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:558–565. © 2022 SETAC</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36582151</pmid><doi>10.1002/etc.5554</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1819-0872</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-7268
ispartof Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2023-03, Vol.42 (3), p.558-565
issn 0730-7268
1552-8618
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2779316344
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Bioavailability
bioavailable contaminant stripping
Biodegradation, Environmental
Contaminants
Feasibility Studies
Mass balance
metal
Metal concentrations
metalloid
Metals
Metals - analysis
Metals, Heavy
Microbalances
Phytoextraction
phytoremediation
Plants
Reduction (metal working)
remediation
Soil
Soil contamination
Soil dynamics
Soil Pollutants - analysis
Soil pollution
Soil remediation
Soils
title An Assessment of the Feasibility of Phytoextraction for the Stripping of Bioavailable Metals from Contaminated Soils
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T11%3A11%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Assessment%20of%20the%20Feasibility%20of%20Phytoextraction%20for%20the%20Stripping%20of%20Bioavailable%20Metals%20from%20Contaminated%20Soils&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=Santa%E2%80%90Cruz,%20Javier&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=558&rft.epage=565&rft.pages=558-565&rft.issn=0730-7268&rft.eissn=1552-8618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/etc.5554&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2779316344%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779316344&rft_id=info:pmid/36582151&rfr_iscdi=true