Testing whether reducing brown trout biomass in peatland lakes increases macro-invertebrate biomass and invertivorous waterbird occurrence
Waterbirds and fish sometimes compete for macro-invertebrate prey. In Scotland, the invertivorous waterbird, the common scoter Melanitta nigra , breeds at oligotrophic lakes with few brown trout Salmo trutta. This study tested whether reducing trout biomass favours this and other invertivorous water...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aquatic ecology 2023-03, Vol.57 (1), p.217-240 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 240 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 217 |
container_title | Aquatic ecology |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Hancock, Mark H. Klein, Daniela Hughes, Robert Stagg, Paul Byrne, Paul Smith, Trevor D. MacLennan, Alison Gaffney, Paul P. J. Bean, Colin W. |
description | Waterbirds and fish sometimes compete for macro-invertebrate prey. In Scotland, the invertivorous waterbird, the common scoter
Melanitta nigra
, breeds at oligotrophic lakes with few brown trout
Salmo trutta.
This study tested whether reducing trout biomass favours this and other invertivorous waterbirds. The study took place in Scotland’s Flow Country, where brown trout occur widely, attracting recreational anglers, though angling has declined. At four small lakes, over 7 years, trout were reduced using 25 m
2
exclosures, and re-introducing traditional angling (including fish removal). Trout, macro-invertebrates and waterbirds were monitored. After angling re-introduction, trout biomass density declined by 56% (95% CLs 13–78%), but there was little lake-level change in combined macro-invertebrate biomass. However, within exclosures, macro-invertebrate biomass increased 4.7-fold (CLs 1.6–14). Analysing invertebrates in eight different groups showed lake-level increases, following angling re-introduction, for two groups (freshwater shrimps
Gammarus
; water-surface invertebrates).
Gammarus
showed the strongest response, increasing sixfold (CLs 2.2–11.6). A combined analysis was performed for the commonest invertivorous waterbirds: common scoter, mallard
Anas platyrhynchos
, teal
A. crecca
, greenshank
Tringa nebularia
and dunlin
Calidris alpina
. After angling effort increased, occurrence of these species changed little initially, but rose later: 4 years after angling began, odds of occurrence had increased 4.9-fold (CLs 2.2–11). This study supports reducing trout biomass in peatland lakes by encouraging traditional angling, to increase some macro-invertebrate groups and usage by invertivorous waterbirds. Further work should test this across more lakes alongside work investigating the origins (native or stocked) of brown trout populations in the Flow Country. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10452-022-10000-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2779277482</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A738440859</galeid><sourcerecordid>A738440859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-81b5930e5229d0a32656f4d38d81891b30ee4b12c052a3e2f6854c293c410f883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU2PFCEQJUYT19E_4InEMysfzTR93Gz8Sjbxsp4JTVfPss7AWNA7mb_gr7bGNnozhFC8eq-q4DH2VslrJWX_virZWS2k1oLuUorzM3albG-EVdo-p9i4rdDWuZfsVa2PRBlkr6_Yz3uoLeUdPz1AewDkCNMSL8CI5ZR5w7I0PqZyCLXylPkRQtuHPPF9-A4XJCKEStEhRCwi5SfABiOGBn9lF_qaSE-FClZ-ojSOCSdeYlwQIUd4zV7MYV_hzZ9zw759_HB_-1ncff305fbmTkRjXRNOjXYwEqzWwySD0Vu7nbvJuMkpN6iRUtCNSkdpdTCg562zXdSDiZ2Ss3Nmw96tdY9Yfiz0fP9YFszU0uu-H2h3ThPremXtwh58ynNpGCKtCQ4plgxzIvymN67rpKOJNkyvAvqGWhFmf8R0CHj2SvqLSX41yZNJ_rdJ_kwis4oqkfMO8N8s_1H9AjJ8l8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779277482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing whether reducing brown trout biomass in peatland lakes increases macro-invertebrate biomass and invertivorous waterbird occurrence</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hancock, Mark H. ; Klein, Daniela ; Hughes, Robert ; Stagg, Paul ; Byrne, Paul ; Smith, Trevor D. ; MacLennan, Alison ; Gaffney, Paul P. J. ; Bean, Colin W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Mark H. ; Klein, Daniela ; Hughes, Robert ; Stagg, Paul ; Byrne, Paul ; Smith, Trevor D. ; MacLennan, Alison ; Gaffney, Paul P. J. ; Bean, Colin W.</creatorcontrib><description>Waterbirds and fish sometimes compete for macro-invertebrate prey. In Scotland, the invertivorous waterbird, the common scoter
Melanitta nigra
, breeds at oligotrophic lakes with few brown trout
Salmo trutta.
This study tested whether reducing trout biomass favours this and other invertivorous waterbirds. The study took place in Scotland’s Flow Country, where brown trout occur widely, attracting recreational anglers, though angling has declined. At four small lakes, over 7 years, trout were reduced using 25 m
2
exclosures, and re-introducing traditional angling (including fish removal). Trout, macro-invertebrates and waterbirds were monitored. After angling re-introduction, trout biomass density declined by 56% (95% CLs 13–78%), but there was little lake-level change in combined macro-invertebrate biomass. However, within exclosures, macro-invertebrate biomass increased 4.7-fold (CLs 1.6–14). Analysing invertebrates in eight different groups showed lake-level increases, following angling re-introduction, for two groups (freshwater shrimps
Gammarus
; water-surface invertebrates).
Gammarus
showed the strongest response, increasing sixfold (CLs 2.2–11.6). A combined analysis was performed for the commonest invertivorous waterbirds: common scoter, mallard
Anas platyrhynchos
, teal
A. crecca
, greenshank
Tringa nebularia
and dunlin
Calidris alpina
. After angling effort increased, occurrence of these species changed little initially, but rose later: 4 years after angling began, odds of occurrence had increased 4.9-fold (CLs 2.2–11). This study supports reducing trout biomass in peatland lakes by encouraging traditional angling, to increase some macro-invertebrate groups and usage by invertivorous waterbirds. Further work should test this across more lakes alongside work investigating the origins (native or stocked) of brown trout populations in the Flow Country.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-2588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10452-022-10000-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Angling ; Aquatic birds ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ducks ; Ecosystems ; Fish ; Fish populations ; Fishing ; Fresh water ; Freshwater ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Freshwater crustaceans ; Freshwater fishes ; Gammarus ; Inland water environment ; Invertebrates ; Lakes ; Life Sciences ; Macroinvertebrates ; Oligotrophic lakes ; Peatlands ; Prey ; Recreation ; Salmo trutta ; Shrimps ; Sport fishing ; Trout ; Waterfowl ; Zoobenthos</subject><ispartof>Aquatic ecology, 2023-03, Vol.57 (1), p.217-240</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-81b5930e5229d0a32656f4d38d81891b30ee4b12c052a3e2f6854c293c410f883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-81b5930e5229d0a32656f4d38d81891b30ee4b12c052a3e2f6854c293c410f883</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6437-7278 ; 0000-0003-2764-0721 ; 0000-0003-3502-0995</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10452-022-10000-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10452-022-10000-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Mark H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stagg, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Trevor D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLennan, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaffney, Paul P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bean, Colin W.</creatorcontrib><title>Testing whether reducing brown trout biomass in peatland lakes increases macro-invertebrate biomass and invertivorous waterbird occurrence</title><title>Aquatic ecology</title><addtitle>Aquat Ecol</addtitle><description>Waterbirds and fish sometimes compete for macro-invertebrate prey. In Scotland, the invertivorous waterbird, the common scoter
Melanitta nigra
, breeds at oligotrophic lakes with few brown trout
Salmo trutta.
This study tested whether reducing trout biomass favours this and other invertivorous waterbirds. The study took place in Scotland’s Flow Country, where brown trout occur widely, attracting recreational anglers, though angling has declined. At four small lakes, over 7 years, trout were reduced using 25 m
2
exclosures, and re-introducing traditional angling (including fish removal). Trout, macro-invertebrates and waterbirds were monitored. After angling re-introduction, trout biomass density declined by 56% (95% CLs 13–78%), but there was little lake-level change in combined macro-invertebrate biomass. However, within exclosures, macro-invertebrate biomass increased 4.7-fold (CLs 1.6–14). Analysing invertebrates in eight different groups showed lake-level increases, following angling re-introduction, for two groups (freshwater shrimps
Gammarus
; water-surface invertebrates).
Gammarus
showed the strongest response, increasing sixfold (CLs 2.2–11.6). A combined analysis was performed for the commonest invertivorous waterbirds: common scoter, mallard
Anas platyrhynchos
, teal
A. crecca
, greenshank
Tringa nebularia
and dunlin
Calidris alpina
. After angling effort increased, occurrence of these species changed little initially, but rose later: 4 years after angling began, odds of occurrence had increased 4.9-fold (CLs 2.2–11). This study supports reducing trout biomass in peatland lakes by encouraging traditional angling, to increase some macro-invertebrate groups and usage by invertivorous waterbirds. Further work should test this across more lakes alongside work investigating the origins (native or stocked) of brown trout populations in the Flow Country.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Angling</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ducks</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish populations</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater crustaceans</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Gammarus</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Oligotrophic lakes</subject><subject>Peatlands</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Salmo trutta</subject><subject>Shrimps</subject><subject>Sport fishing</subject><subject>Trout</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Zoobenthos</subject><issn>1386-2588</issn><issn>1573-5125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU2PFCEQJUYT19E_4InEMysfzTR93Gz8Sjbxsp4JTVfPss7AWNA7mb_gr7bGNnozhFC8eq-q4DH2VslrJWX_virZWS2k1oLuUorzM3albG-EVdo-p9i4rdDWuZfsVa2PRBlkr6_Yz3uoLeUdPz1AewDkCNMSL8CI5ZR5w7I0PqZyCLXylPkRQtuHPPF9-A4XJCKEStEhRCwi5SfABiOGBn9lF_qaSE-FClZ-ojSOCSdeYlwQIUd4zV7MYV_hzZ9zw759_HB_-1ncff305fbmTkRjXRNOjXYwEqzWwySD0Vu7nbvJuMkpN6iRUtCNSkdpdTCg562zXdSDiZ2Ss3Nmw96tdY9Yfiz0fP9YFszU0uu-H2h3ThPremXtwh58ynNpGCKtCQ4plgxzIvymN67rpKOJNkyvAvqGWhFmf8R0CHj2SvqLSX41yZNJ_rdJ_kwis4oqkfMO8N8s_1H9AjJ8l8g</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Hancock, Mark H.</creator><creator>Klein, Daniela</creator><creator>Hughes, Robert</creator><creator>Stagg, Paul</creator><creator>Byrne, Paul</creator><creator>Smith, Trevor D.</creator><creator>MacLennan, Alison</creator><creator>Gaffney, Paul P. J.</creator><creator>Bean, Colin W.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6437-7278</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2764-0721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3502-0995</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Testing whether reducing brown trout biomass in peatland lakes increases macro-invertebrate biomass and invertivorous waterbird occurrence</title><author>Hancock, Mark H. ; Klein, Daniela ; Hughes, Robert ; Stagg, Paul ; Byrne, Paul ; Smith, Trevor D. ; MacLennan, Alison ; Gaffney, Paul P. J. ; Bean, Colin W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-81b5930e5229d0a32656f4d38d81891b30ee4b12c052a3e2f6854c293c410f883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Angling</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ducks</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish populations</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater crustaceans</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Gammarus</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Oligotrophic lakes</topic><topic>Peatlands</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Salmo trutta</topic><topic>Shrimps</topic><topic>Sport fishing</topic><topic>Trout</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Zoobenthos</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Mark H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stagg, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Trevor D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLennan, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaffney, Paul P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bean, Colin W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Aquatic ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hancock, Mark H.</au><au>Klein, Daniela</au><au>Hughes, Robert</au><au>Stagg, Paul</au><au>Byrne, Paul</au><au>Smith, Trevor D.</au><au>MacLennan, Alison</au><au>Gaffney, Paul P. J.</au><au>Bean, Colin W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing whether reducing brown trout biomass in peatland lakes increases macro-invertebrate biomass and invertivorous waterbird occurrence</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic ecology</jtitle><stitle>Aquat Ecol</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>217-240</pages><issn>1386-2588</issn><eissn>1573-5125</eissn><abstract>Waterbirds and fish sometimes compete for macro-invertebrate prey. In Scotland, the invertivorous waterbird, the common scoter
Melanitta nigra
, breeds at oligotrophic lakes with few brown trout
Salmo trutta.
This study tested whether reducing trout biomass favours this and other invertivorous waterbirds. The study took place in Scotland’s Flow Country, where brown trout occur widely, attracting recreational anglers, though angling has declined. At four small lakes, over 7 years, trout were reduced using 25 m
2
exclosures, and re-introducing traditional angling (including fish removal). Trout, macro-invertebrates and waterbirds were monitored. After angling re-introduction, trout biomass density declined by 56% (95% CLs 13–78%), but there was little lake-level change in combined macro-invertebrate biomass. However, within exclosures, macro-invertebrate biomass increased 4.7-fold (CLs 1.6–14). Analysing invertebrates in eight different groups showed lake-level increases, following angling re-introduction, for two groups (freshwater shrimps
Gammarus
; water-surface invertebrates).
Gammarus
showed the strongest response, increasing sixfold (CLs 2.2–11.6). A combined analysis was performed for the commonest invertivorous waterbirds: common scoter, mallard
Anas platyrhynchos
, teal
A. crecca
, greenshank
Tringa nebularia
and dunlin
Calidris alpina
. After angling effort increased, occurrence of these species changed little initially, but rose later: 4 years after angling began, odds of occurrence had increased 4.9-fold (CLs 2.2–11). This study supports reducing trout biomass in peatland lakes by encouraging traditional angling, to increase some macro-invertebrate groups and usage by invertivorous waterbirds. Further work should test this across more lakes alongside work investigating the origins (native or stocked) of brown trout populations in the Flow Country.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10452-022-10000-y</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6437-7278</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2764-0721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3502-0995</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1386-2588 |
ispartof | Aquatic ecology, 2023-03, Vol.57 (1), p.217-240 |
issn | 1386-2588 1573-5125 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2779277482 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Analysis Angling Aquatic birds Biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Ducks Ecosystems Fish Fish populations Fishing Fresh water Freshwater Freshwater & Marine Ecology Freshwater crustaceans Freshwater fishes Gammarus Inland water environment Invertebrates Lakes Life Sciences Macroinvertebrates Oligotrophic lakes Peatlands Prey Recreation Salmo trutta Shrimps Sport fishing Trout Waterfowl Zoobenthos |
title | Testing whether reducing brown trout biomass in peatland lakes increases macro-invertebrate biomass and invertivorous waterbird occurrence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A27%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20whether%20reducing%20brown%20trout%20biomass%20in%20peatland%20lakes%20increases%20macro-invertebrate%20biomass%20and%20invertivorous%20waterbird%20occurrence&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20ecology&rft.au=Hancock,%20Mark%20H.&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=217-240&rft.issn=1386-2588&rft.eissn=1573-5125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10452-022-10000-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA738440859%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779277482&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A738440859&rfr_iscdi=true |