Moving Aircraft River Velocimetry (MARV): Framework and Proof‐of‐Concept on the Tanana River

Information on velocity fields in rivers is critical for designing infrastructure, modeling contaminant transport, and assessing habitat. Although non‐contact approaches to measuring flow velocity are well established, these methods assume a stationary imaging platform. This study eliminates this co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2023-02, Vol.59 (2), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Legleiter, Carl J., Kinzel, Paul J., Laker, Mark, Conaway, Jeffrey S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 59
creator Legleiter, Carl J.
Kinzel, Paul J.
Laker, Mark
Conaway, Jeffrey S.
description Information on velocity fields in rivers is critical for designing infrastructure, modeling contaminant transport, and assessing habitat. Although non‐contact approaches to measuring flow velocity are well established, these methods assume a stationary imaging platform. This study eliminates this constraint by introducing a framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). The workflow takes as input images acquired from an airplane and involves orthorectification, frame overlap analysis, image enhancement, particle image velocimetry (PIV), and aggregation of the resulting velocity vectors onto a prediction grid. We also use new metrics to quantify the agreement between image‐derived and field‐measured velocity vectors in terms of both orientation and magnitude. The potential of MARV was evaluated using data from two Alaskan rivers: a large, highly turbid channel and its smaller, clearer tributary. Sediment boil vortices on the mainstem provided natural features trackable via PIV and estimated velocities corresponded closely with field measurements (R2 up to 0.911). We compared an exhaustive approach that evaluates overlap for all frame combinations to a simpler rolling window implementation and found that the more efficient algorithm did not compromise accuracy. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the method was robust to window parameterization. Comparing PIV output from different flying heights and imaging systems indicated that larger pixels led to higher accuracy and that a more advanced dual‐camera system provided superior performance. Results from the tributary were less encouraging, presumably due to a lack of trackable features in visible images. Testing across a range of rivers is needed to assess the generality of MARV. Plain Language Summary Characterizing flow velocity in rivers is important for evaluating aquatic habitat and understanding contaminant transport. Measuring velocity in the field is laborious and risky, but remote sensing methods are a viable alternative. These techniques typically assume a fixed imaging platform, such as a helicopter hovering in a fixed location. This acquisition mode is well‐suited to small‐scale studies but less appropriate for longer river segments. To overcome this constraint, we introduce a new framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). Images are acquired from an airplane and the overlap between frames identified. The core of the workflow is a particle image velocimetry (PIV) algorithm t
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2022WR033822
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2779155252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2779155252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2370-a7b47d764cb56ac75ef314ec9b0409992deb36643b7d69f2b93906684bb37a623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KAzEYxIMoWKs3HyDgRcHV_Nuk8VYWq0KLstT2GJNsVre2m5rdtvTmI_iMPomr68GTfDDf5cfMMAAcY3SBEZGXBBEyTRGlPUJ2QAdLxiIhBd0FHYQYjTCVYh8cVNUMIcxiLjrgaeTXRfkM-0WwQec1TIu1C3Di5t4WC1eHLTwd9dPJ2RUcBL1wGx9eoS4z-BC8zz_fP34k8aV1yxr6EtYvDo512VxrdQj2cj2v3NHv74LHwfU4uY2G9zd3SX8YWUIFirQwTGSCM2tirq2IXU4xc1YaxJCUkmTOUM4ZNSLjMidGUok47zFjqNCc0C44aX2Xwb-tXFWrmV-FsolURAiJ45jE39R5S9ngqyq4XC1DsdBhqzBS3xuqvxs2OG3xTTF3239ZNU2TlDQFEf0CArtzEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779155252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moving Aircraft River Velocimetry (MARV): Framework and Proof‐of‐Concept on the Tanana River</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Legleiter, Carl J. ; Kinzel, Paul J. ; Laker, Mark ; Conaway, Jeffrey S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Legleiter, Carl J. ; Kinzel, Paul J. ; Laker, Mark ; Conaway, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><description>Information on velocity fields in rivers is critical for designing infrastructure, modeling contaminant transport, and assessing habitat. Although non‐contact approaches to measuring flow velocity are well established, these methods assume a stationary imaging platform. This study eliminates this constraint by introducing a framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). The workflow takes as input images acquired from an airplane and involves orthorectification, frame overlap analysis, image enhancement, particle image velocimetry (PIV), and aggregation of the resulting velocity vectors onto a prediction grid. We also use new metrics to quantify the agreement between image‐derived and field‐measured velocity vectors in terms of both orientation and magnitude. The potential of MARV was evaluated using data from two Alaskan rivers: a large, highly turbid channel and its smaller, clearer tributary. Sediment boil vortices on the mainstem provided natural features trackable via PIV and estimated velocities corresponded closely with field measurements (R2 up to 0.911). We compared an exhaustive approach that evaluates overlap for all frame combinations to a simpler rolling window implementation and found that the more efficient algorithm did not compromise accuracy. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the method was robust to window parameterization. Comparing PIV output from different flying heights and imaging systems indicated that larger pixels led to higher accuracy and that a more advanced dual‐camera system provided superior performance. Results from the tributary were less encouraging, presumably due to a lack of trackable features in visible images. Testing across a range of rivers is needed to assess the generality of MARV. Plain Language Summary Characterizing flow velocity in rivers is important for evaluating aquatic habitat and understanding contaminant transport. Measuring velocity in the field is laborious and risky, but remote sensing methods are a viable alternative. These techniques typically assume a fixed imaging platform, such as a helicopter hovering in a fixed location. This acquisition mode is well‐suited to small‐scale studies but less appropriate for longer river segments. To overcome this constraint, we introduce a new framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). Images are acquired from an airplane and the overlap between frames identified. The core of the workflow is a particle image velocimetry (PIV) algorithm that detects features on the water surface and tracks their movement. Performing PIV for many frame ranges leads to a high density of velocity vectors that are aggregated onto a prediction grid. An initial study on two Alaskan rivers indicated that this approach could provide velocity estimates that agree closely with field measurements. Results were less encouraging for the clearer stream, however, suggesting that trackable features might not be present in some cases. Testing MARV across a range of environments would yield insight as to its general applicability. Key Points Flow velocities estimated from images acquired by a small, fixed wing aircraft flying along a river agreed strongly with field measurements Developed workflow for orthorectifying images, analyzing frame overlap, performing particle image velocimetry, and aggregating vectors onto a prediction grid Acquiring images from a moving platform could make data collection more efficient and enable velocity mapping over longer river segments</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022WR033822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aerodynamics ; Aggregation ; Aircraft ; airplane ; Alaska ; Algorithms ; Aquatic habitats ; Contaminants ; Flow velocity ; Fluid flow ; Frameworks ; Habitats ; Helicopters ; Hovering ; Image acquisition ; Image enhancement ; Image processing ; Imaging techniques ; Methods ; Parameterization ; Particle image velocimetry ; particle image velocimetry (PIV) ; Pollution transport ; Remote sensing ; river ; River channels ; Rivers ; Sensitivity analysis ; Testing ; Transport ; Tributaries ; Vectors ; Velocity ; Velocity distribution ; Velocity estimation ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2023-02, Vol.59 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Published 2023. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>Published 2023. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2370-a7b47d764cb56ac75ef314ec9b0409992deb36643b7d69f2b93906684bb37a623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2370-a7b47d764cb56ac75ef314ec9b0409992deb36643b7d69f2b93906684bb37a623</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0280-5083 ; 0000-0003-0940-8013</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2022WR033822$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2022WR033822$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46468,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Legleiter, Carl J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinzel, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laker, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conaway, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><title>Moving Aircraft River Velocimetry (MARV): Framework and Proof‐of‐Concept on the Tanana River</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Information on velocity fields in rivers is critical for designing infrastructure, modeling contaminant transport, and assessing habitat. Although non‐contact approaches to measuring flow velocity are well established, these methods assume a stationary imaging platform. This study eliminates this constraint by introducing a framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). The workflow takes as input images acquired from an airplane and involves orthorectification, frame overlap analysis, image enhancement, particle image velocimetry (PIV), and aggregation of the resulting velocity vectors onto a prediction grid. We also use new metrics to quantify the agreement between image‐derived and field‐measured velocity vectors in terms of both orientation and magnitude. The potential of MARV was evaluated using data from two Alaskan rivers: a large, highly turbid channel and its smaller, clearer tributary. Sediment boil vortices on the mainstem provided natural features trackable via PIV and estimated velocities corresponded closely with field measurements (R2 up to 0.911). We compared an exhaustive approach that evaluates overlap for all frame combinations to a simpler rolling window implementation and found that the more efficient algorithm did not compromise accuracy. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the method was robust to window parameterization. Comparing PIV output from different flying heights and imaging systems indicated that larger pixels led to higher accuracy and that a more advanced dual‐camera system provided superior performance. Results from the tributary were less encouraging, presumably due to a lack of trackable features in visible images. Testing across a range of rivers is needed to assess the generality of MARV. Plain Language Summary Characterizing flow velocity in rivers is important for evaluating aquatic habitat and understanding contaminant transport. Measuring velocity in the field is laborious and risky, but remote sensing methods are a viable alternative. These techniques typically assume a fixed imaging platform, such as a helicopter hovering in a fixed location. This acquisition mode is well‐suited to small‐scale studies but less appropriate for longer river segments. To overcome this constraint, we introduce a new framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). Images are acquired from an airplane and the overlap between frames identified. The core of the workflow is a particle image velocimetry (PIV) algorithm that detects features on the water surface and tracks their movement. Performing PIV for many frame ranges leads to a high density of velocity vectors that are aggregated onto a prediction grid. An initial study on two Alaskan rivers indicated that this approach could provide velocity estimates that agree closely with field measurements. Results were less encouraging for the clearer stream, however, suggesting that trackable features might not be present in some cases. Testing MARV across a range of environments would yield insight as to its general applicability. Key Points Flow velocities estimated from images acquired by a small, fixed wing aircraft flying along a river agreed strongly with field measurements Developed workflow for orthorectifying images, analyzing frame overlap, performing particle image velocimetry, and aggregating vectors onto a prediction grid Acquiring images from a moving platform could make data collection more efficient and enable velocity mapping over longer river segments</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Aggregation</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>airplane</subject><subject>Alaska</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Helicopters</subject><subject>Hovering</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Image enhancement</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Particle image velocimetry</subject><subject>particle image velocimetry (PIV)</subject><subject>Pollution transport</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>river</subject><subject>River channels</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Tributaries</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Velocity distribution</subject><subject>Velocity estimation</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9KAzEYxIMoWKs3HyDgRcHV_Nuk8VYWq0KLstT2GJNsVre2m5rdtvTmI_iMPomr68GTfDDf5cfMMAAcY3SBEZGXBBEyTRGlPUJ2QAdLxiIhBd0FHYQYjTCVYh8cVNUMIcxiLjrgaeTXRfkM-0WwQec1TIu1C3Di5t4WC1eHLTwd9dPJ2RUcBL1wGx9eoS4z-BC8zz_fP34k8aV1yxr6EtYvDo512VxrdQj2cj2v3NHv74LHwfU4uY2G9zd3SX8YWUIFirQwTGSCM2tirq2IXU4xc1YaxJCUkmTOUM4ZNSLjMidGUok47zFjqNCc0C44aX2Xwb-tXFWrmV-FsolURAiJ45jE39R5S9ngqyq4XC1DsdBhqzBS3xuqvxs2OG3xTTF3239ZNU2TlDQFEf0CArtzEQ</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Legleiter, Carl J.</creator><creator>Kinzel, Paul J.</creator><creator>Laker, Mark</creator><creator>Conaway, Jeffrey S.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0280-5083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0940-8013</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Moving Aircraft River Velocimetry (MARV): Framework and Proof‐of‐Concept on the Tanana River</title><author>Legleiter, Carl J. ; Kinzel, Paul J. ; Laker, Mark ; Conaway, Jeffrey S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2370-a7b47d764cb56ac75ef314ec9b0409992deb36643b7d69f2b93906684bb37a623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Aggregation</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>airplane</topic><topic>Alaska</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Helicopters</topic><topic>Hovering</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Image enhancement</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Particle image velocimetry</topic><topic>particle image velocimetry (PIV)</topic><topic>Pollution transport</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>river</topic><topic>River channels</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Tributaries</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Velocity distribution</topic><topic>Velocity estimation</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Legleiter, Carl J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinzel, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laker, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conaway, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Legleiter, Carl J.</au><au>Kinzel, Paul J.</au><au>Laker, Mark</au><au>Conaway, Jeffrey S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moving Aircraft River Velocimetry (MARV): Framework and Proof‐of‐Concept on the Tanana River</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Information on velocity fields in rivers is critical for designing infrastructure, modeling contaminant transport, and assessing habitat. Although non‐contact approaches to measuring flow velocity are well established, these methods assume a stationary imaging platform. This study eliminates this constraint by introducing a framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). The workflow takes as input images acquired from an airplane and involves orthorectification, frame overlap analysis, image enhancement, particle image velocimetry (PIV), and aggregation of the resulting velocity vectors onto a prediction grid. We also use new metrics to quantify the agreement between image‐derived and field‐measured velocity vectors in terms of both orientation and magnitude. The potential of MARV was evaluated using data from two Alaskan rivers: a large, highly turbid channel and its smaller, clearer tributary. Sediment boil vortices on the mainstem provided natural features trackable via PIV and estimated velocities corresponded closely with field measurements (R2 up to 0.911). We compared an exhaustive approach that evaluates overlap for all frame combinations to a simpler rolling window implementation and found that the more efficient algorithm did not compromise accuracy. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the method was robust to window parameterization. Comparing PIV output from different flying heights and imaging systems indicated that larger pixels led to higher accuracy and that a more advanced dual‐camera system provided superior performance. Results from the tributary were less encouraging, presumably due to a lack of trackable features in visible images. Testing across a range of rivers is needed to assess the generality of MARV. Plain Language Summary Characterizing flow velocity in rivers is important for evaluating aquatic habitat and understanding contaminant transport. Measuring velocity in the field is laborious and risky, but remote sensing methods are a viable alternative. These techniques typically assume a fixed imaging platform, such as a helicopter hovering in a fixed location. This acquisition mode is well‐suited to small‐scale studies but less appropriate for longer river segments. To overcome this constraint, we introduce a new framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). Images are acquired from an airplane and the overlap between frames identified. The core of the workflow is a particle image velocimetry (PIV) algorithm that detects features on the water surface and tracks their movement. Performing PIV for many frame ranges leads to a high density of velocity vectors that are aggregated onto a prediction grid. An initial study on two Alaskan rivers indicated that this approach could provide velocity estimates that agree closely with field measurements. Results were less encouraging for the clearer stream, however, suggesting that trackable features might not be present in some cases. Testing MARV across a range of environments would yield insight as to its general applicability. Key Points Flow velocities estimated from images acquired by a small, fixed wing aircraft flying along a river agreed strongly with field measurements Developed workflow for orthorectifying images, analyzing frame overlap, performing particle image velocimetry, and aggregating vectors onto a prediction grid Acquiring images from a moving platform could make data collection more efficient and enable velocity mapping over longer river segments</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2022WR033822</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0280-5083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0940-8013</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2023-02, Vol.59 (2), p.n/a
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2779155252
source Wiley Journals; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library
subjects Accuracy
Aerodynamics
Aggregation
Aircraft
airplane
Alaska
Algorithms
Aquatic habitats
Contaminants
Flow velocity
Fluid flow
Frameworks
Habitats
Helicopters
Hovering
Image acquisition
Image enhancement
Image processing
Imaging techniques
Methods
Parameterization
Particle image velocimetry
particle image velocimetry (PIV)
Pollution transport
Remote sensing
river
River channels
Rivers
Sensitivity analysis
Testing
Transport
Tributaries
Vectors
Velocity
Velocity distribution
Velocity estimation
Workflow
title Moving Aircraft River Velocimetry (MARV): Framework and Proof‐of‐Concept on the Tanana River
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A33%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moving%20Aircraft%20River%20Velocimetry%20(MARV):%20Framework%20and%20Proof%E2%80%90of%E2%80%90Concept%20on%20the%20Tanana%20River&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Legleiter,%20Carl%20J.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022WR033822&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2779155252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779155252&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true