Moving Aircraft River Velocimetry (MARV): Framework and Proof‐of‐Concept on the Tanana River
Information on velocity fields in rivers is critical for designing infrastructure, modeling contaminant transport, and assessing habitat. Although non‐contact approaches to measuring flow velocity are well established, these methods assume a stationary imaging platform. This study eliminates this co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources research 2023-02, Vol.59 (2), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Water resources research |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Legleiter, Carl J. Kinzel, Paul J. Laker, Mark Conaway, Jeffrey S. |
description | Information on velocity fields in rivers is critical for designing infrastructure, modeling contaminant transport, and assessing habitat. Although non‐contact approaches to measuring flow velocity are well established, these methods assume a stationary imaging platform. This study eliminates this constraint by introducing a framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). The workflow takes as input images acquired from an airplane and involves orthorectification, frame overlap analysis, image enhancement, particle image velocimetry (PIV), and aggregation of the resulting velocity vectors onto a prediction grid. We also use new metrics to quantify the agreement between image‐derived and field‐measured velocity vectors in terms of both orientation and magnitude. The potential of MARV was evaluated using data from two Alaskan rivers: a large, highly turbid channel and its smaller, clearer tributary. Sediment boil vortices on the mainstem provided natural features trackable via PIV and estimated velocities corresponded closely with field measurements (R2 up to 0.911). We compared an exhaustive approach that evaluates overlap for all frame combinations to a simpler rolling window implementation and found that the more efficient algorithm did not compromise accuracy. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the method was robust to window parameterization. Comparing PIV output from different flying heights and imaging systems indicated that larger pixels led to higher accuracy and that a more advanced dual‐camera system provided superior performance. Results from the tributary were less encouraging, presumably due to a lack of trackable features in visible images. Testing across a range of rivers is needed to assess the generality of MARV.
Plain Language Summary
Characterizing flow velocity in rivers is important for evaluating aquatic habitat and understanding contaminant transport. Measuring velocity in the field is laborious and risky, but remote sensing methods are a viable alternative. These techniques typically assume a fixed imaging platform, such as a helicopter hovering in a fixed location. This acquisition mode is well‐suited to small‐scale studies but less appropriate for longer river segments. To overcome this constraint, we introduce a new framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). Images are acquired from an airplane and the overlap between frames identified. The core of the workflow is a particle image velocimetry (PIV) algorithm t |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2022WR033822 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2779155252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2779155252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2370-a7b47d764cb56ac75ef314ec9b0409992deb36643b7d69f2b93906684bb37a623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KAzEYxIMoWKs3HyDgRcHV_Nuk8VYWq0KLstT2GJNsVre2m5rdtvTmI_iMPomr68GTfDDf5cfMMAAcY3SBEZGXBBEyTRGlPUJ2QAdLxiIhBd0FHYQYjTCVYh8cVNUMIcxiLjrgaeTXRfkM-0WwQec1TIu1C3Di5t4WC1eHLTwd9dPJ2RUcBL1wGx9eoS4z-BC8zz_fP34k8aV1yxr6EtYvDo512VxrdQj2cj2v3NHv74LHwfU4uY2G9zd3SX8YWUIFirQwTGSCM2tirq2IXU4xc1YaxJCUkmTOUM4ZNSLjMidGUok47zFjqNCc0C44aX2Xwb-tXFWrmV-FsolURAiJ45jE39R5S9ngqyq4XC1DsdBhqzBS3xuqvxs2OG3xTTF3239ZNU2TlDQFEf0CArtzEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779155252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moving Aircraft River Velocimetry (MARV): Framework and Proof‐of‐Concept on the Tanana River</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Legleiter, Carl J. ; Kinzel, Paul J. ; Laker, Mark ; Conaway, Jeffrey S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Legleiter, Carl J. ; Kinzel, Paul J. ; Laker, Mark ; Conaway, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><description>Information on velocity fields in rivers is critical for designing infrastructure, modeling contaminant transport, and assessing habitat. Although non‐contact approaches to measuring flow velocity are well established, these methods assume a stationary imaging platform. This study eliminates this constraint by introducing a framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). The workflow takes as input images acquired from an airplane and involves orthorectification, frame overlap analysis, image enhancement, particle image velocimetry (PIV), and aggregation of the resulting velocity vectors onto a prediction grid. We also use new metrics to quantify the agreement between image‐derived and field‐measured velocity vectors in terms of both orientation and magnitude. The potential of MARV was evaluated using data from two Alaskan rivers: a large, highly turbid channel and its smaller, clearer tributary. Sediment boil vortices on the mainstem provided natural features trackable via PIV and estimated velocities corresponded closely with field measurements (R2 up to 0.911). We compared an exhaustive approach that evaluates overlap for all frame combinations to a simpler rolling window implementation and found that the more efficient algorithm did not compromise accuracy. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the method was robust to window parameterization. Comparing PIV output from different flying heights and imaging systems indicated that larger pixels led to higher accuracy and that a more advanced dual‐camera system provided superior performance. Results from the tributary were less encouraging, presumably due to a lack of trackable features in visible images. Testing across a range of rivers is needed to assess the generality of MARV.
Plain Language Summary
Characterizing flow velocity in rivers is important for evaluating aquatic habitat and understanding contaminant transport. Measuring velocity in the field is laborious and risky, but remote sensing methods are a viable alternative. These techniques typically assume a fixed imaging platform, such as a helicopter hovering in a fixed location. This acquisition mode is well‐suited to small‐scale studies but less appropriate for longer river segments. To overcome this constraint, we introduce a new framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). Images are acquired from an airplane and the overlap between frames identified. The core of the workflow is a particle image velocimetry (PIV) algorithm that detects features on the water surface and tracks their movement. Performing PIV for many frame ranges leads to a high density of velocity vectors that are aggregated onto a prediction grid. An initial study on two Alaskan rivers indicated that this approach could provide velocity estimates that agree closely with field measurements. Results were less encouraging for the clearer stream, however, suggesting that trackable features might not be present in some cases. Testing MARV across a range of environments would yield insight as to its general applicability.
Key Points
Flow velocities estimated from images acquired by a small, fixed wing aircraft flying along a river agreed strongly with field measurements
Developed workflow for orthorectifying images, analyzing frame overlap, performing particle image velocimetry, and aggregating vectors onto a prediction grid
Acquiring images from a moving platform could make data collection more efficient and enable velocity mapping over longer river segments</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022WR033822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aerodynamics ; Aggregation ; Aircraft ; airplane ; Alaska ; Algorithms ; Aquatic habitats ; Contaminants ; Flow velocity ; Fluid flow ; Frameworks ; Habitats ; Helicopters ; Hovering ; Image acquisition ; Image enhancement ; Image processing ; Imaging techniques ; Methods ; Parameterization ; Particle image velocimetry ; particle image velocimetry (PIV) ; Pollution transport ; Remote sensing ; river ; River channels ; Rivers ; Sensitivity analysis ; Testing ; Transport ; Tributaries ; Vectors ; Velocity ; Velocity distribution ; Velocity estimation ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2023-02, Vol.59 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Published 2023. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>Published 2023. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2370-a7b47d764cb56ac75ef314ec9b0409992deb36643b7d69f2b93906684bb37a623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2370-a7b47d764cb56ac75ef314ec9b0409992deb36643b7d69f2b93906684bb37a623</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0280-5083 ; 0000-0003-0940-8013</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2022WR033822$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2022WR033822$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46468,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Legleiter, Carl J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinzel, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laker, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conaway, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><title>Moving Aircraft River Velocimetry (MARV): Framework and Proof‐of‐Concept on the Tanana River</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Information on velocity fields in rivers is critical for designing infrastructure, modeling contaminant transport, and assessing habitat. Although non‐contact approaches to measuring flow velocity are well established, these methods assume a stationary imaging platform. This study eliminates this constraint by introducing a framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). The workflow takes as input images acquired from an airplane and involves orthorectification, frame overlap analysis, image enhancement, particle image velocimetry (PIV), and aggregation of the resulting velocity vectors onto a prediction grid. We also use new metrics to quantify the agreement between image‐derived and field‐measured velocity vectors in terms of both orientation and magnitude. The potential of MARV was evaluated using data from two Alaskan rivers: a large, highly turbid channel and its smaller, clearer tributary. Sediment boil vortices on the mainstem provided natural features trackable via PIV and estimated velocities corresponded closely with field measurements (R2 up to 0.911). We compared an exhaustive approach that evaluates overlap for all frame combinations to a simpler rolling window implementation and found that the more efficient algorithm did not compromise accuracy. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the method was robust to window parameterization. Comparing PIV output from different flying heights and imaging systems indicated that larger pixels led to higher accuracy and that a more advanced dual‐camera system provided superior performance. Results from the tributary were less encouraging, presumably due to a lack of trackable features in visible images. Testing across a range of rivers is needed to assess the generality of MARV.
Plain Language Summary
Characterizing flow velocity in rivers is important for evaluating aquatic habitat and understanding contaminant transport. Measuring velocity in the field is laborious and risky, but remote sensing methods are a viable alternative. These techniques typically assume a fixed imaging platform, such as a helicopter hovering in a fixed location. This acquisition mode is well‐suited to small‐scale studies but less appropriate for longer river segments. To overcome this constraint, we introduce a new framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). Images are acquired from an airplane and the overlap between frames identified. The core of the workflow is a particle image velocimetry (PIV) algorithm that detects features on the water surface and tracks their movement. Performing PIV for many frame ranges leads to a high density of velocity vectors that are aggregated onto a prediction grid. An initial study on two Alaskan rivers indicated that this approach could provide velocity estimates that agree closely with field measurements. Results were less encouraging for the clearer stream, however, suggesting that trackable features might not be present in some cases. Testing MARV across a range of environments would yield insight as to its general applicability.
Key Points
Flow velocities estimated from images acquired by a small, fixed wing aircraft flying along a river agreed strongly with field measurements
Developed workflow for orthorectifying images, analyzing frame overlap, performing particle image velocimetry, and aggregating vectors onto a prediction grid
Acquiring images from a moving platform could make data collection more efficient and enable velocity mapping over longer river segments</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Aggregation</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>airplane</subject><subject>Alaska</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Helicopters</subject><subject>Hovering</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Image enhancement</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Particle image velocimetry</subject><subject>particle image velocimetry (PIV)</subject><subject>Pollution transport</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>river</subject><subject>River channels</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Tributaries</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Velocity distribution</subject><subject>Velocity estimation</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9KAzEYxIMoWKs3HyDgRcHV_Nuk8VYWq0KLstT2GJNsVre2m5rdtvTmI_iMPomr68GTfDDf5cfMMAAcY3SBEZGXBBEyTRGlPUJ2QAdLxiIhBd0FHYQYjTCVYh8cVNUMIcxiLjrgaeTXRfkM-0WwQec1TIu1C3Di5t4WC1eHLTwd9dPJ2RUcBL1wGx9eoS4z-BC8zz_fP34k8aV1yxr6EtYvDo512VxrdQj2cj2v3NHv74LHwfU4uY2G9zd3SX8YWUIFirQwTGSCM2tirq2IXU4xc1YaxJCUkmTOUM4ZNSLjMidGUok47zFjqNCc0C44aX2Xwb-tXFWrmV-FsolURAiJ45jE39R5S9ngqyq4XC1DsdBhqzBS3xuqvxs2OG3xTTF3239ZNU2TlDQFEf0CArtzEQ</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Legleiter, Carl J.</creator><creator>Kinzel, Paul J.</creator><creator>Laker, Mark</creator><creator>Conaway, Jeffrey S.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0280-5083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0940-8013</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Moving Aircraft River Velocimetry (MARV): Framework and Proof‐of‐Concept on the Tanana River</title><author>Legleiter, Carl J. ; Kinzel, Paul J. ; Laker, Mark ; Conaway, Jeffrey S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2370-a7b47d764cb56ac75ef314ec9b0409992deb36643b7d69f2b93906684bb37a623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Aggregation</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>airplane</topic><topic>Alaska</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Helicopters</topic><topic>Hovering</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Image enhancement</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Particle image velocimetry</topic><topic>particle image velocimetry (PIV)</topic><topic>Pollution transport</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>river</topic><topic>River channels</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Tributaries</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Velocity distribution</topic><topic>Velocity estimation</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Legleiter, Carl J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinzel, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laker, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conaway, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Legleiter, Carl J.</au><au>Kinzel, Paul J.</au><au>Laker, Mark</au><au>Conaway, Jeffrey S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moving Aircraft River Velocimetry (MARV): Framework and Proof‐of‐Concept on the Tanana River</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Information on velocity fields in rivers is critical for designing infrastructure, modeling contaminant transport, and assessing habitat. Although non‐contact approaches to measuring flow velocity are well established, these methods assume a stationary imaging platform. This study eliminates this constraint by introducing a framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). The workflow takes as input images acquired from an airplane and involves orthorectification, frame overlap analysis, image enhancement, particle image velocimetry (PIV), and aggregation of the resulting velocity vectors onto a prediction grid. We also use new metrics to quantify the agreement between image‐derived and field‐measured velocity vectors in terms of both orientation and magnitude. The potential of MARV was evaluated using data from two Alaskan rivers: a large, highly turbid channel and its smaller, clearer tributary. Sediment boil vortices on the mainstem provided natural features trackable via PIV and estimated velocities corresponded closely with field measurements (R2 up to 0.911). We compared an exhaustive approach that evaluates overlap for all frame combinations to a simpler rolling window implementation and found that the more efficient algorithm did not compromise accuracy. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the method was robust to window parameterization. Comparing PIV output from different flying heights and imaging systems indicated that larger pixels led to higher accuracy and that a more advanced dual‐camera system provided superior performance. Results from the tributary were less encouraging, presumably due to a lack of trackable features in visible images. Testing across a range of rivers is needed to assess the generality of MARV.
Plain Language Summary
Characterizing flow velocity in rivers is important for evaluating aquatic habitat and understanding contaminant transport. Measuring velocity in the field is laborious and risky, but remote sensing methods are a viable alternative. These techniques typically assume a fixed imaging platform, such as a helicopter hovering in a fixed location. This acquisition mode is well‐suited to small‐scale studies but less appropriate for longer river segments. To overcome this constraint, we introduce a new framework for moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV). Images are acquired from an airplane and the overlap between frames identified. The core of the workflow is a particle image velocimetry (PIV) algorithm that detects features on the water surface and tracks their movement. Performing PIV for many frame ranges leads to a high density of velocity vectors that are aggregated onto a prediction grid. An initial study on two Alaskan rivers indicated that this approach could provide velocity estimates that agree closely with field measurements. Results were less encouraging for the clearer stream, however, suggesting that trackable features might not be present in some cases. Testing MARV across a range of environments would yield insight as to its general applicability.
Key Points
Flow velocities estimated from images acquired by a small, fixed wing aircraft flying along a river agreed strongly with field measurements
Developed workflow for orthorectifying images, analyzing frame overlap, performing particle image velocimetry, and aggregating vectors onto a prediction grid
Acquiring images from a moving platform could make data collection more efficient and enable velocity mapping over longer river segments</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2022WR033822</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0280-5083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0940-8013</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1397 |
ispartof | Water resources research, 2023-02, Vol.59 (2), p.n/a |
issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2779155252 |
source | Wiley Journals; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library |
subjects | Accuracy Aerodynamics Aggregation Aircraft airplane Alaska Algorithms Aquatic habitats Contaminants Flow velocity Fluid flow Frameworks Habitats Helicopters Hovering Image acquisition Image enhancement Image processing Imaging techniques Methods Parameterization Particle image velocimetry particle image velocimetry (PIV) Pollution transport Remote sensing river River channels Rivers Sensitivity analysis Testing Transport Tributaries Vectors Velocity Velocity distribution Velocity estimation Workflow |
title | Moving Aircraft River Velocimetry (MARV): Framework and Proof‐of‐Concept on the Tanana River |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A33%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moving%20Aircraft%20River%20Velocimetry%20(MARV):%20Framework%20and%20Proof%E2%80%90of%E2%80%90Concept%20on%20the%20Tanana%20River&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Legleiter,%20Carl%20J.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022WR033822&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2779155252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779155252&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |