Attributing Past Carbon Fluxes to CO2 and Climate Change: Respiration Response to CO2 Fertilization Shifts Regional Distribution of the Carbon Sink

Over the past century, increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations have enhanced photosynthesis through CO2 fertilization across the globe. However, the increased growth has also led to greater respiration rates—both from vegetation (autotrophic respiration) and through the breakdown of plant litter an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global biogeochemical cycles 2023-02, Vol.37 (2), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Quetin, Gregory R., Famiglietti, Caroline A., Dadap, Nathan C., Bloom, A. Anthony, Bowman, Kevin W., Diffenbaugh, Noah S., Liu, Junjie, Trugman, Anna T., Konings, Alexandra G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Global biogeochemical cycles
container_volume 37
creator Quetin, Gregory R.
Famiglietti, Caroline A.
Dadap, Nathan C.
Bloom, A. Anthony
Bowman, Kevin W.
Diffenbaugh, Noah S.
Liu, Junjie
Trugman, Anna T.
Konings, Alexandra G.
description Over the past century, increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations have enhanced photosynthesis through CO2 fertilization across the globe. However, the increased growth has also led to greater respiration rates—both from vegetation (autotrophic respiration) and through the breakdown of plant litter and soil organic matter (heterotrophic respiration). The resulting change in carbon flux—and its spatial distribution—that can be attributed to increasing CO2 and climate change remains unknown. We used the Carbon Data Model Framework, a model‐data fusion system that assimilates global observations from satellites and other sources to create an ensemble of observationally constrained carbon cycle representations, to determine the photosynthesis and respiration fluxes that can be attributed to increased atmospheric CO2 and associated climate change from 1920 to 2015. Across the globe, the response of photosynthesis and respiration to atmospheric CO2 dominates their response to climate alone. The regional distribution of the carbon sink attributable to climate change and CO2 is strongly influenced by the 'loss ratio of carbon gained'—the fraction of enhanced photosynthesis that is lost to respiration. While the wet tropics' attributable photosynthesis flux is 1.4 times larger than that of the temperate region, the attributable flux of net carbon uptake is actually 1.25 larger in the temperate region, due to the wet tropics' greater heterotrophic respiration response to enhanced plant growth. At the global scale, the loss ratio of carbon gained is 83 ± 0.6%. Our results highlight the importance of the respiration responses to enhanced plant growth in regulating the land carbon sink. Plain Language Summary Earth's land areas have taken up a large amount of carbon from the atmosphere over the last century. However, exactly where, why, and by how much carbon uptake has increased is uncertain. We used a modeling system informed by global observations from satellites and elsewhere to quantify how the flows of carbon changed in response to the last century of increasing atmospheric CO2. We found that increased photosynthesis stimulates greater ecosystem respiration, decreasing CO2's effect on net land carbon uptake. The fraction of increased photosynthesis that goes to respiration (rather than land carbon storage) varies by region and determines the location of the largest net land carbon uptake. Although it acts indirectly through changes in plant and soil carbon stocks,
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2022GB007478
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2779033802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2779033802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2151-5606c878f00f2a349a122d08164674f3a798374c3e694acba7844913ec4b5fb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4wEscQ7Ya8c_3NpAC1IlEIVz5KRO6xKSEDuC8hq8MKnaSpx2V_NpZzQIXVJyTQnoGyAA0zEhkkt1hAZUcx5pAH6MBkQpEQlg4hSdeb8mhPI41gP0OwqhdVkXXLXEz8YHnJg2qys8Kbtv63GocfIE2FQLnJTuwwSLk5WplvYWv1jfuNYE19Pbva68PfAT2wZXup-dOl-5IvgeWvaXKfGd83vTXqwLHFb2YDt31fs5OilM6e3Ffg7R2-T-NXmIZk_Tx2Q0ixqgMY1iQUSupCoIKcAwrg0FWBBFBReSF8xIrZjkObNCc5NnRirONWU251lcZJwN0dXub9PWn531IV3XXdsH9ClIqQljikBPwY76cqXdpE3bt9BuUkrSbefp_87T6TgByhRlf9RSdTI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779033802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attributing Past Carbon Fluxes to CO2 and Climate Change: Respiration Response to CO2 Fertilization Shifts Regional Distribution of the Carbon Sink</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Quetin, Gregory R. ; Famiglietti, Caroline A. ; Dadap, Nathan C. ; Bloom, A. Anthony ; Bowman, Kevin W. ; Diffenbaugh, Noah S. ; Liu, Junjie ; Trugman, Anna T. ; Konings, Alexandra G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Quetin, Gregory R. ; Famiglietti, Caroline A. ; Dadap, Nathan C. ; Bloom, A. Anthony ; Bowman, Kevin W. ; Diffenbaugh, Noah S. ; Liu, Junjie ; Trugman, Anna T. ; Konings, Alexandra G.</creatorcontrib><description>Over the past century, increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations have enhanced photosynthesis through CO2 fertilization across the globe. However, the increased growth has also led to greater respiration rates—both from vegetation (autotrophic respiration) and through the breakdown of plant litter and soil organic matter (heterotrophic respiration). The resulting change in carbon flux—and its spatial distribution—that can be attributed to increasing CO2 and climate change remains unknown. We used the Carbon Data Model Framework, a model‐data fusion system that assimilates global observations from satellites and other sources to create an ensemble of observationally constrained carbon cycle representations, to determine the photosynthesis and respiration fluxes that can be attributed to increased atmospheric CO2 and associated climate change from 1920 to 2015. Across the globe, the response of photosynthesis and respiration to atmospheric CO2 dominates their response to climate alone. The regional distribution of the carbon sink attributable to climate change and CO2 is strongly influenced by the 'loss ratio of carbon gained'—the fraction of enhanced photosynthesis that is lost to respiration. While the wet tropics' attributable photosynthesis flux is 1.4 times larger than that of the temperate region, the attributable flux of net carbon uptake is actually 1.25 larger in the temperate region, due to the wet tropics' greater heterotrophic respiration response to enhanced plant growth. At the global scale, the loss ratio of carbon gained is 83 ± 0.6%. Our results highlight the importance of the respiration responses to enhanced plant growth in regulating the land carbon sink. Plain Language Summary Earth's land areas have taken up a large amount of carbon from the atmosphere over the last century. However, exactly where, why, and by how much carbon uptake has increased is uncertain. We used a modeling system informed by global observations from satellites and elsewhere to quantify how the flows of carbon changed in response to the last century of increasing atmospheric CO2. We found that increased photosynthesis stimulates greater ecosystem respiration, decreasing CO2's effect on net land carbon uptake. The fraction of increased photosynthesis that goes to respiration (rather than land carbon storage) varies by region and determines the location of the largest net land carbon uptake. Although it acts indirectly through changes in plant and soil carbon stocks, the respiration response to CO2 is a dominant component of the land carbon cycle response to human‐caused emissions of CO2 and associated climate change. Key Points A Bayesian data‐fusion system was used to assimilate global observations to constrain centennial carbon cycle model dynamics The spatial variation of the carbon sink is shaped by how strongly increased plant growth leads to increased plant and soil respiration Higher respiration losses in wet tropics offset stronger plant growth there, resulting in a stronger carbon sink in the temperate regions</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-6236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022GB007478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological fertilization ; Carbon capture and storage ; Carbon cycle ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide concentration ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Carbon sequestration ; Carbon sinks ; Carbon uptake ; carbon‐concentration feedback ; climate ; Climate change ; Data integration ; Distribution ; Emissions ; Fertilization ; Fluctuations ; Fluxes ; model data fusion ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; Photosynthesis ; Plant growth ; Plants ; Plants (botany) ; Regional climates ; remote sensing ; Respiration ; Satellite observation ; Satellites ; Soil organic matter ; Soils ; Spatial distribution ; Stocks ; Tropical environments ; Uptake ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Global biogeochemical cycles, 2023-02, Vol.37 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023. The Authors.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-8856-4964 ; 0000-0002-2810-1722 ; 0000-0001-7586-6210 ; 0000-0002-1486-1499 ; 0000-0002-7184-6594 ; 0000-0002-8659-1117 ; 0000-0002-7903-9711 ; 0000-0002-7884-5332</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2022GB007478$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2022GB007478$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11494,27903,27904,45553,45554,46446,46870</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quetin, Gregory R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Famiglietti, Caroline A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dadap, Nathan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloom, A. Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Kevin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diffenbaugh, Noah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Junjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trugman, Anna T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konings, Alexandra G.</creatorcontrib><title>Attributing Past Carbon Fluxes to CO2 and Climate Change: Respiration Response to CO2 Fertilization Shifts Regional Distribution of the Carbon Sink</title><title>Global biogeochemical cycles</title><description>Over the past century, increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations have enhanced photosynthesis through CO2 fertilization across the globe. However, the increased growth has also led to greater respiration rates—both from vegetation (autotrophic respiration) and through the breakdown of plant litter and soil organic matter (heterotrophic respiration). The resulting change in carbon flux—and its spatial distribution—that can be attributed to increasing CO2 and climate change remains unknown. We used the Carbon Data Model Framework, a model‐data fusion system that assimilates global observations from satellites and other sources to create an ensemble of observationally constrained carbon cycle representations, to determine the photosynthesis and respiration fluxes that can be attributed to increased atmospheric CO2 and associated climate change from 1920 to 2015. Across the globe, the response of photosynthesis and respiration to atmospheric CO2 dominates their response to climate alone. The regional distribution of the carbon sink attributable to climate change and CO2 is strongly influenced by the 'loss ratio of carbon gained'—the fraction of enhanced photosynthesis that is lost to respiration. While the wet tropics' attributable photosynthesis flux is 1.4 times larger than that of the temperate region, the attributable flux of net carbon uptake is actually 1.25 larger in the temperate region, due to the wet tropics' greater heterotrophic respiration response to enhanced plant growth. At the global scale, the loss ratio of carbon gained is 83 ± 0.6%. Our results highlight the importance of the respiration responses to enhanced plant growth in regulating the land carbon sink. Plain Language Summary Earth's land areas have taken up a large amount of carbon from the atmosphere over the last century. However, exactly where, why, and by how much carbon uptake has increased is uncertain. We used a modeling system informed by global observations from satellites and elsewhere to quantify how the flows of carbon changed in response to the last century of increasing atmospheric CO2. We found that increased photosynthesis stimulates greater ecosystem respiration, decreasing CO2's effect on net land carbon uptake. The fraction of increased photosynthesis that goes to respiration (rather than land carbon storage) varies by region and determines the location of the largest net land carbon uptake. Although it acts indirectly through changes in plant and soil carbon stocks, the respiration response to CO2 is a dominant component of the land carbon cycle response to human‐caused emissions of CO2 and associated climate change. Key Points A Bayesian data‐fusion system was used to assimilate global observations to constrain centennial carbon cycle model dynamics The spatial variation of the carbon sink is shaped by how strongly increased plant growth leads to increased plant and soil respiration Higher respiration losses in wet tropics offset stronger plant growth there, resulting in a stronger carbon sink in the temperate regions</description><subject>Biological fertilization</subject><subject>Carbon capture and storage</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide concentration</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Carbon sinks</subject><subject>Carbon uptake</subject><subject>carbon‐concentration feedback</subject><subject>climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Data integration</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>model data fusion</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Regional climates</subject><subject>remote sensing</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Satellite observation</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><subject>Tropical environments</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0886-6236</issn><issn>1944-9224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4wEscQ7Ya8c_3NpAC1IlEIVz5KRO6xKSEDuC8hq8MKnaSpx2V_NpZzQIXVJyTQnoGyAA0zEhkkt1hAZUcx5pAH6MBkQpEQlg4hSdeb8mhPI41gP0OwqhdVkXXLXEz8YHnJg2qys8Kbtv63GocfIE2FQLnJTuwwSLk5WplvYWv1jfuNYE19Pbva68PfAT2wZXup-dOl-5IvgeWvaXKfGd83vTXqwLHFb2YDt31fs5OilM6e3Ffg7R2-T-NXmIZk_Tx2Q0ixqgMY1iQUSupCoIKcAwrg0FWBBFBReSF8xIrZjkObNCc5NnRirONWU251lcZJwN0dXub9PWn531IV3XXdsH9ClIqQljikBPwY76cqXdpE3bt9BuUkrSbefp_87T6TgByhRlf9RSdTI</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Quetin, Gregory R.</creator><creator>Famiglietti, Caroline A.</creator><creator>Dadap, Nathan C.</creator><creator>Bloom, A. Anthony</creator><creator>Bowman, Kevin W.</creator><creator>Diffenbaugh, Noah S.</creator><creator>Liu, Junjie</creator><creator>Trugman, Anna T.</creator><creator>Konings, Alexandra G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8856-4964</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2810-1722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7586-6210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-1499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7184-6594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8659-1117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7903-9711</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7884-5332</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Attributing Past Carbon Fluxes to CO2 and Climate Change: Respiration Response to CO2 Fertilization Shifts Regional Distribution of the Carbon Sink</title><author>Quetin, Gregory R. ; Famiglietti, Caroline A. ; Dadap, Nathan C. ; Bloom, A. Anthony ; Bowman, Kevin W. ; Diffenbaugh, Noah S. ; Liu, Junjie ; Trugman, Anna T. ; Konings, Alexandra G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2151-5606c878f00f2a349a122d08164674f3a798374c3e694acba7844913ec4b5fb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biological fertilization</topic><topic>Carbon capture and storage</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide concentration</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Carbon sinks</topic><topic>Carbon uptake</topic><topic>carbon‐concentration feedback</topic><topic>climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Data integration</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>model data fusion</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Regional climates</topic><topic>remote sensing</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Satellite observation</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><topic>Tropical environments</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quetin, Gregory R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Famiglietti, Caroline A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dadap, Nathan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloom, A. Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Kevin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diffenbaugh, Noah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Junjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trugman, Anna T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konings, Alexandra G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Global biogeochemical cycles</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quetin, Gregory R.</au><au>Famiglietti, Caroline A.</au><au>Dadap, Nathan C.</au><au>Bloom, A. Anthony</au><au>Bowman, Kevin W.</au><au>Diffenbaugh, Noah S.</au><au>Liu, Junjie</au><au>Trugman, Anna T.</au><au>Konings, Alexandra G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attributing Past Carbon Fluxes to CO2 and Climate Change: Respiration Response to CO2 Fertilization Shifts Regional Distribution of the Carbon Sink</atitle><jtitle>Global biogeochemical cycles</jtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0886-6236</issn><eissn>1944-9224</eissn><abstract>Over the past century, increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations have enhanced photosynthesis through CO2 fertilization across the globe. However, the increased growth has also led to greater respiration rates—both from vegetation (autotrophic respiration) and through the breakdown of plant litter and soil organic matter (heterotrophic respiration). The resulting change in carbon flux—and its spatial distribution—that can be attributed to increasing CO2 and climate change remains unknown. We used the Carbon Data Model Framework, a model‐data fusion system that assimilates global observations from satellites and other sources to create an ensemble of observationally constrained carbon cycle representations, to determine the photosynthesis and respiration fluxes that can be attributed to increased atmospheric CO2 and associated climate change from 1920 to 2015. Across the globe, the response of photosynthesis and respiration to atmospheric CO2 dominates their response to climate alone. The regional distribution of the carbon sink attributable to climate change and CO2 is strongly influenced by the 'loss ratio of carbon gained'—the fraction of enhanced photosynthesis that is lost to respiration. While the wet tropics' attributable photosynthesis flux is 1.4 times larger than that of the temperate region, the attributable flux of net carbon uptake is actually 1.25 larger in the temperate region, due to the wet tropics' greater heterotrophic respiration response to enhanced plant growth. At the global scale, the loss ratio of carbon gained is 83 ± 0.6%. Our results highlight the importance of the respiration responses to enhanced plant growth in regulating the land carbon sink. Plain Language Summary Earth's land areas have taken up a large amount of carbon from the atmosphere over the last century. However, exactly where, why, and by how much carbon uptake has increased is uncertain. We used a modeling system informed by global observations from satellites and elsewhere to quantify how the flows of carbon changed in response to the last century of increasing atmospheric CO2. We found that increased photosynthesis stimulates greater ecosystem respiration, decreasing CO2's effect on net land carbon uptake. The fraction of increased photosynthesis that goes to respiration (rather than land carbon storage) varies by region and determines the location of the largest net land carbon uptake. Although it acts indirectly through changes in plant and soil carbon stocks, the respiration response to CO2 is a dominant component of the land carbon cycle response to human‐caused emissions of CO2 and associated climate change. Key Points A Bayesian data‐fusion system was used to assimilate global observations to constrain centennial carbon cycle model dynamics The spatial variation of the carbon sink is shaped by how strongly increased plant growth leads to increased plant and soil respiration Higher respiration losses in wet tropics offset stronger plant growth there, resulting in a stronger carbon sink in the temperate regions</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2022GB007478</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8856-4964</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2810-1722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7586-6210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-1499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7184-6594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8659-1117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7903-9711</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7884-5332</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-6236
ispartof Global biogeochemical cycles, 2023-02, Vol.37 (2), p.n/a
issn 0886-6236
1944-9224
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2779033802
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library
subjects Biological fertilization
Carbon capture and storage
Carbon cycle
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide concentration
Carbon dioxide emissions
Carbon sequestration
Carbon sinks
Carbon uptake
carbon‐concentration feedback
climate
Climate change
Data integration
Distribution
Emissions
Fertilization
Fluctuations
Fluxes
model data fusion
Organic matter
Organic soils
Photosynthesis
Plant growth
Plants
Plants (botany)
Regional climates
remote sensing
Respiration
Satellite observation
Satellites
Soil organic matter
Soils
Spatial distribution
Stocks
Tropical environments
Uptake
Vegetation
title Attributing Past Carbon Fluxes to CO2 and Climate Change: Respiration Response to CO2 Fertilization Shifts Regional Distribution of the Carbon Sink
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T08%3A36%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attributing%20Past%20Carbon%20Fluxes%20to%20CO2%20and%20Climate%20Change:%20Respiration%20Response%20to%20CO2%20Fertilization%20Shifts%20Regional%20Distribution%20of%20the%20Carbon%20Sink&rft.jtitle=Global%20biogeochemical%20cycles&rft.au=Quetin,%20Gregory%20R.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0886-6236&rft.eissn=1944-9224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022GB007478&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2779033802%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779033802&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true