Income inequality and opinion expression gap in the American public: an analysis of policy priorities

Past scholarship has documented that the poor are more likely to withhold their policy preferences in public opinion surveys, suggesting income gaps in political engagement. Despite the wealth of scholarly interest in opinion formation, however, previous studies focused almost exclusively on opinion...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of public policy 2023-03, Vol.43 (1), p.135-156
Hauptverfasser: Yildirim, Tevfik Murat, Bulut, Alper T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 156
container_issue 1
container_start_page 135
container_title Journal of public policy
container_volume 43
creator Yildirim, Tevfik Murat
Bulut, Alper T.
description Past scholarship has documented that the poor are more likely to withhold their policy preferences in public opinion surveys, suggesting income gaps in political engagement. Despite the wealth of scholarly interest in opinion formation, however, previous studies focused almost exclusively on opinion gaps in preferences, leaving income-related gaps in policy prioritisation virtually unexamined. Drawing on 596 public opinion surveys conducted with nearly 700,000 Americans over 55 years, we make a comprehensive attempt to examine income-level differences in “don’t know” responses to the most important problem (MIP) question. Our results show that the less affluent are more likely to say “don’t know” when asked about the MIP facing their country, even after controlling for various factors including educational attainment and political attention. Importantly, we also show that income-related differences in opinionation cross cut other socio-economic differences in policy prioritisation. These results have important implications for the study of public opinion.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0143814X22000253
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2778873728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0143814X22000253</cupid><sourcerecordid>2778873728</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a80c57c0bbecdc58d6d67c93ca235aaa5763f493145f63131290c73e4b5542023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9V8Nqm3ZfFjQfCggreSpumapW2ySQv235uyCx5EGJhh5n1eZgaAa4xuMcLi7g1hRiVmn4QghAinJ2CBWV5kQmJ-ChbzOJvn5-Aixh1CmCZuAcym164z0PZmP6rWDhNUfQ2dt711PTTfPpgY53KrfFLB4cvAVWeC1aqHfqxaq-8TkkK1U7QRugZ6l7oT9MG6YAdr4iU4a1QbzdUxL8HH48P7-jl7eX3arFcvmSaMDJmSSHOhUVUZXWsu67zOhS6oVoRypRQXOW1YQTHjTU7TBaRAWlDDKs4ZQYQuwc3B1we3H00cyp0bQ9oslkQIKQUVRCYVPqh0cDEG05Rp006FqcSonL9Z_vlmYuiRUV0VbL01v9b_Uz_K4ncx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2778873728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Income inequality and opinion expression gap in the American public: an analysis of policy priorities</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat ; Bulut, Alper T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat ; Bulut, Alper T.</creatorcontrib><description>Past scholarship has documented that the poor are more likely to withhold their policy preferences in public opinion surveys, suggesting income gaps in political engagement. Despite the wealth of scholarly interest in opinion formation, however, previous studies focused almost exclusively on opinion gaps in preferences, leaving income-related gaps in policy prioritisation virtually unexamined. Drawing on 596 public opinion surveys conducted with nearly 700,000 Americans over 55 years, we make a comprehensive attempt to examine income-level differences in “don’t know” responses to the most important problem (MIP) question. Our results show that the less affluent are more likely to say “don’t know” when asked about the MIP facing their country, even after controlling for various factors including educational attainment and political attention. Importantly, we also show that income-related differences in opinionation cross cut other socio-economic differences in policy prioritisation. These results have important implications for the study of public opinion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-814X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7815</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X22000253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Campaign contributions ; Citizen participation ; Democracy ; Educational attainment ; Income inequality ; Low income groups ; Political participation ; Politics ; Prioritizing ; Public opinion ; Public opinion surveys ; Social classes ; Socioeconomic factors ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>Journal of public policy, 2023-03, Vol.43 (1), p.135-156</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a80c57c0bbecdc58d6d67c93ca235aaa5763f493145f63131290c73e4b5542023</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7120-6020</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X22000253/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,12824,27321,27843,27901,27902,33751,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulut, Alper T.</creatorcontrib><title>Income inequality and opinion expression gap in the American public: an analysis of policy priorities</title><title>Journal of public policy</title><addtitle>J. Pub. Pol</addtitle><description>Past scholarship has documented that the poor are more likely to withhold their policy preferences in public opinion surveys, suggesting income gaps in political engagement. Despite the wealth of scholarly interest in opinion formation, however, previous studies focused almost exclusively on opinion gaps in preferences, leaving income-related gaps in policy prioritisation virtually unexamined. Drawing on 596 public opinion surveys conducted with nearly 700,000 Americans over 55 years, we make a comprehensive attempt to examine income-level differences in “don’t know” responses to the most important problem (MIP) question. Our results show that the less affluent are more likely to say “don’t know” when asked about the MIP facing their country, even after controlling for various factors including educational attainment and political attention. Importantly, we also show that income-related differences in opinionation cross cut other socio-economic differences in policy prioritisation. These results have important implications for the study of public opinion.</description><subject>Campaign contributions</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prioritizing</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>0143-814X</issn><issn>1469-7815</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9V8Nqm3ZfFjQfCggreSpumapW2ySQv235uyCx5EGJhh5n1eZgaAa4xuMcLi7g1hRiVmn4QghAinJ2CBWV5kQmJ-ChbzOJvn5-Aixh1CmCZuAcym164z0PZmP6rWDhNUfQ2dt711PTTfPpgY53KrfFLB4cvAVWeC1aqHfqxaq-8TkkK1U7QRugZ6l7oT9MG6YAdr4iU4a1QbzdUxL8HH48P7-jl7eX3arFcvmSaMDJmSSHOhUVUZXWsu67zOhS6oVoRypRQXOW1YQTHjTU7TBaRAWlDDKs4ZQYQuwc3B1we3H00cyp0bQ9oslkQIKQUVRCYVPqh0cDEG05Rp006FqcSonL9Z_vlmYuiRUV0VbL01v9b_Uz_K4ncx</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat</creator><creator>Bulut, Alper T.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7120-6020</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Income inequality and opinion expression gap in the American public: an analysis of policy priorities</title><author>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat ; Bulut, Alper T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a80c57c0bbecdc58d6d67c93ca235aaa5763f493145f63131290c73e4b5542023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Campaign contributions</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prioritizing</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulut, Alper T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge University Press Wholly Gold Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat</au><au>Bulut, Alper T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Income inequality and opinion expression gap in the American public: an analysis of policy priorities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public policy</jtitle><addtitle>J. Pub. Pol</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>135-156</pages><issn>0143-814X</issn><eissn>1469-7815</eissn><abstract>Past scholarship has documented that the poor are more likely to withhold their policy preferences in public opinion surveys, suggesting income gaps in political engagement. Despite the wealth of scholarly interest in opinion formation, however, previous studies focused almost exclusively on opinion gaps in preferences, leaving income-related gaps in policy prioritisation virtually unexamined. Drawing on 596 public opinion surveys conducted with nearly 700,000 Americans over 55 years, we make a comprehensive attempt to examine income-level differences in “don’t know” responses to the most important problem (MIP) question. Our results show that the less affluent are more likely to say “don’t know” when asked about the MIP facing their country, even after controlling for various factors including educational attainment and political attention. Importantly, we also show that income-related differences in opinionation cross cut other socio-economic differences in policy prioritisation. These results have important implications for the study of public opinion.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0143814X22000253</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7120-6020</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-814X
ispartof Journal of public policy, 2023-03, Vol.43 (1), p.135-156
issn 0143-814X
1469-7815
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2778873728
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Campaign contributions
Citizen participation
Democracy
Educational attainment
Income inequality
Low income groups
Political participation
Politics
Prioritizing
Public opinion
Public opinion surveys
Social classes
Socioeconomic factors
Wealth
title Income inequality and opinion expression gap in the American public: an analysis of policy priorities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A48%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Income%20inequality%20and%20opinion%20expression%20gap%20in%20the%20American%20public:%20an%20analysis%20of%20policy%20priorities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20policy&rft.au=Yildirim,%20Tevfik%20Murat&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=135-156&rft.issn=0143-814X&rft.eissn=1469-7815&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0143814X22000253&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2778873728%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2778873728&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0143814X22000253&rfr_iscdi=true