Income inequality and opinion expression gap in the American public: an analysis of policy priorities
Past scholarship has documented that the poor are more likely to withhold their policy preferences in public opinion surveys, suggesting income gaps in political engagement. Despite the wealth of scholarly interest in opinion formation, however, previous studies focused almost exclusively on opinion...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of public policy 2023-03, Vol.43 (1), p.135-156 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 156 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 135 |
container_title | Journal of public policy |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Yildirim, Tevfik Murat Bulut, Alper T. |
description | Past scholarship has documented that the poor are more likely to withhold their policy preferences in public opinion surveys, suggesting income gaps in political engagement. Despite the wealth of scholarly interest in opinion formation, however, previous studies focused almost exclusively on opinion gaps in preferences, leaving income-related gaps in policy prioritisation virtually unexamined. Drawing on 596 public opinion surveys conducted with nearly 700,000 Americans over 55 years, we make a comprehensive attempt to examine income-level differences in “don’t know” responses to the most important problem (MIP) question. Our results show that the less affluent are more likely to say “don’t know” when asked about the MIP facing their country, even after controlling for various factors including educational attainment and political attention. Importantly, we also show that income-related differences in opinionation cross cut other socio-economic differences in policy prioritisation. These results have important implications for the study of public opinion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0143814X22000253 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2778873728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0143814X22000253</cupid><sourcerecordid>2778873728</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a80c57c0bbecdc58d6d67c93ca235aaa5763f493145f63131290c73e4b5542023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9V8Nqm3ZfFjQfCggreSpumapW2ySQv235uyCx5EGJhh5n1eZgaAa4xuMcLi7g1hRiVmn4QghAinJ2CBWV5kQmJ-ChbzOJvn5-Aixh1CmCZuAcym164z0PZmP6rWDhNUfQ2dt711PTTfPpgY53KrfFLB4cvAVWeC1aqHfqxaq-8TkkK1U7QRugZ6l7oT9MG6YAdr4iU4a1QbzdUxL8HH48P7-jl7eX3arFcvmSaMDJmSSHOhUVUZXWsu67zOhS6oVoRypRQXOW1YQTHjTU7TBaRAWlDDKs4ZQYQuwc3B1we3H00cyp0bQ9oslkQIKQUVRCYVPqh0cDEG05Rp006FqcSonL9Z_vlmYuiRUV0VbL01v9b_Uz_K4ncx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2778873728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Income inequality and opinion expression gap in the American public: an analysis of policy priorities</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat ; Bulut, Alper T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat ; Bulut, Alper T.</creatorcontrib><description>Past scholarship has documented that the poor are more likely to withhold their policy preferences in public opinion surveys, suggesting income gaps in political engagement. Despite the wealth of scholarly interest in opinion formation, however, previous studies focused almost exclusively on opinion gaps in preferences, leaving income-related gaps in policy prioritisation virtually unexamined. Drawing on 596 public opinion surveys conducted with nearly 700,000 Americans over 55 years, we make a comprehensive attempt to examine income-level differences in “don’t know” responses to the most important problem (MIP) question. Our results show that the less affluent are more likely to say “don’t know” when asked about the MIP facing their country, even after controlling for various factors including educational attainment and political attention. Importantly, we also show that income-related differences in opinionation cross cut other socio-economic differences in policy prioritisation. These results have important implications for the study of public opinion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-814X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7815</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X22000253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Campaign contributions ; Citizen participation ; Democracy ; Educational attainment ; Income inequality ; Low income groups ; Political participation ; Politics ; Prioritizing ; Public opinion ; Public opinion surveys ; Social classes ; Socioeconomic factors ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>Journal of public policy, 2023-03, Vol.43 (1), p.135-156</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a80c57c0bbecdc58d6d67c93ca235aaa5763f493145f63131290c73e4b5542023</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7120-6020</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X22000253/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,12824,27321,27843,27901,27902,33751,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulut, Alper T.</creatorcontrib><title>Income inequality and opinion expression gap in the American public: an analysis of policy priorities</title><title>Journal of public policy</title><addtitle>J. Pub. Pol</addtitle><description>Past scholarship has documented that the poor are more likely to withhold their policy preferences in public opinion surveys, suggesting income gaps in political engagement. Despite the wealth of scholarly interest in opinion formation, however, previous studies focused almost exclusively on opinion gaps in preferences, leaving income-related gaps in policy prioritisation virtually unexamined. Drawing on 596 public opinion surveys conducted with nearly 700,000 Americans over 55 years, we make a comprehensive attempt to examine income-level differences in “don’t know” responses to the most important problem (MIP) question. Our results show that the less affluent are more likely to say “don’t know” when asked about the MIP facing their country, even after controlling for various factors including educational attainment and political attention. Importantly, we also show that income-related differences in opinionation cross cut other socio-economic differences in policy prioritisation. These results have important implications for the study of public opinion.</description><subject>Campaign contributions</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prioritizing</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>0143-814X</issn><issn>1469-7815</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9V8Nqm3ZfFjQfCggreSpumapW2ySQv235uyCx5EGJhh5n1eZgaAa4xuMcLi7g1hRiVmn4QghAinJ2CBWV5kQmJ-ChbzOJvn5-Aixh1CmCZuAcym164z0PZmP6rWDhNUfQ2dt711PTTfPpgY53KrfFLB4cvAVWeC1aqHfqxaq-8TkkK1U7QRugZ6l7oT9MG6YAdr4iU4a1QbzdUxL8HH48P7-jl7eX3arFcvmSaMDJmSSHOhUVUZXWsu67zOhS6oVoRypRQXOW1YQTHjTU7TBaRAWlDDKs4ZQYQuwc3B1we3H00cyp0bQ9oslkQIKQUVRCYVPqh0cDEG05Rp006FqcSonL9Z_vlmYuiRUV0VbL01v9b_Uz_K4ncx</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat</creator><creator>Bulut, Alper T.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7120-6020</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Income inequality and opinion expression gap in the American public: an analysis of policy priorities</title><author>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat ; Bulut, Alper T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a80c57c0bbecdc58d6d67c93ca235aaa5763f493145f63131290c73e4b5542023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Campaign contributions</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prioritizing</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulut, Alper T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge University Press Wholly Gold Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yildirim, Tevfik Murat</au><au>Bulut, Alper T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Income inequality and opinion expression gap in the American public: an analysis of policy priorities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public policy</jtitle><addtitle>J. Pub. Pol</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>135-156</pages><issn>0143-814X</issn><eissn>1469-7815</eissn><abstract>Past scholarship has documented that the poor are more likely to withhold their policy preferences in public opinion surveys, suggesting income gaps in political engagement. Despite the wealth of scholarly interest in opinion formation, however, previous studies focused almost exclusively on opinion gaps in preferences, leaving income-related gaps in policy prioritisation virtually unexamined. Drawing on 596 public opinion surveys conducted with nearly 700,000 Americans over 55 years, we make a comprehensive attempt to examine income-level differences in “don’t know” responses to the most important problem (MIP) question. Our results show that the less affluent are more likely to say “don’t know” when asked about the MIP facing their country, even after controlling for various factors including educational attainment and political attention. Importantly, we also show that income-related differences in opinionation cross cut other socio-economic differences in policy prioritisation. These results have important implications for the study of public opinion.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0143814X22000253</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7120-6020</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-814X |
ispartof | Journal of public policy, 2023-03, Vol.43 (1), p.135-156 |
issn | 0143-814X 1469-7815 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2778873728 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Campaign contributions Citizen participation Democracy Educational attainment Income inequality Low income groups Political participation Politics Prioritizing Public opinion Public opinion surveys Social classes Socioeconomic factors Wealth |
title | Income inequality and opinion expression gap in the American public: an analysis of policy priorities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A48%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Income%20inequality%20and%20opinion%20expression%20gap%20in%20the%20American%20public:%20an%20analysis%20of%20policy%20priorities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20policy&rft.au=Yildirim,%20Tevfik%20Murat&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=135-156&rft.issn=0143-814X&rft.eissn=1469-7815&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0143814X22000253&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2778873728%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2778873728&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0143814X22000253&rfr_iscdi=true |