An evaluation of deep learning models for predicting water depth evolution in urban floods

In this technical report we compare different deep learning models for prediction of water depth rasters at high spatial resolution. Efficient, accurate, and fast methods for water depth prediction are nowadays important as urban floods are increasing due to higher rainfall intensity caused by clima...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2023-02
Hauptverfasser: Russo, Stefania, Perraudin, Nathanaël, Stalder, Steven, Perez-Cruz, Fernando, Leitao, Joao Paulo, Obozinski, Guillaume, Wegner, Jan Dirk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Russo, Stefania
Perraudin, Nathanaël
Stalder, Steven
Perez-Cruz, Fernando
Leitao, Joao Paulo
Obozinski, Guillaume
Wegner, Jan Dirk
description In this technical report we compare different deep learning models for prediction of water depth rasters at high spatial resolution. Efficient, accurate, and fast methods for water depth prediction are nowadays important as urban floods are increasing due to higher rainfall intensity caused by climate change, expansion of cities and changes in land use. While hydrodynamic models models can provide reliable forecasts by simulating water depth at every location of a catchment, they also have a high computational burden which jeopardizes their application to real-time prediction in large urban areas at high spatial resolution. Here, we propose to address this issue by using data-driven techniques. Specifically, we evaluate deep learning models which are trained to reproduce the data simulated by the CADDIES cellular-automata flood model, providing flood forecasts that can occur at different future time horizons. The advantage of using such models is that they can learn the underlying physical phenomena a priori, preventing manual parameter setting and computational burden. We perform experiments on a dataset consisting of two catchments areas within Switzerland with 18 simpler, short rainfall patterns and 4 long, more complex ones. Our results show that the deep learning models present in general lower errors compared to the other methods, especially for water depths \(>0.5m\). However, when testing on more complex rainfall events or unseen catchment areas, the deep models do not show benefits over the simpler ones.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2778498065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2778498065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27784980653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi0sKwjAURYMgWLR7eOC4ENOvQxHFBThyUqJ51ZSYV_PR7VvFBTi6cO45E5aIPF9lTSHEjKXe95xzUdWiLPOEnTYW8ClNlEGTBepAIQ5gUDqr7RXupNB46MjB4FDpS_jQlwzoRnMIt7EmE7-xthDdWVroDJHyCzbtpPGY_nbOlvvdcXvIBkePiD60PUVnx6sVdd0U64ZXZf6f9QZTHUMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2778498065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of deep learning models for predicting water depth evolution in urban floods</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Russo, Stefania ; Perraudin, Nathanaël ; Stalder, Steven ; Perez-Cruz, Fernando ; Leitao, Joao Paulo ; Obozinski, Guillaume ; Wegner, Jan Dirk</creator><creatorcontrib>Russo, Stefania ; Perraudin, Nathanaël ; Stalder, Steven ; Perez-Cruz, Fernando ; Leitao, Joao Paulo ; Obozinski, Guillaume ; Wegner, Jan Dirk</creatorcontrib><description>In this technical report we compare different deep learning models for prediction of water depth rasters at high spatial resolution. Efficient, accurate, and fast methods for water depth prediction are nowadays important as urban floods are increasing due to higher rainfall intensity caused by climate change, expansion of cities and changes in land use. While hydrodynamic models models can provide reliable forecasts by simulating water depth at every location of a catchment, they also have a high computational burden which jeopardizes their application to real-time prediction in large urban areas at high spatial resolution. Here, we propose to address this issue by using data-driven techniques. Specifically, we evaluate deep learning models which are trained to reproduce the data simulated by the CADDIES cellular-automata flood model, providing flood forecasts that can occur at different future time horizons. The advantage of using such models is that they can learn the underlying physical phenomena a priori, preventing manual parameter setting and computational burden. We perform experiments on a dataset consisting of two catchments areas within Switzerland with 18 simpler, short rainfall patterns and 4 long, more complex ones. Our results show that the deep learning models present in general lower errors compared to the other methods, especially for water depths \(&gt;0.5m\). However, when testing on more complex rainfall events or unseen catchment areas, the deep models do not show benefits over the simpler ones.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Catchments ; Cellular automata ; Deep learning ; Flood forecasting ; Flood predictions ; Floods ; Land use ; Mathematical models ; Rainfall ; Spatial resolution ; Urban areas ; Water depth</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-02</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Russo, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perraudin, Nathanaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalder, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez-Cruz, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leitao, Joao Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obozinski, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegner, Jan Dirk</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of deep learning models for predicting water depth evolution in urban floods</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>In this technical report we compare different deep learning models for prediction of water depth rasters at high spatial resolution. Efficient, accurate, and fast methods for water depth prediction are nowadays important as urban floods are increasing due to higher rainfall intensity caused by climate change, expansion of cities and changes in land use. While hydrodynamic models models can provide reliable forecasts by simulating water depth at every location of a catchment, they also have a high computational burden which jeopardizes their application to real-time prediction in large urban areas at high spatial resolution. Here, we propose to address this issue by using data-driven techniques. Specifically, we evaluate deep learning models which are trained to reproduce the data simulated by the CADDIES cellular-automata flood model, providing flood forecasts that can occur at different future time horizons. The advantage of using such models is that they can learn the underlying physical phenomena a priori, preventing manual parameter setting and computational burden. We perform experiments on a dataset consisting of two catchments areas within Switzerland with 18 simpler, short rainfall patterns and 4 long, more complex ones. Our results show that the deep learning models present in general lower errors compared to the other methods, especially for water depths \(&gt;0.5m\). However, when testing on more complex rainfall events or unseen catchment areas, the deep models do not show benefits over the simpler ones.</description><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Cellular automata</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Flood forecasting</subject><subject>Flood predictions</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Water depth</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi0sKwjAURYMgWLR7eOC4ENOvQxHFBThyUqJ51ZSYV_PR7VvFBTi6cO45E5aIPF9lTSHEjKXe95xzUdWiLPOEnTYW8ClNlEGTBepAIQ5gUDqr7RXupNB46MjB4FDpS_jQlwzoRnMIt7EmE7-xthDdWVroDJHyCzbtpPGY_nbOlvvdcXvIBkePiD60PUVnx6sVdd0U64ZXZf6f9QZTHUMg</recordid><startdate>20230220</startdate><enddate>20230220</enddate><creator>Russo, Stefania</creator><creator>Perraudin, Nathanaël</creator><creator>Stalder, Steven</creator><creator>Perez-Cruz, Fernando</creator><creator>Leitao, Joao Paulo</creator><creator>Obozinski, Guillaume</creator><creator>Wegner, Jan Dirk</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230220</creationdate><title>An evaluation of deep learning models for predicting water depth evolution in urban floods</title><author>Russo, Stefania ; Perraudin, Nathanaël ; Stalder, Steven ; Perez-Cruz, Fernando ; Leitao, Joao Paulo ; Obozinski, Guillaume ; Wegner, Jan Dirk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27784980653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Cellular automata</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Flood forecasting</topic><topic>Flood predictions</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Water depth</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Russo, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perraudin, Nathanaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalder, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez-Cruz, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leitao, Joao Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obozinski, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegner, Jan Dirk</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Russo, Stefania</au><au>Perraudin, Nathanaël</au><au>Stalder, Steven</au><au>Perez-Cruz, Fernando</au><au>Leitao, Joao Paulo</au><au>Obozinski, Guillaume</au><au>Wegner, Jan Dirk</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of deep learning models for predicting water depth evolution in urban floods</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-02-20</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>In this technical report we compare different deep learning models for prediction of water depth rasters at high spatial resolution. Efficient, accurate, and fast methods for water depth prediction are nowadays important as urban floods are increasing due to higher rainfall intensity caused by climate change, expansion of cities and changes in land use. While hydrodynamic models models can provide reliable forecasts by simulating water depth at every location of a catchment, they also have a high computational burden which jeopardizes their application to real-time prediction in large urban areas at high spatial resolution. Here, we propose to address this issue by using data-driven techniques. Specifically, we evaluate deep learning models which are trained to reproduce the data simulated by the CADDIES cellular-automata flood model, providing flood forecasts that can occur at different future time horizons. The advantage of using such models is that they can learn the underlying physical phenomena a priori, preventing manual parameter setting and computational burden. We perform experiments on a dataset consisting of two catchments areas within Switzerland with 18 simpler, short rainfall patterns and 4 long, more complex ones. Our results show that the deep learning models present in general lower errors compared to the other methods, especially for water depths \(&gt;0.5m\). However, when testing on more complex rainfall events or unseen catchment areas, the deep models do not show benefits over the simpler ones.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2023-02
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2778498065
source Free E- Journals
subjects Catchments
Cellular automata
Deep learning
Flood forecasting
Flood predictions
Floods
Land use
Mathematical models
Rainfall
Spatial resolution
Urban areas
Water depth
title An evaluation of deep learning models for predicting water depth evolution in urban floods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T00%3A40%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20deep%20learning%20models%20for%20predicting%20water%20depth%20evolution%20in%20urban%20floods&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Russo,%20Stefania&rft.date=2023-02-20&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2778498065%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2778498065&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true