A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method
As a necessary infrastructure for new energy vehicles (NEV), charging piles have become a hot topic of social concern. Studying the innovation efficiency of charging pile companies can help to solve the development dilemma of the charging pile industry. This paper uses the generalized fuzzy data env...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2023-01, Vol.15 (3), p.2110 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 2110 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Li, Shanwei Li, Jingjie Ding, Junli Sun, Mochen Cui, Chenying |
description | As a necessary infrastructure for new energy vehicles (NEV), charging piles have become a hot topic of social concern. Studying the innovation efficiency of charging pile companies can help to solve the development dilemma of the charging pile industry. This paper uses the generalized fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) method based on game theory to study 23 Chinese listed charging pile manufacturing companies’ innovation efficiency from 2019 to 2021. On this basis, 15 charging pile technological interrelatedness companies are joined to establish a new game environment and to discuss the possibility of charging pile product manufacturing companies shifting to a new business model led by value-added service provision. The results show that the innovation efficiency of each company is significantly improved in the cooperative state, while the opposite is true in the competitive state, so cooperation is the company’s priority choice. Charging pile product manufacturing companies are more inclined to cooperate with technologically interrelated companies. The business model dominated by value-added service provision is conducive to improving the level of industrial innovation. The competition will easily lead to the decline of their innovation efficiency. Hence, companies should carefully choose their competition strategy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su15032110 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2775010103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A743433307</galeid><sourcerecordid>A743433307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-eb3788910928170c0a5fd9c558dd2aec1c62434b27ab0b70cf3d7c3dfdb631d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFuEzEQhlcIJKrSC09giRNIKfZON85yCyENkVJRtXC2vPZ46yqxg-1FTU7lMfp6fZIOChLUc_A_nm9mNJ6qeiv4KUDLP-ZBNBxqIfiL6qjmUowEb_jL__Tr6iTnW04HQLRifFT9nrKF3iC7LkkX7HckBrtjMbBlCPGXLp7k3DlvPAZDAcdmNz7ox_uHzFY-F7T0oFPvQ88u_RrZLG62OnjMn9hnnSlMBRYYMOm135N7Puz3O_ZlPmUXWG6ifVO9cnqd8eTvfVz9OJ9_n30drb4tlrPpamSglmWEHcjJpBW8rSdCcsN142xrmmZiba3RCDOuz-Csq6XueEeAAysNWGe7MQjbwnH17lB3m-LPAXNRt3FIgVqqWsqGCzIg6vRA9XqNygcX6WMMmcWNNzGgoxnVVFIrAOCSEt4_SyCm4F3p9ZCzWl5fPWc_HFiTYs4Jndomv9FppwRXf1ao_q0QngATZI0o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2775010103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Li, Shanwei ; Li, Jingjie ; Ding, Junli ; Sun, Mochen ; Cui, Chenying</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Shanwei ; Li, Jingjie ; Ding, Junli ; Sun, Mochen ; Cui, Chenying</creatorcontrib><description>As a necessary infrastructure for new energy vehicles (NEV), charging piles have become a hot topic of social concern. Studying the innovation efficiency of charging pile companies can help to solve the development dilemma of the charging pile industry. This paper uses the generalized fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) method based on game theory to study 23 Chinese listed charging pile manufacturing companies’ innovation efficiency from 2019 to 2021. On this basis, 15 charging pile technological interrelatedness companies are joined to establish a new game environment and to discuss the possibility of charging pile product manufacturing companies shifting to a new business model led by value-added service provision. The results show that the innovation efficiency of each company is significantly improved in the cooperative state, while the opposite is true in the competitive state, so cooperation is the company’s priority choice. Charging pile product manufacturing companies are more inclined to cooperate with technologically interrelated companies. The business model dominated by value-added service provision is conducive to improving the level of industrial innovation. The competition will easily lead to the decline of their innovation efficiency. Hence, companies should carefully choose their competition strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su15032110</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Charging ; Collaboration ; Competition ; Competitive advantage ; Cooperation ; Data envelopment analysis ; Efficiency ; Electric vehicles ; Electrical equipment and supplies industry ; Game theory ; Innovations ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing industry ; Methods ; Strategy</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-01, Vol.15 (3), p.2110</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-eb3788910928170c0a5fd9c558dd2aec1c62434b27ab0b70cf3d7c3dfdb631d93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1794-4281 ; 0000-0002-2071-8517</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Shanwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Junli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Mochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Chenying</creatorcontrib><title>A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>As a necessary infrastructure for new energy vehicles (NEV), charging piles have become a hot topic of social concern. Studying the innovation efficiency of charging pile companies can help to solve the development dilemma of the charging pile industry. This paper uses the generalized fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) method based on game theory to study 23 Chinese listed charging pile manufacturing companies’ innovation efficiency from 2019 to 2021. On this basis, 15 charging pile technological interrelatedness companies are joined to establish a new game environment and to discuss the possibility of charging pile product manufacturing companies shifting to a new business model led by value-added service provision. The results show that the innovation efficiency of each company is significantly improved in the cooperative state, while the opposite is true in the competitive state, so cooperation is the company’s priority choice. Charging pile product manufacturing companies are more inclined to cooperate with technologically interrelated companies. The business model dominated by value-added service provision is conducive to improving the level of industrial innovation. The competition will easily lead to the decline of their innovation efficiency. Hence, companies should carefully choose their competition strategy.</description><subject>Charging</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Electrical equipment and supplies industry</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing industry</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcFuEzEQhlcIJKrSC09giRNIKfZON85yCyENkVJRtXC2vPZ46yqxg-1FTU7lMfp6fZIOChLUc_A_nm9mNJ6qeiv4KUDLP-ZBNBxqIfiL6qjmUowEb_jL__Tr6iTnW04HQLRifFT9nrKF3iC7LkkX7HckBrtjMbBlCPGXLp7k3DlvPAZDAcdmNz7ox_uHzFY-F7T0oFPvQ88u_RrZLG62OnjMn9hnnSlMBRYYMOm135N7Puz3O_ZlPmUXWG6ifVO9cnqd8eTvfVz9OJ9_n30drb4tlrPpamSglmWEHcjJpBW8rSdCcsN142xrmmZiba3RCDOuz-Csq6XueEeAAysNWGe7MQjbwnH17lB3m-LPAXNRt3FIgVqqWsqGCzIg6vRA9XqNygcX6WMMmcWNNzGgoxnVVFIrAOCSEt4_SyCm4F3p9ZCzWl5fPWc_HFiTYs4Jndomv9FppwRXf1ao_q0QngATZI0o</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Li, Shanwei</creator><creator>Li, Jingjie</creator><creator>Ding, Junli</creator><creator>Sun, Mochen</creator><creator>Cui, Chenying</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-4281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-8517</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method</title><author>Li, Shanwei ; Li, Jingjie ; Ding, Junli ; Sun, Mochen ; Cui, Chenying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-eb3788910928170c0a5fd9c558dd2aec1c62434b27ab0b70cf3d7c3dfdb631d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Charging</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Electrical equipment and supplies industry</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing industry</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Shanwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Junli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Mochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Chenying</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Shanwei</au><au>Li, Jingjie</au><au>Ding, Junli</au><au>Sun, Mochen</au><au>Cui, Chenying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2110</spage><pages>2110-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>As a necessary infrastructure for new energy vehicles (NEV), charging piles have become a hot topic of social concern. Studying the innovation efficiency of charging pile companies can help to solve the development dilemma of the charging pile industry. This paper uses the generalized fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) method based on game theory to study 23 Chinese listed charging pile manufacturing companies’ innovation efficiency from 2019 to 2021. On this basis, 15 charging pile technological interrelatedness companies are joined to establish a new game environment and to discuss the possibility of charging pile product manufacturing companies shifting to a new business model led by value-added service provision. The results show that the innovation efficiency of each company is significantly improved in the cooperative state, while the opposite is true in the competitive state, so cooperation is the company’s priority choice. Charging pile product manufacturing companies are more inclined to cooperate with technologically interrelated companies. The business model dominated by value-added service provision is conducive to improving the level of industrial innovation. The competition will easily lead to the decline of their innovation efficiency. Hence, companies should carefully choose their competition strategy.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su15032110</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-4281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-8517</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2023-01, Vol.15 (3), p.2110 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2775010103 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Charging Collaboration Competition Competitive advantage Cooperation Data envelopment analysis Efficiency Electric vehicles Electrical equipment and supplies industry Game theory Innovations Manufacturing Manufacturing industry Methods Strategy |
title | A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T18%3A30%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Game%20Strategy%20Study%20on%20Innovation%20Efficiency%20of%20China%E2%80%99s%20Listed%20Charging%20Pile%20Companies:%20Based%20on%20Generalized%20Fuzzy%20DEA%20Method&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Li,%20Shanwei&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2110&rft.pages=2110-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su15032110&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA743433307%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2775010103&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A743433307&rfr_iscdi=true |