A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method

As a necessary infrastructure for new energy vehicles (NEV), charging piles have become a hot topic of social concern. Studying the innovation efficiency of charging pile companies can help to solve the development dilemma of the charging pile industry. This paper uses the generalized fuzzy data env...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2023-01, Vol.15 (3), p.2110
Hauptverfasser: Li, Shanwei, Li, Jingjie, Ding, Junli, Sun, Mochen, Cui, Chenying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2110
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 15
creator Li, Shanwei
Li, Jingjie
Ding, Junli
Sun, Mochen
Cui, Chenying
description As a necessary infrastructure for new energy vehicles (NEV), charging piles have become a hot topic of social concern. Studying the innovation efficiency of charging pile companies can help to solve the development dilemma of the charging pile industry. This paper uses the generalized fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) method based on game theory to study 23 Chinese listed charging pile manufacturing companies’ innovation efficiency from 2019 to 2021. On this basis, 15 charging pile technological interrelatedness companies are joined to establish a new game environment and to discuss the possibility of charging pile product manufacturing companies shifting to a new business model led by value-added service provision. The results show that the innovation efficiency of each company is significantly improved in the cooperative state, while the opposite is true in the competitive state, so cooperation is the company’s priority choice. Charging pile product manufacturing companies are more inclined to cooperate with technologically interrelated companies. The business model dominated by value-added service provision is conducive to improving the level of industrial innovation. The competition will easily lead to the decline of their innovation efficiency. Hence, companies should carefully choose their competition strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su15032110
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2775010103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A743433307</galeid><sourcerecordid>A743433307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-eb3788910928170c0a5fd9c558dd2aec1c62434b27ab0b70cf3d7c3dfdb631d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFuEzEQhlcIJKrSC09giRNIKfZON85yCyENkVJRtXC2vPZ46yqxg-1FTU7lMfp6fZIOChLUc_A_nm9mNJ6qeiv4KUDLP-ZBNBxqIfiL6qjmUowEb_jL__Tr6iTnW04HQLRifFT9nrKF3iC7LkkX7HckBrtjMbBlCPGXLp7k3DlvPAZDAcdmNz7ox_uHzFY-F7T0oFPvQ88u_RrZLG62OnjMn9hnnSlMBRYYMOm135N7Puz3O_ZlPmUXWG6ifVO9cnqd8eTvfVz9OJ9_n30drb4tlrPpamSglmWEHcjJpBW8rSdCcsN142xrmmZiba3RCDOuz-Csq6XueEeAAysNWGe7MQjbwnH17lB3m-LPAXNRt3FIgVqqWsqGCzIg6vRA9XqNygcX6WMMmcWNNzGgoxnVVFIrAOCSEt4_SyCm4F3p9ZCzWl5fPWc_HFiTYs4Jndomv9FppwRXf1ao_q0QngATZI0o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2775010103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Li, Shanwei ; Li, Jingjie ; Ding, Junli ; Sun, Mochen ; Cui, Chenying</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Shanwei ; Li, Jingjie ; Ding, Junli ; Sun, Mochen ; Cui, Chenying</creatorcontrib><description>As a necessary infrastructure for new energy vehicles (NEV), charging piles have become a hot topic of social concern. Studying the innovation efficiency of charging pile companies can help to solve the development dilemma of the charging pile industry. This paper uses the generalized fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) method based on game theory to study 23 Chinese listed charging pile manufacturing companies’ innovation efficiency from 2019 to 2021. On this basis, 15 charging pile technological interrelatedness companies are joined to establish a new game environment and to discuss the possibility of charging pile product manufacturing companies shifting to a new business model led by value-added service provision. The results show that the innovation efficiency of each company is significantly improved in the cooperative state, while the opposite is true in the competitive state, so cooperation is the company’s priority choice. Charging pile product manufacturing companies are more inclined to cooperate with technologically interrelated companies. The business model dominated by value-added service provision is conducive to improving the level of industrial innovation. The competition will easily lead to the decline of their innovation efficiency. Hence, companies should carefully choose their competition strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su15032110</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Charging ; Collaboration ; Competition ; Competitive advantage ; Cooperation ; Data envelopment analysis ; Efficiency ; Electric vehicles ; Electrical equipment and supplies industry ; Game theory ; Innovations ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing industry ; Methods ; Strategy</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-01, Vol.15 (3), p.2110</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-eb3788910928170c0a5fd9c558dd2aec1c62434b27ab0b70cf3d7c3dfdb631d93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1794-4281 ; 0000-0002-2071-8517</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Shanwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Junli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Mochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Chenying</creatorcontrib><title>A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>As a necessary infrastructure for new energy vehicles (NEV), charging piles have become a hot topic of social concern. Studying the innovation efficiency of charging pile companies can help to solve the development dilemma of the charging pile industry. This paper uses the generalized fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) method based on game theory to study 23 Chinese listed charging pile manufacturing companies’ innovation efficiency from 2019 to 2021. On this basis, 15 charging pile technological interrelatedness companies are joined to establish a new game environment and to discuss the possibility of charging pile product manufacturing companies shifting to a new business model led by value-added service provision. The results show that the innovation efficiency of each company is significantly improved in the cooperative state, while the opposite is true in the competitive state, so cooperation is the company’s priority choice. Charging pile product manufacturing companies are more inclined to cooperate with technologically interrelated companies. The business model dominated by value-added service provision is conducive to improving the level of industrial innovation. The competition will easily lead to the decline of their innovation efficiency. Hence, companies should carefully choose their competition strategy.</description><subject>Charging</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Electrical equipment and supplies industry</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing industry</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcFuEzEQhlcIJKrSC09giRNIKfZON85yCyENkVJRtXC2vPZ46yqxg-1FTU7lMfp6fZIOChLUc_A_nm9mNJ6qeiv4KUDLP-ZBNBxqIfiL6qjmUowEb_jL__Tr6iTnW04HQLRifFT9nrKF3iC7LkkX7HckBrtjMbBlCPGXLp7k3DlvPAZDAcdmNz7ox_uHzFY-F7T0oFPvQ88u_RrZLG62OnjMn9hnnSlMBRYYMOm135N7Puz3O_ZlPmUXWG6ifVO9cnqd8eTvfVz9OJ9_n30drb4tlrPpamSglmWEHcjJpBW8rSdCcsN142xrmmZiba3RCDOuz-Csq6XueEeAAysNWGe7MQjbwnH17lB3m-LPAXNRt3FIgVqqWsqGCzIg6vRA9XqNygcX6WMMmcWNNzGgoxnVVFIrAOCSEt4_SyCm4F3p9ZCzWl5fPWc_HFiTYs4Jndomv9FppwRXf1ao_q0QngATZI0o</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Li, Shanwei</creator><creator>Li, Jingjie</creator><creator>Ding, Junli</creator><creator>Sun, Mochen</creator><creator>Cui, Chenying</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-4281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-8517</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method</title><author>Li, Shanwei ; Li, Jingjie ; Ding, Junli ; Sun, Mochen ; Cui, Chenying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-eb3788910928170c0a5fd9c558dd2aec1c62434b27ab0b70cf3d7c3dfdb631d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Charging</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Electrical equipment and supplies industry</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing industry</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Shanwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Junli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Mochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Chenying</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Shanwei</au><au>Li, Jingjie</au><au>Ding, Junli</au><au>Sun, Mochen</au><au>Cui, Chenying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2110</spage><pages>2110-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>As a necessary infrastructure for new energy vehicles (NEV), charging piles have become a hot topic of social concern. Studying the innovation efficiency of charging pile companies can help to solve the development dilemma of the charging pile industry. This paper uses the generalized fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) method based on game theory to study 23 Chinese listed charging pile manufacturing companies’ innovation efficiency from 2019 to 2021. On this basis, 15 charging pile technological interrelatedness companies are joined to establish a new game environment and to discuss the possibility of charging pile product manufacturing companies shifting to a new business model led by value-added service provision. The results show that the innovation efficiency of each company is significantly improved in the cooperative state, while the opposite is true in the competitive state, so cooperation is the company’s priority choice. Charging pile product manufacturing companies are more inclined to cooperate with technologically interrelated companies. The business model dominated by value-added service provision is conducive to improving the level of industrial innovation. The competition will easily lead to the decline of their innovation efficiency. Hence, companies should carefully choose their competition strategy.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su15032110</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-4281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-8517</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2023-01, Vol.15 (3), p.2110
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2775010103
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Charging
Collaboration
Competition
Competitive advantage
Cooperation
Data envelopment analysis
Efficiency
Electric vehicles
Electrical equipment and supplies industry
Game theory
Innovations
Manufacturing
Manufacturing industry
Methods
Strategy
title A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T18%3A30%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Game%20Strategy%20Study%20on%20Innovation%20Efficiency%20of%20China%E2%80%99s%20Listed%20Charging%20Pile%20Companies:%20Based%20on%20Generalized%20Fuzzy%20DEA%20Method&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Li,%20Shanwei&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2110&rft.pages=2110-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su15032110&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA743433307%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2775010103&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A743433307&rfr_iscdi=true