Asia’s oceanic Anthropocene: How political elites and global offshore oil development moved Asian marine spaces into the new epoch

The Anthropocene epoch, characterized by human-caused planetary-scale transformations like climate change and ocean acidification, today is usually associated with the period beginning in the mid-twentieth century. Taking an oceanic perspective on the Anthropocene in Asia, the article argues that oc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of global history 2023-03, Vol.18 (1), p.25-46
1. Verfasser: Huebner, Stefan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 46
container_issue 1
container_start_page 25
container_title Journal of global history
container_volume 18
creator Huebner, Stefan
description The Anthropocene epoch, characterized by human-caused planetary-scale transformations like climate change and ocean acidification, today is usually associated with the period beginning in the mid-twentieth century. Taking an oceanic perspective on the Anthropocene in Asia, the article argues that oceanic and terrestrial energy regimes synchronized since the 1950s when, for the first time in history, oceanic ghost acres turned marine spaces into a major fuel source. Despite global connections between offshore oil regions located in North America, Asia, and other places going back to the late nineteenth century, Asia’s contingent offshore oil field locations and their physical geographies, combined with political factors, inhibited large-scale offshore drilling before the 1950s. These characteristics of marine spaces meant that Asian political elites and their developmentalist agendas became the guiding force in exploring offshore fields, a process that was hardly dominated by corporate capitalism or structural choice limitations due to the legacies of colonialism.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1740022821000413
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2774760545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1740022821000413</cupid><sourcerecordid>2774760545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-6ea19c565765af83cfd5276ec5be45e1c182fb6a3bf77a7828a70fe408b9ac813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UL1OwzAQjhBIlMIDsFliDthOHLtsVQUUqRIDMEeOc25cJXaw01ZsDLwEr8eT4IoKBsR0352-H92XJOcEXxJM-NUj4TnGlApKMMY5yQ6S0e6UYpoVhz-YiuPkJIRVpBSZYKPkfRqM_Hz7CMgpkNYoNLVD410fVwvXaO62qHetGYySLYIIICBpa7RsXRUvTuvQOA_ImRbVsIHW9R3YAXVuAzXauVvUSW8soNBLFdXGDg4NDSALWwQxqDlNjrRsA5zt5zh5vr15ms3TxcPd_Wy6SFVG6JAWIMlEsYLxgkktMqVrRnkBilWQMyCKCKqrQmaV5lxyQYXkWEOORTWRSpBsnFx8-_bevawhDOXKrb2NkSXlPOcFZjmLLPLNUt6F4EGXvTfxhdeS4HJXdvmn7KjJ9hrZVd7US_i1_l_1BYaCg3E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774760545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Asia’s oceanic Anthropocene: How political elites and global offshore oil development moved Asian marine spaces into the new epoch</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals</source><creator>Huebner, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Huebner, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>The Anthropocene epoch, characterized by human-caused planetary-scale transformations like climate change and ocean acidification, today is usually associated with the period beginning in the mid-twentieth century. Taking an oceanic perspective on the Anthropocene in Asia, the article argues that oceanic and terrestrial energy regimes synchronized since the 1950s when, for the first time in history, oceanic ghost acres turned marine spaces into a major fuel source. Despite global connections between offshore oil regions located in North America, Asia, and other places going back to the late nineteenth century, Asia’s contingent offshore oil field locations and their physical geographies, combined with political factors, inhibited large-scale offshore drilling before the 1950s. These characteristics of marine spaces meant that Asian political elites and their developmentalist agendas became the guiding force in exploring offshore fields, a process that was hardly dominated by corporate capitalism or structural choice limitations due to the legacies of colonialism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1740-0228</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-0236</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1740022821000413</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>19th century ; 20th century ; Acidification ; Anthropocene ; Biogeochemistry ; Bureaucrats ; Capitalism ; Climate change ; Colonialism ; Drilling ; Emissions ; Energy consumption ; Fossil fuels ; Greenhouse gases ; Offshore oil exploration &amp; development ; Oil fields ; Petroleum ; Political elites ; Political factors ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>Journal of global history, 2023-03, Vol.18 (1), p.25-46</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-5601-8715</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740022821000413/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,12825,27903,27904,55607</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huebner, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Asia’s oceanic Anthropocene: How political elites and global offshore oil development moved Asian marine spaces into the new epoch</title><title>Journal of global history</title><addtitle>Journal of Global History</addtitle><description>The Anthropocene epoch, characterized by human-caused planetary-scale transformations like climate change and ocean acidification, today is usually associated with the period beginning in the mid-twentieth century. Taking an oceanic perspective on the Anthropocene in Asia, the article argues that oceanic and terrestrial energy regimes synchronized since the 1950s when, for the first time in history, oceanic ghost acres turned marine spaces into a major fuel source. Despite global connections between offshore oil regions located in North America, Asia, and other places going back to the late nineteenth century, Asia’s contingent offshore oil field locations and their physical geographies, combined with political factors, inhibited large-scale offshore drilling before the 1950s. These characteristics of marine spaces meant that Asian political elites and their developmentalist agendas became the guiding force in exploring offshore fields, a process that was hardly dominated by corporate capitalism or structural choice limitations due to the legacies of colonialism.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Anthropocene</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Bureaucrats</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Offshore oil exploration &amp; development</subject><subject>Oil fields</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Political elites</subject><subject>Political factors</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>1740-0228</issn><issn>1740-0236</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UL1OwzAQjhBIlMIDsFliDthOHLtsVQUUqRIDMEeOc25cJXaw01ZsDLwEr8eT4IoKBsR0352-H92XJOcEXxJM-NUj4TnGlApKMMY5yQ6S0e6UYpoVhz-YiuPkJIRVpBSZYKPkfRqM_Hz7CMgpkNYoNLVD410fVwvXaO62qHetGYySLYIIICBpa7RsXRUvTuvQOA_ImRbVsIHW9R3YAXVuAzXauVvUSW8soNBLFdXGDg4NDSALWwQxqDlNjrRsA5zt5zh5vr15ms3TxcPd_Wy6SFVG6JAWIMlEsYLxgkktMqVrRnkBilWQMyCKCKqrQmaV5lxyQYXkWEOORTWRSpBsnFx8-_bevawhDOXKrb2NkSXlPOcFZjmLLPLNUt6F4EGXvTfxhdeS4HJXdvmn7KjJ9hrZVd7US_i1_l_1BYaCg3E</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Huebner, Stefan</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5601-8715</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Asia’s oceanic Anthropocene: How political elites and global offshore oil development moved Asian marine spaces into the new epoch</title><author>Huebner, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-6ea19c565765af83cfd5276ec5be45e1c182fb6a3bf77a7828a70fe408b9ac813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Anthropocene</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Bureaucrats</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Offshore oil exploration &amp; development</topic><topic>Oil fields</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Political elites</topic><topic>Political factors</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huebner, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge University Press Wholly Gold Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of global history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huebner, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Asia’s oceanic Anthropocene: How political elites and global offshore oil development moved Asian marine spaces into the new epoch</atitle><jtitle>Journal of global history</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Global History</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>25-46</pages><issn>1740-0228</issn><eissn>1740-0236</eissn><abstract>The Anthropocene epoch, characterized by human-caused planetary-scale transformations like climate change and ocean acidification, today is usually associated with the period beginning in the mid-twentieth century. Taking an oceanic perspective on the Anthropocene in Asia, the article argues that oceanic and terrestrial energy regimes synchronized since the 1950s when, for the first time in history, oceanic ghost acres turned marine spaces into a major fuel source. Despite global connections between offshore oil regions located in North America, Asia, and other places going back to the late nineteenth century, Asia’s contingent offshore oil field locations and their physical geographies, combined with political factors, inhibited large-scale offshore drilling before the 1950s. These characteristics of marine spaces meant that Asian political elites and their developmentalist agendas became the guiding force in exploring offshore fields, a process that was hardly dominated by corporate capitalism or structural choice limitations due to the legacies of colonialism.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1740022821000413</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5601-8715</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1740-0228
ispartof Journal of global history, 2023-03, Vol.18 (1), p.25-46
issn 1740-0228
1740-0236
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2774760545
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals
subjects 19th century
20th century
Acidification
Anthropocene
Biogeochemistry
Bureaucrats
Capitalism
Climate change
Colonialism
Drilling
Emissions
Energy consumption
Fossil fuels
Greenhouse gases
Offshore oil exploration & development
Oil fields
Petroleum
Political elites
Political factors
Transnationalism
title Asia’s oceanic Anthropocene: How political elites and global offshore oil development moved Asian marine spaces into the new epoch
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T15%3A04%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Asia%E2%80%99s%20oceanic%20Anthropocene:%20How%20political%20elites%20and%20global%20offshore%20oil%20development%20moved%20Asian%20marine%20spaces%20into%20the%20new%20epoch&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20global%20history&rft.au=Huebner,%20Stefan&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=25-46&rft.issn=1740-0228&rft.eissn=1740-0236&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1740022821000413&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2774760545%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774760545&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1740022821000413&rfr_iscdi=true