Validation of a novel software‐based platform to extract oculometric measures

Purpose: Eye‐tracking systems are a valuable tool in the assessment of disorders by detecting eye movement abnormalities. However, current systems require lab settings, extraction of oculometric measures entails dedicated long sessions, and operation requires qualified personnel. Recently, a novel s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2022-12, Vol.100 (S275), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Rosset, Israel, Raveh, Eitan, Shimon, Assaf Ben, Anisimov, Vova, Ben‐Ami, Edmund, Kreitman, Rivka, Breakstone, Micha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue S275
container_start_page
container_title Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)
container_volume 100
creator Rosset, Israel
Raveh, Eitan
Shimon, Assaf Ben
Anisimov, Vova
Ben‐Ami, Edmund
Kreitman, Rivka
Breakstone, Micha
description Purpose: Eye‐tracking systems are a valuable tool in the assessment of disorders by detecting eye movement abnormalities. However, current systems require lab settings, extraction of oculometric measures entails dedicated long sessions, and operation requires qualified personnel. Recently, a novel software‐based platform was developed, using a webcam, enabling the extraction of oculometric measures in a short test with seamless operation. The aim of this study was to validate this platform as compared with a validated eye‐tracker. Methods: 82 participants (51 females, age range 21–88) were evaluated with a software‐based platform (NeuraLight, Israel) in a 15‐minute eye‐tracking test. Participants were presented with different stimuli for various tasks. During the test, data from a validated eye‐tracker (Tobii Pro, Sweden) were captured. Correlations between oculometric measures captured by both methods were calculated using Pearson correlation. Observable information on demographic data was measured using Fisher information matrix. Results: Eye and gaze positions captured by the NeuraLight platform were highly correlated with eye‐tracker (r = 0.9–0.99, p  0.9, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2022.0359
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2774021286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2774021286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1779-6eba609b7845920b6c89fdca465f7182526b9b570e8865ddc1379640f234961a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM9KxDAQh4MouK4-ghDw3JqkTdJ4WxZdhYU9-AdvIU0TaGk3a5K67s1H8Bl9EltX9uxcZhh-3wx8AFxilOKhrpsUc0qTjLMiJYiQFGVUHIHJYXt8mOnrKTgLoUGIYcbyCVi9qLauVKzdGjoLFVy7d9PC4GzcKm--P79KFUwFN62K1vkORgfNR_RKR-h037rORF9r2BkVem_COTixqg3m4q9PwfPd7dP8PlmuFg_z2TLRmHORMFMqhkTJi5wKgkqmC2ErrXJGLccFoYSVoqQcmaJgtKo0zrhgObIkywXDKpuCq_3djXdvvQlRNq736-GlJJzniGBSsCFF9yntXQjeWLnxdaf8TmIkR3eykaMZOVqSozs5uhu4mz23rVuz-x8kZ6vHX_gHMzxz3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774021286</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a novel software‐based platform to extract oculometric measures</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Rosset, Israel ; Raveh, Eitan ; Shimon, Assaf Ben ; Anisimov, Vova ; Ben‐Ami, Edmund ; Kreitman, Rivka ; Breakstone, Micha</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosset, Israel ; Raveh, Eitan ; Shimon, Assaf Ben ; Anisimov, Vova ; Ben‐Ami, Edmund ; Kreitman, Rivka ; Breakstone, Micha</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Eye‐tracking systems are a valuable tool in the assessment of disorders by detecting eye movement abnormalities. However, current systems require lab settings, extraction of oculometric measures entails dedicated long sessions, and operation requires qualified personnel. Recently, a novel software‐based platform was developed, using a webcam, enabling the extraction of oculometric measures in a short test with seamless operation. The aim of this study was to validate this platform as compared with a validated eye‐tracker. Methods: 82 participants (51 females, age range 21–88) were evaluated with a software‐based platform (NeuraLight, Israel) in a 15‐minute eye‐tracking test. Participants were presented with different stimuli for various tasks. During the test, data from a validated eye‐tracker (Tobii Pro, Sweden) were captured. Correlations between oculometric measures captured by both methods were calculated using Pearson correlation. Observable information on demographic data was measured using Fisher information matrix. Results: Eye and gaze positions captured by the NeuraLight platform were highly correlated with eye‐tracker (r = 0.9–0.99, p &lt; 0.01). Saccade and anti‐saccade latency, pro‐saccade and anti‐saccade error rates, position and velocity gain for all tasks were all highly correlated (r &gt; 0.9, p &lt; 0.01). Relative root mean square error of all measures in both methods was &lt;0.1. Saccadic latency and fixation time were found to be in relation with participants' age. Conclusions: NeuraLight platform was significantly correlated with a validated eye‐tracker, providing high accuracy for eye and gaze positions and oculometric measures. Relation between oculometric measures and age was established. The platform can be implemented for assessment of eye movements in practice. Future studies are needed to use the platform in various conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-375X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-3768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2022.0359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Eye movements ; Latency ; Saccadic eye movements ; Software</subject><ispartof>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2022-12, Vol.100 (S275), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors Acta Ophthalmologica © 2022 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1779-6eba609b7845920b6c89fdca465f7182526b9b570e8865ddc1379640f234961a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1755-3768.2022.0359$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45575,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosset, Israel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raveh, Eitan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimon, Assaf Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anisimov, Vova</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben‐Ami, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreitman, Rivka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breakstone, Micha</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a novel software‐based platform to extract oculometric measures</title><title>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</title><description>Purpose: Eye‐tracking systems are a valuable tool in the assessment of disorders by detecting eye movement abnormalities. However, current systems require lab settings, extraction of oculometric measures entails dedicated long sessions, and operation requires qualified personnel. Recently, a novel software‐based platform was developed, using a webcam, enabling the extraction of oculometric measures in a short test with seamless operation. The aim of this study was to validate this platform as compared with a validated eye‐tracker. Methods: 82 participants (51 females, age range 21–88) were evaluated with a software‐based platform (NeuraLight, Israel) in a 15‐minute eye‐tracking test. Participants were presented with different stimuli for various tasks. During the test, data from a validated eye‐tracker (Tobii Pro, Sweden) were captured. Correlations between oculometric measures captured by both methods were calculated using Pearson correlation. Observable information on demographic data was measured using Fisher information matrix. Results: Eye and gaze positions captured by the NeuraLight platform were highly correlated with eye‐tracker (r = 0.9–0.99, p &lt; 0.01). Saccade and anti‐saccade latency, pro‐saccade and anti‐saccade error rates, position and velocity gain for all tasks were all highly correlated (r &gt; 0.9, p &lt; 0.01). Relative root mean square error of all measures in both methods was &lt;0.1. Saccadic latency and fixation time were found to be in relation with participants' age. Conclusions: NeuraLight platform was significantly correlated with a validated eye‐tracker, providing high accuracy for eye and gaze positions and oculometric measures. Relation between oculometric measures and age was established. The platform can be implemented for assessment of eye movements in practice. Future studies are needed to use the platform in various conditions.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Latency</subject><subject>Saccadic eye movements</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>1755-375X</issn><issn>1755-3768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM9KxDAQh4MouK4-ghDw3JqkTdJ4WxZdhYU9-AdvIU0TaGk3a5K67s1H8Bl9EltX9uxcZhh-3wx8AFxilOKhrpsUc0qTjLMiJYiQFGVUHIHJYXt8mOnrKTgLoUGIYcbyCVi9qLauVKzdGjoLFVy7d9PC4GzcKm--P79KFUwFN62K1vkORgfNR_RKR-h037rORF9r2BkVem_COTixqg3m4q9PwfPd7dP8PlmuFg_z2TLRmHORMFMqhkTJi5wKgkqmC2ErrXJGLccFoYSVoqQcmaJgtKo0zrhgObIkywXDKpuCq_3djXdvvQlRNq736-GlJJzniGBSsCFF9yntXQjeWLnxdaf8TmIkR3eykaMZOVqSozs5uhu4mz23rVuz-x8kZ6vHX_gHMzxz3w</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Rosset, Israel</creator><creator>Raveh, Eitan</creator><creator>Shimon, Assaf Ben</creator><creator>Anisimov, Vova</creator><creator>Ben‐Ami, Edmund</creator><creator>Kreitman, Rivka</creator><creator>Breakstone, Micha</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Validation of a novel software‐based platform to extract oculometric measures</title><author>Rosset, Israel ; Raveh, Eitan ; Shimon, Assaf Ben ; Anisimov, Vova ; Ben‐Ami, Edmund ; Kreitman, Rivka ; Breakstone, Micha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1779-6eba609b7845920b6c89fdca465f7182526b9b570e8865ddc1379640f234961a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Latency</topic><topic>Saccadic eye movements</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosset, Israel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raveh, Eitan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimon, Assaf Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anisimov, Vova</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben‐Ami, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreitman, Rivka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breakstone, Micha</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosset, Israel</au><au>Raveh, Eitan</au><au>Shimon, Assaf Ben</au><au>Anisimov, Vova</au><au>Ben‐Ami, Edmund</au><au>Kreitman, Rivka</au><au>Breakstone, Micha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of a novel software‐based platform to extract oculometric measures</atitle><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>S275</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1755-375X</issn><eissn>1755-3768</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Eye‐tracking systems are a valuable tool in the assessment of disorders by detecting eye movement abnormalities. However, current systems require lab settings, extraction of oculometric measures entails dedicated long sessions, and operation requires qualified personnel. Recently, a novel software‐based platform was developed, using a webcam, enabling the extraction of oculometric measures in a short test with seamless operation. The aim of this study was to validate this platform as compared with a validated eye‐tracker. Methods: 82 participants (51 females, age range 21–88) were evaluated with a software‐based platform (NeuraLight, Israel) in a 15‐minute eye‐tracking test. Participants were presented with different stimuli for various tasks. During the test, data from a validated eye‐tracker (Tobii Pro, Sweden) were captured. Correlations between oculometric measures captured by both methods were calculated using Pearson correlation. Observable information on demographic data was measured using Fisher information matrix. Results: Eye and gaze positions captured by the NeuraLight platform were highly correlated with eye‐tracker (r = 0.9–0.99, p &lt; 0.01). Saccade and anti‐saccade latency, pro‐saccade and anti‐saccade error rates, position and velocity gain for all tasks were all highly correlated (r &gt; 0.9, p &lt; 0.01). Relative root mean square error of all measures in both methods was &lt;0.1. Saccadic latency and fixation time were found to be in relation with participants' age. Conclusions: NeuraLight platform was significantly correlated with a validated eye‐tracker, providing high accuracy for eye and gaze positions and oculometric measures. Relation between oculometric measures and age was established. The platform can be implemented for assessment of eye movements in practice. Future studies are needed to use the platform in various conditions.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1755-3768.2022.0359</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-375X
ispartof Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2022-12, Vol.100 (S275), p.n/a
issn 1755-375X
1755-3768
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2774021286
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content
subjects Age
Eye movements
Latency
Saccadic eye movements
Software
title Validation of a novel software‐based platform to extract oculometric measures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A29%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%20novel%20software%E2%80%90based%20platform%20to%20extract%20oculometric%20measures&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ophthalmologica%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Rosset,%20Israel&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=S275&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1755-375X&rft.eissn=1755-3768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2022.0359&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2774021286%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774021286&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true