Holocene marine terraces as recorders of earthquake uplift: Insights from a rocky coast in southern Hawke's Bay, New Zealand

On rocky tectonic coasts, data from Holocene marine terraces may constrain the timing of coseismic uplift and help identify the causative faults. Challenges in marine terrace investigations include: (1) identifying the uplift datums; (2) obtaining ages that tightly constrain the timing of uplift; (3...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth surface processes and landforms 2023-02, Vol.48 (2), p.452-474
Hauptverfasser: Litchfield, Nicola, Morgenstern, Regine, Clark, Kate, Howell, Andy, Grant, Georgia, Turnbull, Jocelyn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 474
container_issue 2
container_start_page 452
container_title Earth surface processes and landforms
container_volume 48
creator Litchfield, Nicola
Morgenstern, Regine
Clark, Kate
Howell, Andy
Grant, Georgia
Turnbull, Jocelyn
description On rocky tectonic coasts, data from Holocene marine terraces may constrain the timing of coseismic uplift and help identify the causative faults. Challenges in marine terrace investigations include: (1) identifying the uplift datums; (2) obtaining ages that tightly constrain the timing of uplift; (3) distinguishing tsunami deposits from beach deposits on terraces; and (4) identifying missing terraces and hence earthquakes. We address some of these challenges through comparing modern beach sediments and radiocarbon ages with those from a trench excavated across three terraces at Aramoana, central Hikurangi Subduction Margin, New Zealand. Sedimentary analyses identified beach and dune deposits on terraces but could not differentiate specific environments within them. Modern beach shells yielded modern radiocarbon ages, regardless of position or species, showing age inheritance and habitat is likely not an issue when dating shells on these terraces. By integrating terrace mapping, stratigraphy, morphology, and radiocarbon ages we develop a conceptual model of coastal uplift and terrace formation following at least two, possibly three, earthquakes at 5490–5070, 2620–2180, and 950–650 cal. yr bp. A high step and time gap between the upper two terraces raises the possibility that at least one intervening terrace is completely eroded. The trench exposure also showed that terrace stratigraphy may differ from that inferred from surface geomorphology, with apparent beach ridges being of composite origin and draping of younger beach deposits on the outer edge of a previous terrace. Dislocation modelling and comparison of marine terrace and earthquake ages from ~4 km south and ≤ 73 km north confirms that the most likely earthquake source is the nearshore, landward‐dipping, Kairakau Fault. Alternative sources, such as multi‐fault ruptures of the Kairakau‐Waimārama faults or Hikurangi subduction earthquakes, and/or a combination of the two are also possible and should be examined in future studies. On rocky tectonic coasts Holocene marine terraces record earthquake uplift but there are challenges such as identifying the uplift datum, accurate dating and missing terraces. These are addressed through comparing modern beach sediments and radiocarbon ages with those from a trench across terraces in the central Hikurangi Subduction Margin. A coeseismic terrace model, dislocation modelling and comparison of ages with other sites show uplift in three earthquakes most likely on
doi_str_mv 10.1002/esp.5496
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2773977096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2773977096</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2936-d87a2f5adbdb1aa0d09d33925be0d99ec9e61248c70aefbe5c104f845a6959b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9Lw0AQh-FFFKxV8CMMeNCDqbv5t1lvWqotiArqxUuYbCY2bZptdxNKwA9var16-l0eZuBl7FzwkeDcvyG3HkWhig_YQHAVeyoJ5CEbcKGkp4JAHrMT5xacCxEmasC-p6YymmqCFdqyn4asRU0O0IElbWxO1oEpgNA2802LS4J2XZVFcwuz2pVf88ZBYc0KEKzRyw60QddAWYMzbTMnW8MUt0u6dHCP3TU80xY-CSus81N2VGDl6Oxvh-zjYfI-nnpPL4-z8d2Tp30VxF6eSPSLCPMszwQiz7nKg0D5UUY8V4q0olj4YaIlRyoyirTgYZGEEcYqUhkPhuxif3dtzaYl16QL09q6f5n6UgZKyr5Ur672SlvjnKUiXduyr9Klgqe7tmnfNt217am3p9uyou5fl07eXn_9DxwrfC4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2773977096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Holocene marine terraces as recorders of earthquake uplift: Insights from a rocky coast in southern Hawke's Bay, New Zealand</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Litchfield, Nicola ; Morgenstern, Regine ; Clark, Kate ; Howell, Andy ; Grant, Georgia ; Turnbull, Jocelyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Litchfield, Nicola ; Morgenstern, Regine ; Clark, Kate ; Howell, Andy ; Grant, Georgia ; Turnbull, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><description>On rocky tectonic coasts, data from Holocene marine terraces may constrain the timing of coseismic uplift and help identify the causative faults. Challenges in marine terrace investigations include: (1) identifying the uplift datums; (2) obtaining ages that tightly constrain the timing of uplift; (3) distinguishing tsunami deposits from beach deposits on terraces; and (4) identifying missing terraces and hence earthquakes. We address some of these challenges through comparing modern beach sediments and radiocarbon ages with those from a trench excavated across three terraces at Aramoana, central Hikurangi Subduction Margin, New Zealand. Sedimentary analyses identified beach and dune deposits on terraces but could not differentiate specific environments within them. Modern beach shells yielded modern radiocarbon ages, regardless of position or species, showing age inheritance and habitat is likely not an issue when dating shells on these terraces. By integrating terrace mapping, stratigraphy, morphology, and radiocarbon ages we develop a conceptual model of coastal uplift and terrace formation following at least two, possibly three, earthquakes at 5490–5070, 2620–2180, and 950–650 cal. yr bp. A high step and time gap between the upper two terraces raises the possibility that at least one intervening terrace is completely eroded. The trench exposure also showed that terrace stratigraphy may differ from that inferred from surface geomorphology, with apparent beach ridges being of composite origin and draping of younger beach deposits on the outer edge of a previous terrace. Dislocation modelling and comparison of marine terrace and earthquake ages from ~4 km south and ≤ 73 km north confirms that the most likely earthquake source is the nearshore, landward‐dipping, Kairakau Fault. Alternative sources, such as multi‐fault ruptures of the Kairakau‐Waimārama faults or Hikurangi subduction earthquakes, and/or a combination of the two are also possible and should be examined in future studies. On rocky tectonic coasts Holocene marine terraces record earthquake uplift but there are challenges such as identifying the uplift datum, accurate dating and missing terraces. These are addressed through comparing modern beach sediments and radiocarbon ages with those from a trench across terraces in the central Hikurangi Subduction Margin. A coeseismic terrace model, dislocation modelling and comparison of ages with other sites show uplift in three earthquakes most likely on upper plate faults, but subduction earthquakes are also possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-9337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/esp.5496</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Aramoana ; Beach ridges ; Beaches ; Carbon 14 ; Coastal morphology ; coseismic ; Deposits ; Dislocation models ; earthquake ; Earthquakes ; Fault detection ; Fault lines ; Geological faults ; Geomorphology ; Holocene ; marine terrace ; Oceanic trenches ; paleoearthquake ; Radiocarbon dating ; Ridges ; Sediments ; Seismic activity ; Shells ; Stratigraphy ; Subduction ; Subduction (geology) ; Tectonics ; Terraces ; Uplift</subject><ispartof>Earth surface processes and landforms, 2023-02, Vol.48 (2), p.452-474</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2936-d87a2f5adbdb1aa0d09d33925be0d99ec9e61248c70aefbe5c104f845a6959b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2936-d87a2f5adbdb1aa0d09d33925be0d99ec9e61248c70aefbe5c104f845a6959b03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6858-4864 ; 0000-0002-2053-3176</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fesp.5496$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fesp.5496$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Litchfield, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgenstern, Regine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><title>Holocene marine terraces as recorders of earthquake uplift: Insights from a rocky coast in southern Hawke's Bay, New Zealand</title><title>Earth surface processes and landforms</title><description>On rocky tectonic coasts, data from Holocene marine terraces may constrain the timing of coseismic uplift and help identify the causative faults. Challenges in marine terrace investigations include: (1) identifying the uplift datums; (2) obtaining ages that tightly constrain the timing of uplift; (3) distinguishing tsunami deposits from beach deposits on terraces; and (4) identifying missing terraces and hence earthquakes. We address some of these challenges through comparing modern beach sediments and radiocarbon ages with those from a trench excavated across three terraces at Aramoana, central Hikurangi Subduction Margin, New Zealand. Sedimentary analyses identified beach and dune deposits on terraces but could not differentiate specific environments within them. Modern beach shells yielded modern radiocarbon ages, regardless of position or species, showing age inheritance and habitat is likely not an issue when dating shells on these terraces. By integrating terrace mapping, stratigraphy, morphology, and radiocarbon ages we develop a conceptual model of coastal uplift and terrace formation following at least two, possibly three, earthquakes at 5490–5070, 2620–2180, and 950–650 cal. yr bp. A high step and time gap between the upper two terraces raises the possibility that at least one intervening terrace is completely eroded. The trench exposure also showed that terrace stratigraphy may differ from that inferred from surface geomorphology, with apparent beach ridges being of composite origin and draping of younger beach deposits on the outer edge of a previous terrace. Dislocation modelling and comparison of marine terrace and earthquake ages from ~4 km south and ≤ 73 km north confirms that the most likely earthquake source is the nearshore, landward‐dipping, Kairakau Fault. Alternative sources, such as multi‐fault ruptures of the Kairakau‐Waimārama faults or Hikurangi subduction earthquakes, and/or a combination of the two are also possible and should be examined in future studies. On rocky tectonic coasts Holocene marine terraces record earthquake uplift but there are challenges such as identifying the uplift datum, accurate dating and missing terraces. These are addressed through comparing modern beach sediments and radiocarbon ages with those from a trench across terraces in the central Hikurangi Subduction Margin. A coeseismic terrace model, dislocation modelling and comparison of ages with other sites show uplift in three earthquakes most likely on upper plate faults, but subduction earthquakes are also possible.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aramoana</subject><subject>Beach ridges</subject><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>Carbon 14</subject><subject>Coastal morphology</subject><subject>coseismic</subject><subject>Deposits</subject><subject>Dislocation models</subject><subject>earthquake</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Fault detection</subject><subject>Fault lines</subject><subject>Geological faults</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Holocene</subject><subject>marine terrace</subject><subject>Oceanic trenches</subject><subject>paleoearthquake</subject><subject>Radiocarbon dating</subject><subject>Ridges</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Shells</subject><subject>Stratigraphy</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Subduction (geology)</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>Terraces</subject><subject>Uplift</subject><issn>0197-9337</issn><issn>1096-9837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E9Lw0AQh-FFFKxV8CMMeNCDqbv5t1lvWqotiArqxUuYbCY2bZptdxNKwA9var16-l0eZuBl7FzwkeDcvyG3HkWhig_YQHAVeyoJ5CEbcKGkp4JAHrMT5xacCxEmasC-p6YymmqCFdqyn4asRU0O0IElbWxO1oEpgNA2802LS4J2XZVFcwuz2pVf88ZBYc0KEKzRyw60QddAWYMzbTMnW8MUt0u6dHCP3TU80xY-CSus81N2VGDl6Oxvh-zjYfI-nnpPL4-z8d2Tp30VxF6eSPSLCPMszwQiz7nKg0D5UUY8V4q0olj4YaIlRyoyirTgYZGEEcYqUhkPhuxif3dtzaYl16QL09q6f5n6UgZKyr5Ur672SlvjnKUiXduyr9Klgqe7tmnfNt217am3p9uyou5fl07eXn_9DxwrfC4</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Litchfield, Nicola</creator><creator>Morgenstern, Regine</creator><creator>Clark, Kate</creator><creator>Howell, Andy</creator><creator>Grant, Georgia</creator><creator>Turnbull, Jocelyn</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6858-4864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2053-3176</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Holocene marine terraces as recorders of earthquake uplift: Insights from a rocky coast in southern Hawke's Bay, New Zealand</title><author>Litchfield, Nicola ; Morgenstern, Regine ; Clark, Kate ; Howell, Andy ; Grant, Georgia ; Turnbull, Jocelyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2936-d87a2f5adbdb1aa0d09d33925be0d99ec9e61248c70aefbe5c104f845a6959b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aramoana</topic><topic>Beach ridges</topic><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>Carbon 14</topic><topic>Coastal morphology</topic><topic>coseismic</topic><topic>Deposits</topic><topic>Dislocation models</topic><topic>earthquake</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Fault detection</topic><topic>Fault lines</topic><topic>Geological faults</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Holocene</topic><topic>marine terrace</topic><topic>Oceanic trenches</topic><topic>paleoearthquake</topic><topic>Radiocarbon dating</topic><topic>Ridges</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Shells</topic><topic>Stratigraphy</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Subduction (geology)</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>Terraces</topic><topic>Uplift</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Litchfield, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgenstern, Regine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Litchfield, Nicola</au><au>Morgenstern, Regine</au><au>Clark, Kate</au><au>Howell, Andy</au><au>Grant, Georgia</au><au>Turnbull, Jocelyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Holocene marine terraces as recorders of earthquake uplift: Insights from a rocky coast in southern Hawke's Bay, New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>452</spage><epage>474</epage><pages>452-474</pages><issn>0197-9337</issn><eissn>1096-9837</eissn><abstract>On rocky tectonic coasts, data from Holocene marine terraces may constrain the timing of coseismic uplift and help identify the causative faults. Challenges in marine terrace investigations include: (1) identifying the uplift datums; (2) obtaining ages that tightly constrain the timing of uplift; (3) distinguishing tsunami deposits from beach deposits on terraces; and (4) identifying missing terraces and hence earthquakes. We address some of these challenges through comparing modern beach sediments and radiocarbon ages with those from a trench excavated across three terraces at Aramoana, central Hikurangi Subduction Margin, New Zealand. Sedimentary analyses identified beach and dune deposits on terraces but could not differentiate specific environments within them. Modern beach shells yielded modern radiocarbon ages, regardless of position or species, showing age inheritance and habitat is likely not an issue when dating shells on these terraces. By integrating terrace mapping, stratigraphy, morphology, and radiocarbon ages we develop a conceptual model of coastal uplift and terrace formation following at least two, possibly three, earthquakes at 5490–5070, 2620–2180, and 950–650 cal. yr bp. A high step and time gap between the upper two terraces raises the possibility that at least one intervening terrace is completely eroded. The trench exposure also showed that terrace stratigraphy may differ from that inferred from surface geomorphology, with apparent beach ridges being of composite origin and draping of younger beach deposits on the outer edge of a previous terrace. Dislocation modelling and comparison of marine terrace and earthquake ages from ~4 km south and ≤ 73 km north confirms that the most likely earthquake source is the nearshore, landward‐dipping, Kairakau Fault. Alternative sources, such as multi‐fault ruptures of the Kairakau‐Waimārama faults or Hikurangi subduction earthquakes, and/or a combination of the two are also possible and should be examined in future studies. On rocky tectonic coasts Holocene marine terraces record earthquake uplift but there are challenges such as identifying the uplift datum, accurate dating and missing terraces. These are addressed through comparing modern beach sediments and radiocarbon ages with those from a trench across terraces in the central Hikurangi Subduction Margin. A coeseismic terrace model, dislocation modelling and comparison of ages with other sites show uplift in three earthquakes most likely on upper plate faults, but subduction earthquakes are also possible.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/esp.5496</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6858-4864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2053-3176</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-9337
ispartof Earth surface processes and landforms, 2023-02, Vol.48 (2), p.452-474
issn 0197-9337
1096-9837
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2773977096
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Age
Aramoana
Beach ridges
Beaches
Carbon 14
Coastal morphology
coseismic
Deposits
Dislocation models
earthquake
Earthquakes
Fault detection
Fault lines
Geological faults
Geomorphology
Holocene
marine terrace
Oceanic trenches
paleoearthquake
Radiocarbon dating
Ridges
Sediments
Seismic activity
Shells
Stratigraphy
Subduction
Subduction (geology)
Tectonics
Terraces
Uplift
title Holocene marine terraces as recorders of earthquake uplift: Insights from a rocky coast in southern Hawke's Bay, New Zealand
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T13%3A36%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Holocene%20marine%20terraces%20as%20recorders%20of%20earthquake%20uplift:%20Insights%20from%20a%20rocky%20coast%20in%20southern%20Hawke's%20Bay,%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=Earth%20surface%20processes%20and%20landforms&rft.au=Litchfield,%20Nicola&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=452&rft.epage=474&rft.pages=452-474&rft.issn=0197-9337&rft.eissn=1096-9837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/esp.5496&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2773977096%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2773977096&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true